If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Slate)   Family Research Council says women can't serve in combat because they can't pee outdoors. No, seriously, they said that   (slate.com) divider line 301
    More: Silly, Family Research Council, foreign policy  
•       •       •

9331 clicks; posted to Main » on 28 Jan 2013 at 3:44 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



301 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-28 05:24:23 PM  

jehovahs witness protection: You have obviously never served in the armed forces, much less seen combat. I have. The requirements of female members in PT tests is only a fraction required by males.


Fun Fact: 1/1 is a fraction.  Besides, who farking cares?  If you can do the job, you can do the job.  If you can't, you can't.  Y or X shouldn't enter into the equation.
 
2013-01-28 05:24:49 PM  

mark12A: And there's where you tip your hand, your arguments against women in combat have no substance to them but are convient "facts" cobbled together to support a forgone conclusion. How do I know? Your incusion of gays gives the game away seeing as how Gays have served, with distinction in combat since the dawn of time. The Spartans? Boy-loving sodomites to a man, it was a required part of their military training. The Theban "Sacred Ban", the first military unit to defeat the Spartans in infantry combat and the only military unit Alexander the Great ever boasted of defeating? Paired fighters who were also required to be lovers. Alexander himself? a screaming bender. I could go on, and on, and on, but you sir, whether you like it or not, are on exactly the same wrong side of history as those who swore that black lacked the mental capacity to be fighter pilots and tank-drivers and that integrating the troops was bound to lead to disaster.

I love how this is constantly trotted out to justify gays in the military. IT IS NON-GERMANE. What happened in the distant past with a society that ultimately collapsed DOES NOT apply to our current situation.

However, MY present day experience with what I've encountered on Navy ships does apply. The heterosexual horse trading that goes on, the destruction of promising military careers caused by "Zipper Failure" is rampant and ignored by the MSM because it doesn't fit their PC narrative of a smoothly operating, culturally diverse and wonderfully perfect "Modern" military.

Adding gays into the mix will make it even worse. When they were not allowed, they kept their behaviour to themselves. With them in the open, they will be pair bonding and that's when all the conflict, favoritism, jealousy all comes pouring out and crapping up the workplace. Happens with male/female heteros onboard, WILL happen with gays.

Adding sex into modern, technological combat environments is a distraction that will cost lives, and ultimately battl ...


"Adding sex"? You yourself acknowledged it was already there.
 
2013-01-28 05:25:23 PM  

God Is My Co-Pirate: It's true, we'll pee on anything, anytime.


For what it's worth, I wouldn't pee on Eric Cantor if he were on fire.

With your dick.

So there.
 
2013-01-28 05:25:38 PM  
From the HOO-HA thread:

One of the biggest problems we had operationally was that women were constantly dehydrating. The reason was simply because they had no place to pee. Now think about this when it comes to military operations and how far you are removed from the comforts of modern conveniences and think "I can do anything!". Everywhere we went always drew a crowd, we would hope to stop at the side of the road, pull security, and allow females to pop a squat between two humvee doors with another female service member holding a sheet between the doors. The uncomfortablity of the situation led many females to the obvious conclusion that it was preferable to simply reduce drinking water. In 140 degree heat with 100% humidity this led to the obvious problem of dehydration and heat exhaustion, another reason why females always ditched their crew, equipment, and vehicles and simply headed back to their home as soon as we were back inside the wire, including officers, leaving men hours of work to deprep everything.

I've actually sat in mission briefings with females who argued to command, successfully, to reduce the time a proposed mission as they couldn't be outside the wire that long without urinating.
 
2013-01-28 05:27:31 PM  
Girls can't pee outdoors? I have an awful lot of pictures and video that say otherwise.

It is not gonna be any different for a female soldier to pee than any gender of soldier to poop - aside from not having to be as picky about where to pee compared to where to poop.

As for people in this thread worrying over periods and even pregnancy, why not keep them on the pill constantly? Women can postpone periods indefinitely without any health consequence and also not get pregnant too.
 
2013-01-28 05:31:10 PM  

someonelse: hutchkc: kindms: Do women realize that if guys could basically give it all up, let them take care of making the money and stay home, most would do it in a heartbeat ?

I friggin would. Here it's all yours, have fun.

Women make up 47% of the workforce. So, your quest to find enough lazy housewives to hand the reins to: Good luck with that.


