If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(MyFox Twin Cities)   News: Dad points AK-47 at daughter for getting two B's instead of straight A's on her report card. Fark: He just bought the AK-47 because he feared the gub'mint would ban them   (myfoxtwincities.com) divider line 76
    More: Scary, report cards, Central High School, Saint Paul Police Department, KMSP-TV  
•       •       •

14899 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Jan 2013 at 4:09 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-25 02:14:48 PM  
19 votes:
Well, if the daughter (and the mom) had been carrying their own guns, this wouldn't have happened, now would it? He probably only felt empowered to do this because he knew they WEREN'T armed and were therefore easy victims. Remember: an armed society is a polite society. I'm glad we can have situations like this crop up every now and then to serve as just illustrations of that very important point.
2013-01-25 02:41:40 PM  
6 votes:
Bartashevitch admitted having a physical confrontation with his wife and daughter, and admitted to pointing the gun at both of them. He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1
2013-01-25 02:53:21 PM  
5 votes:
This here is a fine example of someone who is too stupid to own a firearm.  Bought the gun because he thought the "gub'mint" was going to ban it, and pointed it in his daughter's face for bringing home two B's instead of straight A's.

Take THAT man's gun and beat him upside the head with it......then don't give it back.
vpb [TotalFark]
2013-01-25 03:24:13 PM  
4 votes:

The Stealth Hippopotamus: vpb: That's why we need to limit the firepower.speed.


If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?! And while we are at it lets limit the gear ratios on bicycles! We really need to limit those as well. If it will just save one life how could we not?!


We already do regulate cars.  They have to have things like break lights for instance.  Cars manufactured after certain dates must have airbags, anti-lock brakes and such.

We need to regulate guns too.
2013-01-25 02:56:42 PM  
4 votes:
He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

As we are all likely to do during a heated, physical exchange.
2013-01-25 02:44:42 PM  
4 votes:

impaler: Bartashevitch admitted having a physical confrontation with his wife and daughter, and admitted to pointing the gun at both of them. He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1


Thank you. This can't be stated enough. And don't ever point it at anything you aren't willing to destroy.
2013-01-25 02:17:14 PM  
4 votes:
I get the felling this 'Murikin fears a lot of things.
2013-01-25 03:32:40 PM  
3 votes:
I don't want to talk about the second amendment or gun control right now. I think I'm just going to go to the store. Maybe I'll get a bottle of pop and some junk food. Then I'm going to sit down and play some video games. That sounds like fun.

You guys don't have to hang out in this thread either if you don't want. Anyone want anything at the store?
vpb [TotalFark]
2013-01-25 03:26:59 PM  
3 votes:
muck4doo:

So government can have them. It's donkey and cart for you.

Well, if you are crazy enough to think you are going to overthrow the government or that anyone would want gun nuts to overthrow the government then you probably shouldn't be trusted with a donkey and cart either.
2013-01-25 03:02:24 PM  
3 votes:
This society just keeps getting more and more polite, doesn't it?
2013-01-25 04:29:55 PM  
2 votes:

vpb
(favorite: Blamed "right wing conspiracy " for Family Research Council shooting after shooter was identified as left wing gay activist)


>>>> However a license does not mean that you will get responsible ownership. See car ownership.


That's why we need to limit the firepower.

Just like we need to limit the free speech of tools like you that spew lies and conspiracy theories.
2013-01-25 04:19:08 PM  
2 votes:
Sounds about right. My dad is one of the "gubmint gon taek mah guns!" people. It's not about protecting your home, a shotgun can do that, it's about making yourself feel strong, or feared. It's about having some power over another human being for these people.

I once watched him hold a gun to my dog's head because it growled at him. Seriously.

/pro-gun
//anti-crazy people with guns
2013-01-25 04:16:28 PM  
2 votes:
I came here to say "WTF, AK's do not chamber the 7.62x54R round..."

Sounds like the guy bought a Mosin Nagant, a bolt action rifle of Russian make which has been around since the 1800's.  Fixed magazine, 5 total I think, bolt action.  SOOOOOO... not an AK, not even a little.  Well, if you consider them both being Russian make and wood stocks and the same diameter bullet... but holy fark are people pushing this AK / AR / Assault Rifle thing beyond stupid at this point.
2013-01-25 04:15:00 PM  
2 votes:
Sure, this gets greenlit, yet there's no post about the fifteen different tyrants who tried to overthrow America today but were stopped thanks to a hero with a machine gun.
2013-01-25 03:46:55 PM  
2 votes:
St. Paul police searched the Bartashevitch home and found ammunition and receipts for two gun purchases. One receipt was for Bill's Gun Shop, dated Jan. 22, 2013. An employee of the gun shop confirmed Bartashevitch sold an AK-47 style gun -- specifically a 7.62X54R -- for $150.

