If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Guardian)   Obama may issue executive order on gun control, which will immediately triple the price of assault weapons and popcorn   (guardian.co.uk) divider line 78
    More: Interesting, assault weapons, Biden, presidential executive order, for sale by owner, force of law, semi-automatic rifle  
•       •       •

11846 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Jan 2013 at 4:52 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-09 04:37:43 PM
6 votes:

Lucky LaRue: You're right: this would really piss off the tea party, and they could conceivably go far enough to justify Obama cracking down with martial law.


The Hoverounds would die before they got anywhere near the capitol.
2013-01-09 05:05:16 PM
5 votes:

Mrbogey: Enjoy your rights while you can.


I know, right?  I should have stocked up on laudanum before the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914.
2013-01-09 06:10:14 PM
4 votes:

Clash City Farker: RulerOfNone: Is a 444 Raging Bull considered an "assault weapon"?

What about a 1966 Beatles Revolver?


Only three hits in 28 minutes so probably not.
2013-01-09 05:09:05 PM
4 votes:

Mr.BobDobalita: super_grass: odinsposse: Oh, and there are about 80,000 alcohol related deaths per year. Cite

Yes but alcohol aren't deadly military-style killing machines designed to kill people harder than your average people-killing pistol.

Plus alcohol is my vice of choice, so hands off.

All rifles, including assault rifles killed ~400 people last year. I would guess Advil killed more.

I can't wrap my head around wanting to remove literally tens of millions of rifles to maybe sorta kinda have a possibility of a chance to reduce 400 murders, even though they probably would have been killed another way for pissing someone off enough to kill someone.



How about having the National Guard patrol black neighborhoods? Has Obama suggested that yet? I would imagine that could cut down on thousands of homicides a year.
2013-01-09 04:58:06 PM
4 votes:
Obama: Gun salesperson of the decade.
2013-01-09 09:02:21 PM
3 votes:
i253.photobucket.com

No matter how I begged Mumsy would never let me get a toy gun. So me and the neighbor kids played Cowboys and Indians and Diplomat.

I have to say, it was tough but thanks to Mumsy's helicopter parenting, I can write one hell of a treaty.
2013-01-09 06:00:26 PM
3 votes:
I remember back during the Bush administration when executive orders were bad. Good times.
2013-01-09 05:33:52 PM
3 votes:
I like how owning one gun makes you a gun nut. Kinda like having one beer makes you an alcoholic, or one joint makes you a rapist.
2013-01-09 05:05:18 PM
3 votes:
that's torn it. wild pigs are gonna invade and take over the country now.
2013-01-09 04:25:07 PM
3 votes:

Dejah: I think some tea kettles would boil over.


This is probably just the Obama administration trolling the hell out of the libertarians, but we should at least consider the possibility that something more insidious is going on.  You're right:  this would really piss off the tea party, and they could conceivably go far enough to justify Obama cracking down with martial law.  I'm not saying it's going to happen that way, but we've got to start thinking like they do before it's too late.
2013-01-09 07:18:19 PM
2 votes:

evoke: I remember all you libs saying that "Obama is NOT coming for your guns you're just being paranoid" before the election


I remember you claiming that Romney would win the election before the election.
2013-01-09 05:54:20 PM
2 votes:

EatenTheSun: Insatiable Jesus: HeWhoHasNoName: Insatiable Jesus: HeWhoHasNoName: I've put 20 hits on 10 targets with three reloads in less than a 90 seconds.

[ih1.redbubble.net image 413x550]

All I'm pointing out is that the ability to put a lot of rounds on target quickly isn't unique to magazine-fed "assault weapons"... and in fact a 100+ year old bolt action rifle is easily capable of it. Which cleanly undermines the fallacious argument that "assault weapons" are somehow significantly more deadly in that regard. They're not, and it's a clear sign of ignorance about the subject matter to claim so.

Then again, I can tell you're not actually interested in rational, calm discourse.

