If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Short List)   The 40 best book to movie adaptations. Because 30 is too few and 50 is too many   (shortlist.com) divider line 105
    More: Cool, silver screen, movie adaptation, adaptations  
•       •       •

6584 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 27 Jan 2013 at 9:35 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



105 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-01-27 02:18:26 AM
No Clockwork Orange.....this list fails.
 
2013-01-27 02:33:15 AM
The list should have 42 items.
 
2013-01-27 06:28:39 AM
The list fails without "The World According to Garp."
 
2013-01-27 06:55:49 AM
No one liked it, but I thought "The Lovely Bones" did a good job of passing along the mood of the book.  And Ang Lee did a wonderful job with "The Life of Pi" even if he couldn't quite nail it.  The movie exists as its own form of art separate from the novel.

"The Lovely Bones" was still a better book.  It's been a long time since I've read something that grabbed me from the beginning not with a story, but with the writing.
 
2013-01-27 08:55:38 AM
Where the hell is

imgc.allpostersimages.com

/movie >>>>> book
//list = abject failure
 
2013-01-27 09:21:25 AM

Mugato: list = abject failure


agreed.
but then again it's   img1.fark.net, which is really nothing more than a  img1.fark.net wanna-be.
 
2013-01-27 09:42:09 AM
Brokeback was a short story, not a book. Speaking of which, the inclusion of Kings's Different Seasons makes no mention of which film is considered for the adaptation. Obvious guess is Rita Hayworth but The Body was magnificent as well. Apt Pupil was a bore.
 
2013-01-27 09:43:53 AM
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy - save your money and get a copy of the (original not US) BBC TV miniseries.

The 2011 version is well acted but cuts out a lot of stuff that is essential to fully understand the plot.
 
2013-01-27 09:46:11 AM
My vote would be for The Constant Gardener
 
2013-01-27 09:53:21 AM
No Battlefield Earth? Clearly this is an anti Scientology list.
 
2013-01-27 09:53:34 AM
Last of the Mohicans? Didn't see it on there.
 
2013-01-27 09:57:56 AM
I would add The Shining but I wouldn't call the list a fail without it, if faithfulness to the source material is a criteria.

What about Passion of the Christ? Wasn't that based on a book or graphic novel or something?
 
2013-01-27 09:59:52 AM

born_yesterday: Last of the Mohicans? Didn't see it on there.


Did you ever read the original novel? To think, we missed out on Daniel Day-Lewis disguising himself as a bear.
 
2013-01-27 10:00:47 AM

Mugato: I would add The Shining but I wouldn't call the list a fail without it, if faithfulness to the source material is a criteria.

What about Passion of the Christ? Wasn't that based on a book or graphic novel or something?


The Shining is on there.
 
2013-01-27 10:03:48 AM

Mugato: I would add The Shining but I wouldn't call the list a fail without it, if faithfulness to the source material is a criteria.

What about Passion of the Christ? Wasn't that based on a book or graphic novel or something?


The Shining was on the list, middle right

RoyHobbs22: Brokeback was a short story, not a book. Speaking of which, the inclusion of Kings's Different Seasons makes no mention of which film is considered for the adaptation. Obvious guess is Rita Hayworth but The Body was magnificent as well. Apt Pupil was a bore.


The hover text mentions "Stand by Me" but I am not overly familiar with Different Seasons.
 
2013-01-27 10:05:20 AM
Can't wait for Under The Dome
 
2013-01-27 10:05:56 AM

Mugato: I would add The Shining but I wouldn't call the list a fail without it, if faithfulness to the source material is a criteria.

What about Passion of the Christ? Wasn't that based on a book or graphic novel or something?


The Shining is on the list.
 
2013-01-27 10:09:16 AM
Why is "Eaters of the dead" on the list?
 
2013-01-27 10:10:10 AM

Lady Beryl Ersatz-Wendigo: born_yesterday: Last of the Mohicans? Didn't see it on there.

