If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NBC Philadelphia)   Delaware woman had sex with a dog while her boyfriend took pics. It was supposed to be the other way around, but the dog was having trouble with the shutter and the evening just got out of control   (nbcphiladelphia.com) divider line 51
    More: Sick, sexual acts, dogs  
•       •       •

20227 clicks; posted to Main » on 11 Jan 2013 at 9:51 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-11 10:05:09 AM
4 votes:

AbbeySomeone: Why do people do this?


Dogs are eager to please, have giant prehensile tongues and don't talk shiat about how they can't get a full time job because their $50 DJ gigs are so,like meaningful and important to so many people, and you're a biatch for asking me to give up my dreams whats for dinner. That's why.
2013-01-11 09:56:44 AM
4 votes:
This thread is just fine without pics. Seriously.
2013-01-11 09:53:55 AM
3 votes:
I'll be in my lab.
2013-01-11 02:06:23 PM
2 votes:
in Delaware "We ran out of other stuff to do" should be a valid defense.
2013-01-11 11:50:56 AM
2 votes:

BronyMedic: A dog is incapable of consenting, and mating with humans is a learned behavior - dogs do not instinctively mount and fark a human woman (or male). They have to be taught and trained that behavior. It's animal abuse, and the dogs that are taken from those homes frequently have to be put down as a rule because they are incapable of "unlearning" the behavior.



You are implying here that any dog that "humps" has been taught that behavior by someone sexually abusing the animal - which would mean that many (most) dogs are being sexually abused.

I call bullshiat.

Either support that implication with evidence (quote it in the thread - and it had better be good) or retract.


/At least we found SOMETHING that you find more titillating than the FDA
2013-01-11 11:26:20 AM
2 votes:
This is a very interesting societal taboo. It is frowned upon and/or illegal in most areas of the world, while in some places bestiality is a generally accepted practice.

There is a mini-documentary on YouTube (about 15 min.) that explores the acceptance of men engaging in sex with donkeys in Columbia, from the time they are 11 or 12 years old up to marriage. The reporter interviews all sorts of Colombians, both women and men, who talk about it like they would the weather. They don't seem to be bothered by it all. The reporter also interviews a expert on sexual relations who suggests religion and it's demand that women remain virgins until they are married play a role in this.

The video may or may not be safe for work. At the end there is intentionally blurred footage of a man behind a donkey, it doesn't show anything but you are certain as to what is taking place. With that description I am going to declare it NSFW just to be safe, and instead of linking directly to the video I am linking to the Google search page, which has several links about this. The documentary is the first one of the google search page. Link
2013-01-11 11:04:32 AM
2 votes:
Wow - she really screwed the pooch!
2013-01-11 10:26:15 AM
2 votes:
This story has a bit more info (as well as a picture of the human boyfriend). According to subby's link, this took place west of Wilford. There is no such place as Wilford, Delaware. It's Milford, dammit, Milford, which is in Slower Delaware where farking your dog is not that unusual.

According to my link: "In the course of their investigation Troopers with the Delaware State Police found a photo of a woman, engaged in sex with a dog. Using the Delaware Justice System Web Portal, the police were able to identify Samantha L. Golt as the woman in the photograph." Probably made easier by the fact the dog was the better looking subject in the photo.
2013-01-11 10:19:39 AM
2 votes:
i0.kym-cdn.com
2013-01-12 05:38:53 PM
1 votes:
Any thread where I get to promote someone from "racist trolling fark" to "racist trolling fark, bestiality apologist" is a pure win.
2013-01-12 01:59:42 AM
1 votes:
omeganuepsilon: I never thought I'd actually see a bestiality apologist on Fark.

Wow. Just wo-. Wait, what am I saying. This is a website that blames women for their rapes, has people champion the "right" for pedophiles and ephebophiles to molest and sexually abuse their victims, defends the catholic church for institutional facilitation of child victimization, and throws their hands up in celebration when a 30 year old teacher farks her 15 year old student, while demanding a man doing the same thing be hanged at the gallows.

Really. Why should I be surprised when some like yourself tries to defend the God given right for people to fark their animals. Vacationed in Sunny Enumclaw lately?
2013-01-12 01:42:00 AM
1 votes:

BronyMedic: A dog is incapable of consenting, and mating with humans is a learned behavior - dogs do not instinctively mount and fark a human woman (or male). They have to be taught and trained that behavior. It's animal abuse, and the dogs that are taken from those homes frequently have to be put down as a rule because they are incapable of "unlearning" the behavior.