If you're trying to make the argument that bolt action is as deadly as a semi-auto, you are something else. Ridiculous on its face.

I have some of each. Which one do you feel like running from? I'll even let you pick the caliber.



Homicidal ideation in a Gunfapper? I am SHOCKED people!
2013-01-09 05:19:12 PM
2 votes:
"This year will go down in history! For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"

You know who also liked gun control...
2013-01-09 05:17:11 PM
2 votes:
I think the plan is just to keep saying "We'll do something!" until the gun nuts boil over and lose their shiat.
2013-01-09 05:08:01 PM
2 votes:
I can't wait to be lectured about my gun rights by an administration responsible for giving guns to Mexican drug cartels.
2013-01-09 05:06:00 PM
2 votes:
2013-01-09 05:04:19 PM
2 votes:
Hey, if Congress won't act, it makes sense for Obama to do something.

Yeah, to hell with that separation of powers crap. We need a President for Life! Much more efficient.

/if he does an executive order, the civil war will start
2013-01-09 04:55:44 PM
2 votes:
Good. And when crazy pants people like that yelling dude on cnn decide to retaliate, we can put them away forever and make the world a better place.
2013-01-09 04:55:14 PM
2 votes:
I swear he's getting paid by the gun manufacturers.
2013-01-10 08:01:51 AM
1 votes:

MythDragon: RickN99: Damn it! I've been trying to buy an AR-15 for 3 months as my Christmas present to myself. Between the empty shelves and the jacked-up prices, I have been waiting for things to settle down.

This is not helping!

Might I suggest:
[sgcusa.com image 850x374]

Acurate, compact, and takes standard AR-15 Mags


That is the ugliest gun I have ever seen.
2013-01-10 02:09:51 AM
1 votes:

Dan the Schman: During the ten-year assault weapons ban, there were 15 mass shootings, where 192 people were injured or killed.

In the 8 years since the ban was lifted, there have been 28 mass shootings, where 460 people have been injured or killed.


Maybe we should ban mass shootings.
2013-01-10 01:53:00 AM
1 votes:

TheJoe03: Xcott: Don't laugh, 3 out of 5 black people agree!

Hey now, I meant the constitution in its current form. The OP wanted to scrap the whole thing but it seems the amendments work just as well.


It's sloppy. It has a lot of good ideas in it, ideas I think we should keep around. I do think we could clarify a lot of things, and justify certain things. How far is the establishment clause of the first amendment meant to go? Is the right to bear arms related to the militia? Why shall we have no standing army? Do we still wish to keep the bits about independant states under a loose federal union? Because that's no longer close to reality, but we still justify certain things with "state's rights". I'd add a few things, as well. Statements of beliefs, if you will. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, but the rights of the few shall not be trampled on by the wants or prejudices of the many, no law shall be passed that addresses two unrelated issues. No amendments may be tacked on to unrelated bills. Laws must be under five pages long, with allowances for as many charts and graphs as may be necessary. Things of that nature.
2013-01-10 12:24:38 AM
1 votes:
OK A little less severe..

I will submit to a National gun registration that includes a mental health evaluation ONLY if you submit to a National Federal ID Card that is required for voting and public assistance including food stamps, WIC, Unemployment Benefits, SSI and Welfare. This card can only be issued to US Citizens (Natural Born to US Citizens or Legally Naturalized). That same ID card will track the mental stability of the holder as well as establishing him as a citizen of the United States of America. This card must also let the holder to purchase firearms and ammunition w/out any further verification or background check.
2013-01-09 10:05:30 PM
1 votes:
i141.photobucket.com
2013-01-09 09:47:23 PM
1 votes:

Rockstone: whidbey: Some drugs are dangerous, some aren't, all guns are

So is a knife, and a machete, and an axe, and a sword...


That's why we periodically have sword massacres in movie theaters and elementary schools.

