If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(ABC)   Va lawmaker goes full President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho on the floor of the statehouse. You NEVER go full Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho   (abcnews.go.com) divider line 239
    More: Strange, Roanoke Times, assault rifles, lawmakers  
•       •       •

14847 clicks; posted to Main » on 18 Jan 2013 at 3:04 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



239 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-18 04:43:28 PM

kombat_unit: I May Be Crazy But...: I've heard a story that since it's legal to carry a concealed weapon in the Texas Capitol building, and if you do you skip the metal detector lines (because what's the point?), some reporters have gotten concealed carry licenses and pistols to speed up the process. I have no idea if I remember right or if it was true when I heard it, but it's funny anyway.

CCW require background check and fingerprints to make sure you're not a illegal butthole.


I actually feel safer around people with CCW's than others. The vast majority are safe and rational. There are however an equal percentage of "idiots" in the gun owning world as there are in any other group of people. Well, except the Democrat party. They are all idiots.
 
2013-01-18 04:43:32 PM
Joe Morrissey. That guy came by my apartment in the mid-80s when I lived in Richmond looking for a vote for something or other he was running for. He always seemed like a douche to me.

/I really got nothing else.
 
2013-01-18 04:43:39 PM

Ow! That was my feelings!: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

So, if it was a pro-gun Republican grandstanding in a legislative chamber with a AK clone, would you still feel it's no big deal?


I wouldn't. An elected official isn't going to murder everyone in the legislature.
 
2013-01-18 04:44:21 PM

geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)


So?
 
2013-01-18 04:45:30 PM

kombat_unit: willfullyobscure: They are dangerous toys, noting more, nothing less. If hicks and lunatics can't play safely with these toys, they will lose them, and that's OK.

Ersatz military gear has no rational place in our civil society. We don't let idiots dress up like cops or firefighters or EMTs, either; you get arrested for that shiat. It should be the same if you want to dress up like a soldier. We can make an exception for re-enactors, since at least they seem to know that they're playing dress-up.

Otherwise, yes, you should lose your military toys at the drop of a hat and they should be regulated to whatever necessary level to keep them away from thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shiat-kickers and Methodists.

It's only common sense.

Read Federalist 45 and then realize how off base your dumb post is.


Yeah OK. cuz you and your fake assault rifle in 5.56 are gonna be a big help against armored IFVs and drone strikes in the event the Fed goes all "crush internal dissent". yeeeep.
 
2013-01-18 04:45:45 PM
Wonder how many CCW senators thought about using Joe's brandishing as an opportunity to pump three into his chest in "self defense"?
 
2013-01-18 04:46:14 PM

ZackDanger: "A lot of people don't know that in many locations in the commonwealth, you can take this gun, you can walk in the middle of Main Street loaded and not be in violation of the law," Morrissey said [...]

So what?


But he could get a ticket for jaywalking or obstructing traffic.
 
2013-01-18 04:46:45 PM
Let's limit the size of magazines!!!

colonyofcommodus.files.wordpress.com

even Tuco has seen a way around it

desmond.imageshack.us
 
2013-01-18 04:46:55 PM
All you anti-gun whackos, how're you non-gun owners going to disarm us?

Nighttime Shoot

... and that's just the smallest sliver of the tiniest percent of the overwhelming majority of Americans who will resist anyone trying to abridge their 2nd Amendment Rights. Rights which We The People reserved unto ourselves. Rights which DO NOT come from the federal government. These Rights are ours, we declared them and we defend them AGAINST government alienation.
 
2013-01-18 04:48:24 PM

geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)



A gun is something to be afraid of and scare your constituents other people with, dumbass, not something to respect or understand.
 
2013-01-18 04:48:43 PM

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Rich Cream: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?


Did they search him for ammo?

Did they search everyone for ammo?


I would have brought it in the day before.


baka-san: Rich Cream: How is that not a pistol grip? Because it connects to the stock at the bottom to make a loop? That's hi-larious. I can still hold it (comfortably) with one hand.

See, by that measure, this has a pistol grip...

[thespecialistsltd.com image 850x249]



Well, my measure would involve the word "perpendicular".
 
