Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Register)   Playboy fined £100k by British regulator for not preventing children accessing porn on the internet. If you look closely, that little dot on the horizon is a horse. Do you want to shut the stable door now?   (theregister.co.uk ) divider line 51
    More: Interesting, FLASHING SMUT, Ofcom, Playboy TV  
•       •       •

4279 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Jan 2013 at 1:45 PM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



51 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-16 01:24:29 PM  
Yes, but is the horse gay?
 
2013-01-16 01:26:48 PM  
Not to let the cat out of the bag, but there are more sources for pron on the internet than just Playboy.
 
2013-01-16 01:46:15 PM  

Slives: Not to let the cat out of the bag, but there are more sources for pron on the internet than just Playboy.


I can get Playboy on the internet?!?
 
2013-01-16 01:47:28 PM  
Why would kids look at playboy when the girls they go to school with will jam things up their ass on command for them via webcam?
 
2013-01-16 01:49:14 PM  
Playboy is old hat.

Why would anyone bother with it anymore? It's just a buch of chicks who Hugh Hefner would find attractive.

Blonds with fake boobs. Every single month. No variety at all.

BOOO-RING.
 
2013-01-16 01:49:19 PM  

HotWingConspiracy: Why would kids look at playboy when the girls they go to school with will jam things up their ass on command for them via webcam?


Know how I know you're a /b/tard?
 
2013-01-16 01:50:28 PM  
blogs-images.forbes.com
 
2013-01-16 01:50:38 PM  
FTA -- "Demand Adult's homepage was apparently found to be much more explicit than that of Playboy TV, however. For that reason, Demand Adult was slapped with a £65,000 fine, while Playboy TV was told to cough up a £35,000 penalty."

Please, I prefer my money shots to be displayed on the surface of the tongue and swallowed.
 
2013-01-16 01:50:52 PM  
playboy does porn? oh yeah, playboy does porn. man, the internet has really jaded my sensibilities.
 
2013-01-16 01:51:36 PM  
If it wasn't for that horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college.
 
2013-01-16 01:52:40 PM  

macadamnut: [blogs-images.forbes.com image 533x288]



I always thought that guy looked like Conan OBrien.
 
2013-01-16 01:52:47 PM  

doczoidberg: Playboy is old hat.

Why would anyone bother with it anymore? It's just a buch of chicks who Hugh Hefner would find attractive.

Blonds with fake boobs. Every single month. No variety at all.

BOOO-RING.


Actually the Playboy tv has hardcore content that's pretty good, like reality tv but with banging.

I only have seen like 5 minute clips because that's what gets to my free sites
 
2013-01-16 01:53:54 PM  
But what about cat photos?

designer-entrepreneurs.com
 
2013-01-16 01:56:39 PM  

The Irresponsible Captain: But what about cat photos?

[designer-entrepreneurs.com image 600x463]


you said "cats" twice.
 
2013-01-16 01:58:16 PM  

The Irresponsible Captain: But what about cat photos?

[designer-entrepreneurs.com image 600x463]


B-b-but, Avenue Q's song??
 
2013-01-16 01:58:51 PM  

fireclown: The Irresponsible Captain: But what about cat photos?

[designer-entrepreneurs.com image 600x463]

you said "cats" twice.


He likes pussy.
 
2013-01-16 02:02:51 PM  
Page 2 girls seen whistling and walking away slooooooowly

JC
 
2013-01-16 02:06:50 PM  
I say, I've heard there is this new technology whereby one can bring graphic images of naked women right into one's own home! We must do something to end this outrage!

Sorry old chap, I'm watching Cinemax.
 
2013-01-16 02:10:44 PM  
Playboy is almost impossible to fap to these days. The internet has pretty much robbed me of that ability.
 
2013-01-16 02:10:46 PM  
"There are a number of controls that websites can use to verify the age of users. This includes asking for credit card details before any adult content is made accessible."

Are there people farking stupid or something? There is no way in hell I would enter my credit card info on a porn site just to be used as age verification.
 
2013-01-16 02:11:30 PM  
*I* knew it was a horse.

I could tell by the pixel.
 
