If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Boomstick Comics)   Frank Darabont signs on to rewrite the Godzilla remake. Now with more zombies   (boomstickcomics.com) divider line 65
    More: Cool, Frank Darabont, Godzilla, Dan Lin, Roy Lee, Legendary Pictures, remakes, zombies, sings  
•       •       •

1274 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 07 Jan 2013 at 12:20 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



65 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-07 03:56:17 PM  

Fano: JinxofSpades: wildstarr: Thank You Black Jesus!: I will be thrilled when every pop culture reference ceases to involve zombies. Jesus christ.

It will just be replaced with something new. Its a on-going cycle. Werewolves of the 80s, vampires of the 90s, and now zombies of the 00s with a little bleed over to the 10s, but something new will be coming soon. And then you will get tired of that as well.

Creatures from various colored lagoons?
C.H.U.D.s?
Mermen?
Trolls?
Mummies?
Slenderman?

Tell me what it's gonna be! I must know!

Boogens


Assblasters.
 
2013-01-07 03:58:43 PM  

JinxofSpades: ArkPanda: JinxofSpades: wildstarr: Thank You Black Jesus!: I will be thrilled when every pop culture reference ceases to involve zombies. Jesus christ.

It will just be replaced with something new. Its a on-going cycle. Werewolves of the 80s, vampires of the 90s, and now zombies of the 00s with a little bleed over to the 10s, but something new will be coming soon. And then you will get tired of that as well.

Creatures from various colored lagoons?
C.H.U.D.s?
Mermen?
Trolls?
Mummies?
Slenderman?

Tell me what it's gonna be! I must know!

Classic fantasy "re-imagined"? We've got a dark and gritty Jack and the Beanstalk and Hansel and Gretel coming up this year.

After my post, I had the same thought. Snow White and The Huntsman, Once Upon a Time, etc. Fairy Tales are the new Twilight. I think you're right.


I'll agree as well.

Click Me
 
2013-01-07 04:01:33 PM  

PirateKing: I wish I could tell you that Godzilla fought the good fight, and the Army let him be. I wish I could tell you that - but Tokyo is no fairy tale world. He never said who did it, but we all knew. Things went on like that for awhile - monster life consists of routine, and then more routine. Every so often, Godzilla would show up with fresh missile bruises. The army kept at him - sometimes he was able to fight 'em off, sometimes not. And that's how it went for Godzilla - that was his routine. I do believe those first two years were the worst for him, and I also believe that if things had gone on that way, this place would have got the best of him.


Glorious
 
2013-01-07 04:09:44 PM  
If this remake turns into another 1998-like version of Godzilla I wouldn't give you a pound of shiat for it. I farking hate that movie; the plot sucks (the lizard swims to NYC from the Pacific?), the treatment of "Godzilla" as just a big monitor lizard is stupid, and it gets immobilized by the cables on a bridge? Really?

If that's what this is I won't be seeing it, and I predict it will be a huge bust.

/will take the rubber suit over the 1998 version every time
//love seeing Gojira kick the remake's butt when they fight
///"what good is this monster??"
 
2013-01-07 04:41:50 PM  

buntz: I'm no Godzilla expert, but shouldn't Godzilla be the type of movie you DON'T put too much effort in to? I mean, look what happened with the "remake" with Matthew Broderick.

When you start taking something like Godzilla too seriously you end up with...well, the Godzilla remake with Matthew Broderick!


Of course, if you go too far in the other direction, you get "Godzilla's Revenge". Or "Godzilla: Final Wars".

Ugh, I had such high hopes for Final Wars. A modern "Destroy All Monsters!" with 15 monsters? Hell yeah! Then Toho decided to have the movie directed by the guy who's famous in Japan for ripping off "The Matrix" with every movie he makes, and it all went downhill. The movie is 2 hours long, and about 25 minutes of it has monsters, with Godzilla himself getting around 15 minutes. The rest is an unholy mash-up of The Matrix, Independence Day, Return of the Jedi, and Dragonball Z. Half of the monsters had barely any screentime (poor Hedorah), and the "Godzilla is so strong he OHKO's everything" thing was lame and annoying, because it was a way of making the monster fights shorter to allow more wire-fu chop suey.