Did you ever read the original novel? To think, we missed out on Daniel Day-Lewis disguising himself as a bear.


I confess I did not. However, they showed the movie on the History or some such channel, and I recall a historian praising the pacing of the movie, and calling Cooper's prose somewhat laborious. I was curious whether this opinion was reinforced in this list. How does it compare to the pace of Moby Dick?
 
2013-01-27 10:10:55 AM

keygrip: No Clockwork Orange.....this list fails.


While I did like the movie adaptation, and the movie ending had a bit of a harder impact, the book ending had a certain poignancy that the movie lacked.

As far as Fight Club goes, I liked the movie ending better. I like the idea that the Narrator has reconciled his personalities and is at large, still out there working Project Mayhem.

The list also picked the wrong Stephen King book to movie adaptation, they really should have gone with The Green Mile for the best adaptation IMO.
 
2013-01-27 10:11:42 AM

overfienduglar: Why is "Eaters of the dead" on the list?


The 13th Warrior; but I agree, the movie seemed different from the book.
 
2013-01-27 10:13:39 AM
A movie adaptation that I would like to see done is The Codex Alera.
 
2013-01-27 10:14:04 AM
I question the relevance of some of the older adaptations. The pacing is simply painful in most movies prior to the late 70's.
 
2013-01-27 10:14:36 AM

rickycal78: keygrip: No Clockwork Orange.....this list fails.

While I did like the movie adaptation, and the movie ending had a bit of a harder impact, the book ending had a certain poignancy that the movie lacked.

As far as Fight Club goes, I liked the movie ending better. I like the idea that the Narrator has reconciled his personalities and is at large, still out there working Project Mayhem.

The list also picked the wrong Stephen King book to movie adaptation, they really should have gone with The Green Mile The Langoliers for the best adaptation IMO.


Haters gonna hate.

/a horrible movie
 
2013-01-27 10:24:04 AM

born_yesterday: Lady Beryl Ersatz-Wendigo: born_yesterday: Last of the Mohicans? Didn't see it on there.

Did you ever read the original novel? To think, we missed out on Daniel Day-Lewis disguising himself as a bear.

I confess I did not. However, they showed the movie on the History or some such channel, and I recall a historian praising the pacing of the movie, and calling Cooper's prose somewhat laborious. I was curious whether this opinion was reinforced in this list. How does it compare to the pace of Moby Dick?


Cooper could meander a bit, and some of his plotting was outright ridiculous. Moby Dick was paced better. But there's no cetology in Cooper, so I guess you have to take the rough with the smooth.

I highly recommend Mark Twain's literary beatdown of Cooper if you haven't read it already: Link
 
2013-01-27 10:24:05 AM
"The Godfather" was a great movie adaptation, if for no other reason than Coppola was wise enough to say "Yeah, we probably shouldn't spend so much time dwelling on Lucy Mancini's gynecological problems."
 
2013-01-27 10:25:25 AM
List is very hit/miss, with some startling omissions (many mentioned above), wrong versions (ditto, especially Tinker, Tailor), but some real spot-ons, such as LA Confidential, The Godfather, Fight Club, Kes,

It's easy to go with Elmore Leonard, since his books are practically ready-made for the cinema, but I would've chosen Out of Sight over Rum Punch/Jackie Brown. Maybe even Get Shorty.

But speaking of Jackie Brown, list needs:
s3.amazonaws.com
 
2013-01-27 10:26:48 AM
I disagree about Lolita. Kubrick had to censor the content so much it doesn't get nearly as dark as the book does. The TV version with Jeremy Irons came closer, but I doubt that Lolita will ever be made into an accurate film, due to the need of having a child actor simulating sex.
 
2013-01-27 10:27:53 AM
Also, I found this line from TFA unfortunate:

 The book, which charts a young boy's adventures in a Japanese internment camp during World War 2, certainly deals with these issues.

Yeah, I don't think you can call what went on in a Japanese POW camp an "adventure".
 