I've encountered many oversexed dogs, but unless my cousin, several friends, and a large number of casual acquaintances were all part of a canine sex ring... this sounds rather full of shiat. Many male dogs are just oversexed, and all it takes is letting a randy one go for it. The same goes for equating prostitution (or even stripping) with human trafficking and exploitation - some people just want to sell it.

/That said, it can and does happen, and I don't think it's any better to raise a dog just for that purpose than to raise a kid just to be a slave.
2013-01-12 01:39:07 AM
1 votes:

Dolfin: You're on my fave list now. Thanks for the post.


To be fair, I got some practice in the dolphin sex thread a few days back....And I just saw your username, so that's funny...or potentially really weird.

The main point is, it's near impossible to rationally argue "abuse" if the animal get his rocks off and is happy about it near as humans can tell.

Sticking your dick in a chicken, yeah, that's pretty much going to destroy it.
But a cow? Stick your dick in a cow, and it won't even notice, kinda like Brony maybe.

/those two I'll credit to a comedian that was on TV when I was posting in the dolphin thread.
Even though we kill them both and eat them(as some do dogs I suppose), one's not really all that reprehensible, but the other is.

And since I'm posting again...

There is such a thing as cruelty, and if that is not present(aside from having sex with subby's mom, talk about cruel and unusual)...if that is not present it's not abuse. If the dog wasn't restrained or held down, and was more or less allowed to do what it wanted, there's no harm done(see below). You can lead a dog to pussy, but you can't make him fark it. If it want's to get away, and you don't let it, then it becomes a different story.

(Pay special attention to the "IF". Not saying these couple did or didn't abuse the dog, simply addressing the possibility of either since we are lacking facts)
Paraphilia

In the current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR), a paraphilia is not diagnosable as a psychiatric disorder unless it causes distress to the individual or harm to others.[1] The DSM-5 draft adds a terminology distinction between the two cases, stating that "paraphilias are not ipso facto psychiatric disorders", and defining paraphilic disorder as "a paraphilia that causes distress or impairment to the individual or harm to others".[15] This is purported by the draft to make a clear distinction between a healthy person with a non-normative sexual behavior and a person with a psychopathological non-normative sexual behavior.


Outdated slightly as the DSM V is out from what I hear, but it's so new it's not out and about, and I don't feel like looking to see what I can find.

IMO, the law was founded on the "Ick" factor, or morality, but that is very outdated. A law does need to be in place where actual cruelty and abuse are there, because that sort of truly sick behavior does happen. But the notion that no animal can consent is a bit intellectually dishonest(or alternatively, intellectually challenged).

How exactly do those animals manage to live today? Sure, rape happens(I mean, DUCKS!), but consent also happens(many species are monogamous). To pretend that's not the case is ignorant at best, willfully so at worst.(being genuinely retarded is somewhere in the middle maybe).
2013-01-12 12:41:16 AM
1 votes:
can't the police be out there solving real crimes?
2013-01-12 12:19:35 AM
1 votes:
Someone who's been trained to like My Little Pony should be put down. I mean, it's not instinct to like that sort of thing as an adult, and you can't unlearn it.

BronyMedic: A dog is incapable of consenting


So, if you and your yiffing partner or whatever don't use words before you suck him off, that is not consent?

Rape and abuse rates are higher than anyone would imagine with this new revelation.
/sarcasm
Dogs are incapable of verbal/written consent.
You can, however read the body language in much the same way one can, and does, their lover. A touch, a caress, etc, no words whatsoever. People the world over, since the beginning of man, has managed to have consensual sex without any sort of written/verbal language.

According to you, collecting semen from a stud horse or bull would be "abuse" as well?

No?

What is the express difference between getting them to willing mount and cum in a plastic baggie or cup, or your mouth or hand/anus/vag?

You sound like the worst kind of conservative, one that attempts to rationalize a kneejerk "ick" reaction and perfectly reasonable prejudice.

As the plethora of pictures in these threads shows, there is no need for teaching, be it an animate or inanimate object, dogs, indeed, a vast number of animals, will attempt to hump anything that moves. Sometimes it's a domination thing, but the inverse is true as well, sometimes he just wants to get his rocks off. Who are you to cockblock him?

What is so wrong with just going with it?

chosis.coldfusionvideo.com

Hint: You're a crazy fundy bastard at heart, and your argument is 100 % about your out-dated personal proprieties and morality.
2013-01-12 12:00:11 AM
1 votes:
lot of bestiality apologists in here.

not surprising, given previous fark defenders of incest and Joe Paterno.
2013-01-11 07:20:17 PM
1 votes:

BronyMedic: Amos Quito: You are implying here that any dog that "humps" has been taught that behavior by someone sexually abusing the animal - which would mean that many (most) dogs are being sexually abused.

