Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   CNN columnist writes long, passionate article about why we shouldn't clone a Neanderthal baby, even though nobody's planning to do so. Next on CNN: Why we shouldn't try to evolve humans out of E.coli   (cnn.com) divider line 8
    More: Stupid, Neanderthals, CNN, Arthur Caplan, Langone Medical Center, synthetic biology, Drs, surrogate mothers, E. coli  
•       •       •

1584 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Jan 2013 at 10:25 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-25 10:25:48 AM  
4 votes:
Oh, look. The E.coli thing again. Ha ha ha, let's point and laugh at the silly conservative politician because he asked if some scientist's Frankenstonian experiments in evolving a race of super E.coli hadn't caused unexpected mutations. Ha ha ha, so funny.

Here's the thing, evolutionistas. Either you accept evolution, or you don't, mmmkay? If you accept evolution, then you accept that all cells are constantly in a state of flux, as it were, evolving into some future evolution along the evolutionary ladder. Or slope, as it were. Very slippery slope. After all, it's a popular notion that "humans evolved from apes." But from where did those apes evolve, hm? Don't know? Look to your own theories! Remember, Adam and Eve never existed. All life started as single cell micro-organisms swimming about in the oceans. And somehow *those* evolved into people, right? Neanderthals, too.

And so why *couldn't* an E.coli virus evolve into a human? Who's to say that, a million bajillion years from now or however long you want to pretend the earth is old, E.coli doesn't itself evolve into a person? Particularly if that E.coli had at some point in its generational evolution infected a human -- because then there would be humanistic DNA in its DNA, which could cause mutations that would bring more human genes to the forefront. From the E.coli would begin to emerge some new form of human, an E.human, and like modern humans did with the Neanderthals, perhaps these new E.humans will push "regular" humans into obsolescence and oblivion. And perhaps it would only be by pairing our current human DNA with Neanderthal DNA -- by merging our strength with the strength of our ancestors -- that we might ourselves evolve a race of Neandohumans who could stand up to the E.humans and preserve our race.

Still laughing, subby? I'm sure as hell not.
2013-01-25 11:27:32 AM  
1 votes:

Coolfusis: Actually, I think a Neanderthal would perform fairly well in our society. Evidence suggests that they're faster, stronger, and just as intelligent (If not moreso) as modern humans. It's been awhile, but I remember one of my biology professors talking about our distinct advantage being a longer development time, which forced community-building and education.


Don't forget the glorious boobs.

www.bookofodds.com

/boobs
2013-01-25 11:23:43 AM  
1 votes:

Pocket Ninja: Oh, look. The E.coli thing again. Ha ha ha, let's point and laugh at the silly conservative politician because he asked if some scientist's Frankenstonian experiments in evolving a race of super E.coli hadn't caused unexpected mutations. Ha ha ha, so funny.

Here's the thing, evolutionistas. Either you accept evolution, or you don't, mmmkay? If you accept evolution, then you accept that all cells are constantly in a state of flux, as it were, evolving into some future evolution along the evolutionary ladder. Or slope, as it were. Very slippery slope. After all, it's a popular notion that "humans evolved from apes." But from where did those apes evolve, hm? Don't know? Look to your own theories! Remember, Adam and Eve never existed. All life started as single cell micro-organisms swimming about in the oceans. And somehow *those* evolved into people, right? Neanderthals, too.

And so why *couldn't* an E.coli virus evolve into a human? Who's to say that, a million bajillion years from now or however long you want to pretend the earth is old, E.coli doesn't itself evolve into a person? Particularly if that E.coli had at some point in its generational evolution infected a human -- because then there would be humanistic DNA in its DNA, which could cause mutations that would bring more human genes to the forefront. From the E.coli would begin to emerge some new form of human, an E.human, and like modern humans did with the Neanderthals, perhaps these new E.humans will push "regular" humans into obsolescence and oblivion. And perhaps it would only be by pairing our current human DNA with Neanderthal DNA -- by merging our strength with the strength of our ancestors -- that we might ourselves evolve a race of Neandohumans who could stand up to the E.humans and preserve our race.

Still laughing, subby? I'm sure as hell not.