2013-01-27 10:30:51 AM

RoyHobbs22: Brokeback was a short story, not a book. Speaking of which, the inclusion of Kings's Different Seasons makes no mention of which film is considered for the adaptation. Obvious guess is Rita Hayworth but The Body was magnificent as well. Apt Pupil was a bore.


If you click on the book, it tells you which story... and it's the one you missed: Stand By Me.

/should be Rita, Shawshank is my favorite movie.
 
2013-01-27 10:33:57 AM
Oh, I should have mentioned total missteps as part of the negative stuff. These films shouldn't qualifiers, so Huston's Moby-Dick is a good film considering the time constraints of commercial releases, the technology of the time, and so forth, but it's a shallow, shallow ripple of Melville's monumental wave. LA Confidential, conversely, is a brilliant adaptation, cutting out a significant subplot, eliminating and consolidating characters, and deftly telescoping the story.

As Tyrone Slothrop just said, Lolita is pretty good, considering. Et cetera.
 
2013-01-27 10:37:20 AM

John Buck 41: The Shining is on there.


Oh. Missed it.
 
2013-01-27 10:40:41 AM

overfienduglar: Why is "Eaters of the dead" on the list?


Set up for Zombie Apocalypse?
 
2013-01-27 10:42:07 AM
Three Days of the Condor was much better than the book.
 
2013-01-27 10:44:04 AM

WippitGuud: RoyHobbs22: Brokeback was a short story, not a book. Speaking of which, the inclusion of Kings's Different Seasons makes no mention of which film is considered for the adaptation. Obvious guess is Rita Hayworth but The Body was magnificent as well. Apt Pupil was a bore.

If you click on the book, it tells you which story... and it's the one you missed: Stand By Me.

/should be Rita, Shawshank is my favorite movie.


The Body = Stand By Me
 
2013-01-27 10:44:52 AM

PainInTheASP: Three Days of the Condor was much better than the book.



They did tighten it up from six days, but I thought Grady's book was very good. I'd say the movie is as good as the book (but different, of course-it is another medium).
 
2013-01-27 10:51:19 AM

runcible spork: PainInTheASP: Three Days of the Condor was much better than the book.

They did tighten it up from six days, but I thought Grady's book was very good. I'd say the movie is as good as the book (but different, of course-it is another medium).


Agreed.  My main beef with the book was the Wendy Ross character.  She just wasn't believable.  Other than that, the parts concerning the CIA were great.
 
2013-01-27 10:54:05 AM

Spanky McStupid: overfienduglar: Why is "Eaters of the dead" on the list?

Set up for Zombie Apocalypse?


If zombies ate the dead, you wouldn't have to worry about a zombie apocalypse.
 
2013-01-27 10:54:10 AM

CanisNoir: overfienduglar: Why is "Eaters of the dead" on the list?

The 13th Warrior; but I agree, the movie seemed different from the book.


The book was written by Crichton. Movies based on his books always feel different (except maybe Andromeda Strain).

/Seriously, how do you fark up Sphere that bad?
 
2013-01-27 10:54:35 AM

NeoCortex42: WippitGuud: RoyHobbs22: Brokeback was a short story, not a book. Speaking of which, the inclusion of Kings's Different Seasons makes no mention of which film is considered for the adaptation. Obvious guess is Rita Hayworth but The Body was magnificent as well. Apt Pupil was a bore.

If you click on the book, it tells you which story... and it's the one you missed: Stand By Me.

/should be Rita, Shawshank is my favorite movie.

The Body = Stand By Me


Know how you can tell I never read Different Seasons?

The Stand needs a re-do, IMO. The TV movie just didn't do it justice. At all.
 
2013-01-27 10:54:57 AM
Silence of the Lambs should have been there. Freakishly faithful to the source material, and I think we all know how well that turned out.

