Marine1: poot_rootbeer: H31N0US: This kind of collusion is monopolistic and illegal.Based on the content of the emails, it sure looks that way. Especially the parts where they talk about how important it is to be discreet about the existence of the "handshake agreements".A reciprocal no-poaching policy is probably more defensible than a reciprocal no-hire policy, though. It depends on whether the agency lies with an HR recruiter initiating contact while representing the company's interests, or an employee representing his own.Given how those emails are written... I doubt it will matter. It paints a picture of a bunch of executives who knew what they were doing was wrong, and did it anyways.
If you like these links, you'll love
Come on, it's $5 a month, just do it.
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Sep 22 2017 04:59:38
Runtime: 0.237 sec (236 ms)