If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Reason Magazine)   2 Girls + 1 Cup = 4 Years   (reason.com) divider line 419
    More: Asinine, victimless crimes, Naruto characters, sexual exploitation, U.S. Department of Justice  
•       •       •

46396 clicks; posted to Main » on 17 Jan 2013 at 12:16 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



419 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-17 03:15:36 AM

starsrift: casual disregard: I'm exasperated. It's not noise, it's expression. It is not something that "should" be done but rather we must accept that it "can" be done.

I accept that awful people will say awful things. I accept that I must tolerate these things in order to live free.

I am an avowed leftist. I could not exist without free speech.

I don't disagree with accepting that people can be allowed to say awful things. Or things, rather, that I think are awful.

But I'm not convinced this film is actually saying or expressing anything.


It doesn't matter! This "film" is a piece of crap!

It cannot be against he law.

If that doesn't settle the discussion, I don't know what will.
 
2013-01-17 03:17:06 AM
Ugh. I saw the original. OK, It grossed me out enough to the point where I don't even order chocolate soft-serve any more. Especially with sprinkles.

However, the article said there were animals involved. I'm done. Until Mr. Ed can sign a consent form, with notaries, and witnesses to his <b>compos mentis</b>... We're done. Put this turd away.
 
2013-01-17 03:17:41 AM

Deman: FARK come to read about corprophilic videos, then discuss animal farkers


Why do you think cholos post pony pics all the time? Some farkers are the bottom of the barrel.
 
2013-01-17 03:20:52 AM

Deman: Bumblefark: Deman: dopekitty74: Deman: Bumblefark: no clever name here just move along: You shouldn't go to jail for poor taste.

farking animals isn't poor taste. It's farking animals. Yes; if you have a hand in that, you need to go to jail. Or, an asylum. I really don't care which.

Its an abuse of a position of power/authority over a sentient being in the worst way.

Pfft.. I'm sure the male dogs farking the girls in the videos are SO traumatized

/eyeroll
//not my thing, but i've seen enough of those sorts of stories floating around to know that some women ARE into it, and in a big way

The dogs enjoying it doesn't make what I said any less true.

True, but it was said with an eyeroll. (AN EYEROLL!). Surely, you are humbled by the passive-aggressive tactics of every petulant 14 year old, everywhere.

Stand down, sir. You are no match.

I post from mobile with a character limit. Sorry if I sound curt, just trying to be succint


Fair enough. I apologize for the dick remark.

The issue for me isn't so much the ability of an animal to consent. The issue for me is that no happy and healthy human being has sex with animals. They just don't.

I certainly don't support jailing people who do have sex with animals, for much the same reasons you allude to. The person has plainly not hurt anyone else, and (while I do think it is abuse to the animal, even if no pain is felt) I don't think the injury justifies something as serious as a loss of civil liberties for the perpetrator. Maybe in a country that treated its inmates more humanely, I'd have a different opinion...but, hey, it's the US.

My problem is with the pornographer. The only possible way a guy make films like this is by exploiting some pretty vulnerable people. A pimp with a camera is still a pimp.

And a pimp that inflicts this sort of humiliation and degradation on his ladies (no matter how enthusiastic they might be about their own debasement) deserves to be stomped to death in the slowest and most painful fashion imaginable.
 
2013-01-17 03:24:10 AM

The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: 1derful: Mike Chewbacca: AverageAmericanGuy: The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: Am I the only one here who didn't miss the part about animals or is animal abuse not a big deal any more?

Animal abuse is abuse in much the same way self abuse is abuse.

When I abuse myself, I give myself consent. Therefore, it is not abuse. Animals cannot consent to engaging in sex acts with humans. Therefore, it is abuse.

So if an orangutan rapes a woman, it's a case of the woman abusing an orangutan? Or since the woman didn't consent, is it just mutual abuse?

OMFG, are you serious?


Yes I am.

By your logic, any sex act between an animal and human is abuse. What if the animal instigates the act without the human's consent?
 
2013-01-17 03:27:08 AM

Bumblefark: Deman: Bumblefark: Deman: dopekitty74: Deman: Bumblefark: no clever name here just move along: You shouldn't go to jail for poor taste.

farking animals isn't poor taste. It's farking animals. Yes; if you have a hand in that, you need to go to jail. Or, an asylum. I really don't care which.

Its an abuse of a position of power/authority over a sentient being in the worst way.

