If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(TMZ)   Octomom is back on welfare. She will get $1,800 a month for food, $1,000 for "emergencies," and dental and medical benefits all because she had to pay for rehab   (tmz.com) divider line 144
    More: Sick, Nadya Suleman, Octo, heaths, TMZ, Medi-Cal, upbeat  
•       •       •

5861 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 06 Jan 2013 at 4:31 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



144 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-06 01:09:36 PM
Fark this shiat. I'm going on welfare. If you can't beat them join them. Oh yea! Free food, getting high and surfing the web all day. No worries cuz my rent is being paid. FARK YEA! Sign me up!
 
2013-01-06 01:13:49 PM
Wouldn't it be cheaper for the government to issue a line of credit for emergencies? Use it for a non-emergency and you pay the money back + fines/interest.
 
2013-01-06 01:39:21 PM
Wouldn't it be cheaper for farther to support his family.
 
2013-01-06 01:43:33 PM
Wouldn't it be cheaper for the government  for thefather  to support his family.

*fixed
 
2013-01-06 01:45:53 PM
Wouldn't it becheaper for the government to have the father support his family.

*fixed again
 
2013-01-06 01:48:33 PM
Wouldn't it be cheaper for the government to have the father support his family?

FTFY YW
 
2013-01-06 01:50:04 PM

webthing01: Wouldn't it becheaper for the government to have the father support his family.

*fixed again


How do you propose doing that? All, and I do mean all of her pregnancies were via IVF. There are no fathers the state can go after for child support.
 
2013-01-06 01:59:29 PM

webthing01: Wouldn't it be cheaper for farther to support his family.


What father?
 
2013-01-06 02:03:06 PM

Bathia_Mapes: webthing01: Wouldn't it becheaper for the government to have the father support his family.

*fixed again

How do you propose doing that? All, and I do mean all of her pregnancies were via IVF. There are no fathers the state can go after for child support.


He knows what he knows dammit, don't confuse him with facts.
 
2013-01-06 02:05:17 PM

Bathia_Mapes: webthing01: Wouldn't it becheaper for the government to have the father support his family.

*fixed again

How do you propose doing that? All, and I do mean all of her pregnancies were via IVF. There are no fathers the state can go after for child support.


Go after the doctor. He implanted 12 embryos at once (when the standard is 2 or 3) in a woman who already had six children, and was barely able to support those kids.

His medical license has already been yanked for ethics regarding the Octomom nonsense.
 
2013-01-06 02:17:43 PM
Good gravy, she's making more than my 63 year old mother has been at the same job since the 80s and had to nearly wipe out her savings just to make ends meet. I am sick of those who mindlessly spurt children, while those of us who are responsible get nothing. The "doctor" who did this should be supporting her, not the people.
 
2013-01-06 02:22:38 PM

loveblondieo: Good gravy, she's making more than my 63 year old mother has been at the same job since the 80s and had to nearly wipe out her savings just to make ends meet. I am sick of those who mindlessly spurt children, while those of us who are responsible get nothing. The "doctor" who did this should be supporting her, not the people.


While I agree I doubt he's in a financial position to do so since he had his license to practice medicne stripped awhile back.
 
2013-01-06 03:05:02 PM
We're told the mother of 14 will be getting $1,800 a month for food, $1,000 for emergency cash, as well as Medi-Cal benefits to help with mental heath and dental issues.

A family of 15 with $2800 per month? Heavens! They're practically billionaires!
 
2013-01-06 03:06:18 PM

Sgt Otter: Bathia_Mapes: webthing01: Wouldn't it becheaper for the government to have the father support his family.

*fixed again

How do you propose doing that? All, and I do mean all of her pregnancies were via IVF. There are no fathers the state can go after for child support.

Go after the doctor. He implanted 12 embryos at once (when the standard is 2 or 3) in a woman who already had six children, and was barely able to support those kids.

His medical license has already been yanked for ethics regarding the Octomom nonsense.


While I agree his license should be yanked, I'm hesitant to say that we should be placing financial liability on doctors for failing to review their patient's tax records.
 
2013-01-06 03:18:44 PM

webthing01: Wouldn't it be cheaper for farther to support his family.


webthing01: Wouldn't it be cheaper for the government  for thefather  to support his family.

