jmr61: Dwight_Yeast:Given how private she is, I think it's far more likely that the donor is someone she knows well. Probably a close friend, maybe gay, and likely not involved in the film industry, unless it's behind the scenes.HOW PRIVATE SHE IS???????? Private? Really? She went on television in front of hundreds of millions of people and she named her lesbian lover and the mother of her children. She showed the faces of her children to those hundreds of millions of people. She told the world about her mother with Alzheimers. She told the world she was single.That's private?That's a hypocrite.
jmr61: HOW PRIVATE SHE IS???????? Private? Really? She went on television in front of hundreds of millions of people and she named her lesbian lover and the mother of her children
Contents Under Pressure: Foster is too intelligent and discreet to do anything but find a completely anonymous donor through the normal means. I do think the boys have the same genetic father, but I don't think anyone will know who he was outside of probably being a medical student somewhere out in Horse Country.
katerbug72: Red Shirt Blues: [3.bp.blogspot.com image 360x537][i.dailymail.co.uk image 634x463]Holy shiat. Definitely. They also look a lot like her when she was young, especially the younger boy.
CigaretteSmokingMan: Hasn't everybody known that she's gay for years?
Bedstead Polisher: Is Jodie Foster the biological mother of those kids or is it her partner? The kids look alike, but nothing like Jodie or Mel.
Repo Man: The Beaver, recut (NSFW).
farkingismybusiness: [i.dailymail.co.uk image 634x356]
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Aug 18 2017 07:58:45
Runtime: 0.223 sec (222 ms)