Yep most people don't have that option, everyone works. I would gladly stay at home and clean/cook than go to work. The initial hit on home maint is tough, but once done the upkeep isn't bad. However if my wife made enough for me not having to work then I would jump at the chance. I agree kindms is right on, however I suspect women say the same thing.
 
2013-01-28 05:31:48 PM  

Precision Boobery: From the HOO-HA thread:

One of the biggest problems we had operationally was that women were constantly dehydrating. The reason was simply because they had no place to pee. Now think about this when it comes to military operations and how far you are removed from the comforts of modern conveniences and think "I can do anything!". Everywhere we went always drew a crowd, we would hope to stop at the side of the road, pull security, and allow females to pop a squat between two humvee doors with another female service member holding a sheet between the doors. The uncomfortablity of the situation led many females to the obvious conclusion that it was preferable to simply reduce drinking water. In 140 degree heat with 100% humidity this led to the obvious problem of dehydration and heat exhaustion, another reason why females always ditched their crew, equipment, and vehicles and simply headed back to their home as soon as we were back inside the wire, including officers, leaving men hours of work to deprep everything.

I've actually sat in mission briefings with females who argued to command, successfully, to reduce the time a proposed mission as they couldn't be outside the wire that long without urinating.


I'm generally all for equality but the profession of killing people in large numbers should not be one where modesty is more important than efficiency.

It's not like heterosexual-only military keeps guys honest, so that argument is sneer worthy. If stopping to take a piss impacts a mission like that, though.. some policy has to change, and if it's one aiming for equality she needs to keep hydrated and piss in a ditch like everyone else.
 
2013-01-28 05:32:11 PM  

jehovahs witness protection: Oh, and if you get captured...YOU GONNA GET RAPED.


T.E. Lawrence has not comment

Ever been in a Turkish prison?
 
2013-01-28 05:33:54 PM  
A detail which I haven't seen discussed but is important to me as a veteran; this former Lt. General who was finally canned for having such idiot views. They did not suddenly acquire those views after reaching the General officer ranks. There certainly had to have been clues that this was the kind of person they were. How the HELL did they manage to be promoted that far? How did they get recommendations from their superiors? How did they get through interviews with promotion boards? I can only imagine the amount of morale damage serving under this moron might have caused.

/no, changing everything you can because you just took over a new post is NOT good leadership
//screw you "Captain Chaos", what we were doing before worked better than this crap you've come up with to put a bullet point on your performance report
 
2013-01-28 05:36:45 PM  

udhq: You liberals need to realize that sexuality is a part of human nature, and is ALWAYS going to be present when men and women share the same space unless they are teenagers who have signed and abstinence pledge.


Nice. 8/10.
 
2013-01-28 05:38:58 PM  

thurstonxhowell: Little known fact: Women did not exist before indoor plumbing.


That must mean God created Eve and the flush toilet at the same time.
 
2013-01-28 05:39:58 PM  
The real reason they don't want women in the military is because the only way women can kill men is with nagging and that is considered torture.
 
2013-01-28 05:41:58 PM  
Mouse died, that post was a quote from ChuDogg
 
2013-01-28 05:43:39 PM  

bk3k: As for people in this thread worrying over periods and even pregnancy, why not keep them on the pill constantly? Women can postpone periods indefinitely without any health consequence and also not get pregnant too.


Pregnancy is another one of those concerns that has been debunked, repeatedly. As it stands now, both men and women can get parental leave. And military women who get pregnant are eligible for, but not guaranteed, an honorable discharge. It hasn't ruined the military thus far, nor has it ruined, say, Israel's military. It's not as if women in combat suddenly become 8-months-pregnant useless blimps overnight.
 
2013-01-28 05:43:45 PM  

Brick-House: This contraption allows women to pee standing up.

[www.jpattitude.com image 750x350]

And here it is in use.

[otoh.org image 252x381]

I also noticed that women smile a lot when they pee.


And here is the combat ready design. Yep, they already make that.

www.champaignsurplus.com
 
2013-01-28 05:44:16 PM  

StaleCoffee: Precision Boobery: From the HOO-HA thread:

One of the biggest problems we had operationally was that women were constantly dehydrating. The reason was simply because they had no place to pee. Now think about this when it comes to military operations and how far you are removed from the comforts of modern conveniences and think "I can do anything!". Everywhere we went always drew a crowd, we would hope to stop at the side of the road, pull security, and allow females to pop a squat between two humvee doors with another female service member holding a sheet between the doors. The uncomfortablity of the situation led many females to the obvious conclusion that it was preferable to simply reduce drinking water. In 140 degree heat with 100% humidity this led to the obvious problem of dehydration and heat exhaustion, another reason why females always ditched their crew, equipment, and vehicles and simply headed back to their home as soon as we were back inside the wire, including officers, leaving men hours of work to deprep everything.