*fixed


webthing01: Wouldn't it becheaper for the government to have the father support his family.

*fixed again


Worst. Troll.  Evar.

/seriously
 
2013-01-06 03:23:56 PM
Procreation.

It's all part of God's plan.
 
2013-01-06 03:42:42 PM

Bathia_Mapes: loveblondieo: Good gravy, she's making more than my 63 year old mother has been at the same job since the 80s and had to nearly wipe out her savings just to make ends meet. I am sick of those who mindlessly spurt children, while those of us who are responsible get nothing. The "doctor" who did this should be supporting her, not the people.

While I agree I doubt he's in a financial position to do so since he had his license to practice medicne stripped awhile back.


True, but he still has a medical degree, and that qualifies him for any number of high paying jobs.
 
2013-01-06 03:56:57 PM
According to sources, Octomom only plans to use the welfare money while she gets back on her feet -- or on her back.


i434.photobucket.com
 
2013-01-06 04:03:30 PM

Runs_With_Scissors_: webthing01: Wouldn't it be cheaper for farther to support his family.

webthing01: Wouldn't it be cheaper for the government  for thefather  to support his family.

*fixed

webthing01: Wouldn't it becheaper for the government to have the father support his family.

*fixed again

Worst. Troll.  Evar.

/seriously


cs5538.userapi.com
You don't love me anymore!
 
2013-01-06 04:13:34 PM

loveblondieo: Good gravy, she's making more than my 63 year old mother has been at the same job since the 80s and had to nearly wipe out her savings just to make ends meet. I am sick of those who mindlessly spurt children, while those of us who are responsible get nothing. The "doctor" who did this should be supporting her, not the people.


Technically, the food aid is for the children, not her. It's not their fault their mother is mentally ill.
 
2013-01-06 04:16:25 PM

Lionel Mandrake: According to sources, Octomom only plans to use the welfare money while she gets back on her feet -- or on her back.


[i434.photobucket.com image 209x200]


Seriously, with all the available porn out there, who would actually pay to see her naked?
I saw a couple of nudes of her at her best, and it nearly put me off my lunch.
 
2013-01-06 04:34:05 PM
That's like a pretax income of 50k
 
2013-01-06 04:35:25 PM
Oh, and its been said already but where the daddies?
 
2013-01-06 04:35:26 PM

TommyymmoT: Lionel Mandrake: According to sources, Octomom only plans to use the welfare money while she gets back on her feet -- or on her back.


[i434.photobucket.com image 209x200]

Seriously, with all the available porn out there, who would actually pay to see her naked?
I saw a couple of nudes of her at her best, and it nearly put me off my lunch.


I agree. Why would anybody want to see her tinkering with her clown car, let alone PAY for the "privilege"?

/Scooter says: "Hotdog down a skag den, know what I mean?"
 
2013-01-06 04:36:12 PM
If she would put out I'm sure there are some men out there who would pay her expenses.

One session at a time of course...
 
2013-01-06 04:36:32 PM
Looks like having a uterus is a better investment than real estate.
 
2013-01-06 04:38:23 PM

BSABSVR: webthing01: Wouldn't it be cheaper for farther to support his family.

What father?


ecx.images-amazon.com

He won't be any help. Poor guy doesn't get much work outside of the holiday season.
 
2013-01-06 04:40:18 PM

TommyymmoT: Seriously, with all the available porn out there, who would actually pay to see her naked?


It's a curiosity thing.  I mean, based on the sex, the Kim Kardashian sex tape is just terrible, yet people bought an ass ton of copies of it.

Once a woman gets mildly famous, a certain percentage of guys will pay to see her naked/farking
 
2013-01-06 04:41:16 PM

Carotid: Oh, and its been said already but where the daddies?


It's already been explained, too.
 
2013-01-06 04:41:35 PM

Quantum Apostrophe: Looks like having a uterus is a better investment than real estate.


The taxpayers are getting a good deal. You would have to pay me AT LEAST $500K/year to raise octomom's droppings.
 
2013-01-06 04:45:45 PM
But the Total Fark left told me welfares moms don't really exist
 
2013-01-06 04:49:26 PM
jaytkay: We'll see in 15-20 years if the taxpayers are getting a good deal.
 