2013-01-18 04:48:58 PM

willfullyobscure: kombat_unit: willfullyobscure: They are dangerous toys, noting more, nothing less. If hicks and lunatics can't play safely with these toys, they will lose them, and that's OK.

Ersatz military gear has no rational place in our civil society. We don't let idiots dress up like cops or firefighters or EMTs, either; you get arrested for that shiat. It should be the same if you want to dress up like a soldier. We can make an exception for re-enactors, since at least they seem to know that they're playing dress-up.

Otherwise, yes, you should lose your military toys at the drop of a hat and they should be regulated to whatever necessary level to keep them away from thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shiat-kickers and Methodists.

It's only common sense.

Read Federalist 45 and then realize how off base your dumb post is.

Yeah OK. cuz you and your fake assault rifle in 5.56 are gonna be a big help against armored IFVs and drone strikes in the event the Fed goes all "crush internal dissent". yeeeep.


Wow. Just wow. If you think that IFV's and Drone strikes are all that is required to win a war, read up on a little war called Vietnam. Might shock you how irregular forces fighting a guerrilla war can overcome technology and regular forces.
 
2013-01-18 04:49:19 PM

ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?


So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.
 
2013-01-18 04:49:31 PM

willfullyobscure: kombat_unit: willfullyobscure: They are dangerous toys, noting more, nothing less. If hicks and lunatics can't play safely with these toys, they will lose them, and that's OK.

Ersatz military gear has no rational place in our civil society. We don't let idiots dress up like cops or firefighters or EMTs, either; you get arrested for that shiat. It should be the same if you want to dress up like a soldier. We can make an exception for re-enactors, since at least they seem to know that they're playing dress-up.

Otherwise, yes, you should lose your military toys at the drop of a hat and they should be regulated to whatever necessary level to keep them away from thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shiat-kickers and Methodists.

It's only common sense.

Read Federalist 45 and then realize how off base your dumb post is.

Yeah OK. cuz you and your fake assault rifle in 5.56 are gonna be a big help against armored IFVs and drone strikes in the event the Fed goes all "crush internal dissent". yeeeep.


0/10 - ignorant troll, yawn
 
2013-01-18 04:50:24 PM

Theburner: BTW, that looks like an AK sold DURING the Clinton ban, as it has a thumb hole stock. Can anyone confirm? That would make this really funny.


I don't see a flash-suppressor or a bayonet lug, so maybe.
 
2013-01-18 04:52:07 PM

willfullyobscure: Yeah OK. cuz you and your fake assault rifle in 5.56 are gonna be a big help against armored IFVs and drone strikes in the event the Fed goes all "crush internal dissent". yeeeep.


I see that a major strategy here is "have the same conversation over and over again until the side with more of a life walks away from their computer."
 
2013-01-18 04:53:21 PM

willfullyobscure: They are dangerous toys, noting more, nothing less. If hicks and lunatics can't play safely with these toys, they will lose them, and that's OK.

Ersatz military gear has no rational place in our civil society. We don't let idiots dress up like cops or firefighters or EMTs, either; you get arrested for that shiat. It should be the same if you want to dress up like a soldier. We can make an exception for re-enactors, since at least they seem to know that they're playing dress-up.

Otherwise, yes, you should lose your military toys at the drop of a hat and they should be regulated to whatever necessary level to keep them away from thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shiat-kickers and Methodists.

It's only common sense.


Declaring a position to be "common sense" is inherently an appeal to the "poisoning the well" fallacy.
 
2013-01-18 04:53:56 PM

BigNumber12: willfullyobscure: Yeah OK. cuz you and your fake assault rifle in 5.56 are gonna be a big help against armored IFVs and drone strikes in the event the Fed goes all "crush internal dissent". yeeeep.

I see that a major strategy here is "have the same conversation over and over again until the side with more of a life walks away from their computer."


...and goes to the rifle range. ;-)
 
2013-01-18 04:54:42 PM

Clemkadidlefark: All you anti-gun whackos, how're you non-gun owners going to disarm us?