I've actually sat in mission briefings with females who argued to command, successfully, to reduce the time a proposed mission as they couldn't be outside the wire that long without urinating.

I'm generally all for equality but the profession of killing people in large numbers should not be one where modesty is more important than efficiency.

It's not like heterosexual-only military keeps guys honest, so that argument is sneer worthy. If stopping to take a piss impacts a mission like that, though.. some policy has to change, and if it's one aiming for equality she needs to keep hydrated and piss in a ditch like everyone else.


If the issue is that civilians are gathering around the soldiers (which is what the post sounds like--I'm assuming this was patrol in Iraq or Afghanistan?) and there was added risk to the soldiers in that a woman would be endangered by going off alone to squat in a corner where a man could just unzip; then the problem isn't that the woman has to squat, it's that she has to take down her whole uniform to do it. Any female cop knows it's a total hassle to have to undo your duty belt to have to piss.

A redesign of the uniform pants, so that a woman could undo the crotch of her pants and straddle, instead of having to drop her pants and squat, would pretty much end the whole "how will a woman pee in front of men" issue right here. I freely give this idea to anyone who wants to patent it and send it along to the Army.
 
2013-01-28 05:44:26 PM  

namegoeshere: udhq: You liberals need to realize that sexuality is a part of human nature, and is ALWAYS going to be present when men and women share the same space unless they are teenagers who have signed and abstinence pledge.

Nice. 8/10.


You don't think the abstinence pledge thing was a dead giveaway?
 
2013-01-28 05:46:52 PM  

mark12A: However, MY present day experience with what I've encountered on Navy ships does apply. The heterosexual horse trading that goes on, the destruction of promising military careers caused by "Zipper Failure" is rampant and ignored by the MSM because it doesn't fit their PC narrative of a smoothly operating, culturally diverse and wonderfully perfect "Modern" military.

Adding gays into the mix will make it even worse. When they were not allowed, they kept their behaviour to themselves. With them in the open, they will be pair bonding and that's when all the conflict, favoritism, jealousy all comes pouring out and crapping up the workplace. Happens with male/female heteros onboard, WILL happen with gays.

Adding sex into modern, technological combat environments is a distraction that will cost lives, and ultimately battles. This pathetic belief that "training" will prevent misbehaviour is every bit as misguided as the Soviets were when they thought lifelong indoctrination/education would produce the "New Soviet Man" who would work selflessly for the greater glory of the Motherland.

Didn't work. You can't change human nature.

Like I said, this gays/women in combat crap will be blow away as soon as we get into a real shooting war.


Gays and women shouldn't be allowed in the military, because hetero men are unable to control themselves in an environment without gays / women.
Sex cannot be introduced into the military because it will cause the end to the good order and function of a military where sex is rampant.
Also, Iraq and Afghanistan, where gays and women are already serving in combat - are not shooting wars.

Stupid, or just trolling?
 
2013-01-28 05:51:35 PM  

someonelse: namegoeshere: udhq: You liberals need to realize that sexuality is a part of human nature, and is ALWAYS going to be present when men and women share the same space unless they are teenagers who have signed and abstinence pledge.

Nice. 8/10.

You don't think the abstinence pledge thing was a dead giveaway?


That kept it from the perfect ten, but it wasn't a bad addition, really. Although I might have gone with, just ask them all to sign an abstinence pledge, because it works so well for teens.
 
2013-01-28 05:53:12 PM  

Gyrfalcon: If the issue is that civilians are gathering around the soldiers (which is what the post sounds like--I'm assuming this was patrol in Iraq or Afghanistan?) and there was added risk to the soldiers in that a woman would be endangered by going off alone to squat in a corner where a man could just unzip; then the problem isn't that the woman has to squat, it's that she has to take down her whole uniform to do it. Any female cop knows it's a total hassle to have to undo your duty belt to have to piss.

A redesign of the uniform pants, so that a woman could undo the crotch of her pants and straddle, instead of having to drop her pants and squat, would pretty much end the whole "how will a woman pee in front of men" issue right here. I freely give this idea to anyone who wants to patent it and send it along to the Army.


Excellent point and interesting idea.
 
