If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Reason Magazine)   2 Girls + 1 Cup = 4 Years   (reason.com) divider line 419
    More: Asinine, victimless crimes, Naruto characters, sexual exploitation, U.S. Department of Justice  
•       •       •

46391 clicks; posted to Main » on 17 Jan 2013 at 12:16 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



419 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-17 12:35:51 AM
Next we need to round up all the people who make hate speeches towards anyone rich.
 
2013-01-17 12:36:18 AM

spman: When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.


So the Jackass crew should be arrested? How about the producers of Cops? Skydiving videos? X-games participants? the NFL?

I'd rather take a log to the chest than get a concussion from the 350# linebacker.
 
2013-01-17 12:36:31 AM

untaken_name: spman: When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.

So you are also against skydiving, jogging, mountain climbing, driving cars, flying on airplanes, and taking showers? Did you know that people DIE doing all of those things? THEY MUST BE STOPPED NOW!!!11!



Yes, but we take precautions when engaging in those activities in order to make them safer. What kind of precautions are there to prevent a person to get horribly sick and dying after eating human waste, or bleeding to death after being farked by a horse?
 
2013-01-17 12:37:37 AM

LemSkroob:
I'd rather take a log to the chest than get a concussion from the 350# linebacker.


if you do both, we could have an NFL commercial.
 
2013-01-17 12:37:42 AM
As much as I am totally not into scat... I am all for this guy. Some people get their kicks in some disgusting ways.. but if no one is hurt and everyone is willing.. who am I to say no?

My guess is this will get overturned in appeals though, tried 3 times? and the DA is gonna have to try pretty hard to proove that the jurors were NOT simply getting revenge for being forced to watch his videos.
 
2013-01-17 12:38:30 AM

LemSkroob: spman: When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.

So the Jackass crew should be arrested? How about the producers of Cops? Skydiving videos? X-games participants? the NFL?

I'd rather take a log to the chest than get a concussion from the 350# linebacker.


Jackass is a carefully orchestrated stunt show designed to look more dangerous than it really is. The NFL is going to encounter some major changes very soon in the wake of the finding from Junior Seau, bank on it.
 
2013-01-17 12:38:50 AM
I'd like to see the celebrities coming out in support of this 'artist' and his works of 'art'.

Dude's a peddler. Looks like he got Max Hardcored and didn't even get to fark anyone.

And that 2 girls 1 Cup video is fake as fark - it's just the inbuilt revulsion to anything poopy that gives it the rep. The prosecutors should have had the jurors eat some of that poop ice cream in defence. Now, TUBGIRL on the other MrHands, well...
 
2013-01-17 12:42:03 AM

JeffMD: As much as I am totally not into scat... I am all for this guy. Some people get their kicks in some disgusting ways.. but if no one is hurt and everyone is willing.. who am I to say no?

My guess is this will get overturned in appeals though, tried 3 times? and the DA is gonna have to try pretty hard to proove that the jurors were NOT simply getting revenge for being forced to watch his videos.


There's no DA he was tried by the Federal Government in Federal Court I.E. Obama's Justice(sic) Department
 
2013-01-17 12:42:43 AM
hoty
 
2013-01-17 12:42:47 AM

spman: Yes, but we take precautions when engaging in those activities in order to make them safer. What kind of precautions are there to prevent a person to get horribly sick and dying after eating human waste, or bleeding to death after being farked by a horse?


Now you're moving the goalpost. I thought you were against any activity that presented the possibility of harm to the person undertaking it. If you don't even know what precautions there are, what makes you so sure they weren't taken? Be honest, you weren't thinking about "precautions" when you first made your statement. You were thinking that activities which you agree with are fine, even if they are dangerous to the participants, and activities you find repulsive shouldn't be allowed to exist, and you used the "danger" thing as a way to plausibly oppose the activities you don't like, but didn't consider how that same rationale would apply to activities you like.
 
2013-01-17 12:43:00 AM
So, why is this in the "politics" tab?

Oh, they mentiond shiat, never mind.
 
2013-01-17 12:44:44 AM

spman: untaken_name: spman: When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.