Pfft.. I'm sure the male dogs farking the girls in the videos are SO traumatized

/eyeroll
//not my thing, but i've seen enough of those sorts of stories floating around to know that some women ARE into it, and in a big way

The dogs enjoying it doesn't make what I said any less true.

True, but it was said with an eyeroll. (AN EYEROLL!). Surely, you are humbled by the passive-aggressive tactics of every petulant 14 year old, everywhere.

Stand down, sir. You are no match.

I post from mobile with a character limit. Sorry if I sound curt, just trying to be succint

Fair enough. I apologize for the dick remark.

The issue for me isn't so much the ability of an animal to consent. The issue for me is that no happy and healthy human being has sex with animals. They just don't.

I certainly don't support jailing people who do have sex with animals, for much the same reasons you allude to. The person has plainly not hurt anyone else, and (while I do think it is abuse to the animal, even if no pain is felt) I don't think the injury justifies something as serious as a loss of civil liberties for the perpetrator. Maybe in a country that treated its inmates more humanely, I'd have a different opinion...but, hey, it's the US.

My problem is with the pornographer. The only possible way a guy make films like this is by exploiting some pretty vulnerable people. A pimp with a camera is still a pimp.

And a pimp that inflicts this sort of humiliation and degradation on his ladies (no matter how enthusiastic they might be about their own debasement) deserves to be stomped to death in the slowest and most painful fashion imaginable.


How do you know the happiness and health of the people that choose to have sex with animals?

/someone's doing something i think is icky, they must be somehow damaged to want to do that!
 
2013-01-17 03:29:23 AM
So if an orangutan rapes a woman, it's a case of the woman abusing an orangutan? Or since the woman didn't consent, is it just mutual abuse?

*blink*
 
2013-01-17 03:30:00 AM

1derful: The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: 1derful: Mike Chewbacca: AverageAmericanGuy: The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: Am I the only one here who didn't miss the part about animals or is animal abuse not a big deal any more?

Animal abuse is abuse in much the same way self abuse is abuse.

When I abuse myself, I give myself consent. Therefore, it is not abuse. Animals cannot consent to engaging in sex acts with humans. Therefore, it is abuse.

So if an orangutan rapes a woman, it's a case of the woman abusing an orangutan? Or since the woman didn't consent, is it just mutual abuse?

OMFG, are you serious?

Yes I am.

By your logic, any sex act between an animal and human is abuse. What if the animal instigates the act without the human's consent?


So did you have a bad experience once? Did the animal not call you the next day? WTF dude? Do you often find yourself in situations where you are at risk of being raped by an animal? I don't think I have ever once thought to myself "watch out, that animal might rape me" and I don't think I know or have heard of anybody else who has either. But maybe I just don't get out enough or don't hang around the right people?

But since we're on the subject, how does the dog get the woman's clothes off before he rapes her?
 
2013-01-17 03:31:22 AM

Mock26: Dear Jurors,

Ever hear of the FIRST AMENDMENT?


Ever hear about not wasting everyone's time. So the movie gross. Well I've seen it, it's not that gross. Certainly we have some bankers, crooked politicians, and actual criminals to put in jail?
 
2013-01-17 03:34:32 AM

The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill:

So did you have a bad experience once? Did the animal not call you the next day? WTF dude? Do you often find yourself in situations where you are at risk of being raped by an animal? I don't think I have ever once thought to myself "watch out, that animal might rape me" and I don't think I know or have heard of anybody else who has either. But maybe I just don't get out enough or don't hang around the right people?



www.premiumhollywood.com
 
2013-01-17 03:36:05 AM

dopekitty74: Bumblefark: Deman: Bumblefark: Deman: dopekitty74: Deman: Bumblefark: no clever name here just move along: You shouldn't go to jail for poor taste.

farking animals isn't poor taste. It's farking animals. Yes; if you have a hand in that, you need to go to jail. Or, an asylum. I really don't care which.

Its an abuse of a position of power/authority over a sentient being in the worst way.

Pfft.. I'm sure the male dogs farking the girls in the videos are SO traumatized

/eyeroll
//not my thing, but i've seen enough of those sorts of stories floating around to know that some women ARE into it, and in a big way

The dogs enjoying it doesn't make what I said any less true.

True, but it was said with an eyeroll. (AN EYEROLL!). Surely, you are humbled by the passive-aggressive tactics of every petulant 14 year old, everywhere.

