If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(My Fox DC)   Don't bring a cattle prod to a gun fight   (myfoxdc.com) divider line 26
    More: Fail, Lance Tomberlin, clerk  
•       •       •

3370 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Jan 2013 at 4:22 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



26 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-01-09 10:44:38 PM  
'florida' tag exists for a reason subby.

Learn it.
Know it.
Live it.
 
2013-01-10 04:24:42 AM  
Or do, but don't expect to live long.
 
2013-01-10 04:27:19 AM  
What if I bring one to a orgy?
 
2013-01-10 04:38:18 AM  

drjekel_mrhyde: What if I bring one to a orgy?


It's usually alright, but it seems like you have to drive to Iowa to find a decent cow orgy, anymore.
 
2013-01-10 05:30:34 AM  
Ban cattle prods!
 
2013-01-10 05:36:30 AM  
Maybe it would be excessive force to shoot him, but shouldn't he at least be shot for being a mega-dumass?
 
2013-01-10 05:41:20 AM  
He needed a cap in the ass so to think about it.
 
2013-01-10 05:52:52 AM  

drjekel_mrhyde: What if I bring one to a orgy?


Go on...
 
2013-01-10 05:56:01 AM  

StoPPeRmobile: Ban cattle prods!


Came here to say this. The obvious response is that today's cattle prod probably resembles ye olde musket more than modern assault rifle does in terms of general effectiveness and thus is arguably more deserving of 2nd amendment protections than a Bushmaster as far as the intention of the authors of the US Constitution is concerned (South Park-esque debate about such intentions aside).

Bring on the National Cattle Prod Association.
 
2013-01-10 06:05:01 AM  
Subby, i do not appreciate your brand of humor.
 
2013-01-10 06:16:49 AM  

Aussie_As: StoPPeRmobile: Ban cattle prods!

Came here to say this. The obvious response is that today's cattle prod probably resembles ye olde musket more than modern assault rifle does in terms of general effectiveness and thus is arguably more deserving of 2nd amendment protections than a Bushmaster as far as the intention of the authors of the US Constitution is concerned (South Park-esque debate about such intentions aside).

Bring on the National Cattle Prod Association.


Google: Bushmaster= Bushmaster Firearms International (for those of us who don't know what the fark)

KritterDictionary: Bushmaster= what KrispyKritter was in youthful bachelor days long ago
 
2013-01-10 06:36:24 AM  
and that's no bull.
 
2013-01-10 06:36:53 AM  

KrispyKritter: Aussie_As: StoPPeRmobile: Ban cattle prods!

Came here to say this. The obvious response is that today's cattle prod probably resembles ye olde musket more than modern assault rifle does in terms of general effectiveness and thus is arguably more deserving of 2nd amendment protections than a Bushmaster as far as the intention of the authors of the US Constitution is concerned (South Park-esque debate about such intentions aside).

Bring on the National Cattle Prod Association.

Google: Bushmaster= Bushmaster Firearms International (for those of us who don't know what the fark)

KritterDictionary: Bushmaster= what KrispyKritter was in youthful bachelor days long ago


I'm pleading guilty to just trying to sound clever having read the term Bushmaster in a few article following some recent appalling shootings in the US. I actually know nothing about guns.

Bush on the other hand I certainly appreciate. I could get really corny and claim to be a lover not a fighter but it's simply more accurate to say I have a bit of a fetish about hairy rather than bald.

Thanks for turning this thread in the right direction dude.
 
2013-01-10 06:45:09 AM  
Drew will be pissed when he sees that someone greenlit this.
 
2013-01-10 07:07:35 AM  

david_gaithersburg: Drew will be pissed when he sees that someone greenlit this.


I take it there's a gun thread "ban" now?
 
2013-01-10 07:23:59 AM  

Fail in Human Form: david_gaithersburg: Drew will be pissed when he sees that someone greenlit this.

I take it there's a gun thread "ban" now?


.
Nah, a ban on the basic human right of self preservation.
 
2013-01-10 07:28:34 AM  
I thought the cattle prod would win out on this one.
 
2013-01-10 07:30:16 AM  
Not unless your name is Chigurgh.
 
2013-01-10 08:42:14 AM  

david_gaithersburg: Fail in Human Form: david_gaithersburg: Drew will be pissed when he sees that someone greenlit this.

I take it there's a gun thread "ban" now?


No, just ones about private citizens using them to defend lives and or property. Similar to the run up to the election and trying to get a post green lit that was not favorable to Obama or unfavorable to Romney. It is Drew's website he can censor it how he wants, It is sort of like MSNBC or a bizarro Fox News
.
Nah, a ban on the basic human right of self preservation.

Haven't you heard? The 2nd Amendment is about hunting and the National Guard

"Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self-defense." (John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America [1787-1788])

"Resistance to sudden violence, for the preservation not only of my person, my limbs, and life, but of my property, is an indisputable right of nature which I have never surrendered to the public by the compact of society, and which perhaps, I could not surrender if I would." (John Adams, Boston Gazette, Sept. 5, 1763, reprinted in The Works of John Adams 438 [Charles F. Adams ed., 1851])
 
2013-01-10 08:59:30 AM  
www.espressob2b.com

/Fark, I am dissapoint.
 
2013-01-10 09:31:48 AM  

Aussie_As: StoPPeRmobile: Ban cattle prods!

Came here to say this. The obvious response is that today's cattle prod probably resembles ye olde musket more than modern assault rifle does in terms of general effectiveness and thus is arguably more deserving of 2nd amendment protections than a Bushmaster as far as the intention of the authors of the US Constitution is concerned (South Park-esque debate about such intentions aside).

Bring on the National Cattle Prod Association.


Although the story would be twice as amusing had the clerk pulled a cattle prod in response.
 
2013-01-10 09:42:00 AM  
That clerk obviously is a pussy and has a very small penis. A REAL man wouldn't grab a gun, he'd go mano-a-mano with the bad guy, besting him with superior martial arts skills.

/only pussies are better armed than the criminals attacking them
//I learned that on Fark
 
2013-01-10 09:50:23 AM  
images.wikia.com
 
2013-01-10 10:12:55 AM  

RickN99: That clerk obviously is a pussy and has a very small penis. A REAL man wouldn't grab a gun, he'd go mano-a-mano with the bad guy, besting him with superior martial arts skills.

/only pussies are better armed than the criminals attacking them
//I learned that on Fark

'
Then you have learned nothing. According to Fark the clerks first move should have been to talk to and attempt to reason with criminal. If that a failed the clerk should have attempted to run away. If unable to do that the clerk should have submitted to whatever the criminal wanted and then dialed 911 at the first opportunity providing he/her survived the encounter.

"Whatever they are, victim disarmers are not concerned neighborhood moms with whom you've amiably agreed to disagree. They're...lying, thieving parasites who'd rather see a woman raped in an alley and strangled with her own pantyhose than see her with a gun in her hand." -- L. Neil Smith & Aaron Zelman, "A Blueprint for Ending Gun Control"
 
2013-01-10 11:09:50 AM  
pseudoscience:
"Although the story would be twice as amusing had the clerk pulled a cattle prod in response."

That'd be a shocking turn of events.
 
2013-01-10 11:41:35 AM  
No patience with your cattle prod, boy ...

warincontext.org
 
Displayed 26 of 26 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report