Nighttime Shoot

... and that's just the smallest sliver of the tiniest percent of the overwhelming majority of Americans who will resist anyone trying to abridge their 2nd Amendment Rights. Rights which We The People reserved unto ourselves. Rights which DO NOT come from the federal government. These Rights are ours, we declared them and we defend them AGAINST government alienation.


As a gun owner, can I just say shut the fark up you moronic wackjob.
 
2013-01-18 04:57:28 PM
I need some advice. Fark has taught me that guns are all about sexing my tiny wang. I've tried to rub various firearms but failed to get excited (My Benelli M4's handle came closet but still no love). I then watched mad gun porn, similar result. Why is this not working?
 
2013-01-18 04:59:40 PM
Obviously, the problem isn't an AK or a AR. It's crazy ass stupid psychotic people who use them to kill. And statistically, they aren't used but in a very small percentage of shootings. Handguns are. And knives. But lets try to ban the "SCARY" looking ones, even though they aren't the problem. Oh yes, and lets make it harder for law abiding people to get them, even though they aren't the ones going bugshiat and killing tons of folks. So let's see of we got the steps covered.

1. Attack all gun users / collectors as rabid frothing children snipers.
2. Put forth a bill to make it more difficult to get a certain kind of firearm, even though that firearm isn't the problem, nor are the people who legally purchase it.
3. Ignore the statistical evidence that shows handguns cause the highest percent of murders, and just go after the guns that "look scary".
4. Wave an AK in the house to show your derp and ignorance
5. profit?

Might as well blame rape victims for the way they dress, and make women wear bags from now on, or take cars away from people because far more people are killed each year from drunk drivers than are killed by guns. But that's ok, just ignore the facts and go after the wrong gun and the wrong people. Please continue with your derpfest.
 
2013-01-18 05:00:02 PM

give me doughnuts [TotalFark]
2013-01-18 01:03:34 PM

That wasn't brandishing a rifle, that was "holding up" a rifle.

Guess how we know you're an obama voter.

bran·dish (brndsh)
To display ostentatiously.

words mean things.
 
2013-01-18 05:01:00 PM

BronyMedic: dugitman: BronyMedic: Gun Thread? I think some margaritas are in order! Play the gun thread drinking game!

On another note, I guess they didn't come unarmed this time. Glad to see events are progressing exactly as people predicted in FARK threads with responsible gun ownership. And by responsible, I mean using them to intimidate and silence people who disagree with you.

Odd sort of patriot, that is.

You should probably read TFA

Lampshading is a difficult concept for you to gasp, isn't it?


Except what you wrote read in no way, shape or form like lampshading. So thats nice. Ass.
 
2013-01-18 05:01:16 PM
This thread has electrolytes.
 
2013-01-18 05:01:46 PM

willfullyobscure: kombat_unit: willfullyobscure: They are dangerous toys, noting more, nothing less. If hicks and lunatics can't play safely with these toys, they will lose them, and that's OK.

Ersatz military gear has no rational place in our civil society. We don't let idiots dress up like cops or firefighters or EMTs, either; you get arrested for that shiat. It should be the same if you want to dress up like a soldier. We can make an exception for re-enactors, since at least they seem to know that they're playing dress-up.

Otherwise, yes, you should lose your military toys at the drop of a hat and they should be regulated to whatever necessary level to keep them away from thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shiat-kickers and Methodists.

It's only common sense.

Read Federalist 45 and then realize how off base your dumb post is.

Yeah OK. cuz you and your fake assault rifle in 5.56 are gonna be a big help against armored IFVs and drone strikes in the event the Fed goes all "crush internal dissent". yeeeep.


Fer the n-th time mere escalation to that level is desirable in itself. If society grows so irrecoverably divided that coexistence becomes unbearable and we all start other meansing the shiat out of each other someone is going to win. Do you trust the cops or the military more to play king maker?
 
2013-01-18 05:03:02 PM
Hey, that's the same place that Patrick Henry used to speak!

"It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace²but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"

Gee, I wonder which of those two speeches crazy white guys are most aligned with. The one about guns being too easily acquired and carried or the one about there's a war on and it's caused Northerners sweeping in.