Stand down, sir. You are no match.

I post from mobile with a character limit. Sorry if I sound curt, just trying to be succint

Fair enough. I apologize for the dick remark.

The issue for me isn't so much the ability of an animal to consent. The issue for me is that no happy and healthy human being has sex with animals. They just don't.

I certainly don't support jailing people who do have sex with animals, for much the same reasons you allude to. The person has plainly not hurt anyone else, and (while I do think it is abuse to the animal, even if no pain is felt) I don't think the injury justifies something as serious as a loss of civil liberties for the perpetrator. Maybe in a country that treated its inmates more humanely, I'd have a different opinion...but, hey, it's the US.

My problem is with the pornographer. The only possible way a guy make films like this is by exploiting some pretty vulnerable people. A pimp with a camera is still a pimp.

And a pimp that inflicts this sort of humiliation and degradation on his ladies (no matter how enthusiastic they might be about their own debasement) deserves to be stomped to death in the slowest a ...


Well, because I spent a career studying such things.

You?
 
2013-01-17 03:36:50 AM

The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: 1derful: The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: 1derful: Mike Chewbacca: AverageAmericanGuy: The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: Am I the only one here who didn't miss the part about animals or is animal abuse not a big deal any more?

Animal abuse is abuse in much the same way self abuse is abuse.

When I abuse myself, I give myself consent. Therefore, it is not abuse. Animals cannot consent to engaging in sex acts with humans. Therefore, it is abuse.

So if an orangutan rapes a woman, it's a case of the woman abusing an orangutan? Or since the woman didn't consent, is it just mutual abuse?

OMFG, are you serious?

Yes I am.

By your logic, any sex act between an animal and human is abuse. What if the animal instigates the act without the human's consent?

So did you have a bad experience once? Did the animal not call you the next day? WTF dude? Do you often find yourself in situations where you are at risk of being raped by an animal? I don't think I have ever once thought to myself "watch out, that animal might rape me" and I don't think I know or have heard of anybody else who has either. But maybe I just don't get out enough or don't hang around the right people?

But since we're on the subject, how does the dog get the woman's clothes off before he rapes her?


I think we just found the victim of this brutal attack. NSFW
 
2013-01-17 03:40:13 AM

spman: casual disregard: Nevermind the content, depraved as it is. We just became a non-free society through this decision.

I disagree, and I'm a big first amendment supporter. To me, this is up there with something like Bum Fights, there has to be SOME limit somewhere, even if it's at the most extreme like this stuff is. When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.


By "big first amendment supporter", I assume you mean you're significantly less than mass-deprived. Y'know, the inability to downvote is a good reason that fark loses people to reddit.
 
2013-01-17 03:47:22 AM
What I'm getting from this thread:

1. Urgh, poop. Gross. But it's not harming anyone, so...
2. Doggy Sex. Urgh, sentient being. Not consensual. Kill the bastard.

Well, about the doggy not being cogniscent of choice:

www.howpilgrim.comv025o.popscreen.com
3.bp.blogspot.com t2.gstatic.com

Dogs will fark humans if given the chance. Fact. Some let it. And Die:

Woman Dies of Allergic Reaction to the Dog She Had Sex With [Image of a woman and a dog that did not have sex via Shutterstock]
 
2013-01-17 03:49:24 AM

log_jammin: So if an orangutan rapes a woman, it's a case of the woman abusing an orangutan? Or since the woman didn't consent, is it just mutual abuse?

*blink*


i think my 'wtfamireading' moment came with comparing washing your dogs ass to humping it.

fark is where analogy goes to die, and be reborn zombified.
 
2013-01-17 03:50:04 AM

GungFu: Dogs will fark humans if given the chance. Fact. Some let it. And Die:


so never EVER turn your back on a dog, or it will rape you.
 
2013-01-17 03:50:19 AM
RIP art. Just because something grosses you out doesn't mean it's not art. To kids, paintings and statues from the renaissance are uninteresting, crappy, and worthless while adult collectors pay millions for them. Others can be satisfied simply by blowjob videos or gangbang ones, while others need different types of sex play, even if it includes fecal matter and other stuff. Let them fantasize and enjoy what gets them excited!
 
2013-01-17 03:52:57 AM

heap: fark is where analogy goes to die, and be reborn zombified.


That's about the best summary I've seen.

