If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Gizmodo)   Why the Moon Landings Could Have Never EVER Been Faked: The Definitive Proof   (gizmodo.com) divider line 21
    More: Obvious, moon landings, moons, landing  
•       •       •

12294 clicks; posted to Geek » on 19 Jan 2013 at 3:17 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-19 06:18:58 AM
3 votes:

I sound fat: I dont think this was faked, but articles that openly mock people who have looked at the evidence and come to a conclusion different from their own on a contraversial issue as "idots" always raise a red flag with me.


What's controversial about going to the moon? Nothing. The reason people regard moon hoaxers as idiots is that they are idiots.
2013-01-19 03:54:17 AM
3 votes:
Very good video. Every time I talk to a moon hoax believer it makes me want to

students.ou.edu
2013-01-19 03:19:07 AM
3 votes:
If NASA has no problem with faking great achievements, why haven't they done any others? Especially with the CGI at their disposal these days.

/wait, lemmee guess: The Mars landers are all in Arizona, right?
2013-01-21 06:11:51 AM
1 votes:

Keizer_Ghidorah: But I recall that I said telescopes, not the Hubble. Earthbound, on the ground telescopes. Can we see the Moon lander, flag, and other things with those?


No.

Remember: You're trying to find something a few feet in size that's 250,000 miles away.
2013-01-19 12:45:26 PM
1 votes:
I do enjoy claiming that the moon landing was a hoax because then I get to see every engineer around me go into apoplexy...
2013-01-19 11:38:58 AM
1 votes:

RoyHobbs22: LBJ killed JFK


Wrong, Oswald was hired by Joe DiMaggio as revenge for his killing of Marylin Monroe, when he discovered he put a hit on the wrong Kennedy he then had RFK wiped out.
2013-01-19 10:50:07 AM
1 votes:

gadian: The technology to fake it didn't exist, but the technology to shoot people to the moon did? I'm not a hoaxer, but that's pretty lame definitive proof.


Not if it is correct. And it is.
2013-01-19 09:41:44 AM
1 votes:
Why can't these people question things worth questioning?
Slu
2013-01-19 08:59:01 AM
1 votes:

I sound fat: I dont think this was faked, but articles that openly mock people who have looked at the evidence and come to a conclusion different from their own on a contraversial issue as "idots" always raise a red flag with me.

although, I would characterize six percent of people in america to BE idiots, so maybe. It just always seems like the author of these types of articles is just trying to strengthen his own position by degrading the other side.


6%????? More like 60%. And you may be a member!
2013-01-19 08:12:01 AM
1 votes:
Good video. Near the end the guy actually gives a technical rundown from a film perspective of what would need to be done to fake the moon landings. Which would be monumentally difficult and require specialized equipment the film industry had never seen up to that point. I could just see a Moon landing denier jumping on that and saying "See? you just listed off how to do it and ruined your own argument."
2013-01-19 08:07:21 AM
1 votes:
there was absolutely no way to fake it at the time. Even the cameras needed to fake it didn't exist back then.

haroonriaz.files.wordpress.com

challengeaccepted.jpg
2013-01-19 07:47:30 AM
1 votes:
Another really good one is the video of them driving the rover around on the moon.

original
HD, stabilized

Even if you had a stadium-sized vaccuum chamber in order to have all the dust kicked up fall back at once, it would be impossible due to Earth's higher gravity to see rooster trails like that, unless we're to believe that inside our stadium-chamber were people at 40% scale running at 2.5x normal speed. Or that despite being recorded using high-speed cameras in order to fake the rooster trails, everything else behaves exactly as it would at normal speed.

For the lulz, watch some old school car-chase or other slowed down/sped up SFX videos. Or for similar effect, an old Godzilla movie where huge Godzilla is a guy in a suit. Everything in such videos exhibits comically "wrong" behavior precisely because time passes at the wrong rate, but this is precisely what we do not see in Apollo videos.

/But there were no stars in the sky!
//The stars are going out...
2013-01-19 07:18:50 AM
1 votes:

Old enough to know better: I admire the guys effort. Personally I tend to lump moon hoaxers, birthers, truthers, etc into the same nutjob category, and laugh and ignore them. Which probably isn't a good idea, but it sure helps keep my blood pressure in check.


Don't forget about the people that believe the earth is flat. Or hollow.
2013-01-19 06:27:50 AM
1 votes:
Wouldn't the physics dictate that the mass was going to the moon once you did all the math?

//Deniers are not very good the the Calculus
2013-01-19 06:21:13 AM
1 votes:

vinniethepoo: I remember that our teachers had TV sets brought into the classrooms so we could watch the moon landing live. My brother was a metallurgist, working at San Dia labs at the time, and was part of the team that analyzed the moon rocks after the mission. He sent me a bunch of 8x10 prints of pictures taken during the mission. Wish I still had those.


I remember watching Apollo 11 on TV as a kid.
2013-01-19 06:13:56 AM
1 votes:

I sound fat: I dont think this was faked, but articles that openly mock people who have looked at the evidence and come to a conclusion different from their own on a contraversial issue as "idots" always raise a red flag with me.


Well, it's a good thing the video didn't do that.
2013-01-19 06:08:50 AM
1 votes:
I dont think this was faked, but articles that openly mock people who have looked at the evidence and come to a conclusion different from their own on a contraversial issue as "idots" always raise a red flag with me.

although, I would characterize six percent of people in america to BE idiots, so maybe. It just always seems like the author of these types of articles is just trying to strengthen his own position by degrading the other side.
2013-01-19 05:57:32 AM
1 votes:
The more "definitive" the proof you offer, the harder the tards will double down on the derp. It's an unwinable argument. They just need to be slapped every time they open their mouths.
2013-01-19 05:40:34 AM
1 votes:
I've seen an Apollo launch up close. That shiat was going to the moon.
2013-01-19 03:51:07 AM
1 votes:
The guy is very entertaining and funny, I like it. If you ever really needed proof, shoot a laser at the retro-reflectors we left on the Moon.
2013-01-19 02:17:43 AM
1 votes:
Because the Russians had every reason to prove it was fake, and they didn't?
 
Displayed 21 of 21 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report