Mosin-Nagants are now AK-47 style guns. They have wood and originated in Russia!
vpb [TotalFark]
2013-01-25 03:03:50 PM  
2 votes:
The Stealth Hippopotamus:

However a license does not mean that you will get responsible ownership. See car ownership.


That's why we need to limit the firepower.
2013-01-25 02:53:48 PM  
2 votes:

The Stealth Hippopotamus: impaler: You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1


4) Do you still want to point the gun at someone just to scare them? Don't cause it could be loaded


However a license does not mean that you will get responsible ownership. See car ownership.


[img685.imageshack.us image 475x307]


LOL! She must have got lessons from my ex. All she needs is some fast food in her left hand.
2013-01-25 02:50:03 PM  
2 votes:

impaler: You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1



4) Do you still want to point the gun at someone just to scare them? Don't cause it could be loaded


However a license does not mean that you will get responsible ownership. See car ownership.


img685.imageshack.us
2013-01-25 02:37:35 PM  
2 votes:
Gun Owners of PeaceTM strike again
2013-01-25 02:28:09 PM  
2 votes:
Watch the libbies try to punish this patriot for using second amendment solutions to raise his kids.
2013-01-25 02:26:55 PM  
2 votes:

ajgeek: Sybarite: Asian dad?

Kirill Bartashevitch

Hm, nope.

Asian REDNECK dad. It's the only explanation.


Name sounds Russian, so he's not a redneck, he's just red.


/aisle seat please.
2013-01-26 03:17:00 AM  
1 votes:

Electrify: clane: bet he wished he had an AK-47

If the Jews had guns, maybe they could have stopped Hitler. But you know who couldn't stop Hitler?

France.

And they had guns.

/if it took the entire world 6 years to stop Hitler, what makes you think a group of German Jews could?


Might have taken a lot of Nazis with them, which counts for something.
2013-01-25 11:12:06 PM  
1 votes:

clane: bet he wished he had an AK-47
[thepirata.com image 410x599]


thepirata.com
True. He wouldn't have had to lean in as far, possibly soiling his jack boots.
2013-01-25 10:17:01 PM  
1 votes:

BGates: The second firearm they mention is the same caliber as an AK, and probably looks like an AK. But that isn't the firearm that was pointed at the girl.


Where does it say that?

/article was poorly written
2013-01-25 08:30:11 PM  
1 votes:

david_gaithersburg: A bunch of people in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Algeria would like to have a word with you.

People like you remind me of the royal loyalists from the late 1700's, they were wetting their panties too.


Are you retarded? Context matters, the US is not a third world country and it's not the 1770s.
2013-01-25 08:29:02 PM  
1 votes:

hamdinger: KidneyStone: [www.politifake.org image 640x939]

Haw haw, I sure am smarter than them thar jurnalists. Them "edjoocated" types with all them fancy queer words and their schoolin' and all them books.. shoot, I heard most of 'em even have all the teeth they was born with. Can you imagine?


Is that honestly the first time you have seen that pic or do you just use the same lame joke every time?
2013-01-25 07:18:30 PM  
1 votes:
The media will search out every story involving a gun they can find however minor and blow it up into as big a national headline as possible. It's an attempt to portray all gun owners in a negative light thereby marginalizing responsible gun owners and create public support for more restricitve gun laws.

Unless of course it's one of those 2.4 million times a year where someone actually defends themselves with a gun. Those are either completely ignored or don't get beyond local news reporting.

Yes, this guy is an idiot.

Yes, he should be severely punished up to and including the confiscation of all his guns and the loss of his right to ever own guns again.

No, he does not represent all gun owners.

No matter how badly the media wants to portray idiots like him as just that. The more negative gun related stories they can sensationalize every day the more you will hear stupid shiat like "he makes the few dozen responsible gun owners look bad".