Best I can come up with is, this is where people take things to their logical conclusions...and then go 400 light years beyond that.
 
2013-01-17 03:55:55 AM
First they came for the Potheads, but I don't smoke so I said nothing. Next they came for the gun nuts, but I don't own guns, so I said nothing. Finally they're here for the dog/pig/chicken/horse farkers and suddenly people give a fark about the bill of rights?

Farkers suck.
 
2013-01-17 03:56:59 AM
FTFA: "Federal prosecutors had to try Isaacs three times before winning a conviction."

Triple Jeopardy... where the winnings can really stack up...
 
2013-01-17 03:57:16 AM
So this is what was meant by "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it".

We already knew that the 1st amendment had limits. "Fire!" in a crowded theater, High Schoolers being punished for signs they held at protests outside of school. School Children not being allowed to protest and say whatever they want at School. Why is it so surprising that we have obscenity limits as well? I'm not asking is it right... I'm asking it is surprising given that, like I said, the 1st amendment isn't absolute and we still live in a relatively puritanical society. Especially with the way the Dominionists and the fundy's have been getting their second wind since Dubya and even more so Obama were elected.

The rage may be warranted, but is anyone surprised?
 
2013-01-17 03:57:27 AM
Bestiality is weird. The claim is made that it's wrong because the animal can't consent. I'm pretty sure the cow that became my steak tonight didn't consent to having a metal bolt shoved through its brain, its throat cut open to bleed out, its flesh cleaved into manageable pieces, those pieces being cooked over a wood charcoal stove until a beautiful medium-rare, then served next to a heaping helping of mashed potatoes, corn on the cob, and washed down with a cold beer.

Is it because humans possibly derive pleasure from bestiality? Well no, I wouldn't think so. I derived pleasure from my steak so that can't be it (I could probably pleasure myself WITH the steak and it still wouldn't be illegal).

Then of course there's always the problem of how cows are bred. It generally starts with some dude giving a bull a handy. Is that bestiality? Is Mike Rowe a cow rapist for artificially inseminating a cow?

Honestly, until any sexual contact done upon an animal is made illegal for any reason as, well as killing or harming an animal is still legal, the only reason I can see for making bestiality illegal is because it makes people uncomfortable and its icky.
 
2013-01-17 04:01:39 AM

Uchiha_Cycliste: So this is what was meant by "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it".

We already knew that the 1st amendment had limits. "Fire!" in a crowded theater, High Schoolers being punished for signs they held at protests outside of school. School Children not being allowed to protest and say whatever they want at School. Why is it so surprising that we have obscenity limits as well? I'm not asking is it right... I'm asking it is surprising given that, like I said, the 1st amendment isn't absolute and we still live in a relatively puritanical society. Especially with the way the Dominionists and the fundy's have been getting their second wind since Dubya and even more so Obama were elected.

The rage may be warranted, but is anyone surprised?


You think this country would be less Jesusified if Romney was elected?
 
2013-01-17 04:02:21 AM

HindiDiscoMonster: FTFA: "Federal prosecutors had to try Isaacs three times before winning a conviction."

Triple Jeopardy... where the winnings can really stack up...


Well, they only said no *double* jeopardy... never triple jeopardy. So technically this is ok, the best kind of ok.

Also, there are *SO* many things wrong with this conviction =/
 
2013-01-17 04:02:30 AM

Korzine: Bestiality is weird. The claim is made that it's wrong because the animal can't consent. I'm pretty sure the cow that became my steak tonight didn't consent to having a metal bolt shoved through its brain, its throat cut open to bleed out, its flesh cleaved into manageable pieces, those pieces being cooked over a wood charcoal stove until a beautiful medium-rare, then served next to a heaping helping of mashed potatoes, corn on the cob, and washed down with a cold beer.

Is it because humans possibly derive pleasure from bestiality? Well no, I wouldn't think so. I derived pleasure from my steak so that can't be it (I could probably pleasure myself WITH the steak and it still wouldn't be illegal).

Then of course there's always the problem of how cows are bred. It generally starts with some dude giving a bull a handy. Is that bestiality? Is Mike Rowe a cow rapist for artificially inseminating a cow?

Honestly, until any sexual contact done upon an animal is made illegal for any reason as, well as killing or harming an animal is still legal, the only reason I can see for making bestiality illegal is because it makes people uncomfortable and its icky.


you know....in a way...you basically just said as long as we have capital punishment then pedophilia is ok.
 