Come to think of it, why did civilization invent firearms at all, when we already had swords? Swords are already dangerous!
2013-01-09 09:33:59 PM
1 votes:

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Government Fromage: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Government Fromage: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: "If it's good enough for the professional, it's good enough for you. Bushmaster. The world's finest AR-platform rifle."

[www.motherjones.com image 466x625]

Congratulations. Dumb advertising is dumb. It's *not* what the professionals (assuming they mean soldiers) use.

Only marketed as such.

Pretty much, but marketing goes a long way. An AR15 and it's military equivalent are about as similar as your Ford Taurus and the one driven by some Nascar guy.

Still fairly popular.

[img2.timeinc.net image 225x300][timenewsfeed.files.wordpress.com image 200x300][static.guim.co.uk image 200x300][www.gannett-cdn.com image 220x300]


img707.imageshack.us
"haha, they think their bodycounts are impressive"
2013-01-09 08:59:57 PM
1 votes:
www.foreignpolicy.com

The only weapon we should be allowed to have should be this watermelon launcher.
2013-01-09 08:21:06 PM
1 votes:

whidbey: To me, an assault rifle is dangerous enough that I do not feel that knowing the kind of distinction you're talking about is the point


I don't think the distinction is as large as you think it is. In reality, what you would call (or at least what I think you would call, because again, I can't get a definition for 'assault weapon' or 'military grade weapon') an assault weapon isn't that much different than a hell of a lot of other guns on the market that you would say you don't want to ban.

whidbey: especially if it looks


What does cosmetics have to do with anything?

whidbey: and acts like a military weapon.


Lots of guns act like military weapons. The biggest differences between what the military uses and what you would find in a comparable civilian gun (other than full auto, which you really don't see in civilian hands) are that the military tends to go with very versatile platforms. It's not that an AR15 type gun is better than what a civilian has (in fact it can be a lot worse when you look at individual uses), it's that it's suitable for many uses at once. That's one of the biggest reasons civilians like them, they can buy one gun that they can do many things with.

whidbey: I don't know. Is your hunting rifle comparable to what the shooter at Sandy Hook used?


Depends on what aspects you are comparing.

whidbey: Or it a lesser powered weapon more suitable to hunting deer?


It's much more powerful, and more accurate. Rate of fire is lower though, I'll give you that. Of course, if we're going to talk rate of fire (and limits on it) you really ought to compare the actual rate of fire used, not what it is technically capable of. For instance, the Sandy Hook killer used about 150 rounds (from what I can tell anyway) in something like 15 minutes. That averages out to 10RPM, or not very fast I can easily hit that with my old bolt action 'hunting rifle'. In fact, the soldiers trained to use the Lee Enfield were trained to hit a minimum of 20RPM, aimed fire. That means 20 rounds hitting a target at 100yd, every minute. More than enough for a spree killer.

justtray: ROFL. Alt outed.


Not sure how misquoting two different people makes either an alt, but that seems to be about your level of logic.
2013-01-09 08:17:40 PM
1 votes:

Clutch2013: Ahem.

This is a civilian hunting rifle.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 573x310]

This is a military-grade precision sniper rifle (bottom example).

[upload.wikimedia.org image 720x374]

The difference between the two? Well, when the Army went to the M24 (not pictured), they went with a longer action to support a longer cartridge, such as a .300 Winchester Magnum. Otherwise, that gun's built off the same platform as the Model 700 above. And for all intents and purposes, the original M40 sniper rifles fielded by the Marines were store-bought Model 700s. Even the latest iteration of the M40, the A5 variant, still uses the same exact action as a store-bought 700.


Solution: mandate that all rifles are to be covered with wood paneling or veneers.

People won't have military-styled weapons and can hunt deer or the odd home intruder with class.
2013-01-09 08:04:24 PM
1 votes:

Jaws_Victim: a liberal is intent on getting their point across in a dignified manner that is meant to respect all parties and Piers did that admirably.