/ I own zero guns.
// I am not a member of the NRA or any other "gun rights" organization.
/// I am against any attempt to limit or infringe on all of our constitutional rights not just those guaranteed by the second amendment.
2013-01-25 07:02:48 PM  
1 votes:
I'm not suprised.

I've been worried that the mania caused by Feinstein an Co.'s pointless, asinine, and over-reaching efforts (combined with paid provacatuer idiots like Beck and Rush) would cause a lot of dumb-asses who would otherwise not bother to run out and go get armed with guns they don;t know the first thing about.

Anywho. Hope this guy sees the inside of a jailcell for a few years. Anyone willing to point a frkking gun at his own family because he got pissed off needs to be taken out of circulation.

This is NOT a responsible gun owner, as is inherently obvious, and anyone aking THAT stupid argument loses an internet. This would be no different than if he had done it with his grandpappy's revolver.
2013-01-25 06:41:28 PM  
1 votes:

muck4doo: The Green Intern: I don't care what the fark the gun was

We know. It's safe to assume it was an AK. Best not nobody have them ever in the future.


Amazing... my point went sailing straight over your head, and yet you still helped me support it.

I'll try explaining it point by point for the thinking impaired:

He pointed a gun at her. The make and model of gun is in question. A certain subset of people would rather debate what kind of gun it is instead of discussing the situation that the gun revolved around.

When I say "I don't care what kind of gun it was." I mean that I do not care if he was pointing an AK, a Glock, an M-16, GAU-8A, or a phased plasma gun in the forty watt range at me. The type of gun is secondary to "This man pointed a gun at his child to intimidate her." I like guns. I have guns. Not to the degree that many of you have... but I'm actually rather thankful for that.

Are you people this pedantic about what kind of car that student driver tried to run over her instructor with?
2013-01-25 06:22:25 PM  
1 votes:
I skipped about five pages of back-and-forth to say this:

Whether you are pro-gun or anti-gun, the purpose of pointing a non-loaded weapon at somebody is still to threaten their lives. Maybe not at that moment, but at a later time. It's saying "This gun could be loaded if I wanted it to be."

It's like some sick trust game, in which the family is supposed to trust the father that the weapon being held is safe, and that he wouldn't really hurt them, because if you, as a child, say anything, you're wrong. And if you say you'll tell anybody, you're in deep shiat.

/my personal experience
//at least this kid's mom stepped between them
///what he did after that was the real big farking clue that this man shouldn't have a weapon at all.
2013-01-25 06:05:30 PM  
1 votes:
Another responsible gun owner
2013-01-25 05:59:56 PM  
1 votes:
I'm just glad this guy has some Passionate Defenders in this thread who are brave enough to stand up for an American's right to point a gun at his daughter.
2013-01-25 05:57:51 PM  
1 votes:

BHK: The gun banners sure don't seem to complain when their heroes in government-issued costumes point guns at people for doing things that are deemed "bad behavior" even though no one was going to be hurt or lose their property. Smoke a joint or shoot up heroin or run an unlicensed lemonade stand, and it's just fine if someone with a badge points a gun at you. And, yet, it's awful when a private citizen does it to his daughter. I'd like to see you hypocrites explain the difference without relying on the "law is the law" tautology..


Because using fear and intimidation that has a lethal edge to it on a child that you should be protecting and not abusing is wrong? Also, you are committing false equivalency - an error on one side (ie your drug bit) does not provide a license for the other to break the social covenant that says we protect children (or try) in this society.
2013-01-25 05:54:11 PM  
1 votes:
imageshack.us
2013-01-25 05:34:31 PM  
1 votes:

Cpl.D: Fellow employee at work: "If more people were armed, it'd be like the old West. An armed society is a polite society."

Me: "Somalia."


Yeah, I've never gotten that whole "armed society is a polite society" thing. What, are they saying people with guns are likely to shoot people who are rude?

And this is supposed to make me feel better about other gun owners?
2013-01-25 05:24:33 PM  
1 votes:
lotta flailing gun nuts in here today.

probably mad that no one died in this latest example of gun nuttery.
2013-01-25 05:11:15 PM  
1 votes:
Another day, another Nutty Raving Asshole doing something stupid with a gun.
2013-01-25 05:03:46 PM  
1 votes:

The Stealth Hippopotamus: Exactly, it is a stupid argument. As is saying all we need is gun will smaller mags or "less firepower". What does that even mean? Smaller bullets with less powder behind them? We as a country need to take responsibility for the real issue and stop trying to blame inanimate objects. Gun violence over all is down and the only reason we are having these debates 5 times a day is because of mentally ill people getting their hands on weapons (not just guns). There are billions and billions of weapons of every shape and size, why not focus our efforts on the relatively few mentally ill people?


