Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(AZ Family)   Another father quivers at the thought of how close his precious snowflake came to accidentally seeing a naked human body. "If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done"   (azfamily.com ) divider line
    More: Silly, Super Mario Brothers, Nintendo, Tucson, parental controls, Tucson GameStop  
•       •       •

17137 clicks; posted to Main » on 05 Jan 2013 at 11:23 AM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



138 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2013-01-05 07:47:28 AM  
"Multiple pictures, multiple positions, just not a good Christmas present,"

Let me show you my sexual positions.
My sexual positions, let me show them to you.
 
2013-01-05 08:06:28 AM  
My hobby: Uploading pictures of dicks to Nintendos and returning them to target.

www.reactionface.info
 
2013-01-05 09:27:36 AM  
but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.
 
2013-01-05 10:41:39 AM  
Wanted for questioning:

i595.photobucket.com
 
2013-01-05 10:41:42 AM  

Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.


I'd much rather see hours and hours of bouncy boobs than violence, which is why I'm not the internet and not watching TV.
 
2013-01-05 10:45:18 AM  
What is with this country's puritanical obsession with sex?  "ZOMG A TITTY!!" For fark's sake, dude.  I'd rather see some guy's wang on the news accidentally than see heaps of bloody dead bodies.
 
2013-01-05 11:19:02 AM  
"If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done"

"...I mean, holy shiat, I would have had to talk to my kid about...you know...(whispers) ess-ee-ex!!"
 
2013-01-05 11:19:18 AM  

Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.


I think this backwards view stems from a biblical perspective. Burning animal flesh is a sweet smell unto the Lord. Not turning your head away from your dad's nakedness is a crime punishable by curse. Naked is shameful, blah blah. Oh but dashing pregnant women on the rocks because they're heathens? Oh yeah. The Lord likes that shiat. Violence good. Naked bad.
 
2013-01-05 11:19:40 AM  
Willett is just happy that his young daughter didn't get an eyeful of the inappropriate images.

"If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done," he said. "I mean, the 'intense emotional trauma' that she would have experienced due to their 'intentional infliction of emotional distress' would have caused her 'pain and suffering' and required many millions of 'compen-' what's that word? oh- 'compensatory damages'."
 
2013-01-05 11:26:25 AM  
"If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done"

She might have...liked it.
 
2013-01-05 11:27:27 AM  
"If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done - I mean, if she saw that, then it would turn her all sexy and then she'd make me do nasty things to her... terrible, awful things I would do to her, and it would all be her fault after she saw those pictures...  she would be a naughty, naughty girl, then, and she would need to be spanked.  Y'know, hold that thought, I'll be right back, gotta go to the bathroom," he said.
 
2013-01-05 11:28:28 AM  
Two lessons learned.
Fear naked bodies.
Be an attention whore.
 
2013-01-05 11:28:59 AM  
There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.
 
2013-01-05 11:29:08 AM  

Coco LaFemme: What is with this country's puritanical obsession with sex?  "ZOMG A TITTY!!" For fark's sake, dude.  I'd rather see some guy's wang on the news accidentally than see heaps of bloody dead bodies.


Perhaps it was male on male? What if it was horse on chick? We don't know. Certainly you wouldn't want your pre-pubescent daughter witnessing two guys doing a rumple still skin would ya?

/don't buy "re-furbished" electronics without checking the contents first.
 
2013-01-05 11:31:09 AM  
porn =/= "a naked human body"
 
2013-01-05 11:31:14 AM  

Mystery Vortex: There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.


This, all of this. But I suspect those without children will never understand the difference.

Of course, the dad is a cheap bastard for not buying his kid a brand new DS so it's his fault and he shall be shamed for it.
 
2013-01-05 11:32:12 AM  
I don't know what I would have done.

Perhaps some sort of Parenting Skills would have been required.
 
2013-01-05 11:32:56 AM  
Idiot Exhibit A - "Don't look at the titties!"
Idiot Exhibit B - "Don't look at the guns!"

Idiots everywhere
 
2013-01-05 11:33:29 AM  
In other words, submitter is ok with showing pornography to children?

No one said anything about a glimpse of a boob or a butt. He said pornography. And no one said anything about violence either. It was Super Mario Bros. on a DS. I get the feeling he'd like to keep his kid away from both sex and violence. Of course, this is the fark echo chamber where any mention of how children shouldn't be exposed to sexually explicit images is always followed up with BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 50 BEHEADINGS OUR CHILDREN SEE EVERYDAY???
 
2013-01-05 11:33:47 AM  
"If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done"

Gotten over it and gone on with the rest of my life?
 
2013-01-05 11:33:48 AM  
Uh dad...hate to break it to you but your daughter is already sending naked pics of herself to strangers on the internet.
 
2013-01-05 11:34:30 AM  
Look out, Ethel!
 
2013-01-05 11:34:37 AM  
I save a ton buying refurbished too, I never get this lucky.
 