"You are an incredibly stupid man"
2013-01-09 08:04:12 PM
1 votes:
I don't know why the gun owners are upset.

Now they can do what they've been keeping their stockpile of weapons for.

If the government starts restricting guns in ways they don't like, they can start killing every police officer, member of the armed forces, and government official.

You know, to protect us. From us.
2013-01-09 07:55:20 PM
1 votes:

whidbey: This also is not a satisfactory response. I really do not care about splitting hairs.


you are pushing for restrictions on firearms, yet you cant define what these restrictions are going to be because you know nothing about firearms. Kind of like old, worn out republicans writing legislation on vaginas. I know that makes you angry so there's your parallel
2013-01-09 07:51:31 PM
1 votes:

whidbey: Why do we need automatic weapons in the hands of civilians?


What on God's green Earth are you blathering about now? Civilian ownership of automatic weapons is already all but illegal.
2013-01-09 07:34:41 PM
1 votes:
24.media.tumblr.com
2013-01-09 07:20:10 PM
1 votes:

whidbey: pmdgrwr: How are more gun laws going to be different.

Guns!=pot


Exactly. Prohibition will totally work this time. Black markets don't apply to things like guns, and stuff.
2013-01-09 07:11:25 PM
1 votes:

pmdgrwr: All this with laws against drug use. How are more gun laws going to be different.


Well for starters, it's hard to grow guns in your basement.
2013-01-09 06:51:07 PM
1 votes:
I bought Jiffy-stock 3 weeks ago and today I'm a billionaire.
Thanks to the idiots on BOTH side of this argument.

www.conagrafoods.com
2013-01-09 06:34:28 PM
1 votes:
2013-01-09 06:31:21 PM
1 votes:

OgreMagi: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: Giltric: Insatiable Jesus: Mr.BobDobalita: So we've got 100k-ish defensive gun uses (DGU) where lives were probably saved.... and we've got around 12k gun murders.... 100k lives saved to 12k lives lost.... ummmmm.... maybe I"m bad at math, but seems to me guns save more people than kill.


How many DGUs would have been unnecessary if the other party didn't have a gun?


Did the guy in Atlanta who was shot by the woman hiding with her 2 kids in the closet have a gun?

I mean maybe he just wanted to scare her or play mousetrap with her kids....

He had a crowbar.

And likely would have moved on had she answered the door or made her presence known.

I seriously hate the anti-2nd crowd's habit of blaming the victim.  It's their own special kind of derp.


I understand that if it was a legitimate home invasion her body would have had ways of rejecting that.
2013-01-09 06:29:04 PM
1 votes:

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: HartRend: CRIMINALS DO NOT FOLLOW LAWS

OUTLAWING GUNS DOES NOT DO A DAMN THING TO THE BAD GUYS

ONLY THE GOOD GUYS FOLLOW THE LAW

OUTLAWING GUNS ONLY TAKES AWAY FROM THE GOOD GUYS

Where are the bad guys getting their guns?


Well the mexican bad guys were getting their guns from this administration.
2013-01-09 06:07:57 PM
1 votes:

EatenTheSun: Insatiable Jesus: EatenTheSun: Insatiable Jesus: HeWhoHasNoName: Insatiable Jesus: HeWhoHasNoName: I've put 20 hits on 10 targets with three reloads in less than a 90 seconds.

[ih1.redbubble.net image 413x550]

All I'm pointing out is that the ability to put a lot of rounds on target quickly isn't unique to magazine-fed "assault weapons"... and in fact a 100+ year old bolt action rifle is easily capable of it. Which cleanly undermines the fallacious argument that "assault weapons" are somehow significantly more deadly in that regard. They're not, and it's a clear sign of ignorance about the subject matter to claim so.

Then again, I can tell you're not actually interested in rational, calm discourse.

If you're trying to make the argument that bolt action is as deadly as a semi-auto, you are something else. Ridiculous on its face.

