violentsalvation: doglover: Anti-gun people are like creationists."I don't know anything and I have no experience, but based on some crap I heard once on TV and some youtube videos I didn't watch the whole way through here's Jesus riding a dinosaur a bunch of things that won't stop crime but would me feel good because I'm very ignorant."They would no longer be anti-gun people if they would take the time to learn about the guns that they are so very afraid of, the existing gun laws, and the blah weapons sparse appearance in violent crime.
t3knomanser: Similarly, requiring firearm owners to carry insurance would create a social net system.
way south: Princess Ryans Knickers: Pro-gun people are like creationists:Anti-gun people are even more like creationists.They have a theory they've never seen work in America but will gladly provide unrelated examples from other nations as proof./specific nations anyway./the moment we start pulling up the full list they go Bevets on your arse.
way south: Prince
Surpheon: Lenny_da_Hog: (and no carrier will ever insure liability from illegal activity)Ya know, making up blatant and easily disproven lies just makes all your other arguments look weaker. Automobile insurance regularly pays out for your illegal acts If you hit and injure someone driving drunk, it is common for you insurance to pay and many states require you to carry such liability insurance. Fanatical liars like you are going to lose the gun rights debate faster than any of the usual suspects on the left everyone has already tuned out - we know their crazy, but you sound crazy and stupid. Do we really want you armed?
Surpheon: Based on current trend lines, deaths by guns will surpass deaths from automobile accidents in the US by 2015.
Without Fail: I spend my time deep stroking my curly red-haired bubble butt equipped wife.
FlashHarry: Dinjiin: [images55.fotki.com image 450x720][i50.tinypic.com image 450x720]FTFY
aegean: Once again, dumbmitter, the 2nd amendment is not about hunting.
DubtodaIll: Also how close are we to ray guns?
duffblue: If gun control advocates want to actually have meaningful discussion and debate about the "assault weapon" and "high capacity" ban, they MUST address these questions
neenerist: Without Fail: I spend my time deep stroking my curly red-haired bubble butt equipped wife.[i48.tinypic.com image 450x505]
p51d007: We divide off the country, put everyone that hates guns, wants them banned onone side of the country.
FlashHarry: i wonder if adam lanza had one on order...
Dancin_In_Anson: FlashHarry: FTFYYou know, I'm curious about something here. There seem to be a few of you who have deemed themselves penis experts and I can only assume that you are one of them seeing as you have made such a post. Since you are such an aficionado of the penis and the sizes of them when it comes to the types of firearms that one might or might not own, how exactly do you determine what the firearm/penis size is? I mean does an average dick qualify for a .22 single shot rifle or maybe a Derringer handgun and a bigger wang get you a Red Rider BB gun while a smaller dangle score you a larger caliber weapon? Or does there some other criteria that you use not based on size vs caliber but size vs rate of fire? How many penises did you study to arrive at your determination? Did you consider them while flaccid or turgid? Was this done in person or were lots of pictures enough for you? If in person did you hold them or was a good long look enough? One of the guys I work with is in the market for a new handgun. Perhaps he could send you a picture of his cock and you could tell him what would work best for him. Let me know eh?
Surpheon: military assault weapon
Lenny_da_Hog: They are not intentionally criminal cases -- things like DUI aren't considered intentionally criminal. If you intentionally murder someone with your car,
doglover: Anti-gun people are like creationists.
anarchy_x: Those who beat their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not.
doglover: DubtodaIll: Also how close are we to ray guns?Ray guns don't work in atmosphere.
vpb: oldfarthenry: Wouldn't it be easier (& cheaper) to just learn how to aim guns? You'd have to stop waving them above your head while you pontificate to do it.Nah. Not macho enough for the little Rambos.R.A.Danny: FlashHarry: i wonder if adam lanza had one on order...Nah, you can't hit the side of a school from the inside using one of those.It would be great for a flock of first graders though.
Taxcheat: Wait until these bedwetters learn there's nothing stopping you from buying a fighter jet or tank. Well, other than the shipping costs, but that's what Amazon Prime is for.
Surpheon: duffblue: If gun control advocates want to actually have meaningful discussion and debate about the "assault weapon" and "high capacity" ban, they MUST address these questionsHoly shiat. I think I briefly dated you in college.If you want to protect gun rights, you need to suggest why they are worth protecting even at the cost of kindergarterners being literally blown to pieces by a crazy guy with a military assault weapon (one with excellent gun control - he put in range time from the reports) .Sorry, 20 dead kindergartners puts the ball in your court a hell of a lot more than a black teen armed with a pack of Skittles. If you don't comprehend how, you have completely lost the battle. It's just a matter of time before you lose your gun rights. Welcome to a meritocracy. Stupid tends to lose in the long run.
p51d007: Here is an idea for you lib gun haters out there.We divide off the country, put everyone that hates guns, wants them banned onone side of the country. Put the gun lovers on the other side. Then erect a 100 FOOTwall. 50 feet high, and 50 feet deep. NO ONE is allowed to move from one side orthe other. Then, in a few years we see how many people on the gun lovers side end updead from "bad guys", versus how many anti gun lovers are still alive, have any of theirproperty etc. In a few years, the pro gun lovers can then come tear down the wall, andhave the fun of shooting up the bad guys on the anti gun lovers side, because, oncethe bad guys find out there is absolutely NO WEAPONS on the anti gun side, they willhave a field day raping and destroying everything on the anti gun side.
