Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Times of Israel)   MORSI: I'm not anti-semitic. The Jewish-controlled media just says I am   (timesofisrael.com ) divider line
    More: Ironic, Egyptian President, Jewish, United States, Ali Said, Egyptian, John McCain  
•       •       •

2738 clicks; posted to Main » on 24 Jan 2013 at 9:02 AM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



178 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all

 
2013-01-25 09:40:35 AM  
George Babbitt: Are you kidding with that source? I'm not denying that there was an influx of Arab's following the installment of Jews in the area, but you want me to read anything written by a British Palestinian Mandate born Jew? Her family were probably shooting at the British to drive them out vis-a-vis the Irgun.

TappingTheVeinSo you're going to ignore the facts she presents, which you can research yourself, and refuse to accept it because she's a jew ? well, judging from your bullshiat thus far it kinda makes sense.

You two have fun stripping out only those things that you want to engage. Tapping, you have spent how much time deriding Amos for taking something out of context, and then you are going to do it to me?



liam76: You are wasting a lot of time with a guy who thinks Jews in concentration camps turned down a deal to go to Spain if the promised not to go to Palestine.

See above.



TappingTheVein

Ok.. that's insane even by Amos Quito anti-semitic conspiracy ravings, which says a lot.

Ok, I know that I'm just being trolled, but now it feels like you two are paid to distract and suck up the time and energy of those things which are not popularly stated. Congratulations, you're doing a wonderful job of it.

 
2013-01-25 10:11:01 AM  

George Babbitt: You two have fun stripping out only those things that you want to engage. Tapping, you have spent how much time deriding Amos for taking something out of context, and then you are going to do it to me?


What is left to engage ? it's already obvious that you are clueless and have no idea what the hell you're talking about and you seem to suffer from some kind of a religious retardation. And if what liam76 said about your comment on concentration camps you are batshiat insane.
But it's great how you grasped the fact that Amos Quito is talking out of his anti-semitic ass again. So you got that going for you. Which is nice.

George Babbitt: Ok, I know that I'm just being trolled, but now it feels like you two are paid to distract and suck up the time and energy of those things which are not popularly stated. Congratulations, you're doing a wonderful job of it.


Dude, whatever you're taking/snorting/huffing, you should stop. It's not good for you.
 
2013-01-25 11:09:46 AM  

George Babbitt: liam76: You are wasting a lot of time with a guy who thinks Jews in concentration camps turned down a deal to go to Spain if the promised not to go to Palestine.
See above.


What did I take out of context?

I said that link was garbage and not true, you tried to argue it was, and that a deal to let all the jews in Europe go to spain in 41 and 42 happened. That would mean jews in concentration camps and death camps chose to stay.
 
2013-01-25 03:10:00 PM  

TappingTheVein: Like i said, history of the region kinda predates 1917.


No one should give a flying fark about who owned what a century ago. Even things a couple generations back shouldn't being the primary issue.

I don't care whose bible says what, who thinks the holiness of a place belongs to them, or whose granddad killed whose. It is too late to fix those problems and all that can be done now is look at how things are and find a way forward. Demanding that the location belong to either Jews or Palestinians is a foolish argument. People have a right to live where they are born. That includes both Jews (who depending on what you believe have parents/grandparents who had no right to settle there) and Palestinians (and depending on what people believe they never really existed, never had a state, or have no historical claim either). Both are there now, and the current apartheid state is deplorable.

As for which side is more violent or more "wrong" that is a much more complicated question than the history of the area. It isn't all Jews or all Palestinians pushing against one another. It is a small percent on both sides who are being able to continue their operations thanks to their own enemies. The settlers with tacit government approval push an agenda to eliminate any chance at prosperity for the Palestinians, and the acts of terror by the Palestinians gives them an excuse to do so.

For my 2c, the Palestinian people have no reasonable capability of stopping the violence from their side, while the Israeli government CAN control what its people do because it has such greater resources. I'm not saying its fair, but the only way toward peace is for the Israelis, as the stronger of the two, to be unwavering in the seeking of peace and to accept some lumps on the way. By throwing force back against force while continuing the settlements and other provoking measures like not recognizing a Palestinian state and not giving the state the chance to even attempt self governance, the Israelis succeed in nothing more than churning out generation after generation of violent rebels against their control.
 