I have some of each. Which one do you feel like running from? I'll even let you pick the caliber.


Homicidal ideation in a Gunfapper? I am SHOCKED people!

Nah, I have no desire to kill you. But if I did, it wouldn't make much difference which rifle I brought.



i.qkme.me
2013-01-09 05:59:16 PM
1 votes:

RulerOfNone: Is a 444 Raging Bull considered an "assault weapon"?


What about a 1966 Beatles Revolver?
2013-01-09 05:58:51 PM
1 votes:

duffblue: Insatiable Jesus: HeWhoHasNoName: Insatiable Jesus: HeWhoHasNoName: I've put 20 hits on 10 targets with three reloads in less than a 90 seconds.

[ih1.redbubble.net image 413x550]

All I'm pointing out is that the ability to put a lot of rounds on target quickly isn't unique to magazine-fed "assault weapons"... and in fact a 100+ year old bolt action rifle is easily capable of it. Which cleanly undermines the fallacious argument that "assault weapons" are somehow significantly more deadly in that regard. They're not, and it's a clear sign of ignorance about the subject matter to claim so.

Then again, I can tell you're not actually interested in rational, calm discourse.

If you're trying to make the argument that bolt action is as deadly as a semi-auto, you are something else. Ridiculous on its face.

Tell that to the 16 dead and 32 injured by charles whitman


duffblue: Insatiable Jesus: HeWhoHasNoName: Insatiable Jesus: HeWhoHasNoName: I've put 20 hits on 10 targets with three reloads in less than a 90 seconds.

[ih1.redbubble.net image 413x550]

All I'm pointing out is that the ability to put a lot of rounds on target quickly isn't unique to magazine-fed "assault weapons"... and in fact a 100+ year old bolt action rifle is easily capable of it. Which cleanly undermines the fallacious argument that "assault weapons" are somehow significantly more deadly in that regard. They're not, and it's a clear sign of ignorance about the subject matter to claim so.

Then again, I can tell you're not actually interested in rational, calm discourse.

If you're trying to make the argument that bolt action is as deadly as a semi-auto, you are something else. Ridiculous on its face.

Tell that to the 16 dead and 32 injured by charles whitman



16 dead in 2 hours with a bolt action rifle.

26 dead in 10 minutes with a semi-auto.

Is this the math Gunfappers use to make themselves feel better? Oh wait, that's what the guns are for. Sorry.
2013-01-09 05:50:59 PM
1 votes:

umad: The AR15 is one of the smallest rifle calibers there is.


Any weapon that fires AR15s would have to be pretty damn large.

umad: You don't understand it because surprise, surprise, you don't know shiat about guns and base your arguments on feelings rather than logic.


Oh, irony.
2013-01-09 05:43:29 PM
1 votes:
FARK gun threads read like Free Republic politics threads.

/enjoys shooting
//not a gun owner, maybe one day I will purchase one.
2013-01-09 05:40:58 PM
1 votes:

HeWhoHasNoName: I've put 20 hits on 10 targets with three reloads in less than a 90 seconds.


ih1.redbubble.net
2013-01-09 05:40:27 PM
1 votes:
So, if us gun owners (especially those of us who own evil things like assault weapons) are supposed to feel shame and embarrassment at owning one, do people who drink also feel shame and embarrassment every time they take a sip?

What, with the 10,000 drunk driving deaths. And the 100k+ people who die in the hospital either due to or complicated by prolonged, heavy alcohol use? And all the rapes, robberies, assaults and murders that are committed by drunk people? Or the domestic violence caused by alcoholics? Or the hundreds of thousands of kids who are abused and neglected by an alcoholic parent?