Lenny_da_Hog: It's easy to figure out. We use the Lenny Scale.If you are exactly like me -- that is, if you are me -- you have precisely the perfectly sized penis. It is so large that it satisfies all women without appearing to be the result of plastic surgery or Satanic pacts. Therefore, everything I own represents that perfect penis.If you own something slightly more macho than what I have, it is because your penis is too small.If you own something slightly less macho than what I have, it is because you are gay.These are not mutually exclusive. You can be both gay and have a small penis, depending on your consumer choices. For example, you own both a 4x4 3/4-ton pick-up AND a Mazda Miata.
Without Fail: neenerist: Without Fail: I spend my time deep stroking my curly red-haired bubble butt equipped wife.[i48.tinypic.com image 450x505]I admit that the hair is about the same. Everything else in that picture is horribly different.
Surpheon: Lenny_da_Hog: They are not intentionally criminal cases -- things like DUI aren't considered intentionally criminal. If you intentionally murder someone with your car,What happened to the arguement that the majority of guns used to kill people are stolen? Adam Lanza's mom was intentionally criminal when she stockpiled military grade hardware and didn't properly secure it from her crazy son?Seriously, do you think this is a winning argument you're making? It's like you're a Mormon in Utah.
duffblue: A few dead kids is a drop in the barrel in a nation responsible for the deaths of millions due to imperialism.
Stratohead: aegean: Once again, dumbmitter, the 2nd amendment is not about hunting.It's also not about self defense, over throwing the federal government, or some other ridiculous horseshiat. But that doesn't stop the Gun Lobby from repeating that and the hunting garbage over and over and over again. But then the NRA only gives a damn about selling guns and gun accessories, and nothing else, and they will do and say anything to push that agenda...logic or classrooms full of dead children be damned.One of my pets is diabetic. In order to purchase the tiny ass syringes needed to administer her 2 insulin shots per day, I have to show 2 forms of ID and play 20 questions at the drug store, every goddamn time...meanwhile I can walk into any gunshow in the country and buy as big an arsenal as I can afford, no ID, no questions asked.Priorities...what the fark are those?
DubtodaIll: doglover: DubtodaIll: Also how close are we to ray guns?Ray guns don't work in atmosphere.Aw man really? Well why the hell not? I'm just antsy for the next step forward in personal weapon technology. And no strapping a computer to a bullet firing gun doesn't count. I'm talking lasers or electromagnetic manipulation or deatomization or something we don't even have words for yet.
Skyd1v: Ford 1 ton dually and a wheezy little Honda Accord. Crap.
lewismarktwo: I was wondering when the media would start to make hay from bump fire...
Dr Jack Badofsky: Oh, ok. You ARE married to Ronald McDonald.
Der Poopflinger: lewismarktwo: I was wondering when the media would start to make hay from bump fire...bump firing from the hip is one thing, this is kind of different dont you think. hip fire in inaccurate, that add-on is "accurate".
Without Fail: duffblue: A few dead kids is a drop in the barrel in a nation responsible for the deaths of millions due to imperialism.Please give me the names and addresses of a few American kids who don't matter.Maybe some young relatives of yours?Just 20 for now. A drop in the barrel.Thanks.
t3knomanser: I don't understand the reasoning that something must be useful in order to be ownable. I own a few firearms. I would never turn them on another human being or animal, not even in self defense (okay, maybe an animal in self defense).Is there anything inherently wrong with chucking 900 rounds of lead downrange in a controlled environment if that's what you want to do? I think it's incredibly silly, but it's a kind of neat engineering challenge.The problem with firearms is one of externalities. Firearms create an attractive nuisance- we are all measurably less safe because firearms exist and are common in the US. Between accidents, outlier incidents like mass shootings (which, by population, are exceedingly rare), and crime (which usually doesn't involve legally owned firearms, which makes new laws on the subject difficult).So let's apply economics to the problem: each firearm carries with it a risk that it is used in a negative fashion. Each negative application carries with it a social cost- deaths, medical bills, public fear, and so on. This gives us a strategy for attacking the problem in a fashion far more nuanced than "2nd Amendment, biatches!" and "Ban (some/most/all) guns!"A gun tax, for example, would be perfectly reasonable- an assessment at the point of purchase for the total social costs of allowing firearms to be owned. It could be adjusted based on its ability to enact costs- high fire rates and large magazines would be taxed more steeply. Similarly, requiring firearm owners to carry insurance would create a social net system.This allows us to restrict access to firearms without taking active steps to ban anything, it allows us to evaluate our measures based on measurable economic values, it creates a new class of charge to be brought against those who use firearms illegally. It addresses things in terms of externalities.
Der Poopflinger: lewismarktwo: I was wondering when the media would start to make hay from bump fire...bump firing from the hip is one thing, this is kind of different dont you think. hip fire in inaccurate, that "add-on" is accurate.
GungFu: Meh, wake me up when we see these mentioned in the news and a new high score has been set for US mass killings.
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: May 24 2017 22:24:22
Runtime: 0.714 sec (713 ms)