In gun control threads, you are only allowed to talk about wanting to take away guns or wanting to kill Obama with a gun because he is black.
2013-01-25 04:57:58 PM  
1 votes:

Maximer: way south: A hundred year old bolt action "AK-47"...

The media isn't even trying to hide its trolling anymore.

Probably why more and more people are trusting them even less these days.

I thought there was a "Code of Honor" in journalism... or was that just an Old-Wives Tale?


They're playing to their young, stupid, and knee-jerk audience.
2013-01-25 04:45:58 PM  
1 votes:
Lionel Mandrake: Watch the libbies try to punish this patriot for using second amendment solutions to raise his kids.


What a "Second Amendment Solution" might look like


images2.opticsplanet.com

If he's using that on his daughter, it's not really an improvement.
2013-01-25 04:41:04 PM  
1 votes:
See, I'm willing to believe that every gun-owning Farker is a paragon of responsibility and gun safety, but I simply can't be convinced that all of the people who legally own guns are likewise responsible and safe.

People have a tendency to do very irrational things when they are angry and/or frightened.

I don't care how responsible you are, and how many times you've given lectures on gun safety. Some people will just have a flip switched and suddenly they are doing something stupid like brandishing their gun. In fact, I feel that owning a gun makes it more likely that any anger or fright scenario will escalate to brandishing, and possibly using, that gun.
2013-01-25 04:39:32 PM  
1 votes:

jchic: So. He grabbed his gun during an argument, and made sure it was not loaded (yes, I know they're all loaded, bear with me) and then pointed it at his wife and daughter? What exactly was the point he was trying to make? The whole reason a gun exists is to shoot something so if you make sure that that gun can't shoot, what, exactly, are you trying to convey by pointing an unloaded gun at someone? If you get one more B I'll load this gun and then shoot you?


The magic gun fairy will put ammo in your chamber whenever you're not looking. If you can't look inside the chamber to see it's empty, you better assume it's loaded.

Everyone else, however, being further away from the gun than you, can't reasonably see that the gun is unloaded. So they're going to assume it's loaded. If you pointed it at them, they will have a completely rational reason to believe that you are pointing a loaded weapon at them and intend to destroy them with it. Why not? You just broke Rule 3. Why wouldn't they think you're the kind of idiot that would break Rule 1 as well.

And for this reason, this ardent Second Amendment supporter says that this dude doesn't get to have guns any more. Why? Because if you point a gun at someone for a reason that doesn't meet your state's use of force laws, if you're not in immediate fear of death or bodily harm, you're breaking a felony kinda law.
2013-01-25 04:39:11 PM  
1 votes:

muck4doo: Pert: Did anybody else notice that the receipts for guns were both dated AFTER the alleged incident?

I thought that too, but it looks like he sold them after that. Which doesn't make any sense if you think he bought them because of Obama's proposition. It's just the usual derpers trying to bend this story to help their political agenda. As a matter of fact, the whole damn story doesn't make sense unless you put it in a derp agenda format.


You should know all about derp, chico.
2013-01-25 04:38:00 PM  
1 votes:
I believe this what us "gun nuts" warned about:

Step 1: Have a discussion about "reasonable" gun control measures.

Step 2: Billy Bob who doesn't have $1200 to spend on an AR15 and wasn't really planning on getting one, runs out after selling his second car and buys one.

Step 3: (around 2014) Billy Bob sells his AR15 for an eightball and $200 in cash.

Step 4: Latin Disciples uses the AR15 in question to kill 7 in a driveby shooting.

Even discussing an assault weapons ban was supremely stupid. What Obama should have done is firmly said there are no plans for a ban, waited a few months, and then decided what to do. About a gazillion people who were never in the market for a semiautomatic weapon now have one at home, thanks to the wonderful "national conversation" that we're having.
2013-01-25 04:37:46 PM  
1 votes:

Pert: Did anybody else notice that the receipts for guns were both dated AFTER the alleged incident?


