Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Defense News)   US Intelligence: "Uh, you know how we speculated China had around 300 nukes? We may have missed a zero"   (defensenews.com) divider line 33
    More: Scary, People's Republic of China, United States, try, Chinese, nuclear deterrent, Federation of American Scientists, nuclear tests, U.S. law  
•       •       •

17845 clicks; posted to Main » on 07 Jan 2013 at 6:23 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-07 06:07:04 PM  
22 votes:
But if they nuke you into the stone age, an hour later you're civilized again
2013-01-07 06:12:22 PM  
9 votes:
Me bomb you long time.
2013-01-07 06:32:17 PM  
7 votes:
They'll never use them. Wanna know why? General Tso's chicken.
2013-01-07 07:20:42 PM  
5 votes:
Bring it on. I have enough money to buy a 10mm pistol and a Varmint Rifle.

patronsaintofknives.files.wordpress.com
2013-01-07 06:54:43 PM  
4 votes:
China declaring war on us would be like the local Walmart declaring war on a nearby trailer park.
2013-01-07 06:54:27 PM  
3 votes:
img202.imageshack.us
DEATH IS A PREFERABLE ALTERNATIVE TO COMMUNISM.
2013-01-07 06:54:35 PM  
2 votes:

What was plan to take over America again? I forget.......

ts3.mm.bing.net

2013-01-07 06:46:27 PM  
2 votes:
If their nukes are like any other Chinese produced item, they'll break before they can even get any use out of them, because to save costs on parts they replaced the expensive Pu-239 fusion plug with a thin piece of plastic,and wired the whole thing with the thinnest wire they could find.
2013-01-07 06:41:09 PM  
2 votes:
So someone finally found the 0 weapons from Saddam's nuclear program?
2013-01-07 06:36:08 PM  
2 votes:

Brian Ryanberger: Some 'Splainin' To Do: Yeah... I'm not staying up late worrying that China is going to nuke us. They've got way too much invested in being part of the world to bother incinerating it.

You obviously do not understand the Chicom hive mind which is bent on racial domination of the globe by nature's most perfect specimen: the Han Chinese. So perfect they come with a 3 inch dick.


Don't even pretend your teaderping micropenis is any bigger. Poor thing, constantly crushed between your fat rolls and your power chair.
2013-01-07 06:25:36 PM  
2 votes:

Some 'Splainin' To Do: Yeah... I'm not staying up late worrying that China is going to nuke us. They've got way too much invested in being part of the world to bother incinerating it.


You obviously do not understand the Chicom hive mind which is bent on racial domination of the globe by nature's most perfect specimen: the Han Chinese. So perfect they come with a 3 inch dick.
2013-01-08 05:12:43 PM  
1 votes:

ronaprhys: DrPainMD: FTA: The new National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), signed by U.S. President Barack Obama on Jan. 2, orders the Commander of the U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) to submit a report by Aug. 15 on the "underground tunnel network used by the People's Republic of China with respect to the capability of the United States to use conventional and nuclear forces to neutralize such tunnels and what is stored within such tunnels."

Why do we waste our money on this carp? I can guarantee you that Switzerland doesn't waste money on garbage like this. Why not? Because they know that there is zero chance that China is going to nuke them. And, if we'd mind our own business and not try to turn the entire planet into our empire, we wouldn't have to worry about it, either.

We're not trying to turn the world into our empire, dolt. That's too bloody expensive to maintain - a lessen we learned from the Brits. What we're trying to do is turn the entire world into our biatches. Much cheaper for us.

The state of education and critical thinking these days is horrifically bad. How you idiots even make it out of primary school is beyond me.


We already have turned the world into our empire. At the end of WW2, we took over the empire from the Brits and have been working hard to expand it ever since. And we are paying to maintain it... have you seen our military/homeland defense/State Department budgets lately. Maintaining the empire is a major reason why our economy is in the tank.

Altho, you are correct on one point: the state of education and critical thinking these days is horrifically bad. How you idiots even make it out of primary school is beyond me.
2013-01-07 10:52:57 PM  
1 votes:

cchris_39: mayIFark: There is no practical difference between 300 and 3,000.

So, yeah, non-issue.

If your missile defense systems shoot down 95% of the incoming, there is quite a big difference.


Shooting down Scuds is one thing. ICBMs is different.
2013-01-07 09:04:00 PM  
1 votes:

deamonbutterfly: If China bombed the US, wouldn't China's economy cease to exist? They may "own" us, but we own all their "made in china" crap.. in fact, i think when i crap, its pre stamped "made in china". i'll have to check.


Unless it started as a burrito, in which case, "Hecho en Mexico"
2013-01-07 09:02:25 PM  
1 votes:

buzzcut73: If their nukes are like any other Chinese produced item, they'll break before they can even get any use out of them, because to save costs on parts they replaced the expensive Pu-239 fusion plug with a thin piece of plastic,and wired the whole thing with the thinnest wire they could find.