So you are also against skydiving, jogging, mountain climbing, driving cars, flying on airplanes, and taking showers? Did you know that people DIE doing all of those things? THEY MUST BE STOPPED NOW!!!11!


Yes, but we take precautions when engaging in those activities in order to make them safer. What kind of precautions are there to prevent a person to get horribly sick and dying after eating human waste, or bleeding to death after being farked by a horse?


You can't be serious. Consenting adult behavior is seldom rational, but it should never be illegal. If you can't see why the awful writing of the Marquis de Sade should be available to the public, I don't know how to respond.
 
2013-01-17 12:44:50 AM

borg: JeffMD: As much as I am totally not into scat... I am all for this guy. Some people get their kicks in some disgusting ways.. but if no one is hurt and everyone is willing.. who am I to say no?

My guess is this will get overturned in appeals though, tried 3 times? and the DA is gonna have to try pretty hard to proove that the jurors were NOT simply getting revenge for being forced to watch his videos.

There's no DA he was tried by the Federal Government in Federal Court I.E. Obama's Justice(sic) Department


I'd like to buy a vowel punctuation mark
 
2013-01-17 12:45:19 AM
The obscene videos included a video approximately two hours in length of a female engaging in sex acts involving human bodily waste and a video one hour and 37 minutes in length of a female engaged in sex acts with animals.

Animals can't consent. Fark this guy if he thinks that's art.
 
2013-01-17 12:45:37 AM

tjfly: [media.reason.com image 275x206][www.awardscircuit.com image 661x480]


You forgot to add: upload.wikimedia.org
 
2013-01-17 12:46:20 AM
art.penny-arcade.com
 
2013-01-17 12:46:43 AM
Edward James Olmos really let himself go.
 
2013-01-17 12:47:51 AM

casual disregard: spman: casual disregard: Nevermind the content, depraved as it is. We just became a non-free society through this decision.

I disagree, and I'm a big first amendment supporter. To me, this is up there with something like Bum Fights, there has to be SOME limit somewhere, even if it's at the most extreme like this stuff is. When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.

I can't even fathom a way in which scat porn would actually be legit, how a person could even tolerate the smell, much less perform any sort of activity with it is beyond my ability to comprehend. The fact that you never read about these Brazilian women getting salmonella and hepatitis and dying leads me to believe most of it is fake. I think the government even tried to prosecute the US distributor for the 2 Girls 1 Cup movie, and even he admitted that it was all fake, since they couldn't find women who would actually agree to do it.

As for the bestiality stuff, that I don't even want to know. All I can say is you must have one HELL of a drug habit to agree to participate in that stuff.

No, fark your limits. I refuse to accept that answer.

I cannot state this more strongly. My government has no place in regulating speech. You have no place in regulating freedom.


Well, that's a bit much. I'm pretty happy with jailing people who make kiddie porn and death threats.
 
2013-01-17 12:47:59 AM

Pincy: Animals can't consent.


Neigh means neigh.
 
2013-01-17 12:48:50 AM

Paris1127: The video referenced in the headline (it's NSFW and not worth the trauma) is another man's work. What's scary is that there are probably more people out there making similar films...


Then I recommend that you (or anyone else actually sickened by 2g1c) never go to any porn torrent site and search for "mfx".  Or so I'm told by a friend.

Some of the titles of their movies are hilarious, though.  Link (very very nsfw.  Not actual movies, just a list of dvds for sale)  My favorite is "Karla's Birthday Bukkake: Bring your Diarrhea!"
 
2013-01-17 12:48:59 AM

spman: casual disregard: Nevermind the content, depraved as it is. We just became a non-free society through this decision.

I disagree, and I'm a big first amendment supporter. To me, this is up there with something like Bum Fights, there has to be SOME limit somewhere, even if it's at the most extreme like this stuff is. When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.

I can't even fathom a way in which scat porn would actually be legit, how a person could even tolerate the smell, much less perform any sort of activity with it is beyond my ability to comprehend. The fact that you never read about these Brazilian women getting salmonella and hepatitis and dying leads me to believe most of it is fake. I think the government even tried to prosecute the US distributor for the 2 Girls 1 Cup movie, and even he admitted that it was all fake, since they couldn't find women who would actually agree to do it.