I mean, shouldn't all the alcohol nuts come together as part of this nation and say "Now Is the Time To End This!" We need to have a national conversation about alcohol. We need to put reasonable restrictions on it. Why does ANYBODY need a liter bottle of vodka? If you drank that whole thing, you would be *dead*. Why is it that anyone with an ID that says they are over 21 can walk into a liquor store and buy as much alcohol as they want, even if they have a rap sheet 3 feet long with alcohol related convictions. My god, we even have bars that mix alcohol with fruit juice, so that people who don't even like the taste of alcohol can get drunk.
2013-01-09 05:34:03 PM
1 votes:

Bit'O'Gristle: There is no easy answer, except outlaw guns except for hunting. To be kept at the range locked up when not used.


Or we could really enforce the 2nd Amendment and require all gun owners to meet weekly/monthly at the nearest town square for a few hours of marching practice and basic infantry tactics. Ya know, sort of like a well-regulated militia.

/If that happens, I get dibs on the beer and pork rinds concession stand.
2013-01-09 05:33:28 PM
1 votes:
I think this is just a way to get the economy moving. Scaring fat pasty white people into buying more guns and ammo. The paranoid losers fall for it every time.
2013-01-09 05:29:51 PM
1 votes:

super_grass: In b4 gun nuts complain that Obama is somehow conspiring against them.

NOBODY IS TRYING TO TAKE YOUR GUNZ AWAY


Just like he said he won't use the indefinite detention power he singed into law.
2013-01-09 05:25:19 PM
1 votes:
All things that I don't completely agree with are scary, and I wish to deprive 315 million other people of their 2nd amendment rights as a result of my own fear, ignorance and cowardice
2013-01-09 05:22:01 PM
1 votes:
I doubt that this will happen but if it does I swear to walk up to every person that told me that Obama was a constitutional scholar and can be trusted to uphold the constitution and just slap them silly.
2013-01-09 05:21:25 PM
1 votes:
This is like a joke website right?
2013-01-09 05:21:09 PM
1 votes:

Xaneidolon: Think about the principle of this.

What if he were to issue an executive order eroding some part of the first amendment? Or any of a number of others that you might favor. How would you react?

In my mind, it's the same thing.

Let's be more straightforward. If the 2nd amendment needs to go, amend the constitution. If we need to go to war, let's have Congress make a declaration thereof. Ad naseum.

Recall how most of us felt with the legal, extra-legal, and even ethical gymnastics that occurred to "legalize" torture?

It's just all the same to me.



How the fark did they let you in this thread??? Stop making sense!

/newsletter, please
2013-01-09 05:19:41 PM
1 votes:

keepitcherry: duffblue: I can't wait to be lectured about my gun rights by an administration responsible for giving guns to Mexican drug cartels.

I hate to be that guy but , THIS. What a farking joke.



blessthe40oz.com

Barack "You can get my drones when you pry them out of my cold, dead fingers"  Obama
2013-01-09 05:17:30 PM
1 votes:
Assault weapons /= all guns, but hey, don't let that stop the hyperbolic outrage.
cdn.head-fi.org
2013-01-09 05:13:17 PM
1 votes:

tnpir: Thunderpipes: Pub President gets in power, you will of course, be fine with him simply making whatever law he wants too, because liberals are honest and fair.

Good, glad to see you're finally accepting the truth.

/dipshiat


We should just abolish the silly Congress thingie. Just proclaim Obama Emperor and all your dreams come true.
2013-01-09 05:13:11 PM
1 votes:
The black man gonna revoke your man card.
2013-01-09 05:11:51 PM
1 votes:

Dimensio: Nina_Hartley's_Ass: AbbeySomeone: I can understand rifles and pistols but why do people need the big weaponry ie, assault rifles, etc?

To shoot American soldiers and police officers.

Of course, they don't say that until later in the conversation but they get around to it eventually.

Are you actually that misinformed, or are you just lying?


No just a tired troll that doesn't even bother trying anymore.
2013-01-09 05:09:25 PM
1 votes:
Charge the Hoverrounds up Honey, we're goin' to war!