Although quite glad Hannibal wasn't there (Still makes me stabby how they completely botched the ending just to make audiences 'happy'. GRRRRRRRRR)
 
2013-01-27 11:00:20 AM

WippitGuud: NeoCortex42: WippitGuud: RoyHobbs22: Brokeback was a short story, not a book. Speaking of which, the inclusion of Kings's Different Seasons makes no mention of which film is considered for the adaptation. Obvious guess is Rita Hayworth but The Body was magnificent as well. Apt Pupil was a bore.

If you click on the book, it tells you which story... and it's the one you missed: Stand By Me.

/should be Rita, Shawshank is my favorite movie.

The Body = Stand By Me

Know how you can tell I never read Different Seasons?

The Stand needs a re-do, IMO. The TV movie just didn't do it justice. At all.


I agree about The Stand, but I don't think it would work that well as a film, since it would either be a three-film commitment or way too compressed to fit into one film. It would probably work best as a 12-episode series on HBO. There's always talk about someone re-doing it, but who knows when it will actually happen.
 
2013-01-27 11:01:06 AM
To Kill a Lamb?
lh5.googleusercontent.com
 
2013-01-27 11:02:16 AM

BeatrixK: Silence of the Lambs should have been there. Freakishly faithful to the source material, and I think we all know how well that turned out.

Although quite glad Hannibal wasn't there (Still makes me stabby how they completely botched the ending just to make audiences 'happy'. GRRRRRRRRR)


Silence of the Lambs was on the list, but for some reason they re-used the To Kill a Mockingbird cover for the picture.
 
2013-01-27 11:03:44 AM

DrPainMD: The list fails without "The World According to Garp."


I like "Garp" (love the novel) but I think "The Cider House Rules" was a better adaptation of an Irving novel. Likely because Irving did it himself.
 
2013-01-27 11:04:32 AM

BeatrixK: Silence of the Lambs should have been there. Freakishly faithful to the source material, and I think we all know how well that turned out.

Although quite glad Hannibal wasn't there (Still makes me stabby how they completely botched the ending just to make audiences 'happy'. GRRRRRRRRR)



It is there; it's the second To Kill a Mockingbird. My biggest beef with that one is that Crichton's book felt like it was written with the movie in mind. This is different than my assessment of Elmore Leonard's books, which are cinematic but still feel like novels. I read Silence of the Lambs before the movie came out and it felt like I was reading a movie; like one of those tie-in novelizations.
 
2013-01-27 11:07:11 AM
runcible spork:

It is there; it's the second To Kill a Mockingbird. My biggest beef with that one is that Crichton'sHarris' book felt like it was written with the movie in mind. This is different than my assessment of Elmore Leonard's books, which are cinematic but still feel like novels. I read Silence of the Lambs before the movie came out and it felt like I was reading a movie; like one of those tie-in novelizations.


FTFM.
 
2013-01-27 11:29:54 AM
Step into my office.
 
2013-01-27 11:31:04 AM

WippitGuud: Know how you can tell I never read Different Seasons?

The Stand needs a re-do, IMO. The TV movie just didn't do it justice. At all.


Pretty sure Stand By Me was The Body. You had Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption, Apt Pupil, The Body, and The Breathing Method.
 
2013-01-27 11:33:12 AM

NeoCortex42: Seriously, how do you fark up Sphere that bad?


agreed. same thing applies to 'congo.' jurassic park was a pretty good movie, just nowhere near as interesting as the book.
 
2013-01-27 11:36:52 AM
also, list fails (to troll) without starship troopers :-/
 
2013-01-27 11:37:15 AM
The movie version of "Bridges of Madison County" was much, much better than the book deserved.
 
2013-01-27 11:37:49 AM

divgradcurl: NeoCortex42: Seriously, how do you fark up Sphere that bad?

agreed. same thing applies to 'congo.' jurassic park was a pretty good movie, just nowhere near as interesting as the book.


The book for Jurassic Park was also better since it killed off Hammond. With his hubris, it seemed to proper end to the character.
 