2013-01-16 02:17:27 PM  
Don't tell Britian about google.
 
2013-01-16 02:18:04 PM  

ReapTheChaos: "There are a number of controls that websites can use to verify the age of users. This includes asking for credit card details before any adult content is made accessible."

Are there people farking stupid or something? There is no way in hell I would enter my credit card info on a porn site just to be used as age verification.


CC age verification? Is this story from 1996? Get with the 3rd millenium.
 
2013-01-16 02:18:47 PM  
upload.wikimedia.org
Watch out UK gov, some of us are passing this game around and Sierra ISN'T EVEN TRYING to stop us. And we're TWELVE!!1!One!
 
2013-01-16 02:22:35 PM  

Fark Rye For Many Whores: Watch out UK gov, some of us are passing this game around and Sierra ISN'T EVEN TRYING to stop us. And we're TWELVE!!1!One!


IIRC that game had some kind of "maturity test", did it not?
 
2013-01-16 02:23:30 PM  

maachubo: CC age verification? Is this story from 1996? Get with the 3rd millenium.


I suppose if it came down to it, I might take out a CC with a $100 max amount just for ID purposes.
 
2013-01-16 02:25:42 PM  

fireclown: Fark Rye For Many Whores: Watch out UK gov, some of us are passing this game around and Sierra ISN'T EVEN TRYING to stop us. And we're TWELVE!!1!One!

IIRC that game had some kind of "maturity test", did it not?


I don't think there was anything mature about that game at all.

And we LIKED IT THAT WAY!

/never to the parents about the 'StripPoker c64' game either
 
2013-01-16 02:30:23 PM  

doczoidberg: Playboy is old hat.

Why would anyone bother with it anymore? It's just a buch of chicks who Hugh Hefner would find attractive.

Blonds with fake boobs. Every single month. No variety at all.

BOOO-RING.


And all shaven. Why to they all shave completely? I don't want an out of control Growler just a little trimmed bush.
 
2013-01-16 02:37:03 PM  
Swiss Colony:

And all shaven. Why to they all shave completely? I don't want an out of control Growler just a little trimmed bush.

Agreed.
 
2013-01-16 02:50:51 PM  
This is not good. This is very not good. There is no way to verify anyone's age online that doesn't open them up to identity fraud. Like ReapTheChaos said, only a complete retard would use any of them, especially on a site that doesn't charge you money.By forcing porn sites to use these, the UK is effectively banning all free porn from their internet. It's backdoor censorship.
 
2013-01-16 02:58:16 PM  
Playboy is porn? I thought it was just a brand name teenage girls bought.
 
2013-01-16 03:07:52 PM  

HotWingConspiracy: Why would kids look at playboy when the girls they go to school with will jam things up their ass on command for them via webcam?


A sharpie, perhaps?
 
2013-01-16 03:11:56 PM  

The Irresponsible Captain: But what about cat photos?

[designer-entrepreneurs.com image 600x463]


that graph is kinda misleading, a good portion of porn *is* cat photos.
 
2013-01-16 03:47:39 PM  
I'm confident that Playboy has enough high-powered lawyers to launch appeal after appeal until those snooty paranoid joyless toffs that run the UK government get called on it for wasting taxpayer's money on this boondoggle.
 
2013-01-16 03:54:49 PM  

HotWingConspiracy: Why would kids look at playboy when the girls they go to school with will jam things up their ass on command for them via webcam?


Go on...
 
2013-01-16 03:58:39 PM  

ignacio: "It's backdoor censorship."


You said backdoor, heh heh.
 
2013-01-16 04:01:11 PM  
So are youporn, tube8, and etc all blocked by the UK's national firewall?
 
2013-01-16 04:15:28 PM  
Once your kids are old enough to actively look for porn, they're old enough to find it.
 
2013-01-16 04:23:11 PM  

PYROY: Playboy is almost impossible to fap to these days. The internet has pretty much robbed me of that ability.


Yeah too bad I dont remember what Randy said on SP to quote it.
 
2013-01-16 04:41:26 PM  
Wait... There's porn on the internet?!
 