2013-01-17 04:03:07 AM

Korzine: Bestiality is weird. The claim is made that it's wrong because the animal can't consent. I'm pretty sure the cow that became my steak tonight didn't consent to having a metal bolt shoved through its brain, its throat cut open to bleed out, its flesh cleaved into manageable pieces, those pieces being cooked over a wood charcoal stove until a beautiful medium-rare, then served next to a heaping helping of mashed potatoes, corn on the cob, and washed down with a cold beer.

Is it because humans possibly derive pleasure from bestiality? Well no, I wouldn't think so. I derived pleasure from my steak so that can't be it (I could probably pleasure myself WITH the steak and it still wouldn't be illegal).

Then of course there's always the problem of how cows are bred. It generally starts with some dude giving a bull a handy. Is that bestiality? Is Mike Rowe a cow rapist for artificially inseminating a cow?

Honestly, until any sexual contact done upon an animal is made illegal for any reason as, well as killing or harming an animal is still legal, the only reason I can see for making bestiality illegal is because it makes people uncomfortable and its icky.


Tell you what...fark a cow, and let us know how it goes. You seem an open minded sort. If it is really just an irrational societal taboo, surely you have no problem with this experiment.

Otherwise, I guess we have to assume you are a penny-ante philosopher confused by your own thought process.

Do let us know.
 
2013-01-17 04:05:53 AM

Korzine: Bestiality is weird. The claim is made that it's wrong because the animal can't consent. I'm pretty sure the cow that became my steak tonight didn't consent to having a metal bolt shoved through its brain, its throat cut open to bleed out, its flesh cleaved into manageable pieces, those pieces being cooked over a wood charcoal stove until a beautiful medium-rare, then served next to a heaping helping of mashed potatoes, corn on the cob, and washed down with a cold beer.

Is it because humans possibly derive pleasure from bestiality? Well no, I wouldn't think so. I derived pleasure from my steak so that can't be it (I could probably pleasure myself WITH the steak and it still wouldn't be illegal).

Then of course there's always the problem of how cows are bred. It generally starts with some dude giving a bull a handy. Is that bestiality? Is Mike Rowe a cow rapist for artificially inseminating a cow?

Honestly, until any sexual contact done upon an animal is made illegal for any reason as, well as killing or harming an animal is still legal, the only reason I can see for making bestiality illegal is because it makes people uncomfortable and its icky.


You haven't eaten a steak in a long time that came from a cow that was stunned/killed with a captive bolt gun. They are stunned now with electricity. Like a big ass wall mounted stun gun.
 
2013-01-17 04:06:59 AM

thisisarepeat: Uchiha_Cycliste: So this is what was meant by "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it".

We already knew that the 1st amendment had limits. "Fire!" in a crowded theater, High Schoolers being punished for signs they held at protests outside of school. School Children not being allowed to protest and say whatever they want at School. Why is it so surprising that we have obscenity limits as well? I'm not asking is it right... I'm asking it is surprising given that, like I said, the 1st amendment isn't absolute and we still live in a relatively puritanical society. Especially with the way the Dominionists and the fundy's have been getting their second wind since Dubya and even more so Obama were elected.

The rage may be warranted, but is anyone surprised?

You think this country would be less Jesusified if Romney was elected?



I don't know I firmly believe that there are a shiat load of people that are more vocal and more active because the president is black. Who can say if they would pipe down and relax if we returned to the status-quo and president c.c.c.c.c.c...combo breaker was not re-elected? Needless to say; thank God! that he was re-elected

\ ♪ Nobody knows ♪
\\♫ Nobody Knows ♪
\\\obscure?
 
2013-01-17 04:07:06 AM

thisisarepeat: Korzine: Bestiality is weird. The claim is made that it's wrong because the animal can't consent. I'm pretty sure the cow that became my steak tonight didn't consent to having a metal bolt shoved through its brain, its throat cut open to bleed out, its flesh cleaved into manageable pieces, those pieces being cooked over a wood charcoal stove until a beautiful medium-rare, then served next to a heaping helping of mashed potatoes, corn on the cob, and washed down with a cold beer.

Is it because humans possibly derive pleasure from bestiality? Well no, I wouldn't think so. I derived pleasure from my steak so that can't be it (I could probably pleasure myself WITH the steak and it still wouldn't be illegal).

