If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Examiner)   Alex Jones claims Obama has met the rules of impeachment under Article II, Section IV of the Constitution; fortunately for everyone else, Jones seems to have skipped Article I, Section III   (examiner.com) divider line 189
    More: Dumbass, President Obama, articles of impeachment, Constitution of the United States, Andrew Johnson, hair removal, impeachment, veto override  
•       •       •

4780 clicks; posted to Politics » on 16 Jan 2013 at 9:08 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



189 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-16 02:28:02 AM  
Ah yes, an online petition from Alex Jones. That'll carry a lot of weight. Next up, a bill to make Facebook 'likes' legally binding. That'll get him.
 
2013-01-16 03:30:04 AM  
Submitter seems to have skipped Article VI, Section XII, which says "those who provide taxation without representation" are not allowed to be president, and "the Founding Fathers are rolling in their grave at the sight of this Taxbongo".
 
2013-01-16 04:42:58 AM  
I can't think of a president who hasn't met the requirements for impeachment.
 
2013-01-16 08:35:11 AM  

Mike_LowELL: Submitter seems to have skipped Article VI, Section XII, which says "those who provide taxation without representation" are not allowed to be president, and "the Founding Fathers are rolling in their grave at the sight of this Taxbongo".


LOL
 
2013-01-16 09:04:58 AM  

DrPainMD: I can't think of a president who hasn't met the requirements for impeachment.


James Garfield.

Hard to fark things up too badly when you're only in office for 6 months.
 
2013-01-16 09:06:40 AM  
Good luck with that.
 
2013-01-16 09:10:44 AM  

dittybopper: DrPainMD: I can't think of a president who hasn't met the requirements for impeachment.

James Garfield.

Hard to fark things up too badly when you're only in office for 6 months.


William Henry Harrison.
 
2013-01-16 09:12:16 AM  

Mike_LowELL: Submitter seems to have skipped Article VI, Section XII, which says "those who provide taxation without representation" are not allowed to be president, and "the Founding Fathers are rolling in their grave at the sight of this Taxbongo".


I thought you were crazy, then I went to a constitution website, used CTRL-F and entered "Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves at the sight of this Taxbongo" and... there it was.

You learn something new every day.
 
2013-01-16 09:18:48 AM  

WSUCanuck: dittybopper: DrPainMD: I can't think of a president who hasn't met the requirements for impeachment.

James Garfield.

Hard to fark things up too badly when you're only in office for 6 months.

William Henry Harrison.


No actually, Harrison farked a chicken on stage during his inaugural speech and that's how he caught the AIDS that killed him a month later.


/The more you know.jpg
 
2013-01-16 09:18:53 AM  

I_Am_Weasel: Mike_LowELL: Submitter seems to have skipped Article VI, Section XII, which says "those who provide taxation without representation" are not allowed to be president, and "the Founding Fathers are rolling in their grave at the sight of this Taxbongo".

I thought you were crazy, then I went to a constitution website, used CTRL-F and entered "Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves at the sight of this Taxbongo" and... there it was.

You learn something new every day.


Yes. The founding fathers dreamed of a semi-literate society of morbidly obese gun hicks.
 
2013-01-16 09:20:00 AM  
In today's linked article, we learn that a bitter and delusional man is attempting a petty revenge against the president that the president will never even hear about, let alone be affected by.

Wow. This is some New York Times-level sh*t right there.
 
2013-01-16 09:22:47 AM  
empirestrikesblack.com

Obama's escape vehicle from the Articles of Impeachment.
 
2013-01-16 09:24:46 AM  
I thought the impeachment against Clinton was bs. however I would not have wanted a Rmoney presidency but if he banned any firearms by executive order, I would not be sad to see him impeached and convicted.
 
2013-01-16 09:24:54 AM  
who the hell is andrew johnson?

/impeach everyone
 
2013-01-16 09:25:16 AM  

WSUCanuck: dittybopper: DrPainMD: I can't think of a president who hasn't met the requirements for impeachment.

James Garfield.

Hard to fark things up too badly when you're only in office for 6 months.

William Henry Harrison.