But the real problem with their nukes is that the warhead manufacturer (a wholly owned subsidiary of Bark Bark Celestial Dog Food Conglomerate) replaced the plutonium with lead to save on costs.
2013-01-07 09:02:14 PM  
1 votes:

AverageAmericanGuy: Come on now. No one thinks the Chinese are going to bomb the U.S. with nukes.


Cheap Chinese-made nukes probably won't work half the time.
2013-01-07 08:59:06 PM  
1 votes:

Raoul Eaton: kd1s: Here's something to remember. Everyone remembers former President Jimmy Carter as weak on defense. Well, he wasn't. He's the guy who moved almost our entire nuclear arsenal to a submarine based force.

In essence we can lay waste to China in the matter of about 10 to 20 minutes. And they know it.

Not a good idea, that. Moving everything to submarines raises the stakes and cuts time to de-escalate or detect mistakes -- it tends to promote a "launch on warning" response from the folks who know you can take them out in the same time it takes to cook a frozen burrito.


www.capitalnewyork.com
2013-01-07 08:19:53 PM  
1 votes:
Wanted for questioning:

1.bp.blogspot.com

/has a history of getting decimal points wrong
2013-01-07 07:56:31 PM  
1 votes:

insertsnarkyusername: To be honest why even bother with a second strike? It's a lot more efficient to let the other country's culture evolve to a better point then it is for us climb our way back out of the stone age in a radioactive wasteland.


Well, if you have enough caps, you might get a nice apartment with running water.
2013-01-07 07:24:30 PM  
1 votes:

Sock Ruh Tease: Bring it on. I have enough money to buy a 10mm pistol and a Varmint Rifle.

[patronsaintofknives.files.wordpress.com image 425x318]


Well now, that depends entirely on how good your Barter skill is, doesn't it?
2013-01-07 07:23:45 PM  
1 votes:

tinyarena: whither_apophis: Hu's gonna bomb us??

China. China's gonna bomb us. Didn't you read the article?


I did. Actually it isn't Hu but Wen!
2013-01-07 07:17:16 PM  
1 votes:
Better shiat my pants and increase defense spending.
2013-01-07 07:14:22 PM  
1 votes:

whither_apophis: Hu's gonna bomb us??


Third base?
2013-01-07 07:01:38 PM  
1 votes:

AmazinTim: They're far more likely to nuke themselves in the foot than they are to nuke the US.


Sadly, there was some confusion at Headquarters over the meaning of the phrase "take-out Chinese".
2013-01-07 07:01:13 PM  
1 votes:
Having the space to store 3000 nukes is emphatically NOT the same thing as actually having 3000 nukes. For example, I have room in my garage for as many as 2 Ferraris! But I don't actually have 2 Ferraris. See how that works, subby?
2013-01-07 06:54:44 PM  
1 votes:

whither_apophis: Hu's gonna bomb us??


China. China's gonna bomb us. Didn't you read the article?
2013-01-07 06:46:35 PM  
1 votes:

mayIFark: There is no practical difference between 300 and 3,000.

So, yeah, non-issue.


If your missile defense systems shoot down 95% of the incoming, there is quite a big difference.
2013-01-07 06:46:07 PM  
1 votes:

drjekel_mrhyde: How many does Israel have?
/Somebody had to go there


oh please... like the Jewish people believe they are gods chosen ones and can do no wrong.
2013-01-07 06:41:18 PM  
1 votes:
we need a new mission "to disarm Iraq China of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein Hu-ever's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people Chinese women."
2013-01-07 06:35:19 PM  
1 votes:

neongoats: Defense department guy, "oh shiat, they really almost actually might cut some of our grossly inflated budget"

MI Complex 1%er, "quick, lets try to whip us up a new Cold War"

Defense department guy, "phew, my great great great grand kids 150 years from now need to live in the lap of sybaritic luxury, and I was worried"


I would laugh, if it weren't so true.

/Eh, hell, I'll laugh anyway
//Not like enough sheeple have woken up to do anything about it yet
2013-01-07 06:32:41 PM  
1 votes:
How many does Israel have?
/Somebody had to go there
2013-01-07 06:30:52 PM  
1 votes:
They're far more likely to nuke themselves in the foot than they are to nuke the US.
2013-01-07 06:30:13 PM  
1 votes:
Obviously the only answer to this is to double or triple the US  defence budget. In fact, I propose the Defence Department take ALL incoming revenue, and give back what they don't need. Oh ya, and invoke conscription again. But only the homeless and people making less than $250000 a year.

/Tea Party for the win!
 
Displayed 33 of 33 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report