Huh. I couldn't begin to guess.
 
2013-01-18 05:06:50 PM

simplicimus: ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?

So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.


And non-economists shouldn't make propose economic legislation, non-engineers shouldn't propose internet legislation, and non-doctors shouldn't propose medical legislation, right? If that's your argument, I'm all for it. If you think it only applies to this one topic... derp.
 
2013-01-18 05:08:59 PM

kombat_unit: I need some advice. Fark has taught me that guns are all about sexing my tiny wang. I've tried to rub various firearms but failed to get excited (My Benelli M4's handle came closet but still no love). I then watched mad gun porn, similar result. Why is this not working?


/Its only working for the people that say it works on you. They are trying to feel better about their closet gun pron fantasies. See what i did there? turned it right around.
 
2013-01-18 05:09:02 PM

ProfessorOhki: simplicimus: ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?

So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.

And non-economists shouldn't make propose economic legislation, non-engineers shouldn't propose internet legislation, and non-doctors shouldn't propose medical legislation, right? If that's your argument, I'm all for it. If you think it only applies to this one topic... derp.


It would certainly be nice if they were listened to instead of having it brushed off by people with a "The internet is a series of tubes" level of knowledge.
 
2013-01-18 05:09:06 PM

Clemkadidlefark: All you anti-gun whackos, how're you non-gun owners going to disarm us?

Nighttime Shoot

... and that's just the smallest sliver of the tiniest percent of the overwhelming majority of Americans who will resist anyone trying to abridge their 2nd Amendment Rights. Rights which We The People reserved unto ourselves. Rights which DO NOT come from the federal government. These Rights are ours, we declared them and we defend them AGAINST government alienation.


You need to be making youtube videos and linking them here so mainstream America gets your message loud and clear.

Please?
 
2013-01-18 05:09:15 PM

ProfessorOhki: simplicimus: ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?

So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.

And non-economists shouldn't make propose economic legislation, non-engineers shouldn't propose internet legislation, and non-doctors shouldn't propose medical legislation, right? If that's your argument, I'm all for it. If you think it only applies to this one topic... derp.


Nope, I'm fine with all of the above. Expertise has value.
 
2013-01-18 05:09:58 PM

Dimensio: Declaring a position to be "common sense" is inherently an appeal to the "poisoning the well" fallacy.


Isn't there something along the lines of an "appeal to consensus" or "false consensus?"

\Not English major
\\Engineering major
\\\Didn't have to use words
 
2013-01-18 05:11:32 PM
Okay, I get it, you don't like guns
ignore the fact that handguns are the lion's share of the weapons used in murders
and that these people surround themselves with men who have guns..
yet want to take ours
I don't really get that a thumbhole makes a rifle into a dangerous assault weapon that kills on command
but okay

What really bugs me, is that if they had all this information
on how dangerous and horrible these specific guns are
why didn't they say something before?
Where was the vitriol?
Where was the outraged politician bringing a gun to shake at his fellow rich people?
Thousands die every year and now it's a problem...
 
2013-01-18 05:12:33 PM

Bit'O'Gristle: kombat_unit: I need some advice. Fark has taught me that guns are all about sexing my tiny wang. I've tried to rub various firearms but failed to get excited (My Benelli M4's handle came closet but still no love). I then watched mad gun porn, similar result. Why is this not working?

/Its only working for the people that say it works on you. They are trying to feel better about their closet gun pron fantasies. See what i did there? turned it right around.


Dang. That is too bad because I'm ready to save a ton of cash by foregoing dating.
 
2013-01-18 05:13:46 PM

Theburner: Front Page of the Toronto Star.. Teenager shot in Toronto High rise.
Further in the article, 2 others were shot in the same building last year.

Where are the holier than thou Canadians preaching about their awesome gun laws?


We haven't gone anywhere, though at this point I'm starting to wonder why.

And because this happened, I guess all Canucks have to buy a gun and Arnold Schwarzenegger gets to be Prime Minister.

Cheers.
 
2013-01-18 05:14:29 PM

ProfessorOhki: simplicimus: ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?