2013-01-28 05:53:54 PM  
Just wait until they're in a group of farting male soldiers
 
2013-01-28 05:56:15 PM  
With about 2 weeks of eating nothing but Asparagus they pee a substance correctly classified as a WMD covered under the Chemical Warfare Treaty. They may not be as accurate as us guys but they make up for that with their scattergun effect. Very scarey!
 
2013-01-28 05:57:23 PM  

jehovahs witness protection: Oh, and if you get captured...YOU GONNA GET RAPED.


This is something a woman should understand and take into consideration before signing up, not a reason to tell them they can't.
 
2013-01-28 06:00:07 PM  

someonelse: namegoeshere: How are women able to be firefighters, and carry men out of fires while wearing over 70 pounds of equipment, if they can't carry injured men out of a combat situation?

They do. Link


Those are some hilarious animated gifs but I'm disturbed that is a fetish.
 
2013-01-28 06:01:21 PM  

Gyrfalcon: StaleCoffee: Precision Boobery: From the HOO-HA thread:

One of the biggest problems we had operationally was that women were constantly dehydrating. The reason was simply because they had no place to pee. Now think about this when it comes to military operations and how far you are removed from the comforts of modern conveniences and think "I can do anything!". Everywhere we went always drew a crowd, we would hope to stop at the side of the road, pull security, and allow females to pop a squat between two humvee doors with another female service member holding a sheet between the doors. The uncomfortablity of the situation led many females to the obvious conclusion that it was preferable to simply reduce drinking water. In 140 degree heat with 100% humidity this led to the obvious problem of dehydration and heat exhaustion, another reason why females always ditched their crew, equipment, and vehicles and simply headed back to their home as soon as we were back inside the wire, including officers, leaving men hours of work to deprep everything.

I've actually sat in mission briefings with females who argued to command, successfully, to reduce the time a proposed mission as they couldn't be outside the wire that long without urinating.

I'm generally all for equality but the profession of killing people in large numbers should not be one where modesty is more important than efficiency.

It's not like heterosexual-only military keeps guys honest, so that argument is sneer worthy. If stopping to take a piss impacts a mission like that, though.. some policy has to change, and if it's one aiming for equality she needs to keep hydrated and piss in a ditch like everyone else.

If the issue is that civilians are gathering around the soldiers (which is what the post sounds like--I'm assuming this was patrol in Iraq or Afghanistan?) and there was added risk to the soldiers in that a woman would be endangered by going off alone to squat in a corner where a man could just unzip ...



sounds great for pissing, even better for raping!

/not serious of course
//guys have to drop drawers too
///women just have to do so more often
 
2013-01-28 06:01:37 PM  

Gyrfalcon: StaleCoffee: Precision Boobery: From the HOO-HA thread:

One of the biggest problems we had operationally was that women were constantly dehydrating. The reason was simply because they had no place to pee. Now think about this when it comes to military operations and how far you are removed from the comforts of modern conveniences and think "I can do anything!". Everywhere we went always drew a crowd, we would hope to stop at the side of the road, pull security, and allow females to pop a squat between two humvee doors with another female service member holding a sheet between the doors. The uncomfortablity of the situation led many females to the obvious conclusion that it was preferable to simply reduce drinking water. In 140 degree heat with 100% humidity this led to the obvious problem of dehydration and heat exhaustion, another reason why females always ditched their crew, equipment, and vehicles and simply headed back to their home as soon as we were back inside the wire, including officers, leaving men hours of work to deprep everything.

I've actually sat in mission briefings with females who argued to command, successfully, to reduce the time a proposed mission as they couldn't be outside the wire that long without urinating.

I'm generally all for equality but the profession of killing people in large numbers should not be one where modesty is more important than efficiency.

It's not like heterosexual-only military keeps guys honest, so that argument is sneer worthy. If stopping to take a piss impacts a mission like that, though.. some policy has to change, and if it's one aiming for equality she needs to keep hydrated and piss in a ditch like everyone else.

If the issue is that civilians are gathering around the soldiers (which is what the post sounds like--I'm assuming this was patrol in Iraq or Afghanistan?) and there was added risk to the soldiers in that a woman would be endangered by going off alone to squat in a corner where a man could just unzip; then the problem isn't that the woman has to squat, it's that she has to take down her whole uniform to do it. Any female cop knows it's a total hassle to have to undo your duty belt to have to piss.

A redesign of the uniform pants, so that a woman could undo the crotch of her pants and straddle, instead of having to drop her pants and squat, would pretty much end the whole "how will a woman pee in front of men" issue right here. I freely give this idea to anyone who wants to patent it and send it along to the Army.