The receipts were from when he SOLD the guns AFTER the incident.
2013-01-25 04:29:33 PM  
1 votes:
Pretty typical. "Who's the man NOW?", as he points the gun at a woman and child. Because he wasn't threatening enough toward them before that.
2013-01-25 04:28:06 PM  
1 votes:

muck4doo: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: It's assholes like this that make the two or three dozen responsible gun owners in this country look bad.

No, it's the people that say stupid things like you just did that try to make the millions of responsible gun owners look bad. You should stop posting. You are making the first amendment look bad.


Just say what you mean: "Waah! I have no sense of humor!"
2013-01-25 04:26:21 PM  
1 votes:
25.media.tumblr.com

Or I point rifle at you.
2013-01-25 04:25:57 PM  
1 votes:

vpb: muck4doo:

So government can have them. It's donkey and cart for you.

Well, if you are crazy enough to think you are going to overthrow the government or that anyone would want gun nuts to overthrow the government then you probably shouldn't be trusted with a donkey and cart either.

.
A bunch of people in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Algeria would like to have a word with you.

People like you remind me of the royal loyalists from the late 1700's, they were wetting their panties too.
2013-01-25 04:23:43 PM  
1 votes:

gameshowhost: Apos: In before the Outraged RightTM assign all blame to the impudent brat whose glib remarks forced a concerned parent/True PatriotTM to take drastic action.

She was coming right at him!


Let me rephrase that
2013-01-25 04:23:07 PM  
1 votes:
It's assholes like this that make the two or three dozen responsible gun owners in this country look bad.
2013-01-25 04:22:59 PM  
1 votes:
i429.photobucket.com

/really? I'm the Weeners this?
2013-01-25 04:22:57 PM  
1 votes:

Apos: In before the Outraged RightTM assign all blame to the impudent brat whose glib remarks forced a concerned parent/True PatriotTM to take drastic action.


She was coming right at him!
2013-01-25 04:22:06 PM  
1 votes:
Gun nuts are nuts who have guns. Who new?
2013-01-25 04:22:00 PM  
1 votes:

Pocket Ninja: Well, if the daughter (and the mom) had been carrying their own guns, this wouldn't have happened, now would it? He probably only felt empowered to do this because he knew they WEREN'T armed and were therefore easy victims. Remember: an armed society is a polite society. I'm glad we can have situations like this crop up every now and then to serve as just illustrations of that very important point.


Not only brilliant, but quick on the draw, as it were.
2013-01-25 04:21:11 PM  
1 votes:
Now he's all alone, except for his precious, precious gun.

[shoots out light]
2013-01-25 04:18:36 PM  
1 votes:

The Stealth Hippopotamus: If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?! And while we are at it lets limit the gear ratios on bicycles! We really need to limit those as well. If it will just save one life how could we not?!


Fortunately cars were not invented solely for taking human life.
2013-01-25 04:16:50 PM  
1 votes:

muck4doo: BunkoSquad: This society just keeps getting more and more polite, doesn't it?

fark you


See!!!
2013-01-25 04:16:32 PM  
1 votes:
I really hope some enterprising prisoners beat the sh*t out of this guy. If only because the gun is ALWAYS LOADED.

/Farking dipshiat.
2013-01-25 04:16:19 PM  
1 votes:

vpb: Blues_X: You can get an AK for just $150?

7.62x54R is a type of ammunition.

I think he paid $375 for the AK.clone


I went over that part of TFA several times. Bottom line; too loose, weak details.
2013-01-25 04:14:58 PM  
1 votes:
Bartashevitch admitted having a physical confrontation with his wife and daughter, and admitted to pointing the gun at both of them. He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

Then what's the farking point?  You may as well have pointed a hammer or an alligator at them.
2013-01-25 04:14:15 PM  
1 votes:
Ok, now I am convinced that if Obama just proposed like 10 more bills for gun control, the gun nuts will become unhinged and prove Obama's point.
2013-01-25 03:38:57 PM  
1 votes:

vpb: We already do regulate cars. They have to have things like break lights for instance. Cars manufactured after certain dates must have airbags, anti-lock brakes and such.

We need to regulate guns too.



You dont think we currently regulate guns? Do you think that all firearms have a safety because adding parts always makes a better product? Do you think they all weapons come with a trigger lock because the manufacture just had them laying around and though you'd like one?