Then of course there's always the problem of how cows are bred. It generally starts with some dude giving a bull a handy. Is that bestiality? Is Mike Rowe a cow rapist for artificially inseminating a cow?

Honestly, until any sexual contact done upon an animal is made illegal for any reason as, well as killing or harming an animal is still legal, the only reason I can see for making bestiality illegal is because it makes people uncomfortable and its icky.

You haven't eaten a steak in a long time that came from a cow that was stunned/killed with a captive bolt gun. They are stunned now with electricity. Like a big ass wall mounted stun gun.


Ergo, the cow was totally asking for it.
 
2013-01-17 04:07:15 AM

log_jammin: Korzine: Bestiality is weird. The claim is made that it's wrong because the animal can't consent. I'm pretty sure the cow that became my steak tonight didn't consent to having a metal bolt shoved through its brain, its throat cut open to bleed out, its flesh cleaved into manageable pieces, those pieces being cooked over a wood charcoal stove until a beautiful medium-rare, then served next to a heaping helping of mashed potatoes, corn on the cob, and washed down with a cold beer.

Is it because humans possibly derive pleasure from bestiality? Well no, I wouldn't think so. I derived pleasure from my steak so that can't be it (I could probably pleasure myself WITH the steak and it still wouldn't be illegal).

Then of course there's always the problem of how cows are bred. It generally starts with some dude giving a bull a handy. Is that bestiality? Is Mike Rowe a cow rapist for artificially inseminating a cow?

Honestly, until any sexual contact done upon an animal is made illegal for any reason as, well as killing or harming an animal is still legal, the only reason I can see for making bestiality illegal is because it makes people uncomfortable and its icky.

you know....in a way...you basically just said as long as we have capital punishment then pedophilia is ok.


How?
 
2013-01-17 04:08:30 AM

The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: 1derful: The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: 1derful: Mike Chewbacca: AverageAmericanGuy: The Short Bald Guy from Benny Hill: Am I the only one here who didn't miss the part about animals or is animal abuse not a big deal any more?

Animal abuse is abuse in much the same way self abuse is abuse.

When I abuse myself, I give myself consent. Therefore, it is not abuse. Animals cannot consent to engaging in sex acts with humans. Therefore, it is abuse.

So if an orangutan rapes a woman, it's a case of the woman abusing an orangutan? Or since the woman didn't consent, is it just mutual abuse?

OMFG, are you serious?

Yes I am.

By your logic, any sex act between an animal and human is abuse. What if the animal instigates the act without the human's consent?

So did you have a bad experience once? Did the animal not call you the next day? WTF dude? Do you often find yourself in situations where you are at risk of being raped by an animal? I don't think I have ever once thought to myself "watch out, that animal might rape me" and I don't think I know or have heard of anybody else who has either. But maybe I just don't get out enough or don't hang around the right people?

But since we're on the subject, how does the dog get the woman's clothes off before he rapes her?



I'm a 5' tall female. When I was a teenager, a giant stray black lab jumped me in my front yard. He pinned me down on the ground and went to work. If I had been involved in an activity that required little clothing, such as swimming, the dog absolutely would have successfully raped me. Fortunately, that was not the case. It took my dad and two neighbors to pull him off of me. I'm not saying it's a common situation, but it can happen.

On another note, there are some very interesting discussions in this thread. Who knew fecal porn and animal farking could inspire such a wealth of ideas?
 
2013-01-17 04:14:26 AM

EVERYBODY PANIC: Dear Mr. Campbell, you may be right. Please offer a better definition. I'm open about this. Tonight may just get interesting after all.


Research positive liberty and negative liberty. Also read up on the tragedy of the commons. What you're espousing, simple libertarianism, isn't well-equipped to deal with the real problems facing humans in modern society. Sorry I don't have more time to engage you.
 
2013-01-17 04:18:08 AM

GungFu: Woman Dies of Allergic Reaction to the Dog She Had Sex With [Image of a woman and a dog that did not have sex via Shutterstock]


Oh man, I just like to imagine the chick in the photo reading this article.

I'll just sell this cute stock photo of me and Sparky. Maybe a pet hotel or something can use it on their website, yay!
WOMAN KILLED BY DOG SPERM AFTER SEXING UP DOG SHE MET ON INTERNET
._.
 
2013-01-17 04:19:35 AM
If he gets 4 years for 2 videos... oh man am I in trouble :P

spman: casual disregard: Nevermind the content, depraved as it is. We just became a non-free society through this decision.