2013-01-25 03:55:06 PM  

Smackledorfer: No one should give a flying fark about who owned what a century ago. Even things a couple generations back shouldn't being the primary issue.

I don't care whose bible says what, who thinks the holiness of a place belongs to them, or whose granddad killed whose. It is too late to fix those problems and all that can be done now is look at how things are and find a way forward. Demanding that the location belong to either Jews or Palestinians is a foolish argument. People have a right to live where they are born. That includes both Jews (who depending on what you believe have parents/grandparents who had no right to settle there) and Palestinians (and depending on what people believe they never really existed, never had a state, or have no historical claim either). Both are there now, and the current apartheid state is deplorable.


Apartheid implies Palestenians are Israeli citizens.

Smackledorfer: As for which side is more violent or more "wrong" that is a much more complicated question than the history of the area. It isn't all Jews or all Palestinians pushing against one another. It is a small percent on both sides who are being able to continue their operations thanks to their own enemies. The settlers with tacit government approval push an agenda to eliminate any chance at prosperity for the Palestinians, and the acts of terror by the Palestinians gives them an excuse to do so.


The settlers have been pushed out of some areas, and Israel was rewarded with more rocket attacks.

That doesn't make Israel settlements in the WB ok, but you can see why many see no benefit in moving them.

Smackledorfer: For my 2c, the Palestinian people have no reasonable capability of stopping the violence from their side, while the Israeli government CAN control what its people do because it has such greater resources. I'm not saying its fair, but the only way toward peace is for the Israelis, as the stronger of the two, to be unwavering in the seeking of peace and to accept some lumps on the way. By throwing force back against force while continuing the settlements and other provoking measures like not recognizing a Palestinian state and not giving the state the chance to even attempt self governance, the Israelis succeed in nothing more than churning out generation after generation of violent rebels against their control


I would agree about the settlement. But your bit about violence only works if they lived in a vacuum.

They have taken steps to give them self governance and it inevitably leads to more attacks.

There isn't going to be peace until groups in Palestine that care more about killing Israeli's than helping their children (cough Hamas cough) are only fringe groups. That isn't going to happen until surrounding arabs accept the state of Israel and see defeating it as less important than helping palestenians.
 
2013-01-25 04:13:57 PM  

Smackledorfer: No one should give a flying fark about who owned what a century ago. Even things a couple generations back shouldn't being the primary issue.


Correct. And as i said this is a fact: Israel exists and will continue to exist despite the fantasies of arab jihadists, Dhimmi useful idiots and anti-semite idiots like Amos Quito.

Smackledorfer: don't care whose bible says what, who thinks the holiness of a place belongs to them, or whose granddad killed whose. It is too late to fix those problems and all that can be done now is look at how things are and find a way forward. Demanding that the location belong to either Jews or Palestinians is a foolish argument. People have a right to live where they are born. That includes both Jews (who depending on what you believe have parents/grandparents who had no right to settle there) and Palestinians (and depending on what people believe they never really existed, never had a state, or have no historical claim either). Both are there now, and the current apartheid state is deplorable.


Correct and that was the basis of the Partition Plan. Guess who rejected it and tried to eradicate the other side ?

Smackledorfer: As for which side is more violent or more "wrong" that is a much more complicated question than the history of the area. It isn't all Jews or all Palestinians pushing against one another. It is a small percent on both sides who are being able to continue their operations thanks to their own enemies. The settlers with tacit government approval push an agenda to eliminate any chance at prosperity for the Palestinians, and the acts of terror by the Palestinians gives them an excuse to do so.


And yet the palestinians declare that their goal is the eradication of Israel and the taking of what they see as arab land. Both of the main factions of the palestinian leadership (although Hamas are more up front about it than Fatah).
The palestinians were the ones who refused to negotiate in good faith, even when Israel agreed to accept almost all of their demands (Camp David 2000) but that will mean the palestinians will no longer be the puppets of the arab world against Israel and the ones who actually control the fate of the palestinians, the ones sitting in Syria and Iran, decided to continue the 'jihad'.

Israel had forced settlers out of regions in the past, in fact Gaza was a great testing ground when all of the israeli settlers withdrew from the region. The palestinians in response moved their missile launchers closer to the border for better aim at israeli cities while decimating plantations left by the israeli setters.

Smackledorfer: For my 2c, the Palestinian people have no reasonable capability of stopping the violence from their side, while the Israeli government CAN control what its people do because it has such greater resources.


