If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Reuters)   Officials note that although the tanker was empty, it didn't spill any oil. Ric Romero does first-ever facepalm   (reuters.com) divider line 4
    More: Followup, San Francisco Bay Bridge, San Francisco Bay, chemical tanker, Golden Gate Bridge, Royal Dutch Shell plc, Marshall Islands, energy market, quarter miles  
•       •       •

2538 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Jan 2013 at 10:01 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-09 10:10:52 AM
1 votes:
A tanker can be unladen of cargo and still have massive amounts of fuel and oil.
2013-01-09 10:09:38 AM
1 votes:
So where did they bury the survivors?
2013-01-09 10:09:33 AM
1 votes:
I would imagine that even an empty tanker has enough residual oil in it to be a problem
2013-01-09 10:05:49 AM
1 votes:
It's important to note whether the tanker was empty when it struck the bridge or became so afterwards.
 
Displayed 4 of 4 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report