On the subject of Tri-Star's "Godzilla", while I despise everything else, I love Zilla himself. He's a cool creature design, especially with his son Zilla Jr in the animated series.

images3.wikia.nocookie.net

images3.wikia.nocookie.net
 
2013-01-07 04:45:31 PM  

Bendal: If this remake turns into another 1998-like version of Godzilla I wouldn't give you a pound of shiat for it. I farking hate that movie; the plot sucks (the lizard swims to NYC from the Pacific?), the treatment of "Godzilla" as just a big monitor lizard is stupid, and it gets immobilized by the cables on a bridge? Really?

If that's what this is I won't be seeing it, and I predict it will be a huge bust.

/will take the rubber suit over the 1998 version every time
//love seeing Gojira kick the remake's butt when they fight
///"what good is this monster??"


Blame Devlin and Emmerich for wanting "a realistic Godzilla". Apparently being a 200-foot-tall nuclear mutant is "realistic" to them, and a uranium heat ray and super-healing is just too fantasy.

/they also said that their movie was what Toho would have made in 1954 if they had modern special effects technology. What utter gall
 
2013-01-07 05:52:08 PM  
Anybody else reading Stokoe's "Godzilla: Half Century War" comic? It's pretty awesome. I'm not even a kaiju fan, and I love it.
 
2013-01-07 06:01:19 PM  
Meh, unless he's putting some new spin on it i doubt it's possible to make a Godzilla movie that isn't just some throwaway crap you watch once and then forget an hour later.
 
2013-01-07 06:09:31 PM  
It will be dark and gritty and use a lot of shacky cam action... maybe have Godzilla spawn off little nasties to prowl the subways and the like... ya that sounds like a winner
 
2013-01-07 07:45:36 PM  

buntz: I'm no Godzilla expert, but shouldn't Godzilla be the type of movie you DON'T put too much effort in to? I mean, look what happened with the "remake" with Matthew Broderick.

When you start taking something like Godzilla too seriously you end up with...well, the Godzilla remake with Matthew Broderick!


Very well put. My favorite and also some of the most beloved Godzilla movies have been ones like Godzilla vs Monster Zero aka King Ghidora or Godzilla vs Gigan. They are over the top to the point you have to shake your head and say "Wow!" and have a laugh.
 
2013-01-07 08:08:21 PM  

Nurglitch: They can't top Godzilla vs Megaguirus.


I thought the did with "Giant Monsters All Out Attack" by making Godzilla a flat out evil monster.
Godzilla vs. Biollante was really good too, but it's hard to find.
 
2013-01-07 11:53:06 PM  

buntz: I'm no Godzilla expert, but shouldn't Godzilla be the type of movie you DON'T put too much effort in to? I mean, look what happened with the "remake" with Matthew Broderick.

When you start taking something like Godzilla too seriously you end up with...well, the Godzilla remake with Matthew Broderick!


Hank Azaria zombies to zombie.
 
2013-01-08 08:40:44 AM  

Bendal: If this remake turns into another 1998-like version of Godzilla I wouldn't give you a pound of shiat for it. I farking hate that movie; the plot sucks (the lizard swims to NYC from the Pacific?),


Monitor lizards are known for their swimming ability.

the treatment of "Godzilla" as just a big monitor lizard is stupid,


Actually, it's quite clever, and certainly a more movie plausible origin of the creature than "giant dinosaur that was trapped at the bottom of the sea for 2 million(!) years" like the original film. It also allowed a bit of flexibility in the design of the creature.

and it gets immobilized by the cables on a bridge? Really?


Only temporarily. Had the jets not been there to hit it, it would have broken free fairly quickly.

The best part of that film is that the creature isn't immortal. It wasn't created millions of years ago, just decades ago, and it *CAN* be killed by conventional means without having to resort to some sort of super weapon.

And perhaps the best point of all is that it's recognized that the creature is "just an animal" acting on it's own instinct and intelligence, not some malevolent or benevolent force bent on destroying or saving Japan.