I disagree, and I'm a big first amendment supporter. To me, this is up there with something like Bum Fights, there has to be SOME limit somewhere, even if it's at the most extreme like this stuff is. When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.

I can't even fathom a way in which scat porn would actually be legit, how a person could even tolerate the smell, much less perform any sort of activity with it is beyond my ability to comprehend. The fact that you never read about these Brazilian women getting salmonella and hepatitis and dying leads me to believe most of it is fake. I think the government even tried to prosecute the US distributor for the 2 Girls 1 Cup movie, and even he admitted that it was all fake, since they couldn't find women who would actually agree to do it.

As for the bestiality stuff, that I don't even want to know. All I can say is you must have one HELL of a drug habit to agree to participate in that stuff.


1 Fark you
2. Fark you to hell
3. No there should be no limits right up til someone is actually victimized. NOTHING short of that should be limited.
4. Fark your sexual morals
5. You don't understand what feces is in the first place. Mostly partially digested food but also bacteria THAT LIVES IN YOUR INTESTINES(population TRIILIONS). So if a person ate their own poo (assuming it just came out and did not land on the floor/dirt/etc), they would be taking in (mostly helptful) bacteria that ALREADY live in their intestines. And also food.

Eating another person's poo caries the risk that they may have some sort of infection(or even parasite) that you can thus catch from them.
6. Things like that do NOT need to be stopped. I can see no reason that the role of government in making things illegal should extend beyond stopping you from doing things that harm other people, and conversely stopping other people from doing things that harm you. There is no reason for them to intrude into peoples lives such to stop us from willingly choosing behaviors which only harm ourselves. Be that drinking alcohol(as long as we don't drive), requiring seat belts, or having very odd fetishes.
7. Fark you, freedom is more important than your morals.

spman: I'm not saying anything about it being gross. I'm saying it should be illegal because it's a dangerous activity that can't be done safely. If you eat, or hell just come in contact with human waste, at least in the sort of manner that you would in a porno, you WILL get sick, possibly fatally so. Find me a scenario where you are eating human shiat and not getting ill, and I will agree it should be legal.


Fecal Transplant biatch. Yes, that can involve doctors actually making someone digest feces... to save their life. Seems you have something off in your facts.

I'd also like to point out that dogs will instinctually eat feces they just happen to find laying around(where any type of bacteria has a good chance to multiply within it). They live. It is nutrition.

spman: Do you believe that if a man is so desperate to provide for his family, and finds someone willing to pay them enough to last the rest of their lives, and all the man has to do is shoot himself on camera? It doesn't matter if he dies or not, just shoot himself on camera, not in the arm or in the foot, maybe in the gut or the chest where you reasonably stand a chance of hitting some vital organs. Should this be legal?


You know I'm actually fine with that on a basis of what should be legal. I think anyone offering that deal to the man is a serious piece of shiat, but still if that man is free to choose(with no consequence from refusing) then I don't think there should be a law against it. I think that suicide should be perfectly legal. See #6 above.

If you can't even choose to cease living(no matter your motivations), then you have not any real freedom at all. You might think that is crazy, but if the government alone can make that illegal, then they have made YOUR LIFE their choice. In other words, you don't even own your own life.
Authoritarians like you can screw off now.
 
2013-01-17 04:25:30 AM

log_jammin:

you know....in a way...you basically just said as long as we have capital punishment then pedophilia is ok.


I'm pretty sure killing and eating children is illegal as well as is artificially inseminating them. So that would make the criteria of pedophilia being illegal as not hypocritical. I'm not 100% sure what capital punishment has to do with anything either. Unless your arguing that using capital punishment on children should also make pedophilia legal. Which even then isn't really the same as my argument as I'm pretty sure they don't mass use the death penalty on children.

Bumblefark: Tell you what...fark a cow, and let us know how it goes. You seem an open minded sort. If it is really just an irrational societal taboo, surely you have no problem with this experiment.

Otherwise, I guess we have to assume you are a penny-ante philosopher confused by your own thought process.

Do let us know.


No, because I think bestiality is gross. I also think sex between two dudes is gross too, but I'm not on a morality crusade to get it banned because I realize that my personal feelings shouldn't dictate law for everyone else. Plus, I'm pretty sure even if bestiality is hypothetically legal, having sex with someones cows would still be breaking some sort of property laws.
 