So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.

And non-economists shouldn't make propose economic legislation, non-engineers shouldn't propose internet legislation, and non-doctors shouldn't propose medical legislation, right? If that's your argument, I'm all for it. If you think it only applies to this one topic... derp.


Cool strawman brown, but knowing not to wave a gun around a crowded room with your finger isn't gunsmith level expertise.

People who jabber about tubes shouldn't propose internet regulation.
Bretharians shouldn't propose medical legislation.

/no economics example. That shiat is ALL voodoo anyway.
 
2013-01-18 05:17:34 PM

Holocaust Agnostic: ProfessorOhki: simplicimus: ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?

So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.

And non-economists shouldn't make propose economic legislation, non-engineers shouldn't propose internet legislation, and non-doctors shouldn't propose medical legislation, right? If that's your argument, I'm all for it. If you think it only applies to this one topic... derp.

Cool strawman brown, but knowing not to wave a gun around a crowded room with your finger isn't gunsmith level expertise.


Again, so what? Are you suggesting that you should need to know anything about gun safety to own and brandish a gun? That's some commie pinko socio liberal nazi talk right there.
 
2013-01-18 05:17:53 PM
The day the people are fully disarmed is when the new order truly begins.
 
2013-01-18 05:21:42 PM

ProfessorOhki: Holocaust Agnostic: ProfessorOhki: simplicimus: ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?

So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.

And non-economists shouldn't make propose economic legislation, non-engineers shouldn't propose internet legislation, and non-doctors shouldn't propose medical legislation, right? If that's your argument, I'm all for it. If you think it only applies to this one topic... derp.

Cool strawman brown, but knowing not to wave a gun around a crowded room with your finger isn't gunsmith level expertise.

Again, so what? Are you suggesting that you should need to know anything about gun safety to own and brandish a gun? That's some commie pinko socio liberal nazi talk right there.


As a commie pinko socio etc etc I'm fine with that.
 
2013-01-18 05:25:00 PM
Can we please just begin the impeachment trials.
 
2013-01-18 05:25:55 PM

Clemkadidlefark: All you anti-gun whackos, how're you non-gun owners going to disarm us?

Nighttime Shoot

... and that's just the smallest sliver of the tiniest percent of the overwhelming majority of Americans who will resist anyone trying to abridge their 2nd Amendment Rights. Rights which We The People reserved unto ourselves. Rights which DO NOT come from the federal government. These Rights are ours, we declared them and we defend them AGAINST government alienation.


I came.
 
2013-01-18 05:29:36 PM

swangoatman: So if this guy, and David Gregory, took a twelve year old girl and showed her his wang it would be okay as long as it was for educational purposes on national news television and you told the cops you were gonna do it and you get the kid from "a friend".
Nice to know.


GDISM, I keep telling you it is not illegal when "we" do it.
/only applies to "they"
 
2013-01-18 05:30:03 PM
Ever notice how people think that if you keep some stuff in some areas of the society and other stuff in other areas of the society - and we all agree that this hypocrisy is normal and good - but if you take some stuff in that society and put it where we think it shouldn't be, people lose their rags?
 
2013-01-18 05:36:28 PM

ProfessorOhki: Holocaust Agnostic: ProfessorOhki: simplicimus: ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?

So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.

And non-economists shouldn't make propose economic legislation, non-engineers shouldn't propose internet legislation, and non-doctors shouldn't propose medical legislation, right? If that's your argument, I'm all for it. If you think it only applies to this one topic... derp.

Cool strawman brown, but knowing not to wave a gun around a crowded room with your finger isn't gunsmith level expertise.

Again, so what? Are you suggesting that you should need to know anything about gun safety to own and brandish a gun? That's some commie pinko socio liberal nazi talk right there.


Goalpost moving as well?
 
2013-01-18 05:43:16 PM

Clemkadidlefark: All you anti-gun whackos, how're you non-gun owners going to disarm us?

Nighttime Shoot

... and that's just the smallest sliver of the tiniest percent of the overwhelming majority of Americans who will resist anyone trying to abridge their 2nd Amendment Rights. Rights which We The People reserved unto ourselves. Rights which DO NOT come from the federal government. These Rights are ours, we declared them and we defend them AGAINST government alienation.