2013-01-27 11:38:34 AM

rickycal78: As far as Fight Club goes, I liked the movie ending better. I like the idea that the Narrator has reconciled his personalities and is at large, still out there working Project Mayhem.


And he doesn't talk to God at the end of the movie. I like the movie ending better but to each their own.
 
2013-01-27 11:43:46 AM

rickycal78: BeatrixK: Silence of the Lambs should have been there. Freakishly faithful to the source material, and I think we all know how well that turned out.

Although quite glad Hannibal wasn't there (Still makes me stabby how they completely botched the ending just to make audiences 'happy'. GRRRRRRRRR)

Silence of the Lambs was on the list, but for some reason they re-used the To Kill a Mockingbird cover for the picture.


Ahhh....that explains it. Didn't click on TKAM, since that one was right.
 
2013-01-27 11:45:38 AM

BeatrixK: Although quite glad Hannibal wasn't there (Still makes me stabby how they completely botched the ending just to make audiences 'happy'. GRRRRRRRRR)


No, the ending in the book was too farked up. Hannibal and Clarice kill the guy together and then become lovers? That was ridiculous

.

NeoCortex42: The book for Jurassic Park was also better since it killed off Hammond. With his hubris, it seemed to proper end to the character.


Yeah but that happens in all those kinds of stories. The creator is killed by his creation because he's an egotistical asshole. It's almost a cliche. JP the book was an R, JP the movie was a PG-13. And I know people hate it when they think a movie should be an R but that's just not the movie Spielberg made. Plus the book went on and on and on with Malcom preaching. Just die already. Of course Crichton had to re-con it that he didn't die for the seqeul.
 
2013-01-27 11:47:29 AM
LOTR!
 
2013-01-27 11:49:13 AM
I'm sort of surprised that Harry Potter wasn't included. I really like those movies and I hope there is another movie or two. I think a movie prequel chronicling Tom Riddell's youth, time at Hogwarts, rise to power, building an army, and the first war; of course ending when Harry's mother stop Voldemort from killing Harry. I think a lot could be done to fill in those blanks.
 
2013-01-27 11:50:28 AM

divgradcurl: NeoCortex42: Seriously, how do you fark up Sphere that bad?

agreed. same thing applies to 'congo.' jurassic park was a pretty good movie, just nowhere near as interesting as the book.


I think Sphere and Congo simply work better as books and really never had a realistic shot at being good movies unless most of the source material was dumped.

If I recall correctly, the movie Sphere was actually pretty faithful to the book. What they should have done was completely rewrite acts II and III -- pretty much what's done with every Philip K. Dick adaption.

Congo should have never been a movie. The book was fast paced and entertaining, but there was just no way that a movie adaption, no matter how loose of an adaptation, was not going to be silly.
 
2013-01-27 11:50:59 AM

hugheric: LOTR!


I think it was excluded for the same reason Harry Potter was... not a stand along film.
 
2013-01-27 12:00:52 PM
cdn-9.nflximg.com
 
2013-01-27 12:01:43 PM
It diverges a lot from the short story after the first act, but more so than even Blade Runner, of all the Philip K. Dick adaptations it best capture's Dick's wit and sense of humor about the future.
 
2013-01-27 12:07:18 PM

Mugato: Where the hell is

[imgc.allpostersimages.com image 325x488]

/movie >>>>> book
//list = abject failure


That is undesputedly #1, perhaps they left it off for that reason?
 
2013-01-27 12:08:53 PM
The Road
The Game of Thrones (really, you dont think of the series as a very long movie? why not?)
 
2013-01-27 12:09:05 PM

rickycal78: BeatrixK: Silence of the Lambs should have been there. Freakishly faithful to the source material, and I think we all know how well that turned out.

Although quite glad Hannibal wasn't there (Still makes me stabby how they completely botched the ending just to make audiences 'happy'. GRRRRRRRRR)

Silence of the Lambs was on the list, but for some reason they re-used the To Kill a Mockingbird cover for the picture.


