If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(ESPN)   Saints officially had the worst NFL defense. Of all time. If only there was a way to give their players a psychological edge over the competition   (espn.go.com) divider line 13
    More: Followup  
•       •       •

1284 clicks; posted to Sports » on 25 Jan 2013 at 11:51 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-25 10:28:38 AM
3 votes:
I love the irony of this happening in the same season as the airing of that commercial with the dude watching football on his phone and saying the the Saints have the "best defense in the league."

/Clay Matthews: "I will eat you."
2013-01-25 12:40:38 PM
2 votes:
Maybe they should create some sort of incentives program to encourage the defensive players to make big plays.
2013-01-25 11:18:24 AM
2 votes:
They then did the prudent thing and waited for every passable candidate to be hired before firing their defensive coordinator
2013-01-25 02:28:21 PM
1 votes:

downstairs: pute kisses like a man: mikaloyd: Buh bye Spaggy

Hello ANYbody

I don't really blame him entirely. he came in under very tough circumstances and tried to completely overhaul a defensive system for a defense that already wasn't stellar. not to mention, historically it has taken him more than a season to implement his system with other teams.

Same here.  Considering the clusterfark the whole season was, I think Spags deserved one *real* year to see what he could do.


Yeah, he didn't really have much to work with. They really need to clean house on defense. I'd start with Patrick Robinson. 2 years ago. That dude gets burned more than the Amazon Rainforest.
2013-01-25 01:45:50 PM
1 votes:

cgraves67: Maybe they should create some sort of incentives program to encourage the defensive players to make big plays.


That sounds like a brilliant idea. Why is no one doing this?
2013-01-25 01:25:13 PM
1 votes:

thecpt: justtray: Actually he's technically wrong, thus my point entirely.

I bolded it for you since you seem to be retarded

we're talking about two different things.

While the Court is extremely disturbed by the fundamental lack of due process in Goodell's denying the players the identities of and the right to confront their accusers

I'm talking about that part. As it actually happened and the penalties he was trying to dole out at the beginning, he should of had a lot more than what he did. Your linking my two statements which were about different things and didn't explain your comment that I questioned. If you're okay with all of the penalties given to the Saints, coaches, and players this season than go ahead and call me retarded, because I don't give a shiat about your opinion then.


Feeling is mutual.
2013-01-25 01:16:09 PM
1 votes:

Slow To Return: justtray: Really? You think he's pleased his suit failed and his career is over? Ok.

You can argue till you're blue in the face about legal tactics and such. But at the end of the day, Vilma managed to recoup his 2012 salary in full.


Did you throw out your back moving those goalposts?

Allow me to retort anyway. At what cost? How much did his lawyer soak up? Where is he working next year? What's the over under on total number of years before he's broke?

Councillor, I rest my case
2013-01-25 01:06:50 PM
1 votes:

thecpt: justtray: thecpt: if only there was a way that they could of had the full defense as they prepared it. But Goodell had to flex nuts based off insufficient evidence.

Hows that defamation* suit going?

Get used to them*.

used to what?

"While the Court is extremely disturbed by the fundamental lack of due process in Goodell's denying the players the identities of and the right to confront their accusers, that was substantially rectified later in the process," Berrigan wrote. "So while the process was initially procedurally flawed, the statements were ultimately found to have enough support to defeat the defamation claims."

He's technically right. The best kind of right.

/I'm not even a Saints fan. Just feel bad their fans had to put up with that bs.


Actually he's technically wrong, thus my point entirely.

I bolded it for you since you seem to be retarded.
2013-01-25 01:02:16 PM
1 votes:
When the Saints call a 3-4 or 4-3 they're just counting the number of touchdowns to be given up.
2013-01-25 12:48:11 PM
1 votes:

thecpt: if only there was a way that they could of had the full defense as they prepared it. But Goodell had to flex nuts based off insufficient evidence.


Hows that defamation* suit going?

Get used to them*.
2013-01-25 12:15:34 PM
1 votes:

Killer Cars: mikaloyd: Buh bye Spaggy

Hello ANYbody

I don't think anyone would have coached up the Saints defense last year to even "average". A mix of overrated or just-not-very-good players combined with the mindf*ck of an offseason they had.


They lost to the chiefs. In the superdome
2013-01-25 12:13:14 PM
1 votes:

Deneb81: GQueue: The Saints defense never stopped providing a bounty even this season, this year it was a bounty of points to the other team.

Rob Ryan is a available...


No he's not, and who cares if he was? Does Gary Gibbs have a job? I like vanilla...
2013-01-25 11:57:52 AM
1 votes:
The Saints defense never stopped providing a bounty even this season, this year it was a bounty of points to the other team.
 
Displayed 13 of 13 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report