Simply not true. The moment Hamas understood that firing rockets on Israel will end badly in the last conflict a couple of months ago and they agreed to a cease fire not a single mortar/missile/stone was fired from Gaza.
Israel do control its people, otherwise there would be no more gaza by now after close to a decade of constant bombing of israeli cities.

Smackledorfer: but the only way toward peace is for the Israelis, as the stronger of the two, to be unwavering in the seeking of peace and to accept some lumps on the way


Again, you are simply not aware of the facts. Israel for long periods of time did not retaliate when the palestinians were firing dozens of rockets a day on israeli cities. There is no 'circle of violence' simply because the reason for the palestinians 'jihad' is the existence of Israel, period. They say so openly.

Smackledorfer: By throwing force back against force while continuing the settlements and other provoking measures like not recognizing a Palestinian state and not giving the state the chance to even attempt self governance, the Israelis succeed in nothing more than churning out generation after generation of violent rebels against their control


What palestinian state ? the one that never ever existed ? are you referring to the West Bank (previously Jordan) ? Gaza ? (previously Egypt) ? the only state in the region which is the De facto palestinian state is called Jordan.
If the arabs want another arab country in the region with arabs who now call themselves palestinians, maybe they should accept the fact that Israel exists and it's not going away. Something that seems to be very difficult for them.
 
2013-01-25 06:21:07 PM  

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: What "facts"?

The fact that by cherry-picking a single comment, removing it from its context, and ignoring other comments made by Ben Gurion that directly contradict this interpretation, the author distorts history, Among others. I already posted this about 4 times now in this thread.

Amos Quito: I cite Sir Martin John Gilbert, a "British historian and honorary Fellow of Merton College, University of Oxford. He is the author of over eighty books, including works on the Holocaust and Jewish history. Gilbert is a leading historian of the modern world, and is known as the official biographer of Sir Winston Churchill."


You try to rebut Gilbert by citing  CAMERA " The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA) is an American non-profit pro-Israel media watchdog group.[3] The group says it was founded in 1982 "to respond to the Washington Post's coverage of Israel's Lebanon incursion", and to respond to what it considers the media's "general anti-Israel bias

So who are we to believe? A world renown historian, or a pack of agenda-driven Zionist apologists whose work is SO shoddy that they don't even dare to claim authorship?

And again you refuse to actually address the facts presented in the Camera article which i posted over and over again.
Again you pathetically try to kill the messenger while squirming your way to avoid touching the message with a ten-foot pole.

This was already discussed with you ad nauseum, your bullshiat debunked over and over and over again. You using the same exact quote by the same exact author to present your anti-semitic conspiracy drivel makes it extremely easy to do.



Keep saying that, Tappy.  Who knows - with a wave of a magic wand and a sprinkle of fairy dust - it may just come true!

I would remind you that you are not attempting to "debunk" me, but the work of the famed Jewish historian Sir Martin John Gilbert, and while I would be happy to dissect, line by line, point by point, the unsigned Zionist screed scribbled by the "staff" of CAMERA that you rely on as PROOF! that Ben-Gurion didn't really MEAN what he said when he said what he said, I'll save that thrashing for another thread.

For the moment, all we need to know is this: In "debunking" Ben-Gurion's statement, the "staff" of Zionist shills at CAMERA rely on ONE SOURCE for their "PROOF!", and that is the writings of Shabtai Teveth, Ben-Gurion's official biographer - the SAME MAN whose works Sir Martin John Gilbert relied on as the source of the quote that you find so irritating.

Do you really believe that Gilbert, a world renown historian, Churchill's official biographer, and author of over 80 books on the history of the 20th century - INCLUDING numerous works on WWI, WWII AND the Holocaust simply "overlooked" the material that your Zionist pals at CAMERA dangle in their attempts at Ben-Gurion revisionism?

Or maybe Martin Gilbert is just a Jewish anti-Semite? (That's the WORST kind, you know)

I suggest you write Sir Gilbert a letter. Point him to the CAMERA article, and tell him that he is a fool - ignorant of the history.

Oh, and don't forget to link to this thread as PROOF! that you debunked Sir Gilbert. I'm sure he'd get a kick out of that.

TTYS, Tappy.

You have a joyous weekend.
 