Have the mockingbirds stopped screaming, Thad Beaumont?
 
2013-01-27 12:19:32 PM

Fano: Mugato: Where the hell is

[imgc.allpostersimages.com image 325x488]

/movie >>>>> book
//list = abject failure

That is undesputedly #1, perhaps they left it off for that reason?


They left it off to piss people off and get page hits!

Seriously, the book was not good. It's a credit to Spielberg as a young filmmaker that he made a classic film out of that book. I realize Spielberg didn't write the screenplay, in fact Benchley, the author of the book was one of the screenwriters but still.
 
2013-01-27 12:22:04 PM
Stand By Me is a perfect movie, though Shawshank (from the same book) is just as good a film.

And no First Blood?
 
2013-01-27 12:25:40 PM
25.media.tumblr.com >moviegrrlreviews.files.wordpress.com
A rather progressive and modern take on the themes found in the novel.
 
2013-01-27 12:29:35 PM
Have to disagree on Tinker Tailor. The BBC series adaptation was much better than the movie. The movie was enjoyable, but departed from the book in a few unnecessary ways that I don't think were an improvement.
 
2013-01-27 12:49:15 PM

T.rex: And no First Blood?


Maybe because they cut the scene where Rambo made Trautman kill him and then turned the whole thing into an action franchise.
 
2013-01-27 12:49:35 PM
tl;dr
 
2013-01-27 01:03:53 PM
I liked both the book and film versions of High Fidelity. I think I actually like the movie more.
 
2013-01-27 01:24:28 PM

Fano: rickycal78: BeatrixK: Silence of the Lambs should have been there. Freakishly faithful to the source material, and I think we all know how well that turned out.

Although quite glad Hannibal wasn't there (Still makes me stabby how they completely botched the ending just to make audiences 'happy'. GRRRRRRRRR)

Silence of the Lambs was on the list, but for some reason they re-used the To Kill a Mockingbird cover for the picture.

Have the mockingbirds stopped screaming, Thad Beaumont?


And sometimes... just sometimes... a mockingbird brings the soul back.
 
2013-01-27 01:50:20 PM
Cider House Rules- covered
Jaws (?!)- covered
Exorcist (?!)- covered
Grapes- covered

Carry on, farkers.

/Outsiders? (Ducks)
 
2013-01-27 02:03:21 PM
okay list. as much as I love the LOTR movies( save for How the Ent moot was done) its not that great of an adaptation but i am not sure how much better any one could do it.
 
2013-01-27 02:14:50 PM
0.tqn.com
 
2013-01-27 02:21:27 PM
Still waiting for "Ender's Game"
 
2013-01-27 02:22:05 PM

Bucky Katt: The list should have 42 items.


I see what you did there.
 
2013-01-27 02:53:04 PM

Hawk24: DrPainMD: The list fails without "The World According to Garp."

I like "Garp" (love the novel) but I think "The Cider House Rules" was a better adaptation of an Irving novel. Likely because Irving did it himself.


It was more accurate, but was a crappy book (and movie). Still waiting for the big-screen version of "Setting Free the Bears" or "The Water-Method Man."
 
2013-01-27 02:58:38 PM
Also forgot Bonfire of the Vanities or, if preferred, The Right Stuff.
 
2013-01-27 03:01:55 PM
seanconneryonline.com

Now hear thish. Thish lisht is rubbish.
 
2013-01-27 03:02:00 PM

Tyrone Slothrop: I disagree about Lolita. Kubrick had to censor the content so much it doesn't get nearly as dark as the book does. The TV version with Jeremy Irons came closer, but I doubt that Lolita will ever be made into an accurate film, due to the need of having a child actor simulating sex.