You must have me confused with another poster in this thread. Either that or you're doing what you always do, and create strawmen and try to "read into" some hidden meaning in what I've posted to argue some form of ridicule from.

Both are understandable mistakes given how you normally act. But the funny thing is, I never said this. In fact, I linked an SPCA article which went into detail on why dogs would "hump" something. Humping is natural. A dog seeking out human vagina to place it's dick in is a learned behavior.

Now, unless you're going for the James Randi Prize in Psychic Mind-reading from beyond the internet, there's no hidden language or meaning behind that statement.


Amos Quito: I call bullshiat.

Either support that implication with evidence (quote it in the thread - and it had better be good) or retract.

You want me to link evidence that supports a fictional statement I never made outside of your mind to support your strawman?

Damn, dude.  If you're going to champion animal abusers, at least own it. Be honest about it. It's not going to be the first morally reprehensible act you've glorified or defended on FARK, after all. You should feel proud to be known as "that guy who trolls by defending Dog-Farkers as "Natural Animal Behavior".

[images.encyclopediadramatica.se image 300x375]


BronyMedic

No, you clearly spoke making a specific claim regarding 'how things are' ie: You made a statement that dogs had to be put down because of this learned, and non unlearnable behavior. That statement sounds like bullshiat, and people called you on it.

So, in the parlance of wikipedia: Citation needed

Or, colloquially: That sounds like bullshiat, so we are going to need more than your expert statement to believe
2013-01-11 06:49:45 PM
1 votes:

Amos Quito: You are implying here that any dog that "humps" has been taught that behavior by someone sexually abusing the animal - which would mean that many (most) dogs are being sexually abused.


You must have me confused with another poster in this thread. Either that or you're doing what you always do, and create strawmen and try to "read into" some hidden meaning in what I've posted to argue some form of ridicule from.

Both are understandable mistakes given how you normally act. But the funny thing is, I never said this. In fact, I linked an SPCA article which went into detail on why dogs would "hump" something. Humping is natural. A dog seeking out human vagina to place it's dick in is a learned behavior.

Now, unless you're going for the James Randi Prize in Psychic Mind-reading from beyond the internet, there's no hidden language or meaning behind that statement.


Amos Quito: I call bullshiat.

Either support that implication with evidence (quote it in the thread - and it had better be good) or retract.


You want me to link evidence that supports a fictional statement I never made outside of your mind to support your strawman?

Damn, dude.  If you're going to champion animal abusers, at least own it. Be honest about it. It's not going to be the first morally reprehensible act you've glorified or defended on FARK, after all. You should feel proud to be known as "that guy who trolls by defending Dog-Farkers as "Natural Animal Behavior".

images.encyclopediadramatica.se
2013-01-11 06:28:05 PM
1 votes:
uberhumor.com
2013-01-11 04:51:01 PM
1 votes:

weltallica: [i.imgur.com image 640x480]

Say what you will.

At least I KNOW he loves me.


I have never clicked on a profile faster, or been more sorely disappointed.
2013-01-11 02:12:40 PM
1 votes:

The Angry Hand of God: I am curious as to the "conspiracy" part of the charge.


Criminal conspiracy occurs whenever more than one person plan or execute a crime. Interestingly enough, it is a felony, even if the base crime is a misdemeanor. It is typically the first extra charge filed when the DA decides to throw the book at someone.

It is also possible to be acquitted of the crime and convicted of conspiracy, believe it or not.
2013-01-11 12:30:30 PM
1 votes:
On the web, off the top of my head I can recall having seen male dogs humping totally on their own initiative:

cats
cows
a dead frozen dog
a deer
a monkey
a racoon
a lioness

Hilarious, and about 1/3 of these animals seemed unaware that the dog was going to town on them, the rest seemed bored.

I'd google and post pics, but that may be NSFW I guess.
F42
2013-01-11 12:28:33 PM
1 votes:

hdhale: Since the dog is acting on instinct and training and wouldn't naturally desire intercourse outside its species


said the person who's never seen a real live dog, ever.

they be humpin' everythang!
2013-01-11 12:25:59 PM
1 votes:

impaler: BronyMedic: dogs do not instinctively mount and fark a human woman

So... you've never owned a dog I see.

My dog instinctively mounts and humps a teddy bear. Also legs and arms.


