If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(YouTube)   Ring ring. "Hello." "Hey Adam, it's Jim. What's going on?" "Not much, just chilling and..uh..I'll call you back"   (youtube.com) divider line 8
    More: Cool  
•       •       •

9549 clicks; posted to Geek » on 06 Jan 2013 at 9:25 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2013-01-06 03:11:38 PM
3 votes:

Fish in a Barrel: In stunning 360p!


There was a perfectly good 1080 link, no idea why subby picked this one.
Link
2013-01-09 01:37:14 PM
1 votes:

GeneralJim: I've said something untrue on purpose ONCE on Fark, and explained in the same thread what I did


You're up to at least four lies, BTW.

The untruth was in a different thread from the one where you "explained" what you did (besides the fact that you've been putting forward that same untruth for at least two years). Additionally, this "explanation" of yours was in actuality another lie to try to cover it up, for the reasons I gave in the other thread, and outlined above.

Come on now. You've been caught and there's no point in trying to pile on more lies. What I'm trying to do here is to show you something - if you can't deal rationally or honestly with even your very own words (regarding an easily-disproven falsehood) like an adult, then what does that say about your ability to deal rationally or honestly with anything more complex?

I'm trying to show you a mirror here. The rest of us are just anonymous people at a news aggregator - what we think in this small corner of the intertubes matters little. In the end, it's about you and your choices - do you have enough self-respect to man up and do the right thing, or are you going to try to cover it up and blame others like a childish coward. Let's see what you do.
2013-01-09 01:33:26 PM
1 votes:

GeneralJim: Damnhippyfreak: GeneralJim: I've said something untrue on purpose ONCE on Fark,


Technically, you've done it at least twice:

GeneralJim: I've not always been right, but I have ALWAYS been honest

With this latest post of yours, that makes at least three ;)
Another one too stupid to understand the difference between using an untruth as a rhetorical device and a lie. I'm not surprised.

/ So, is this kind of crap what you always do when you've got nothing?



It's more that I'm highlighting the kind of crap you always do when you've got nothing.

As I pointed out in the other thread, the bit in bold isn't true as you've been making this same mistake for over two years (with me attempting to correct you since then), the "untruth" still remains as you still haven't gotten the source right, even in the post which you claim "did not remain in an "untrue" state".

You're putting forward a lie to cover up a mistake borne out of intentional ignorance on your part, and then you're continuing to lie about it, like a immature child.
2013-01-09 02:24:29 AM
1 votes:

GeneralJim: I've said something untrue on purpose ONCE on Fark,



Technically, you've done it at least twice:

GeneralJim: I've not always been right, but I have ALWAYS been honest


With this latest post of yours, that makes at least three ;)
2013-01-09 01:51:06 AM
1 votes:

GeneralJim: HighZoolander: So not only do you lie whenever you feel like it, you think it's someone else's fault that you had to do it. Wow you're unhinged.
Speaking of unhinged... where did you get THAT little screed? I've said something untrue on purpose ONCE on Fark, and explained in the same thread what I did. Of course, seeing how pathetically clueless you are, it would not surprise me in the least if you don't understand the difference. Try some more character assassination, though... you need the practice.


Um, Damnhippyfreak gave pretty compelling evidence that you'd been saying that same untruth for years - so not just in that same thread. This is pretty good evidence of yet another lie you've told though, so good job!

Damnhippyfreak's post exposing your extended lie here: Link

I'd ask you to stop lying, but we both know you can't.
2013-01-09 01:46:51 AM
1 votes:

GeneralJim: something said with the intention to deceive


HighZoolander: GeneralJim:And, incidentally, my claim ... was a deliberate misstatement.


This is just too easy - maybe next time ask for evidence of more than one lie?
2013-01-08 12:22:11 AM
1 votes:

GeneralJim: o -- Ice core data refute the idea that changes in carbon dioxide level play a significant role in global temperature.


No they don't.


o -- The models are so far off in their predictions that we are ALREADY outside the error bars.

No they aren't - certainly not all of them, if any of them. Which error bars specifically are you referring to?


o -- CERN just validated the process by which Svensmark claims cosmic rays influence clouds, and ordered scientists to NOT discuss the climate implications of CLOUD.

[citation needed]

I won't take your word for it because you're a damn liar.


o -- The "semi-infinte" atmospheric model has been mathematically disproved by Miskoskolczi, and his fix has models predicting accurately.

Hahaha. Oh wait, you're serious. LOLOL.


o -- The historic climate data in repositories overseen by Phil Jones and James Hansen keep changing over time, and show as "human-created," i.e. fudged.

Bullshiat.


o -- Phil Jones has admitted that scientific fraud has taken place.

[citation needed]

o -- Studies involving MEASUREMENT, as opposed to computer modelling, show that the IPCC has VASTLY over-estimated atmospheric sensitivity to carbon dioxide.

No, as Damnhippyfreak explained to you in the other thread.


And, this is peer-reviewed science you are denying or ignoring. So, the warmers want the "denier" tag now? Go for it.

Says the guy who is denying or ignoring 99% of peer-reviewed climate science, and is an admitted lying liar.

GeneralJim:And, incidentally, my claim ... was a deliberate misstatement. ... And I apologize to the other Fark readers for the misdirection, now corrected. YOU should apologize for making it necessary

So not only do you lie whenever you feel like it, you think it's someone else's fault that you had to do it. Wow you're unhinged.
2013-01-06 03:04:58 PM
1 votes:
Thrilling headline, subby. I have no idea what you're talking about, and I don't care enough to find out.
 
Displayed 8 of 8 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report