The Jeremy Irons version directed by Adrian Lynn was a film. Caught it our local arthouse theater when it came out. It was racy enough to be banned all over the place and I think it's out of print as a result of the simulated child sex. I think if you saw a TV version of it they likely removed everything racy (especially Frank Langella's penis as he hilariously flees for his life at the end). I thought that version of the film did a good job of making the audience feel bad for a pedophile, not having read the book I'm not sure that was the point. The ending of that film is one of the best payoffs in any film. The Kubrick version was tame and Peter Sellers was not nearly as creepy as Frank Langella.
 
2013-01-27 03:11:42 PM

Clash City Farker: [seanconneryonline.com image 226x300]

Now hear thish. Thish lisht is rubbish.


Between his impeccable Russian in Red October and his spotless "Egyptian-passing-as-Spaniard" in Highlander, the man was a true chameleon of dialects.
 
2013-01-27 04:40:37 PM
Slaughter House 5?
 
2013-01-27 05:35:00 PM
...

NeoCortex42: the man was a true chameleon of dialects.


You say me he dead?
 
2013-01-27 05:40:39 PM
Gary Sinese's "Of Mice & Men" was damned near perfect. Much better than the 50's version.
 
2013-01-27 06:03:02 PM
images3.wikia.nocookie.net

Hi guys. I thought this thread could use a few elves as backup so I brought some from Lothlorien.
 
2013-01-27 06:45:03 PM

Uchiha_Cycliste: I'm sort of surprised that Harry Potter wasn't included. I really like those movies and I hope there is another movie or two. I think a movie prequel chronicling Tom Riddell's youth, time at Hogwarts, rise to power, building an army, and the first war; of course ending when Harry's mother stop Voldemort from killing Harry. I think a lot could be done to fill in those blanks.


Really? I didn't think most of the movies were anywhere near the quality of the books. The seventh and eighth movies were awesome. First and second weren't amazing, but they were very close to the book. Everything in the middle for was a big ole "meh."
 
2013-01-27 07:01:48 PM

wholedamnshow: Uchiha_Cycliste: I'm sort of surprised that Harry Potter wasn't included. I really like those movies and I hope there is another movie or two. I think a movie prequel chronicling Tom Riddell's youth, time at Hogwarts, rise to power, building an army, and the first war; of course ending when Harry's mother stop Voldemort from killing Harry. I think a lot could be done to fill in those blanks.

Really? I didn't think most of the movies were anywhere near the quality of the books. The seventh and eighth movies were awesome. First and second weren't amazing, but they were very close to the book. Everything in the middle for was a big ole "meh."


Maybe I'm just partial. I didn't really get into it until everything was available, (though I did go to the midnight showing of the first HP movie with friends, as a freshman at Cal. Anyways, after I finally saw them, I've really really dug em.Especially everything from The order on the phoenix on. I've gone back and watched em all (or almost all) numerous times, which I don't usually do.
 
2013-01-27 07:51:12 PM
Imma just leaving this here.
content7.flixster.com
Loved the book years before the movie was a glint in Reiner's eye.
 
2013-01-27 07:59:49 PM
And while we're at it, there's this gem from the pen of Richard Condon. (Prizzi's Honor, Winter Kills, etc)
www.sfgate.com
 
2013-01-27 08:16:53 PM

CanisNoir: overfienduglar: Why is "Eaters of the dead" on the list?

The 13th Warrior; but I agree, the movie seemed different from the book.


The book was hella awesome. I use it as a companion text for "Beowulf" and the kids love the movie. I miss teaching seniors...
 
2013-01-27 08:28:36 PM
Are all movies made about books...Movies have explosions, special effects, Hot women...Books have????Pages!!!
 
2013-01-27 08:32:29 PM

Spanky McStupid: overfienduglar: Why is "Eaters of the dead" on the list?

Set up for Zombie Apocalypse?


They other day this movie was on SyFy:

img72.imageshack.us

And the Comcast listing had the description for this:

3.bp.blogspot.com
I had the sound muted and was REALLY confused for a while.
 