Crap. That's who I was thinking of. Garfield was actually my second choice, I couldn't remember Harrison.
 
2013-01-16 09:25:47 AM  
i1.kym-cdn.com

/eating babies
 
2013-01-16 09:28:19 AM  
I predict every Republican House will impeach every Democratic president who is re-elected to a second term.
 
2013-01-16 09:28:21 AM  

Whiskey Pete: I_Am_Weasel: Mike_LowELL: Submitter seems to have skipped Article VI, Section XII, which says "those who provide taxation without representation" are not allowed to be president, and "the Founding Fathers are rolling in their grave at the sight of this Taxbongo".

I thought you were crazy, then I went to a constitution website, used CTRL-F and entered "Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves at the sight of this Taxbongo" and... there it was.

You learn something new every day.

Yes. The founding fathers dreamed of a semi-literate society of morbidly obese gun hicks.


Just to put that in graphical representation:

These Guys:

pakistanisforpeace.files.wordpress.com

Are Very Proud of These Guys:

4.bp.blogspot.com

And who wouldn't be?

"P
A
T

R


I

O


T


I

C

DESCENDING!"
 
2013-01-16 09:28:38 AM  
will someone please rip this guys jaw off
 
2013-01-16 09:29:00 AM  
Alex Jones Claims....

Stopped reading right there. Anything with that name and the word "claims" should tell you it's grade A Bullshiat, Mostly Circus Animal no Filler.
 
2013-01-16 09:30:07 AM  

apacheco: will someone please rip this guys jaw off


Who would dare to? He'd surely try to eat your hand.
 
2013-01-16 09:30:32 AM  

kudayta: WSUCanuck: dittybopper: DrPainMD: I can't think of a president who hasn't met the requirements for impeachment.

James Garfield.

Hard to fark things up too badly when you're only in office for 6 months.

William Henry Harrison.

No actually, Harrison farked a chicken on stage during his inaugural speech and that's how he caught the AIDS that killed him a month later.


/The more you know.jpg


I didn't know there were Republicans back in the 1840s. The more you know indeed.
 
2013-01-16 09:31:13 AM  
Jones also skipped the day that God was handing out sanity.
 
2013-01-16 09:31:14 AM  

BronyMedic: Alex Jones Claims....

Stopped reading right there. Anything with that name and the word "claims" should tell you it's grade A Bullshiat, Mostly Circus Animal no Filler.


If Alex Jones said the sun was going to rise in the east I would make sure my western shades were closed so the sun wouldn't wake me up in the morning.
 
2013-01-16 09:31:46 AM  

Koalaesq: apacheco: will someone please rip this guys jaw off

Who would dare to? He'd surely try to eat your hand.


You have to pick him up by grasping his shell right behind his head so he can't get you. Like alligator snapping turtles.
 
2013-01-16 09:32:03 AM  

Bigdogdaddy: I thought the impeachment against Clinton was bs. however I would not have wanted a Rmoney presidency but if he banned any firearms by executive order, I would not be sad to see him impeached and convicted.


Translation: Assault weapons highest form of patriotic.
 
d23 [TotalFark]
2013-01-16 09:32:57 AM  
The party that are "physical conservatives" are going to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars by forcing a senate trial that can't possibly go anywhere because it's initiated only because they don't like him.

Stop calling the GOP conservative. It's total bullshiat.
 
2013-01-16 09:33:02 AM  

BronyMedic: Alex Jones Claims....

Stopped reading right there. Anything with that name and the word "claims" should tell you it's grade A Bullshiat, Mostly Circus Animal no Filler.


He claims the Bilderbergs eat human babies wrapped in gold.  I don't know how anyone can take him seriously on anything if he believes that.

/didn't miss your ref, Epoch_Zero
 
2013-01-16 09:35:08 AM  
Speaking of both Presidents who have had Articles of Impeachment passed against them: Interestingly, both presidents were Democrats and, in both cases, impeachment proceedings were initiated by a Republican-controlled House in a highly-polarized political environment.

Interesting, but not surprising.
 
2013-01-16 09:36:17 AM  

d23: The party that are "physical conservatives" are going to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars by forcing a senate trial that can't possibly go anywhere because it's initiated only because they don't like him.