I guess that means she's have to "go commando" then...
 
2013-01-28 06:09:18 PM  

Hella Fark: sounds great for pissing, even better for raping!

/not serious of course
//guys have to drop drawers too
///women just have to do so more often


The presence of crotches in pants hasn't stopped rape up till now, so I doubt this would change anything.

dopekitty74: I guess that means she's have to "go commando" then...


I would think she already would be. Why have one more pair of pants to drop?
 
2013-01-28 06:12:58 PM  
A friend of mine has a pic of a bunch of our female coworkers taking a wizz on Pennsylvania Ave. He has the capital building in the background its beautiful.
 
2013-01-28 06:23:02 PM  
What does the KKK have to say on this matter? I mean, since we're apparently polling hate groups now.
 
2013-01-28 06:32:18 PM  

Aigoo: Dear FRC, I peed outdoors for seven years. I also dug foxholes, shared tents with men and women (and even, occasionally, officers), got shot at, sweated and shed blood, marched countless miles with about half of my body weight on my back, gave up holidays, missed important events in loved ones' lives such as my father's 50th birthday party and funerals of several relatives, and only narrowly made it to the funeral of the grandfather with whom I lived and who raised me for several years, and due to the nature of my job, once saved an entire farking battalion because I was the only one who happened to notice the precarious situation they were about to find themselves in and quickly recommended to the COL that he consider giving orders to remove them from that situation while there was still time, before they were all slaughtered.

When you, FRC, do that as a "non-combat soldier," then you can tell me whether or not I should be serving my country in an official combat role--because news flash: we've been serving in combat for years, whether you decide to acknowledge it or not. But until you do even a fraction of what we women have done for our country in a "non-combat" role, FRC, shut the fark up you sniveling douchetards.


You know your period doesn't count right?

/just kidding... thanks for your service and sacrifice, and great comment.
 
2013-01-28 06:33:58 PM  

Karac: Stupid, or just trolling?


both
 
2013-01-28 06:38:44 PM  

groppet: A friend of mine has a pic of a bunch of our female coworkers taking a wizz on Pennsylvania Ave. He has the capital building in the background its beautiful.


Oh, I bet that's lovely. The pinnacle of beauty.
 
2013-01-28 06:45:05 PM  

jehovahs witness protection: Oh, and if you get captured...YOU GONNA GET RAPED.


Three guys from my brigade got captured during my second deployment. We eventually found their bodies, or parts of them anyway. From what I gathered their deaths were probably something like the chainsaw scene in Scarface. Compared to that, what the hell is rape?
 
2013-01-28 06:48:52 PM  

kid_icarus: Well it's only logical, guys. It's the same reason we passed the nationwide ban on women camping back in the 90s.


shiat, I didn't get the memo. Where do I hand in my Lady Card?
 
2013-01-28 07:00:44 PM  

Gyrfalcon:
dopekitty74: I guess that means she's have to "go commando" then...
I would think she already would be. Why have one more pair of pants to drop?


What? No way would I go commando in rough military pants, especially considering that I probably wouldn't be showering much. I don't know about you guys, but I can just pull my underwear aside if I need to pee.
 
2013-01-28 07:04:22 PM  
I read somewhere that the desert-dwelling Bedouin and other Muslims pee squatting on their heels. You tell them they can't be in the army and blow people up.
 
2013-01-28 07:09:35 PM  
Another version says they kneel to pee. That makes a lot of sense if you are peeing on a sand dune. Your legs and robes will shield you from curious eyes trying to get a peep at your willy to make sure you are a Believer (or Belieber), and it makes control a lot easier, even in a brisk wind.

Maybe we should redesign our toilets to make it a lot harder for men or women to get their knickers in a knot over whether the seat goes up or down. But it at an angle that encourages a "natural" method of waste-elimination and which forces the lid down after use.
 
2013-01-28 07:20:34 PM  

God Is My Co-Pirate: Cythraul: There's Always A Bloody Ghost: I'm Canadian, so I'm getting a kick out of this.

Canada has allowed women to fill combat roles for 20 years. http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/10/25/women-filled-8-3-of-canadas-co mbat-positions-in-afghanistan-study/

Yes, yes. You Canadians are always so more civilized than we lowly United Statesians.

It's true, we'll pee on anything, anytime.


.. and here's proof:

media.canada.com
/not me
 
2013-01-28 07:25:20 PM  
Every combat unit should be at least 1/3 women.