The doomsayer scenario?

Step 1) Classify as enemy combatants
Step 2)
ricks.foreignpolicy.com
 
2013-01-18 05:44:52 PM

ProfessorOhki: Clemkadidlefark: All you anti-gun whackos, how're you non-gun owners going to disarm us?

Nighttime Shoot

... and that's just the smallest sliver of the tiniest percent of the overwhelming majority of Americans who will resist anyone trying to abridge their 2nd Amendment Rights. Rights which We The People reserved unto ourselves. Rights which DO NOT come from the federal government. These Rights are ours, we declared them and we defend them AGAINST government alienation.

The doomsayer scenario?

Step 1) Classify as enemy combatants
Step 2)
[ricks.foreignpolicy.com image 625x348]


Nice, but too pricey for my budget.
 
2013-01-18 05:51:14 PM

ProfessorOhki: Clemkadidlefark: All you anti-gun whackos, how're you non-gun owners going to disarm us?

Nighttime Shoot

... and that's just the smallest sliver of the tiniest percent of the overwhelming majority of Americans who will resist anyone trying to abridge their 2nd Amendment Rights. Rights which We The People reserved unto ourselves. Rights which DO NOT come from the federal government. These Rights are ours, we declared them and we defend them AGAINST government alienation.

The doomsayer scenario?

Step 1) Classify as enemy combatants
Step 2)
[ricks.foreignpolicy.com image 625x348]


Now THAT looks like a penis.
 
2013-01-18 05:55:40 PM

spacelord321: ProfessorOhki: Holocaust Agnostic: ProfessorOhki: simplicimus: ProfessorOhki: geo9270: Xythero: So what? It was an unloaded gun that was inspected by police before enterring the chamber. What's the big deal?

The 4 Basic Rules of Gun Safety:

•Treat all guns as if they are loaded.

•Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.

•Keep your finger off the trigger until your sights are on the target.

•Be sure of your target and what is beyond it.


How many did this moran violate? (Hint ALL OF THEM)

So?

So, people who have no idea how to handle a gun should not be proposing legislation on guns. I'm supposed to let idiots describe what an "assault weapon" is? All guns are assault weapons, as are my bow, crossbow and swords. Probably my cutlery.

And non-economists shouldn't make propose economic legislation, non-engineers shouldn't propose internet legislation, and non-doctors shouldn't propose medical legislation, right? If that's your argument, I'm all for it. If you think it only applies to this one topic... derp.

Cool strawman brown, but knowing not to wave a gun around a crowded room with your finger isn't gunsmith level expertise.

Again, so what? Are you suggesting that you should need to know anything about gun safety to own and brandish a gun? That's some commie pinko socio liberal nazi talk right there.

Goalpost moving as well?


That's cute; you think I actually set goalposts. Nah, the point is the more you criticize what he did with a gun, the stronger the case you make for the control of guns. If you're saying it's an absolute right, then him being a complete moron is fine because he didn't actually endanger or threaten anyone - ergo, he was just carrying openly, right? If you're saying that he shouldn't have been allowed to do it, then you're making an argument for gun control based on something.

There's basically three stances you can have:
1) Trust all John Q. Publics with guns, as is their inalienable right; that means that you've got to accept that people will do stupid things with them and that there's nothing you can do about it; you can try to educate, but not force
2) Ban all guns.
3) The middle ground in which you admit that you're pro-gun control and then address the real debate of where those lines should be drawn.

You can't hold 1 and 3 at the same time. If you're against all gun control, you've got to come to terms with the fact that some people will totally disregard safe handling.
 
2013-01-18 05:56:19 PM
Correct me if I am wrong, but the goal is to keep dangerous weapons out of the hands of untrained asshats, eh?
Case in point!

This moran is the poster child for who should not have access to weapons.
 
2013-01-18 05:57:44 PM
But FWIW, I agree that those lines should be drawn by someone who knows what a barrel shroud is.
 
Displayed 50 of 239 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report