2013-01-06 04:54:36 PM
I am as open minded as they come, but this woman pegged the meter way too long ago.

gifs.gifbin.com
 
2013-01-06 04:55:50 PM

Nemo's Brother: But the Total Fark left told me welfares moms don't really exist


Nobody ever told you that. What you were told is that the majority of people on welfare aren't trying to work the system. What you heard is welfare moms don't exists The mistake is understandable, considering the fact that you are an idiot..
 
2013-01-06 04:56:27 PM

Carotid: Oh, and its been said already but where the daddies?


Scroll back up and see my original comment. All of her prenancies, every single one of them, were a result of IVF. They likely used donor sperm from a sperm bank,

And then there's this California law regarding anonymous sperm donors:

The anonymous sperm donor is protected from parental responsibility by California State Law (Civil Code #7613, California Uniform Parentage Act (b)) which states: "The donor of semen provided to a licensed physician and surgeon for use in artificial insemination of a woman other than the donor's wife is treated in law as if he were not the natural father of a child thereby conceived."
 
2013-01-06 04:56:27 PM

Quantum Apostrophe: jaytkay: We'll see in 15-20 years if the taxpayers are getting a good deal.


Doubtful. The ones that are strippers won't make enough to offset the ones in prison using taxpayer money. The dead ones will at least save some money.
 
2013-01-06 04:57:43 PM

BSABSVR: webthing01: Wouldn't it be cheaper for farther to support his family.

What father?


-fb

/duh
 
2013-01-06 04:57:52 PM

Arumat: TommyymmoT: Lionel Mandrake: According to sources, Octomom only plans to use the welfare money while she gets back on her feet -- or on her back.


[i434.photobucket.com image 209x200]

Seriously, with all the available porn out there, who would actually pay to see her naked?
I saw a couple of nudes of her at her best, and it nearly put me off my lunch.

I agree. Why would anybody want to see her tinkering with her clown car, let alone PAY for the "privilege"?

/Scooter says: "Hotdog down a skag den, know what I mean?"


Probably not since she had all of her babies via C-section.
 
2013-01-06 05:00:40 PM

TommyymmoT: Bathia_Mapes: loveblondieo: Good gravy, she's making more than my 63 year old mother has been at the same job since the 80s and had to nearly wipe out her savings just to make ends meet. I am sick of those who mindlessly spurt children, while those of us who are responsible get nothing. The "doctor" who did this should be supporting her, not the people.

While I agree I doubt he's in a financial position to do so since he had his license to practice medicne stripped awhile back.

True, but he still has a medical degree, and that qualifies him for any number of high paying jobs.


I don't care if it's a high paying job or not. If it was anyone who porked her and got her prego, DYFS would force the baby daddy to pay money towards the support of the kid.

Why shouldn't this apply?
 
2013-01-06 05:03:56 PM

MBrady: TommyymmoT: Bathia_Mapes: loveblondieo: Good gravy, she's making more than my 63 year old mother has been at the same job since the 80s and had to nearly wipe out her savings just to make ends meet. I am sick of those who mindlessly spurt children, while those of us who are responsible get nothing. The "doctor" who did this should be supporting her, not the people.

While I agree I doubt he's in a financial position to do so since he had his license to practice medicne stripped awhile back.

True, but he still has a medical degree, and that qualifies him for any number of high paying jobs.

I don't care if it's a high paying job or not. If it was anyone who porked her and got her prego, DYFS would force the baby daddy to pay money towards the support of the kid.

Why shouldn't this apply?


I doubt there's any legal way this doctor could be forced to pay child support. Granted they could try to take him to court, but I doubt it would go anywhere.
 
2013-01-06 05:15:32 PM

Nemo's Brother: But the Total Fark left told me welfares moms don't really exist


The Total Fark left told you that people don't have babies and  profit off welfare. No one ever told you that mothers on welfare don't exist.
 
2013-01-06 05:16:28 PM

Theaetetus: While I agree his license should be yanked, I'm hesitant to say that we should be placing financial liability on doctors for failing to review their patient's tax records.


Why? It's not a medically necessary procedure where there could be some wiggle room. Why shouldn't the burden be on the doctor to, at the very least, collect certain information to ensure that what he's doing is ethical?