Stop calling the GOP conservative. It's total bullshiat.


Eh. It won't even get that far; without some actual wrongdoing (even though the investigation was politically motivated bullshiat, Clinton did commit perjury) they'll never get enough Democrats to reach the two-thirds vote requirement for articles of impeachment.
 
2013-01-16 09:36:27 AM  

Epoch_Zero: Koalaesq: apacheco: will someone please rip this guys jaw off

Who would dare to? He'd surely try to eat your hand.

You have to pick him up by grasping his shell right behind his head so he can't get you. Like alligator snapping turtles.


i was thinking of holding him by his legs like a chicken. You ever see a cock fight? those claws can cut you up
 
2013-01-16 09:37:07 AM  

DrPainMD: I can't think of a president who hasn't met the requirements for impeachment.


Andrew Johnson?
 
2013-01-16 09:37:49 AM  

thurstonxhowell: Speaking of both Presidents who have had Articles of Impeachment passed against them: Interestingly, both presidents were Democrats and, in both cases, impeachment proceedings were initiated by a Republican-controlled House in a highly-polarized political environment.

Interesting, but not surprising.


You realize that the ideologies of the parties have basically switched since then, right? I mean, don't get me wrong, I would love to besmirch the name of the GOP every minute of every day and from every corner of this country, but your statement - it doesn't mean what you think it means.
 
2013-01-16 09:41:45 AM  

WSUCanuck: dittybopper: DrPainMD: I can't think of a president who hasn't met the requirements for impeachment.

James Garfield.

Hard to fark things up too badly when you're only in office for 6 months.

William Henry Harrison.


cdn.uproxx.com
 
2013-01-16 09:41:49 AM  
Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."
 
2013-01-16 09:43:55 AM  
I'm glad Alex Jones got the ball rolling on this. Now the media can stop talk about Grover Norquist setting the agenda for the Rederplicans and start talking about this raving lunatic setting the agenda for them.

Rederps not policing their own is making this easy.
 
2013-01-16 09:46:15 AM  

BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."


What a totally confident gun lobby with legally sound positions does when it's totally confident and just being attacked by opportunist anti-gun zealots does, you guys.
 
2013-01-16 09:47:54 AM  

BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."


Wrong thread, asshole
 
2013-01-16 09:48:24 AM  

BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."


Would you prefer that we listen to Wayne Lapierre when he tell us gun owners cannot be trusted to follow gun laws and that they pose such a grave threat that every school in the country must be provided with armed guards to protect the children from gun owners?
 
2013-01-16 09:49:53 AM  

Epoch_Zero: What a totally confident gun lobby with legally sound positions does when it's totally confident and just being attacked by opportunist anti-gun zealots does, you guys.


Oh, I was so hoping that disgusting thing would come up today.

With all their money, you'd think the NRA would have better strategists.  That thing is pure, blinding propaganda.  Offensive, low-information, bottom-feeding political ads aspire be that ad.
 
2013-01-16 09:53:11 AM  

Philip Francis Queeg: BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."

Would you prefer that we listen to Wayne Lapierre when he tell us gun owners cannot be trusted to follow gun laws and that they pose such a grave threat that every school in the country must be provided with armed guards to protect the children from gun owners?


Mass shootings are fairly rare, though they do get a lot of media attention. Many of my fellow lefties have gun control as a pet issue and enjoy nothing more than standing on the bodies of dead kids so they can push their pet agenda. The rest who hop onto the band wagon during the media blitz are just useful idiots.
 
2013-01-16 09:53:21 AM  

Diogenes: BronyMedic: Alex Jones Claims....

Stopped reading right there. Anything with that name and the word "claims" should tell you it's grade A Bullshiat, Mostly Circus Animal no Filler.

He claims the Bilderbergs eat human babies wrapped in gold.  I don't know how anyone can take him seriously on anything if he believes that.

/didn't miss your ref, Epoch_Zero


They guy must be a nutter. No mention of barbecue sauce?
 
2013-01-16 09:53:57 AM  

Epoch_Zero: BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."

