Nina_Hartley's_Ass: 1960's NASA went to the fncking MOON.
dead: Which is a shame, because without a manned capability, today's NASA doesn't even rival the 1960's NASA.
Baelz: Read the article, and found the Derp.Western critics have expressed concern over the potential military applications of Iran's rocket program since boosters developed to reach space could also be used as long-range ballistic missiles. The Islamic republic has denied such ambitions for its space program.Name one Country that Iran has ever attacked since they removed the Shah when it wasn't defending itself.Ya, I thought so.
SN1987a goes boom: [encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com image 262x192]So, they're going to land on the Moon?/not sure subby thought this out all the way.
ristst: I'm always fascinated by people who say this. Do you even know what computing resources were available back then? And even if it were that dire, so what? Computers aren't doing the lifting, engines burning chemicals do the lifting. Guess what? Nothing's changed there.
Haliburton Cummings: they found some Nazi's to work for them?
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Jan 24 2017 19:21:51
Runtime: 0.192 sec (192 ms)