The state ought to sue him for malpractice then take away the kids, put the money they recover in a trust for them and ship them off to somebody who isn't a walking train wreck.

Nemo's Brother: But the Total Fark left told me welfares moms don't really exist


Who told there aren't mothers on welfare? Oh, right, nobody. You're just so completely full of your own shiat you're bungling your own idiotic "welfare queen" schtick. Because apparently ignoring important context wasn't good enough for you, you had to turn the derp all the way to up to 11 and mangle the whole thing.

Begone, moron.
 
2013-01-06 05:18:39 PM
Wouldn't it be cheaper to put her down and parcel out the kids to good homes?

\wet works
 
2013-01-06 05:20:04 PM

Theaetetus: We're told the mother of 14 will be getting $1,800 a month for food, $1,000 for emergency cash, as well as Medi-Cal benefits to help with mental heath and dental issues.

A family of 15 with $2800 per month? Heavens! They're practically billionaires!


Exactly my reaction. I have no regard for this woman, but she does have to feed, cloth, and shelter 14 children. The food budget works out to be less than four dollars a person per day. Assuming she gets subsidized or free housing, transportation, clothing, and childcare for 14 children would come to considerably more than $1000 a month. Did she make really stupid (if not insane) choices? Sure. But her children didn't, and I can't see punishing them for her mistakes.

Of course, I don't think she should be raising those children, and I think she shouldn't be able to have any more. But, since the state cannot find grounds for taking away her children, and since we have rules against restricting fertility for anyone, the next best solution is to make sure the children are given at least basic care.
 
2013-01-06 05:27:38 PM

Bathia_Mapes: Arumat: TommyymmoT: Lionel Mandrake: According to sources, Octomom only plans to use the welfare money while she gets back on her feet -- or on her back.


[i434.photobucket.com image 209x200]

Seriously, with all the available porn out there, who would actually pay to see her naked?
I saw a couple of nudes of her at her best, and it nearly put me off my lunch.

I agree. Why would anybody want to see her tinkering with her clown car, let alone PAY for the "privilege"?

/Scooter says: "Hotdog down a skag den, know what I mean?"

Probably not since she had all of her babies litters via C-section.


Fixed it for ya ... would like to do that to her tubes, too.
 
2013-01-06 05:31:19 PM
If the pro-life protesters are serious about there being so many homes for unwanted pregnancies, why don't we see kids being confiscated from parents who can't support them without help, like this, and given to said widely-available nice homes?

Oh, right. Because that's a crock, too.
 
2013-01-06 05:36:47 PM
This is normal poor people kinds of problems. Also explains why California is bankrupt, they must have decided to make up the difference where the Federal benefits ended.

But this does not mean she is a bad person, several decades ago we would not know who she is and she would not have custody. I guess the main question here is do you want women to continue to be able to stay with their children or do you want to take the children away. I have no opinion on either side. I don't like kids.
 
2013-01-06 05:37:17 PM

DeaH: Of course, I don't think she should be raising those children, and I think she shouldn't be able to have any more. But, since the state cannot find grounds for taking away her children, and since we have rules against restricting fertility for anyone, the next best solution is to make sure the children are given at least basic care.


Besides not having strong enough grounds for removing the kids, $35k a year for the next 16 years is also pretty certainly a whole lot cheaper than foster care, etc, for the brood. Better for the kids? Hard to say one way or the other, but almost certainly cheaper.

The same applies to the hundreds of "DRUG TEST WELFARE RECIPIENTS" posts I see on Facebook. People without children basically haven't gotten any welfare since the first Clinton administration. What cutting welfare-receiving parents equals is spending a LOT of money on foster care and adoption programs. Which the people in question are against.
 
2013-01-06 05:38:22 PM
Octomom is the welfare Queen Bee that republicans claim every single mom on welfare is.   I'm surprised they haven't waged war on her.
 
2013-01-06 05:38:33 PM
<b><a href="http://www.fark.com/comments/7520779/81710111#c81710111" target="_blank">Nemo's Brother</a>:</b> <i>But the Total Fark left told me welfares moms don't really exist</i>

<a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3677" target="_blank">91% of entitlements go to the elderly, disabled or working families</a>. But don't let facts get in your way of your rage.
 
Displayed 50 of 144 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report