2013-01-26 04:21:11 AM  

Amos Quito: Keep saying that, Tappy.  Who knows - with a wave of a magic wand and a sprinkle of fairy dust - it may just come true!

I would remind you that you are not attempting to "debunk" me, but the work of the famed Jewish historian Sir Martin John Gilbert, and while I would be happy to dissect, line by line, point by point, the unsigned Zionist screed scribbled by the "staff" of CAMERA that you rely on as PROOF! that Ben-Gurion didn't really MEAN what he said when he said what he said, I'll save that thrashing for another thread.


by cherry-picking a single comment, removing it from its context, and ignoring other comments made by Ben Gurion that directly contradict this interpretation, the author distorts history, Among others. I already posted this about 4 times now in this thread.

Proof:

The Ben Gurion quote is taken from comments he made to Mapai's central committee on December 7, 1938. This followed Britain's decision to deny entrance into Palestine of 10,000 German Jewish orphans in the wake of Kristallnacht, instead offering them asylum within Great Britain. It was almost a year before the Nazis launched World War II and several years before the Final Solution (to annihilate the Jews) was methodically implemented. While Ben Gurion believed that Germany's anti-Jewish policies would necessitate creating a safe haven for numerous Jewish refugees that no other country was willing to accept, he had no way of predicting the enormity of what was to follow.

The British offer to accept several thousand children appeared to be a gesture of conscience allowing Britain to close the doors of Palestine - not only to those German orphans, but to future refugees as well. Ben Gurion had recently witnessed the results of the international Evian conference, which had been convened in July 1938 to address the growing Jewish refugee problem, and knew that other countries were also unwilling to accept hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees. He believed that only a Jewish homeland would be able to properly absorb these Jews. Thus Ben Gurion stated that "our concern is not only the personal interest of these children, but the historic interest of the Jewish people" (translation from the stenographic records by Shabtai Teveth, Ben Gurion and the Holocaust, Harcourt Brace & Co. 1996, p. 47).

According to the records of the Mapai meeting, Yitzchak Ben Zvi immediately clarified Ben Gurion's brusque remark, explaining "ten thousand children are a small part of Germany's [Jewish] children...They [the British] don't intend to save Germany's Jews, and certainly not all of them. The moment the Jewish State Plan [the Peel plan] was shelved, the possibility of complete rescue of Germany's Jews was shelved with it." (ibid. p. 48)

There is ample evidence - ignored by Ignatiev - that Ben Gurion viewed the rescue of Jews as paramount. As early as 1936, Ben Gurion told Palestine's high commissioner, Sir Arthur Wauchope, that "had there been the possiblity of bringing Poland's Jews to the United States or Argentina, we would have done so regardless of our Zionist beliefs. But the world was closed to us. And had there also not been room for us in Palestine, our people would have had only one way out: to commit suicide" (Ben Gurion, Memoirs, p.3:105, cited in Shabtai Teveth, Ben Gurion and the Holocaust, pp xlix, 110). And in November 1941, Ben Gurion argued that "the supremely important thing now is salvage, and nation-building is incidental" (Teveth, ibid. p.xlviii).

It was only in November 1942 that the Yishuv became aware of the systematic slaughter of Jews. The Zionist leadership established a rescue committee and raised hundreds of thousands of pounds for the rescue mission. Ben Gurion made his priorities clear at a September 1943 fund-raising meeting of the Mobilization and Rescue Appeal in Jerusalem where he hailed the Allies' invasion of Europe for "first of all, and foremost, the saving of Jews, then the saving of the Yishuv, and finally and thirdly the saving of Zionism" (cited in Teveth, p. 143). He emphasized the importance of funding the rescue mission, saying:

"We must do whatever is humanly possible...to extend material aid to those working on rescue operations in order to save [those who] can still be saved, to delay the calamity as far as it can be delayed. [And we must] do it immediately, to the best of our ability. I hesitate to say - since the matter is so serious - that we shall do our utmost; we are flesh and blood and cannot do the maximum, but we shall do what we can." (quoted in Friling, Tuvia, Arrows in the Dark, University of Wisconsin Press 2003)

Amos Quito: For the moment, all we need to know is this: In "debunking" Ben-Gurion's statement, the "staff" of Zionist shills at CAMERA rely on ONE SOURCE for their "PROOF!", and that is the writings of Shabtai Teveth, Ben-Gurion's official biographer - the SAME MAN whose works Sir Martin John Gilbert relied on as the source of the quote that you find so irritating.