I definitely am!   Started off a bit slow, but the dénouement was brilliant.
2013-01-25 10:49:31 AM  
1 votes:

madgonad: Or perhaps we would be totally surprised and the Neanderthal would grow up to be a Rhodes Scholar and write papers on chauvinism based upon species.


You're looking at the world through Rhodes-Scholared glasses.
2013-01-25 10:37:09 AM  
1 votes:

Pocket Ninja: From the E.coli would begin to emerge some new form of human, an E.human, and like modern humans did with the Neanderthals, perhaps these new E.humans will push "regular" humans into obsolescence and oblivion.


There's no maybe about it. Ever hear of genetic memory? These E.humans sure as hell would have. They'd remember to kill people sure as their ancient single-celled ancestors used to. It's the same way all humans have a strange desire to kill and punish lizards and other reptiles. It's because we remember the dinosaurs that used to eat us alive. These things get passed down.
2013-01-25 10:32:57 AM  
1 votes:

Pocket Ninja: Oh, look. The E.coli thing again. Ha ha ha, let's point and laugh at the silly conservative politician because he asked if some scientist's Frankenstonian experiments in evolving a race of super E.coli hadn't caused unexpected mutations. Ha ha ha, so funny.

Here's the thing, evolutionistas. Either you accept evolution, or you don't, mmmkay? If you accept evolution, then you accept that all cells are constantly in a state of flux, as it were, evolving into some future evolution along the evolutionary ladder. Or slope, as it were. Very slippery slope. After all, it's a popular notion that "humans evolved from apes." But from where did those apes evolve, hm? Don't know? Look to your own theories! Remember, Adam and Eve never existed. All life started as single cell micro-organisms swimming about in the oceans. And somehow *those* evolved into people, right? Neanderthals, too.

And so why *couldn't* an E.coli virus evolve into a human? Who's to say that, a million bajillion years from now or however long you want to pretend the earth is old, E.coli doesn't itself evolve into a person? Particularly if that E.coli had at some point in its generational evolution infected a human -- because then there would be humanistic DNA in its DNA, which could cause mutations that would bring more human genes to the forefront. From the E.coli would begin to emerge some new form of human, an E.human, and like modern humans did with the Neanderthals, perhaps these new E.humans will push "regular" humans into obsolescence and oblivion. And perhaps it would only be by pairing our current human DNA with Neanderthal DNA -- by merging our strength with the strength of our ancestors -- that we might ourselves evolve a race of Neandohumans who could stand up to the E.humans and preserve our race.

Still laughing, subby? I'm sure as hell not.


I don't think you get how viruses work. Nice science fiction novel concept though
2013-01-25 10:31:25 AM  
1 votes:

Pocket Ninja: Oh, look. The E.coli thing again. Ha ha ha, let's point and laugh at the silly conservative politician because he asked if some scientist's Frankenstonian experiments in evolving a race of super E.coli hadn't caused unexpected mutations. Ha ha ha, so funny.

Here's the thing, evolutionistas. Either you accept evolution, or you don't, mmmkay? If you accept evolution, then you accept that all cells are constantly in a state of flux, as it were, evolving into some future evolution along the evolutionary ladder. Or slope, as it were. Very slippery slope. After all, it's a popular notion that "humans evolved from apes." But from where did those apes evolve, hm? Don't know? Look to your own theories! Remember, Adam and Eve never existed. All life started as single cell micro-organisms swimming about in the oceans. And somehow *those* evolved into people, right? Neanderthals, too.

And so why *couldn't* an E.coli virus evolve into a human? Who's to say that, a million bajillion years from now or however long you want to pretend the earth is old, E.coli doesn't itself evolve into a person? Particularly if that E.coli had at some point in its generational evolution infected a human -- because then there would be humanistic DNA in its DNA, which could cause mutations that would bring more human genes to the forefront. From the E.coli would begin to emerge some new form of human, an E.human, and like modern humans did with the Neanderthals, perhaps these new E.humans will push "regular" humans into obsolescence and oblivion. And perhaps it would only be by pairing our current human DNA with Neanderthal DNA -- by merging our strength with the strength of our ancestors -- that we might ourselves evolve a race of Neandohumans who could stand up to the E.humans and preserve our race.

Still laughing, subby? I'm sure as hell not.


I bet you're a blast at parties!
2013-01-25 09:13:53 AM  
1 votes:
encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com
 
Displayed 8 of 8 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report