/Somebody's got to make the sammiches.
//I'll be leaving now.
 
2013-01-28 07:40:45 PM  

Aigoo: Dear FRC, I peed outdoors for seven years. I also dug foxholes, shared tents with men and women (and even, occasionally, officers), got shot at, sweated and shed blood, marched countless miles with about half of my body weight on my back, gave up holidays, missed important events in loved ones' lives such as my father's 50th birthday party and funerals of several relatives, and only narrowly made it to the funeral of the grandfather with whom I lived and who raised me for several years, and due to the nature of my job, once saved an entire farking battalion because I was the only one who happened to notice the precarious situation they were about to find themselves in and quickly recommended to the COL that he consider giving orders to remove them from that situation while there was still time, before they were all slaughtered.

When you, FRC, do that as a "non-combat soldier," then you can tell me whether or not I should be serving my country in an official combat role--because news flash: we've been serving in combat for years, whether you decide to acknowledge it or not. But until you do even a fraction of what we women have done for our country in a "non-combat" role, FRC, shut the fark up you sniveling douchetards.


Aaand this is a perfect example of why this is sort of dumb sh*t is still even up for discussion. Someone much more qualified than anyone currently commenting on the subject comes in, says something relevant and pretty much gets ignored entirely as the trolls and interweb experts continue the slapfight unabated.
 
2013-01-28 07:40:50 PM  
If you look hard enough you will find videos of women peeing standing up with no mechanical aids and only their zippers down. It's only a matter of getting the right angle.
 
2013-01-28 07:45:04 PM  
Shocking, that the Family Research Council doesn't understand female anatomy.

I mean, the word "research" is in their name. Do they not have Google?
 
2013-01-28 07:48:30 PM  

Cythraul: Oh hey, they're attacking non-gays. This is one of the anti-gay family organizations, right? They're so many of them, I lose track.


Yes. The Family Research Council (FRC) is the one that the the Southern Poverty Law Center classified as an anti-gay hate group in 2010, to which the FRC responded with "WE'RE not the hate group, YOU'RE the hate group!"

So yes, this is about their level of argument.
 
2013-01-28 07:49:29 PM  
I've only been able to find one legitimate concern about having women in combat roles - and this issue was discovered by Israelis:

...Lt. Col. Dave Grossman briefly mentions that female soldiers in the Israel Defense Forces have been officially prohibited from serving in close combat military operations since 1948. The reason for removing female soldiers from the front lines was due less to the performance of female soldiers, and more due to the behavior of the male infantrymen after witnessing a woman wounded. The IDF saw a complete loss of control over soldiers who apparently experienced an uncontrollable, protective, instinctual aggression, severely degrading the unit's combat effectiveness.

This resulted in an all female infantry battalion created in 2001.
 
2013-01-28 07:51:05 PM  

wildcardjack: I thought the problem would be the specialty booby armor. Can't just send a breast plate to an armorer to make adjustments. At least not these days.


True. Female Armor Sucks.
 
TWX
2013-01-28 07:51:08 PM  

Brick-House: Technically, I don't think she's outside but that's just semantics. Now because some Mod might get all pissy and ban me, I am reluctantly going to say NSFW


This satisfies Rule 34 in so many ways...
 
2013-01-28 07:54:45 PM  

Gelatinous: Thank god they don't poop.


ecx.images-amazon.com bellicosebeauty.files.wordpress.com

I sense a contradiction.
 
2013-01-28 07:59:30 PM  

Karac: Anyone else ever notice how every single one of these objections to women serving in combat has already been proven wrong by the decade or so that we've let them be shot at in Iraq and Afghanistan?

At least when they were objecting to gays serving openly they could point to something that was actually going to change. They may as well be arguing that we can't take the chance on letting women drive or vote.



Yeah, some of them are working on that, too.
 
2013-01-28 08:02:22 PM  

kindms: Womens equality is basically a sprint to PTSD, Heart Disease, Stress, hypertension etc etc oh but there is a bigger paycheck so it is AWESOME.

Do women realize that if guys could basically give it all up, let them take care of making the money and stay home, most would do it in a heartbeat ?


I knew there was a reason why I had you favorited as "dumb and insane."
 
2013-01-28 08:06:54 PM  
Haven't women been peeing outside for the past billion years of animal evolution? Even going by the standard that the Earth is 6000 years old, there's a large chunk of that period where women peed outside.
 
Displayed 50 of 301 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report