See above for Proof.

Amos Quito: Do you really believe that Gilbert, a world renown historian, Churchill's official biographer, and author of over 80 books on the history of the 20th century - INCLUDING numerous works on WWI, WWII AND the Holocaust simply "overlooked" the material that your Zionist pals at CAMERA dangle in their attempts at Ben-Gurion revisionism?


No because he didn't use it to display his anti-semitic conspircy bullshiat theories like yourself. As proven and cited by the information given in the Camera article which you can research yourself if you don't believe it exists.

Amos Quito: I suggest you write Sir Gilbert a letter. Point him to the CAMERA article, and tell him that he is a fool - ignorant of the history.


I suggest you stop using that quote out of context while ignore the rest of the Ben Gurion information that contradict your bullshiat anti-semitic conspiracy rants.

Bolding text is fun.

Amos Quito: Oh, and don't forget to link to this thread as PROOF! that you debunked Sir Gilbert. I'm sure he'd get a kick out of that.


Not Sir Gilbert, You. The anti-semite turd who keeps bringing an out of context quote to present his favorite anti-semitic bullshiat rant which was debunked over and over and over again.
 
2013-01-26 02:17:53 PM  

TappingTheVein: Not Sir Gilbert, You. The anti-semite turd who keeps bringing an out of context quote to present his favorite anti-semitic bullshiat rant which was debunked over and over and over again.


So what do you think? One week and he will be reposting the same BS?
 
2013-01-26 03:38:09 PM  

liam76: So what do you think? One week and he will be reposting the same BS?


Absolutely. He's a consistent anti-semite lying sack of shiat and that's why he's my favorite.
 
2013-01-26 04:47:41 PM  

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Oh, and don't forget to link to this thread as PROOF! that you debunked Sir Gilbert. I'm sure he'd get a kick out of that.

Not Sir Gilbert, You. The anti-semite turd who keeps bringing an out of context quote to present his favorite anti-semitic bullshiat rant which was debunked over and over and over again.


Just out of curiosity, what (in your mind) do you THINK you just proved / disproved / bunked / debunked etc?

Please be precise.

Thanks.
 
2013-01-26 04:58:05 PM  

Amos Quito: Just out of curiosity, what (in your mind) do you THINK you just proved / disproved / bunked / debunked etc?

Please be precise.


Read above. It's posted only about 5 or 6 times.
 
2013-01-27 11:18:41 AM  

Amos Quito: TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Oh, and don't forget to link to this thread as PROOF! that you debunked Sir Gilbert. I'm sure he'd get a kick out of that.

Not Sir Gilbert, You. The anti-semite turd who keeps bringing an out of context quote to present his favorite anti-semitic bullshiat rant which was debunked over and over and over again.

Just out of curiosity, what (in your mind) do you THINK you just proved / disproved / bunked / debunked etc?

Please be precise.

Thanks.


What do you think you "prove" by that same tired quote?
 
2013-01-27 11:24:57 AM  

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Just out of curiosity, what (in your mind) do you THINK you just proved / disproved / bunked / debunked etc?

Please be precise.

Read above. It's posted only about 5 or 6 times.


TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Just out of curiosity, what (in your mind) do you THINK you just proved / disproved / bunked / debunked etc?

Please be precise.

Read above. It's posted only about 5 or 6 times.



I see. You are incapable of independent thought.


www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

teekhapan.files.wordpress.com

There's a good lad.

Tune in next time.
 
2013-01-27 11:43:30 AM  

Amos Quito: TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Just out of curiosity, what (in your mind) do you THINK you just proved / disproved / bunked / debunked etc?

Please be precise.

Read above. It's posted only about 5 or 6 times.

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Just out of curiosity, what (in your mind) do you THINK you just proved / disproved / bunked / debunked etc?

Please be precise.

Read above. It's posted only about 5 or 6 times.


I see. You are incapable of independent thought.


[www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org image 128x176]

[teekhapan.files.wordpress.com image 192x211]

There's a good lad.

Tune in next time.


You try and cast a certain group of people based off an out of context quote from 70+ years ago, somebody puts it in context and you accuse them being incapable of independent thought?
 
2013-01-27 02:58:19 PM  

Amos Quito: I see. You are incapable of independent thought.


Apparently you're not just an anti-semite sack of shiat but a reading comprehension challenged anti-semite sack of shiat.
 