2013-01-16 04:54:39 PM  
FTA"users could access skin flicks by registering with a debit card, which kids as young as 11 can apply for"

Since when?

I'll be damned before I give out my CC number to a porn site...
 
2013-01-16 05:14:12 PM  

maachubo: ReapTheChaos: "There are a number of controls that websites can use to verify the age of users. This includes asking for credit card details before any adult content is made accessible."

Are there people farking stupid or something? There is no way in hell I would enter my credit card info on a porn site just to be used as age verification.

CC age verification? Is this story from 1996? Get with the 3rd millenium.


Came to say this or why didn't you tell them about 9/11.
 
2013-01-16 06:37:01 PM  
( )
☉ ☉
) (
( v )
 
2013-01-16 06:38:31 PM  
Fined 100,000 pounds? That's, like, 7143 stone!

/about the same as your mum
 
2013-01-16 07:23:14 PM  

Swiss Colony: doczoidberg: Playboy is old hat.

Why would anyone bother with it anymore? It's just a buch of chicks who Hugh Hefner would find attractive.

Blonds with fake boobs. Every single month. No variety at all.

BOOO-RING.

And all shaven. Why to they all shave completely? I don't want an out of control Growler just a little trimmed bush.


We got to do some cleanup on a house fire for a few neigbors, an old couple in their 80's. They moved on and told us anything left in the house, we were welcome to salvage it. Best discovery was an old suitcase under the stairs that had a pile of swinger mags and some 60's and 70's Playboys. I couldn't get over how lovely and natural the ladies were, as opposed to the blonde barbie type I've been seeing for so many years. I remember thinking that maybe Hefner had gone senile, and just kept forgetting he was featuring the same type over and over, because he obviously had wider tastes back in the day.
 
2013-01-16 07:36:33 PM  

rogue_L_chick: Swiss Colony: doczoidberg: Playboy is old hat.

Why would anyone bother with it anymore? It's just a buch of chicks who Hugh Hefner would find attractive.

Blonds with fake boobs. Every single month. No variety at all.

BOOO-RING.

And all shaven. Why to they all shave completely? I don't want an out of control Growler just a little trimmed bush.

We got to do some cleanup on a house fire for a few neigbors, an old couple in their 80's. They moved on and told us anything left in the house, we were welcome to salvage it. Best discovery was an old suitcase under the stairs that had a pile of swinger mags and some 60's and 70's Playboys. I couldn't get over how lovely and natural the ladies were, as opposed to the blonde barbie type I've been seeing for so many years. I remember thinking that maybe Hefner had gone senile, and just kept forgetting he was featuring the same type over and over, because he obviously had wider tastes back in the day.


Isn't Heff's daughter running the company now?

/giggity
 
2013-01-16 08:17:10 PM  
what does Playboy have to do with porn?
 
2013-01-16 10:25:29 PM  

doczoidberg: Playboy is old hat.

Why would anyone bother with it anymore? It's just a buch of chicks who Hugh Hefner would find attractive.

Blonds with fake boobs. Every single month. No variety at all.


sure, if the only playboy models you've ever heard of are anna nicole smith, jenny mccarthy, and victoria silvstedt.

playboy models are just as varied as the girls at any other website or nude magazine. skinny brunettes, busty redheads, asian and black chicks, and yes, fake-boobed blondes as well. if you include the hundreds of cybergirls from the website as well as their special edition models, and you have the entire spectrum of female beauty on display. complaining that all playboy models look the same is just stupid.

my main problem with playboy is that they do too much airbrushing, mainly because too many of their photoshoots are taken in dark rooms with artificial lighting. compare that to a site like met-art where almost all their pictures are taken outside with natural daylight with no airbrushing, and the difference is amazing. the girls at met-art look 50 times better than playboy, mainly because of the better photography.
 
2013-01-17 12:06:29 AM  

Prey4reign: Please, I prefer my money shots to be displayed on the surface of the tongue and swallowed.


Stick out your tongue sweetie pie.

Consider the following image. The blue noses have some explaining to do.

bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov
 
2013-01-17 12:14:07 AM  
It$ all to protect the children$.
 
Displayed 50 of 51 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report