We bred dachshunds (with other dachshunds) when I was growing up. The males would get to humping anything, feet, ankles, shinbones -- hey, they're dachshunds, they can't reach much higher than that -- but it wasn't just a Dom thing. Sometimes the rocket would emerge and even squirt (eww). I imagine you give him ANY positive reinforcement (ie. a pleasing receptacle for his doggie-johnson), and he'll hump on gleefully until he's tired and ready for that cigarette.

Now, yer females are a different matter. Ours came into heat just twice a year and while I never tested the matter, I understood that it meant they weren't even receptive or capable of sexing unless they were in season. Regardless, they would never just back up to you and say, "Give it to me, baby".

I suppose the law might make the distinction between pitcher and catcher, but then laws being laws and what with the Equality and What Not, I suppose if you make it illegal for a man to fark a female dog, then you must likewise make it illegal for a woman with a strap-on to fark a female dog. And likewise nobody gets to be farked by a male dog. Sort of a sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander kind of thing, only that's for goose-farkers, I suppose.
2013-01-11 12:22:35 PM
1 votes:
If it ain't a dead deer by the side of the road it ain't shiat.

/that one goes back a ways
2013-01-11 12:08:59 PM
1 votes:
"Police say the investigation began late last month from a concerned citizen's tip."

What I really want to know is how the "concerned" citizen found out?  Did the boyfriend show the pics?  Did she brag about being farked by a dog?  I can't imagine why a dog-farker or her boyfriend would want anyone else to know.
2013-01-11 12:01:40 PM
1 votes:
This is why some pics should never be posted to Facebook.
2013-01-11 11:53:14 AM
1 votes:

BronyMedic: dogs do not instinctively mount and fark a human woman (or male).


Dogs hump everything. Legs, pillows, other dogs, the cat, children.
2013-01-11 11:32:32 AM
1 votes:
There is a pig semen business here and I can assure you the pigs know when it is harvesting time (twice a week) and appear to be very willing and happy to participate.
2013-01-11 11:14:20 AM
1 votes:
If it's generally legal to feed your dog peanut butter, does it really matter if you put it in a bowl or a box?
2013-01-11 11:12:54 AM
1 votes:

BronyMedic: Philimus: semiotix: "I guess I'm okay with there being anti-bestiality laws--strictly on animal abuse grounds. The people who fark animals are probably not going to be very considerate of their welfare and safety in general...."

I'm not so sure about this. I mean, dog-farking isn't a kink I would ever think of either, but how can it be animal abuse if it's a male dog pitching to a woman? Wouldn't consent sort of be implied by the fact that he's farking her? And I don't know if there's any chance of STDs being a problem but would guess any devotchka inclined to do it "doggy-style" for real might want to make sure her hound is clean and healthy at least in that respect.

\Whole story sounds fishy to me. And haven't cops got more serious crimes to investigate than stuff like this?

A dog is incapable of consenting, and mating with humans is a learned behavior - dogs do not instinctively mount and fark a human woman (or male).



You've never been around dogs much, have you?
2013-01-11 10:49:38 AM
1 votes:

fickenchucker: BronyMedic: orclover: This thread is just fine without pics. Seriously.

Click the picture! It'll helpfully show what was filmed!

[i49.tinypic.com image 400x386]

Infatuations with horses is pretty common with these bestiality freaks, too.


I always thought of people having sex with horses highly improbable, the math just isnt there. If this is happening then why arent ER's lined with men with hoof prints where their testicles used to be and women torn nearly in half? I mean you spook a horse from behind and its going to kick you......seems to be about the spookiest farking thing you could do to a horse. I mean I know its happened in roman times but those guys had like teams of slaves to help them out, but in modern day? It just seems like a major operation requiring a group of people and possibly a forklift. Who the hell would find that erotic?
2013-01-11 10:44:55 AM
1 votes:
semiotix: "I guess I'm okay with there being anti-bestiality laws--strictly on animal abuse grounds. The people who fark animals are probably not going to be very considerate of their welfare and safety in general...."

I'm not so sure about this. I mean, dog-farking isn't a kink I would ever think of either, but how can it be animal abuse if it's a male dog pitching to a woman? Wouldn't consent sort of be implied by the fact that he's farking her? And I don't know if there's any chance of STDs being a problem but would guess any devotchka inclined to do it "doggy-style" for real might want to make sure her hound is clean and healthy at least in that respect.

\Whole story sounds fishy to me. And haven't cops got more serious crimes to investigate than stuff like this?
2013-01-11 10:43:11 AM
1 votes:
Wonder if they did it human style.
2013-01-11 10:40:45 AM
1 votes:

BronyMedic: Kit Fister: hdhale: Kit Fister: I'm sorry, but, why is this even a crime? People, own home, consenting adults, whatever.