As for the bestiality stuff, that I don't even want to know. All I can say is you must have one HELL of a drug habit to agree to participate in that stuff.


So do you mind explaining how scat porn is actually  dangerous? Because, while there are reasons it is (and consent issues with bestiality), your post was 'We must regulate dangerous things--and I find this icky!'.

What the jury claims is bullshiat too--this isn't exploitation. It's paid work they happen to find icky. If you're going to ban something, at least pretend you have a concrete reason. I find it icky too, but I'm not calling to ban it. There's a reason for that.

/Once you ban things because they're icky, who's to say someone won't find  you icky someday?
 
2013-01-17 12:50:43 AM

Pincy: The obscene videos included a video approximately two hours in length of a female engaging in sex acts involving human bodily waste and a video one hour and 37 minutes in length of a female engaged in sex acts with animals.

Animals can't consent. Fark this guy if he thinks that's art.


Plants can't consent. Animals have brains.

I never put one in my cat, but I promise you we can communicate on some level. Likewise I can convince a deaf man without knowing ASL.

What the fark is wrong with you people??
 
2013-01-17 12:51:36 AM

spman: Jackass is a carefully orchestrated stunt show designed to look more dangerous than it really is.


Most of that crew will be lucky if they can walk correctly by the time they are 50. The endless list of concussions, broken clavicles, burns, busted ribs, shattered hands, and torn urethras are well documented.


The NFL is going to encounter some major changes very soon in the wake of the finding from Junior Seau, bank on it.

there are billions of dollars a year that are generated out there by the NFL that like things just the way they are.
 
2013-01-17 12:51:52 AM
Where the hell was Larry Flynt in all this?  I would have thought he would come to the rescue.
I don't care for Larry's objectification of women but his photo series on what is obscene was great.
Made me really start thinking.

did Ira there make Tub Girl?  GAAAAAA
 
2013-01-17 12:55:42 AM
FTFA: Federal prosecutors had to try Isaacs three times before winning a conviction.

So double jeopardy protects you, triple jeopardy no so much.
 
2013-01-17 12:57:31 AM

spman: casual disregard: Nevermind the content, depraved as it is. We just became a non-free society through this decision.

I disagree, and I'm a big first amendment supporter. To me, this is up there with something like Bum Fights, there has to be SOME limit somewhere, even if it's at the most extreme like this stuff is. When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.

I can't even fathom a way in which scat porn would actually be legit, how a person could even tolerate the smell, much less perform any sort of activity with it is beyond my ability to comprehend. The fact that you never read about these Brazilian women getting salmonella and hepatitis and dying leads me to believe most of it is fake. I think the government even tried to prosecute the US distributor for the 2 Girls 1 Cup movie, and even he admitted that it was all fake, since they couldn't find women who would actually agree to do it.

As for the bestiality stuff, that I don't even want to know. All I can say is you must have one HELL of a drug habit to agree to participate in that stuff.


Oh look. A moralist that admittedly declares that he cannot fathom that other people are into things that he finds repugnant.

[FrankBurnsprayingjpeg]

/off to spunk on primroses
//sorry, it's just my thing
 
2013-01-17 12:57:54 AM

no clever name here just move along: You shouldn't go to jail for poor shiaty taste.

FTFY
 
2013-01-17 12:58:11 AM
What the hedline is referencing is one of the most disgusting thing I've ever seen, and I truly believe I should have to go to jail for seeing it.

/proud sheeple
 
2013-01-17 12:58:58 AM

Plant Rights Activist: when asked for comment all the defendant had to say was, "Ski bi di bi di do bap do do do bam do ada bwi ba ba bada bo baba ba da bo bwi ba ba ba do "


ic.pics.livejournal.com

Approves
 
2013-01-17 12:59:49 AM

Nuclear Monk: Turns out there is a limit to what is acceptable and what isn't.