2013-01-17 04:27:43 AM

thisisarepeat: How?


he said that since we can kill it without it's consent, then we shouldn't make farking it illegal since it can't give its consent. right?

well then if we can kill people legally without their consent(capital punishment, war, etc..), then obviously we shouldn't make it illegal to fark people who can't give their consent (children, the disabled, etc..)either.
 
2013-01-17 04:28:29 AM

Korzine: but I'm not on a morality crusade to get it banned because I realize that my personal feelings shouldn't dictate law for everyone else


This makes you a better person than practically 99.99% of God-botherers in this country.

\Please don't mistake this comment for implying that you are a god botherer.
\\I'm just saying you are a much better person than all the asses that believe they should do what you just said you wouldn't.
 
2013-01-17 04:28:36 AM
Now where the hell am I going to get any of these videos since he is out of business?
 
2013-01-17 04:32:19 AM

MayoSlather: Uranus Is Huge!: Real poo or simulated poo?

It matters.

From what I've read it wasn't real poo. Still gross, but it was some sort of chocolate mixture, and not actual poo.


NEVER let them see the end of The Bloodhound Gang's video "Bad Touch"
 
2013-01-17 04:34:57 AM

Korzine: I'm pretty sure killing and eating children is illegal as well as is artificially inseminating them.


I wasn't talking about what is currently legal or illegal.
 
2013-01-17 04:38:35 AM

log_jammin: thisisarepeat: How?

he said that since we can kill it without it's consent, then we shouldn't make farking it illegal since it can't give its consent. right?

well then if we can kill people legally without their consent(capital punishment, war, etc..), then obviously we shouldn't make it illegal to fark people who can't give their consent (children, the disabled, etc..)either.


I'm not going to go on a big pro rush rant so you can take a breath/shot/hit/whatever. But why do you believe it would be traumatic t...Fark this. Of course its wrong to fark livestock, but with all those stoners out there do you think its an effective use of resources to try this cow farkerologist?
 
2013-01-17 04:41:06 AM
You shouldn't be able to torture kittens just because animal control gasses them without written consent.
 
2013-01-17 04:42:23 AM

farkRus: I'm a 5' tall female. When I was a teenager, a giant stray black lab jumped me in my front yard. He pinned me down on the ground and went to work. If I had been involved in an activity that required little clothing, such as swimming, the dog absolutely would have successfully raped me. Fortunately, that was not the case. It took my dad and two neighbors to pull him off of me. I'm not saying it's a common situation, but it can happen.

On another note, there are some very interesting discussions in this thread. Who knew fecal porn and animal farking could inspire such a wealth of ideas?


I have been assured this is bullshiat. There are no females on the internet.
 
2013-01-17 04:42:40 AM

HindiDiscoMonster: MayoSlather: Uranus Is Huge!: Real poo or simulated poo?

It matters.

From what I've read it wasn't real poo. Still gross, but it was some sort of chocolate mixture, and not actual poo.

NEVER let them see the end of The Bloodhound Gang's video "Bad Touch"


It was still served from an anus.
 
2013-01-17 04:43:56 AM

thisisarepeat: You shouldn't be able to torture kittens just because animal control gasses them without written consent.


precisely.
 
2013-01-17 04:45:59 AM
Thank God that Archer ad teh two native girls being covered in every bodily fluid known to man, when Archer is the Prate Kind isn't considered obscene.
 
2013-01-17 04:46:46 AM

ariosto: Meh. Everyone knows swap.avi was better.


This.

/obligatory Something Awful swap.avi review
 
2013-01-17 04:47:40 AM

Uchiha_Cycliste: Thank God that Archer ad teh two native girls being covered in every bodily fluid known to man, when Archer is the Prate Kind isn't considered obscene.


I just started watching that show yesterday. nice to know what I have to look forward to.
 
2013-01-17 04:51:11 AM

log_jammin: Uchiha_Cycliste: Thank God that Archer ad teh two native girls being covered in every bodily fluid known to man, when Archer is the Prate Kind isn't considered obscene.

I just started watching that show yesterday. nice to know what I have to look forward to.


Archer as the Pirate King is pretty Bad-ass. And Bonus, there is a super bad-ass character that is voiced by Brock f*cking Samson!
 
2013-01-17 04:52:14 AM
also, sorry bout the pseudo-spoiler.
 
Displayed 50 of 419 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report