Keeping an animal around as a living sex toy should probably be a crime of some sort I would think. Since the dog is acting on instinct and training and wouldn't naturally desire intercourse outside its species, I'm not sure that you could designate the dog as anything but that in this case.

So, we criminalize everything we don't like? Does that mean I can criminalize PBR, anti-hunters, vegans, and skinny jeans?

Well, it's not like there are places people can go to get things that would enable them to do that, without abusing the animal. (NSFW, or anything in your mouth at the moment you see it. Yes, those are REAL products.)


And, I'm still having a hard time making the leap from dog gets his rocks off to abuse of the animal. Abuse in my mind suggests that it's doing some sort of harm to the animal.
2013-01-11 10:32:24 AM
1 votes:
Police say the investigation began late last month from a concerned citizen's tip.

They obviously told somebody, and now know who ratted them out.
2013-01-11 10:29:53 AM
1 votes:

Ahkam: The dog-farker in question:

[morallowground.com image 232x409]

Link: http://morallowground.com/2013/01/09/milford-delaware-couple-samantha- l-golt-and-james-p-crow-arrested-on-bestiality-charges/

/ew


A picture pff of facebook of a woman who was holding a baby (guessing from the bit of ear not cropped from the photo)

That site better be sure of their ID there, or someone's pre-job google searches are going to need some prospective employer alerting*. And if I was on the jury in a hypothetical libel suit like that, the news site had better have good liability insurance.

/* "No, I'm not THAT Samantha!"
2013-01-11 10:28:02 AM
1 votes:
morallowground.com
James Crow, the boyfriend who took pictures of his girlfriend having sex with her pit bulls.
2013-01-11 10:22:50 AM
1 votes:
I guess I'm okay with there being anti-bestiality laws--strictly on animal abuse grounds. The people who fark animals are probably not going to be very considerate of their welfare and safety in general.

But I'm not sure it ought to be news (or even not-news-but-rather-Fark-dot-com). As the internet will tell you, this is not exactly an uncommon practice.

Police say the investigation began late last month from a concerned citizen's tip.

Heh. The first rule of dog-farking is that you do not talk about dog-farking. Did we learn nothing from Bobcat Goldthwait's seminal dog-farking rom-com Sleeping Dogs Lie, people?
2013-01-11 10:21:31 AM
1 votes:

hdhale: Kit Fister: I'm sorry, but, why is this even a crime? People, own home, consenting adults, whatever.

Keeping an animal around as a living sex toy should probably be a crime of some sort I would think. Since the dog is acting on instinct and training and wouldn't naturally desire intercourse outside its species, I'm not sure that you could designate the dog as anything but that in this case.


So, we criminalize everything we don't like? Does that mean I can criminalize PBR, anti-hunters, vegans, and skinny jeans?
2013-01-11 10:16:45 AM
1 votes:

revman64: So, she gave the dog a bone(r)...


I have something for you...AC/DC had something to say about that.
2013-01-11 10:12:37 AM
1 votes:
Now he is going to come home and worry about his lady farking his best friend.
2013-01-11 10:11:52 AM
1 votes:
That's knot cool.
2013-01-11 10:05:18 AM
1 votes:
While I agree that this is disturbing to some degree, I don't really get why it's illegal. Aren't there some murders to solve or something? I guess it's animal abuse... Sort of.

At least both adults were consenting. (The dog obviously can't.) a friend of mine came home once to find her husband getting f*cked by the dog. Which had apparently been happening for sometime.

They got a divorce.
2013-01-11 10:04:13 AM
1 votes:
The dog-farker in question:

morallowground.com

Link: http://morallowground.com/2013/01/09/milford-delaware-couple-samantha- l-golt-and-james-p-crow-arrested-on-bestiality-charges/

/ew
2013-01-11 10:03:12 AM
1 votes:
I'm sorry, but, why is this even a crime? People, own home, consenting adults, whatever.
2013-01-11 09:59:47 AM
1 votes:
It's interspecies erotica.
2013-01-11 09:57:57 AM
1 votes:
In her defense, he was begging for it...
2013-01-11 09:57:29 AM
1 votes:
Just remember... bark means bark
2013-01-11 09:56:37 AM
1 votes:
A quick google search seems to indicate this is not all that uncommon.

/Kelly can be a guy's name...
2013-01-11 09:54:18 AM
1 votes:
I wanted to see pics of the dog. Anyone know what kind of dog puts up with this?
 
Displayed 51 of 51 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report