What a totally confident gun lobby with legally sound positions does when it's totally confident and just being attacked by opportunist anti-gun zealots does, you guys.


And? You do realize that there were armed guards at that school before the secret service got there, right? Not every student's parent has access to launch codes. So if allowing guns in schools provides no additional safety over gun free zones, and the presence of guns only leads to an increased chance of innocents being shot, as gun control advocates would have us believe, then why would Obama send his kids to a school with such "backwards" thinking? Pointing out hypocrisy is a fair tactic.
 
2013-01-16 09:54:12 AM  
....so....they finally acknowledge he was elected?
 
2013-01-16 09:55:07 AM  

Saiga410: They guy must be a nutter. No mention of barbecue sauce?


Honestly.  Like them or hate them, the Bilderbergs aren't heathens.
 
2013-01-16 09:55:10 AM  

Fail in Human Form: Philip Francis Queeg: BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."

Would you prefer that we listen to Wayne Lapierre when he tell us gun owners cannot be trusted to follow gun laws and that they pose such a grave threat that every school in the country must be provided with armed guards to protect the children from gun owners?

Mass shootings are fairly rare, though they do get a lot of media attention. Many of my fellow lefties have gun control as a pet issue and enjoy nothing more than standing on the bodies of dead kids so they can push their pet agenda. The rest who hop onto the band wagon during the media blitz are just useful idiots.


Wayme Lapierre is a lefty now?
 
2013-01-16 09:55:45 AM  

Fail in Human Form: Mass shootings are fairly rare, though they do get a lot of media attention. Many of my fellow lefties have gun control as a pet issue and enjoy nothing more than standing on the bodies of dead kids so they can push their pet agenda. The rest who hop onto the band wagon during the media blitz are just useful idiots.


"Pushing your pet agenda" sounds like a euphemism for something very naughty.
 
2013-01-16 09:56:19 AM  

Philip Francis Queeg: Fail in Human Form: Philip Francis Queeg: BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."

Would you prefer that we listen to Wayne Lapierre when he tell us gun owners cannot be trusted to follow gun laws and that they pose such a grave threat that every school in the country must be provided with armed guards to protect the children from gun owners?

Mass shootings are fairly rare, though they do get a lot of media attention. Many of my fellow lefties have gun control as a pet issue and enjoy nothing more than standing on the bodies of dead kids so they can push their pet agenda. The rest who hop onto the band wagon during the media blitz are just useful idiots.

Wayme Lapierre is a lefty now?


The NRA didn't say a word after the shooting, until the media went full retard and they had to respond. The NRA isn't the group that writes its legislation, gleefully, in the blood of the dead before the bodies are even cold.
 
2013-01-16 09:56:30 AM  

JAMES YEAGER (1/9/2013): fark that. I'm telling you that if that happens, it's going to spark a Civil War, and I'll be glad to fire the first shot. ... I'm not farking putting up with this, I'm not letting my country be ruled by a dictator, I'm not letting anybody take my guns! If it goes one inch further, I'm going to start killing people!


Link

Gun owners are so sane and rational.
 
2013-01-16 09:59:17 AM  

Lost Thought 00: BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."

Wrong thread, asshole


It's the right thread. This is about your obsession with Alex Jones and your attempt to poison the well, and use every underhanded debate tactic available, such as yours.

Philip Francis Queeg: BraveNewCheneyWorld: Gun control drones - "Hey, we can't seem to form a rational argument against gun ownership. There are simply no facts or statistics backing our position. What should we do?"

Gun control drum-beater - "Find a crazy person on their side, then try to associate him with everyone who disagrees with us, we need to poison that well. Oh, and don't ever try to argue against 2nd amendment supporters' facts, it'll just provide any undecided people the opportunity to realize that we're just pandering to emotions, and our gun control plan won't do what we say it will. Just call them names, or pretend they said something else."

Would you prefer that we listen to Wayne Lapierre when he tell us gun owners cannot be trusted to follow gun laws and that they pose such a grave threat that every school in the country must be provided with armed guards to protect the children from gun owners?


Care to provide a source for that quote? Sounds like you're pretending he said something he did not.
 
Displayed 50 of 189 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


Report