When was the last time you bought a firearm?
2013-01-25 03:23:18 PM  
1 votes:

muck4doo: A donkey and cart can do the same job as a truck.


images3.wikia.nocookie.net
2013-01-25 03:20:45 PM  
1 votes:

BronyMedic: The Stealth Hippopotamus: If no car can go over 20 miles an hour than there would be fewer fatalities. I mean do you really need to go 40 miles an hour?! And while we are at it lets limit the gear ratios on bicycles! We really need to limit those as well. If it will just save one life how could we not?!

To be fair, it's a lot harder to get an aortic sheer at 20 miles an hour. Or turn a pedestrian into a buff of pink mist.


A donkey and cart can do the same job as a truck.
2013-01-25 03:13:36 PM  
1 votes:

Amos Quito: You think he's been porking his daughter?


Okay. That made me laugh. Bravo, Sir. Bravo.

In all seriousness, coming from someone who sees a lot of abused kids come through, if that dad is willing to threaten his daughter at gunpoint for something, he's willing and probably in the current act of harming her in some other fashion, physically or emotionally. It's not really a stretch to assume or intervene with an investigation.

/wonder how many "falls" she's had in the last 5 years.
2013-01-25 03:00:42 PM  
1 votes:

BronyMedic: At any rate, and in all seriousness, this is insane. What responsible gun owner, let alone decent human parent, would threaten their OWN CHILD with a rifle. Period. At the very least, it's the basic definition of emotional abuse, and probably an indicator that something else non-kosher is going on in the house.



You think he's been porking his daughter?
2013-01-25 02:56:13 PM  
1 votes:

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Never use an AK on a teenager

/that's what shotguns are for


You know, Rock Salt won't really kill you, but it'll sure act as an effective behavioral modifier.

At any rate, and in all seriousness, this is insane. What responsible gun owner, let alone decent human parent, would threaten their OWN CHILD with a rifle. Period. At the very least, it's the basic definition of emotional abuse, and probably an indicator that something else non-kosher is going on in the house.

People like this need to be beat upside the head (Sorry, your rights end where my nose begins logic on this one. You do not have the right to threaten a CHILD with a rifle because of their freakin' report card) and be mandated to seek mental health evaluation and care.
2013-01-25 02:55:10 PM  
1 votes:

Coco LaFemme: This here is a fine example of someone who is too stupid to own a firearm.  Bought the gun because he thought the "gub'mint" was going to ban it, and pointed it in his daughter's face for bringing home two B's instead of straight A's.

Take THAT man's gun and beat him upside the head with it......then don't give it back.


Something tells me he wasn't a straight A student either.
2013-01-25 02:54:10 PM  
1 votes:

Mugato: "terroristic"? Didn't even know that was a word.

Was that really terrorism though? Oh right. Everything is terrorism now.



Terrorism is the new black.
2013-01-25 02:53:07 PM  
1 votes:

impaler: Bartashevitch admitted having a physical confrontation with his wife and daughter, and admitted to pointing the gun at both of them. He said the gun was not loaded and that he checked the chamber before pointing it at them.

You know, if we needed to at least pass a licensing exam to get weapon, like we do a car, these guy would know that:
1) A gun is ALWAYS loaded.
2) See # 1
3) Did you see #1 yet? If not, see #1


So.  He grabbed his gun during an argument, and made sure it was not loaded (yes, I know they're all loaded, bear with me) and then pointed it at his wife and daughter?  What exactly was the point he was trying to make?  The whole reason a gun exists is to shoot something so if you make sure that that gun can't shoot, what, exactly, are you trying to convey by pointing an unloaded gun at someone?  If you get one more B I'll load this gun and then shoot you?
2013-01-25 02:43:11 PM  
1 votes:
this is why we can't have nice things.
vpb [TotalFark]
2013-01-25 02:36:28 PM  
1 votes:

Blues_X: You can get an AK for just $150?


7.62x54R is a type of ammunition.

I think he paid $375 for the AK.
2013-01-25 02:31:28 PM  
1 votes:
She got two B's? She's just starting to fill out.
2013-01-25 02:29:15 PM  
1 votes:
Fool.

He could have pointed a shotgun or a pistol, but no, it had to be an ASSAULT WEAPON, and now he's on Fark.
2013-01-25 02:14:59 PM  
1 votes:
Asian dad?

Kirill Bartashevitch

Hm, nope.
 
Displayed 76 of 76 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report