It also follows the general outline of the original film: Man's use of nuclear weapons creates a situation where a giant monster appears, and it appears to be unstoppable. Hell, even the beginning is similar, it's just that the relatively small fishing vessel is now a large factory ship instead. It even answers questions left unexplored by the original, like what does a 200 foot tall monster *EAT* (fish, and a lot of it).

What the 1998 film doesn't do is resort to the sort of deus ex machina like an "oxygen destroyer" to defeat the creature: Conventional weapons worked under the right circumstances, which were hard to engineer, but with constant pressure were likely to happen at *SOME* point. It just required the normally very agile and wary creature to be caught in the open long enough for them to work.

I still say the 1998 film is superior in almost every way to pretty much all Japanese Godzilla films except for the original, and perhaps one or two others.
 
2013-01-10 03:08:20 AM  

dittybopper: Bendal: If this remake turns into another 1998-like version of Godzilla I wouldn't give you a pound of shiat for it. I farking hate that movie; the plot sucks (the lizard swims to NYC from the Pacific?),

Monitor lizards are known for their swimming ability.

the treatment of "Godzilla" as just a big monitor lizard is stupid,

Actually, it's quite clever, and certainly a more movie plausible origin of the creature than "giant dinosaur that was trapped at the bottom of the sea for 2 million(!) years" like the original film. It also allowed a bit of flexibility in the design of the creature.

and it gets immobilized by the cables on a bridge? Really?

Only temporarily. Had the jets not been there to hit it, it would have broken free fairly quickly.

The best part of that film is that the creature isn't immortal. It wasn't created millions of years ago, just decades ago, and it *CAN* be killed by conventional means without having to resort to some sort of super weapon.

And perhaps the best point of all is that it's recognized that the creature is "just an animal" acting on it's own instinct and intelligence, not some malevolent or benevolent force bent on destroying or saving Japan.

It also follows the general outline of the original film: Man's use of nuclear weapons creates a situation where a giant monster appears, and it appears to be unstoppable. Hell, even the beginning is similar, it's just that the relatively small fishing vessel is now a large factory ship instead. It even answers questions left unexplored by the original, like what does a 200 foot tall monster *EAT* (fish, and a lot of it).

What the 1998 film doesn't do is resort to the sort of deus ex machina like an "oxygen destroyer" to defeat the creature: Conventional weapons worked under the right circumstances, which were hard to engineer, but with constant pressure were likely to happen at *SOME* point. It just required the normally very agile and wary creature to be caught in the open lon ...


Then you completely misunderstood or didn't care about what Gojira was about. The central theme was the horror of the atomic bomb, a radioactive terror that came from nowhere and annihilated everything it touched. Godzilla was the atomic bomb made flesh. He was an unstoppable force of nature, almost an act of God. And it's telling that the only thing that was able to ever, EVER kill Godzilla, in all of his movies, was a weapon even more terrible than himself, a weapon so atrocious that its creator destroyed himself and all of his work to ensure that the Oxygen Destroyer, along with Godzilla, would never become a reality again.

Knowing things like what Godzilla ate was unnecessary (though Godzilla 1985 showed that he "fed" on radiation itself, absorbing it into his body like a sponge). Watching his day-to-day life was unnecessary. Godzilla is the King of the Monsters, rising from the sea to either put humanity back in its place or battle whatever aliens or other monsters needed an ass-kicking at the time. We enjoy watching him stomp and smash and burn and clobber everything in his path. That is the eloquence of Godzilla.

Tri-Star's Godzilla farked up right off the bat when they decided to take the "God" out of Godzilla. Instead of being the personification of the horrors of the atomic bomb, Zilla was just a great big animal trying to do normal animal things. The message of the movie wasn't awareness of the destructive terror of war and superweapons, but yet another Man vs Nature cheapie where Man wins once again. None of the characters were interesting or even tolerable. Half of the movie was a remake of "Jurassic Park". Zilla barely did any damage while he was in New York. The only similarity between Zilla and Godzilla was the fact they were both reptiles mutated by atomic bombs. The movie failed as a Godzilla film, and it failed as a film period in many other ways.
 
2013-01-10 03:09:26 AM  
Hell, "Cloverfield" was a better Godzilla movie than Tri-Star's "Godzilla".
 
Displayed 15 of 65 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report