2013-01-27 09:16:52 PM
WippitGuud
2013-01-27 10:30:51 AM

>>>> RoyHobbs22: Brokeback was a short story, not a book. Speaking of which, the inclusion of Kings's Different
>>>> Seasons makes no mention of which film is considered for the adaptation. Obvious guess is Rita Hayworth but
>>>> The Body was magnificent as well. Apt Pupil was a bore.

If you click on the book, it tells you which story... and it's the one you missed: Stand By Me.


*facepalm*
 
2013-01-27 10:09:47 PM
List fails without Blade Runner.
Actually, I don't know if Blade Runner made the list. I didn't read it. Fark Short List and their long-ass lists.
Surprise!
 
2013-01-27 11:29:23 PM
This list does not have the right stuff.
 
2013-01-28 12:39:15 AM
Hipster douchebags, listen up; American Psycho is not funny. It is one of the most God-awful borefests ever committed to the printed page. Even the people who defend it have to admit that they flip through its horrible, rambling prose five pages at a time. I enjoyed the movie, which considering how much I hated the novel, is nothing short of miraculous.
 
2013-01-28 12:50:35 AM

NeoCortex42: The book for Jurassic Park was also better since it killed off Hammond. With his hubris, it seemed to proper end to the character.


I do believe Hammond was slated to die originally, but when Richard Attenborough expressed interest, both Spielberg and Crichton felt that that it would be better to save Hammond than to kill Attenborough, so they turned him into the lovable old man that he was in the movie.
 
2013-01-28 09:11:50 AM
I see Jaws and The Princess Bride were mentioned. But where is Jurassic Park? That movie is very well done for that kind of book. I went in thinking, Jaws, The Princess Bride, Jurassic Park, and To Kill a Mocking Bird were on the list. So the list fails big time.
 
2013-01-28 10:54:02 AM
It may have been a kids' book, but Holes was brilliantly adapted to the screen (feelings about Shia not withstanding).

Coraline worked out pretty well too.

And James and the Giant Peach, though it's been ages since I've seen it.
 
2013-01-28 10:54:25 AM
Re: Jurassic Park.

I haven't read it in twenty years, but I seem to recall that the book had two T-Rex(es), the big one from the movie and a "baby" T-Rex running around. Wasn't the little T-Rex the most vicious dinosaur in the book? Even more than the raptors?
 
2013-01-28 12:10:39 PM

Mateorocks: Re: Jurassic Park.

I haven't read it in twenty years, but I seem to recall that the book had two T-Rex(es), the big one from the movie and a "baby" T-Rex running around. Wasn't the little T-Rex the most vicious dinosaur in the book? Even more than the raptors?


The Baby was the T-Rex that killed the second a--hole lawyer. The book did have several things that happened that was not in the movie though. Hammond was a jerk who deserved to die. Genero was an actual cool character, Grant was way more of a Badass then he was in the movie. Raptors were scarier in the book due to that whole hotel scene. But all in all, the movie was still a very well done adaptation of the book.
 
2013-01-28 01:39:50 PM
The Name of the Rose adaptation turned out better than I expected.  I also agree with the farker who mentioned The Lovely Bones.

I've heard that two books I love are being made into movies and I'm afraid.  "The Art of Racing In The Rain" and "I Know This Much Is True".  Please please please don't screw them up too badly, Hollywood.
 
2013-01-28 09:29:35 PM

freetomato: The Name of the Rose adaptation turned out better than I expected.


That was a great movie adaptation even though they focused a bit more on the girlfriend than they did in the book.

Fun fact about the Slater sex scene:  the director told Valentina Vargas to go as realistic as possible before filming the scene, but he didn't let Christian Slater know about it because he wanted to catch a look of surprise.  Slater thought the scene he was filming was going to end when she started pulling up his shirt.  When she continued, the look of surprise and bewilderment on his face is genuine.  They left the entire take in the movie.

Second fun fact - in the original release you can see Slater's dick rubbing up against Vargas's crotch.
 
Displayed 105 of 105 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report