2013-01-27 03:07:13 PM  
Clean up on aisle 12.

Better sound the alarm in case it goes green.
 
2013-01-27 03:26:15 PM  
I'm just going to leave this here to show that CAMERA is not a credible source for debunking anything considering their record for 'advocacy over accuracy'.
 
2013-01-27 03:28:11 PM  

Amos Quito: Clean up on aisle 12.

Better sound the alarm in case it goes green.


How pathetic can you be when you get that you were caught with your anti-semitic pants down again so you bring in an unrelated link ?

InterruptingQuirk: I'm just going to leave this here to show that CAMERA is not a credible source for debunking anything considering their record for 'advocacy over accuracy'.


Point to anything said in my posts from CAMERA which you know is incorrect.
 
2013-01-27 03:33:22 PM  

TappingTheVein:

InterruptingQuirk: I'm just going to leave this here to show that CAMERA is not a credible source for debunking anything considering their record for 'advocacy over accuracy'.

Point to anything said in my posts from CAMERA which you know is incorrect.


Point to anything said in your posts from CAMERA which you know is correct.
 
2013-01-27 03:35:06 PM  

InterruptingQuirk: Point to anything said in your posts from CAMERA which you know is correct.


^
|
|


There.
 
2013-01-27 04:10:29 PM  
On second thought, Amos Quito, it was more pathetic to bring in your alt InterruptingQuirk to post that. This must be some kind of record.
my hat's off to you good sir!
 
2013-01-27 04:16:33 PM  
Show us on the doll where the Jews touched you, Amos Quito. It's all right, we won't snicker and chortle.
 
2013-01-27 05:01:05 PM  

Keizer_Ghidorah: Show us on the doll where the Jews touched you, Amos Quito. It's all right, we won't snicker and chortle.



LOL!

You and Tappy should get a room.

/Cheaper that way


Oh, and good news!

That thread about Zionists pumping the Ethiopian (BLACK) Jews full of Depo Provera?

Yeah, it got redlit.

Looks like the strong-arm boys at CAMERA put in a call to Drew, eh?
 
2013-01-27 05:17:10 PM  

Amos Quito: Looks like the strong-arm boys at CAMERA put in a call to Drew, eh?


Oh i'm sure you'll find something else negative you can find about jews to take it's place. Anti-semite is as anti-semite does.
Maybe you can use your pathetic alt InterruptingQuirk to submit instead, to spice things up a bit.
 
2013-01-27 05:27:44 PM  

TappingTheVein: Amos Quito: Looks like the strong-arm boys at CAMERA put in a call to Drew, eh?

Oh i'm sure you'll find something else negative you can find about jews to take it's place. Anti-semite is as anti-semite does.
Maybe you can use your pathetic alt InterruptingQuirk to submit instead, to spice things up a bit.


Meh, I don't do alts, Tappy.

But as you were whining earlier about CONTEXT, I thought you might just get a kick out of this. (From a thread will hit the main page later this evening)

No, seriously, it's hilarious, and as you're an atheist, I'm sure you'll appreciate it.


/Don't worry, I'll address the CAMERA / HASBARA apologist piece in another thread
//This one is cold
///And stale
 
2013-01-27 05:27:56 PM  

Amos Quito: Keizer_Ghidorah: Show us on the doll where the Jews touched you, Amos Quito. It's all right, we won't snicker and chortle.

LOL!

You and Tappy should get a room.

/Cheaper that way

Oh, and good news!

That thread about Zionists pumping the Ethiopian (BLACK) Jews full of Depo Provera?

Yeah, it got redlit.

Looks like the strong-arm boys at CAMERA put in a call to Drew, eh?


Too difficult for you to put that as a normal paragraph? Wouldn't be surprising, since all you seem to be able to comprehend are Jewish conspiracies that make 9/11 Truthers look sane.
 
2013-01-27 06:05:10 PM  

Amos Quito: Meh, I don't do alts, Tappy.


Lying about this as well ? can't be surprised, i can tell you that.

Amos Quito: /Don't worry, I'll address the CAMERA / HASBARA apologist piece in another thread
//This one is cold
///And stale


But fits perfectly for your pathetic alt who was created a few hours ago. At least put some effort into this, this is embarrassing.
 
Displayed 28 of 178 comments


Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Newest | Show all


View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report