Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Minneapolis Star Tribune)   City officials argue over whether to remove stop signs at nonexistent intersection   ( divider line
    More: Asinine, Woodbury, stop signs, city managers, housing developments, traffic volume  
•       •       •

8275 clicks; posted to Main » on 05 Jan 2013 at 2:28 PM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

2013-01-05 02:44:31 PM  
2 votes:
And here it is...

2013-01-05 11:38:53 PM  
1 vote:
Solution: stop building subdivisions.
2013-01-05 03:08:00 PM  
1 vote:
I live 1 block from that stop sign. There is a blind driveway just over the crest of the hill and 16 year olds like to jump their cars there too. Keep the sign or lower the hill to make it less dangerous.

2013-01-05 02:46:14 PM  
1 vote:
As usual, dumbass local residents wanting to use traffic control.devices as speed enforcement.

Newsflash yards: stop signs are NOT speed enforcement. Period.
2013-01-05 02:33:36 PM  
1 vote:
Woodbury considers removing them, but neighbors say it won't be safe if they no longer have the signs to slow traffic.

If only there was some kind of sign to limit the speed of drivers...
Displayed 5 of 5 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.