/lol @ the hateful hillbillies
2013-01-09 05:07:58 PM
1 votes:
Maybe now, we can finally castrate the gun makers' lobby and get some real reform around this joint.
2013-01-09 05:05:52 PM
1 votes:

super_grass: odinsposse: Oh, and there are about 80,000 alcohol related deaths per year. Cite

Yes but alcohol aren't deadly military-style killing machines designed to kill people harder than your average people-killing pistol.

Plus alcohol is my vice of choice, so hands off.


so your an alchoholic?

Like I am a gun nut?
2013-01-09 05:04:19 PM
1 votes:

odinsposse: Oh, and there are about 80,000 alcohol related deaths per year. Cite


Yes but alcohol aren't deadly military-style killing machines designed to kill people harder than your average people-killing pistol.

Plus alcohol is my vice of choice, so hands off.
2013-01-09 05:02:24 PM
1 votes:
Of course if anything happens to Hobama then Biden becomes el Presidente so he's as safe as a babe in his mother's arms.

img.gawkerassets.com
2013-01-09 05:01:35 PM
1 votes:

L82DPRT: If I were a selfish 1% with a warehouse full of semi-autos and my own private police I'd support a ban too.


That's cute how you're trying to turn that whole "1%" thing around on liberals.

It's almost as funny as when conservatives call liberals "elitists."  That usually gets a chuckle out of me.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some popcorn to make.
2013-01-09 05:01:13 PM
1 votes:

Jaws_Victim: Good. And when crazy pants people like that yelling dude on cnn decide to retaliate, we can put them away forever and make the world a better place.


So were you also waiting and hoping Piers Morgan would rear back and coldcock that motherfarker upside the head?
2013-01-09 05:01:06 PM
1 votes:
Gun owners truly believe that one day they are going to bust into the white house and start running things.
2013-01-09 05:01:01 PM
1 votes:
"You can have my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers."

Your proposal is acceptable.
2013-01-09 04:59:30 PM
1 votes:

FlashHarry: ourbigdumbmouth: I'm cool with only rich people having guns

i keep hearing this talking point. can anyone elucidate?


A poor person can afford a $1000 AR-15, but $3000 is just out of their price range for good.
2013-01-09 04:59:01 PM
1 votes:
Hey, if Congress won't act, it makes sense for Obama to do something.
2013-01-09 04:57:48 PM
1 votes:
President Morsi of Egypt pushed his own agenda through, why shouldn't Obama. It isn't like Obama is an elected official in the country that is supposed to be the poster child for democracy.
2013-01-09 04:57:34 PM
1 votes:
In b4 gun nuts complain that Obama is somehow conspiring against them.

NOBODY IS TRYING TO TAKE YOUR GUNZ AWAY
2013-01-09 04:56:49 PM
1 votes:
"We are not going to get caught up in the notion that unless we can do everything we're going to do nothing," Biden said. "It's critically important that we act."

Oh, I'm sure you guys will do something...whether it's a horrible abortion of a bill, twisted into worthlessness as a result of misguided desire to compromise and not piss off the nutwing right, is the actual question.
2013-01-09 04:56:25 PM
1 votes:
Damn it! I've been trying to buy an AR-15 for 3 months as my Christmas present to myself. Between the empty shelves and the jacked-up prices, I have been waiting for things to settle down.

This is not helping!
2013-01-09 04:56:07 PM
1 votes:
Alex Jones is gonna be pissed!

I finally saw that clip with him and PM. OMG, that guy is a loud mouthed schnook if I ever heard one!
2013-01-09 04:54:52 PM
1 votes:
And I may suddenly mutate into a dragon that breathes lightning and shiats diamonds.

Come back when you morons have something more concrete than "May," "Might" or "Could."
2013-01-09 04:54:12 PM
1 votes:
I'm cool with only rich people having guns
2013-01-09 04:53:58 PM
1 votes:
If I were a selfish 1% with a warehouse full of semi-autos and my own private police I'd support a ban too.
 
Displayed 78 of 78 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report