That limit is corn.


media.skateboard.com.au
 
2013-01-17 01:00:37 AM
media.reason.com
www.metal-archives.com
 
2013-01-17 01:01:19 AM

spman: I can't even fathom a way in which scat porn would actually be legit, how a person could even tolerate the smell, much less perform any sort of activity with it is beyond my ability to comprehend.


i258.photobucket.com

The fact that you never read about these Brazilian women getting salmonella and hepatitis and dying leads me to believe most of it is fake.

Does CNN do a lot of reports about the STD infection rates of South American fetish porn skanks?
 
2013-01-17 01:02:47 AM

Pincy: Animals can't consent. Fark this guy if he thinks that's art.


He might very well like that.
 
2013-01-17 01:02:53 AM

dookdookdook: Does CNN do a lot of reports about the STD infection rates of South American fetish porn skanks?


Why yes...yes they do.
 
2013-01-17 01:03:12 AM

untaken_name: spman: Yes, but we take precautions when engaging in those activities in order to make them safer. What kind of precautions are there to prevent a person to get horribly sick and dying after eating human waste, or bleeding to death after being farked by a horse?

Now you're moving the goalpost. I thought you were against any activity that presented the possibility of harm to the person undertaking it. If you don't even know what precautions there are, what makes you so sure they weren't taken? Be honest, you weren't thinking about "precautions" when you first made your statement. You were thinking that activities which you agree with are fine, even if they are dangerous to the participants, and activities you find repulsive shouldn't be allowed to exist, and you used the "danger" thing as a way to plausibly oppose the activities you don't like, but didn't consider how that same rationale would apply to activities you like.


I'm not saying anything about it being gross. I'm saying it should be illegal because it's a dangerous activity that can't be done safely. If you eat, or hell just come in contact with human waste, at least in the sort of manner that you would in a porno, you WILL get sick, possibly fatally so. Find me a scenario where you are eating human shiat and not getting ill, and I will agree it should be legal.

Do you believe that if a man is so desperate to provide for his family, and finds someone willing to pay them enough to last the rest of their lives, and all the man has to do is shoot himself on camera? It doesn't matter if he dies or not, just shoot himself on camera, not in the arm or in the foot, maybe in the gut or the chest where you reasonably stand a chance of hitting some vital organs. Should this be legal?
 
2013-01-17 01:03:23 AM
Yet no one was forced to participate in making these movies

It was smart of him to get those animals to sign waivers.
 
2013-01-17 01:03:31 AM

NewportBarGuy: The day America died.


Animals dude.... animals.
 
2013-01-17 01:03:46 AM

spman: Yes, but we take precautions when engaging in those activities in order to make them safer. What kind of precautions are there to prevent a person to get horribly sick and dying after eating human waste, or bleeding to death after being farked by a horse?


Well for one, most of those scat videos are fake, they're using something that resembles shiat. Secondly, as gross as it may seem, there are people who are into these kinds of things. Some women like being shiat on, others like farking dogs/horses. There's women who like being fisted, a horse cock isn't any bigger than a human arm, yet I've seen guys elbow deep into some sluts twat with that. None of it's my cup of tea, but hey, to each their own.
 
2013-01-17 01:05:18 AM
no one was forced to watch them. Except for the jurors, who took their revenge last April by finding him guilty on five counts of producing and distributing obscenity

So the moral of this story is: If you are being tried for obscenity, make sure your lawyer uses his peremptories to get all the old ladies and fundamentalists OFF THE JURY. Or this could be you.
 
2013-01-17 01:07:17 AM
FTA "he advertised and sold obscene videos"

People buy porn online?

/until they clearly define obscene, rather than "community standards", he should be free to take money from weirdos all he wants.
 
2013-01-17 01:07:26 AM
a video one hour and 37 minutes in length of a female engaged in sex acts with animals

I'm ok with bestiality being illegal.
 
2013-01-17 01:08:28 AM

dookdookdook: Does CNN do a lot of reports about the STD infection rates of South American fetish porn skanks?


not unless someone tweets it.
 
2013-01-17 01:08:30 AM

dookdookdook: My favorite is "Karla's Birthday Bukkake: Bring your Diarrhea!"


www.cavemancircus.com

/didn't porn titles use to be at least *slightly* funny and/or arousing?
 
2013-01-17 01:09:39 AM

RatMaster999: Nuclear Monk: Turns out there is a limit to what is acceptable and what isn't.

That limit is corn.

[media.skateboard.com.au image 374x576]


guffaw!
 
2013-01-17 01:10:35 AM

no clever name here just move along: You shouldn't go to jail for poor taste.


Agreed. Apparently a fair number of jurors also felt that way--it took three trials to convict him.

spman: casual disregard: Nevermind the content, depraved as it is. We just became a non-free society through this decision.

I disagree, and I'm a big first amendment supporter. To me, this is up there with something like Bum Fights, there has to be SOME limit somewhere, even if it's at the most extreme like this stuff is. When the activity goes beyond free speech, and borders on being dangerous to the participants, it has to be stopped.

I can't even fathom a way in which scat porn would actually be legit, how a person could even tolerate the smell, much less perform any sort of activity with it is beyond my ability to comprehend. The fact that you never read about these Brazilian women getting salmonella and hepatitis and dying leads me to believe most of it is fake. I think the government even tried to prosecute the US distributor for the 2 Girls 1 Cup movie, and even he admitted that it was all fake, since they couldn't find women who would actually agree to do it.


Yeah, that's my understanding--the extreme stuff is faked. The girls really do take a dump on camera but beyond that it's camera games and replacing it with fake stuff.

As for the bestiality stuff, that I don't even want to know. All I can say is you must have one HELL of a drug habit to agree to participate in that stuff.

Some country over in Europe just clamped down on bestiality as they were becoming a tourist destination for it as it was legal there. Therefore, obviously, some people choose to do it.

LemSkroob: Nice. I liked how they kept jury-shopping till they got one they liked.

Its funny, you are only allowed one chance to defend yourself, but you can be dragged into a courtroom over and over again. All the prosecutor needs is to win one game, and they have the series, but the defense needs to have a perfect record and win every game.


No, the prosecutor only gets one shot (although you can face both state and federal charges--they're different crimes), taking three tries would mean that two attempts resulted in trials that couldn't complete--presumably hung juries. Once you are declared innocent that's it, they can't try you again no matter what. (Something that I actually disagree with a bit--I would say that if you are later convicted of tampering with your trial the not guilty becomes a mistrial instead and they can try you again.)
 
2013-01-17 01:10:49 AM
Jesus fought and died on the cross, fighting the British so that me and my lady can drink some George Dickle and prepare for some procreatin' with some wholesome, old fashioned shiat sex vidoes.
 
2013-01-17 01:11:24 AM

log_jammin: a video one hour and 37 minutes in length of a female engaged in sex acts with animals

I'm ok with bestiality being illegal sharia law.


/fix'd
 
2013-01-17 01:11:47 AM

ReapTheChaos: yet I've seen guys elbow deep into some sluts twat


Yikes man. But I'm sure you are respectful to all the women in your life.
 
2013-01-17 01:12:28 AM
Federal prosecutors had to try Isaacs three times before winning a conviction.

Don't you Americans have some sort of Constitutional guarantee about being tried more than once for the same crime?
 
2013-01-17 01:14:15 AM

spman: I'm not saying anything about it being gross. I'm saying it should be illegal because it's a dangerous activity that can't be done safely. If you eat, or hell just come in contact with human waste, at least in the sort of manner that you would in a porno, you WILL get sick, possibly fatally so. Find me a scenario where you are eating human shiat and not getting ill, and I will agree it should be legal.

Do you believe that if a man is so desperate to provide for his family, and finds someone willing to pay them enough to last the rest of their lives, and all the man has to do is shoot himself on camera? It doesn't matter if he dies or not, just shoot himself on camera, not in the arm or in the foot, maybe in the gut or the chest where you reasonably stand a chance of hitting some vital organs. Should this be legal?


In either case - how does that action hurt you, me or anyone else?  People do stupid shiat all the time - that doesn't mean it requires a law on the books.
 
Displayed 50 of 419 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report