2013-01-05 11:35:55 AM  

Sybarite: "Multiple pictures, multiple positions, just not a good Christmas present,"

Let me show you my sexual positions.
My sexual positions, let me show them to you.


cdn.publishme.se
 
2013-01-05 11:37:34 AM  
This never would have happened if you hadn't been such a loathsome poor person. Try and make a few bucks to buy your little rat a new Christmas present for new year.
 
2013-01-05 11:37:35 AM  

7th Son of a 7th Son: Uh dad...hate to break it to you but your daughter is already sending naked pics of herself to strangers on the internet.


Considering my 6 year old is a DS freak, and what I believe is the main demographic for the DS, I hope not.

/Not the dad in the story, monitor daughter's computer usage very closely
 
2013-01-05 11:37:38 AM  
I demand that Obama create a Porn On Refurbished Nintendos commission, with me in charge.
 
2013-01-05 11:37:38 AM  
Step 1. Buy Refurbished Game System
Step 2. Load it with Porn
Step 3. Complain about the Porn
Step 4. Profit
 
2013-01-05 11:37:57 AM  
Suck my fat one, you cheap dime store hood
 
2013-01-05 11:38:21 AM  

Tyrone Slothrop: Look out, Ethel!


Winner
 
2013-01-05 11:39:07 AM  
What his kid may of looked like:

images3.wikia.nocookie.net

/obscure?
 
2013-01-05 11:39:56 AM  

7th Son of a 7th Son: Uh dad...hate to break it to you but your daughter is already sending naked pics of herself to strangers on the internet.


Now, if one of her friends texts him a naked photo of her, the circle of life will be complete.
 
2013-01-05 11:41:01 AM  
"If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done"

I guess we can rule out "properly use the subjunctive."
 
2013-01-05 11:41:05 AM  
You know, if these parents wouldn't be cheapskates and pay for a new console as opposed to a refurbished one, this wouldn't be an issue.And seriously, if you shop at Gamestop, used/refurbished is only $10 maybe $20 less than a new console. If it's a game, I've seen used copies of games at $2 or less than new copies. It's not worth it to buy used from Gamestop unless you're talking games that are 5 or 10 years old, that's when they might start marking them down. Otherwise, pony up the few extra dollars, get a new copy that supports the developer(Or the publisher), and avoid having to deal with a copy that someone dropped into a pile of Doritos, put it in the console, and poured a few more Doritos on it before closing the tray.
 
2013-01-05 11:42:53 AM  
Subby is so cool, he shows his kids Indonesian transgender/tentacle/midget/vomit anime.
 
2013-01-05 11:43:45 AM  
Gotta agree with the people who say it's the father's fault. You get what you pay for. The guy who was supposed to delete the memory probably started whacking off to the pics and forgot to erase them after he came. Happens all the time I'm sure.
 
2013-01-05 11:43:52 AM  
There are a lot of people on here that fall into the same trap a lot of atheists (not agnostics) do- I don't like how the Bible says God is, so he can't be real.
If he wants to say violence is OK and nudity isn't, you've got no moral authority to judge. Don't pretend you have any more idea of what's going on than I do.
 
2013-01-05 11:45:40 AM  

offmymeds: Sybarite: "Multiple pictures, multiple positions, just not a good Christmas present,"

Let me show you my sexual positions.
My sexual positions, let me show them to you.

[cdn.publishme.se image 492x566]


You should be punished for doing this do my eyes - you could have had a spoiler alert, something like: this will spoil you breakfast.
 
2013-01-05 11:45:47 AM  

Via Infinito: Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.

I think this backwards view stems from a biblical perspective. Burning animal flesh is a sweet smell unto the Lord. Not turning your head away from your dad's nakedness is a crime punishable by curse. Naked is shameful, blah blah. Oh but dashing pregnant women on the rocks because they're heathens? Oh yeah. The Lord likes that shiat. Violence good. Naked bad.


"i bet the jews did this.jpg"

/seemed appropriate
//that guy's kid is getting a purity ring when she's 14
 
2013-01-05 11:46:49 AM  
There is a difference between "Snowflake" and having the embarrassing talk with a prepubescent about why those adults were wrestling naked. Boobs are one thing, the full boogie requires some explanation. Personally, when my kid is old enough, I'm just going to break it to him without a bunch of metaphor. No need to add mystery to the world's crassness.
 
2013-01-05 11:47:07 AM  

whither_apophis: Via Infinito: Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.

I think this backwards view stems from a biblical perspective. Burning animal flesh is a sweet smell unto the Lord. Not turning your head away from your dad's nakedness is a crime punishable by curse. Naked is shameful, blah blah. Oh but dashing pregnant women on the rocks because they're heathens? Oh yeah. The Lord likes that shiat. Violence good. Naked bad.

"i bet the jews did this.jpg"

/seemed appropriate
//that guy's kid is getting a purity ring when she's 14


And a babby when she's 15
 
2013-01-05 11:47:30 AM  

Benevolent Misanthrope: "If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done


Why don't people ever use the past perfect tense? The father is clearly describing an interrupted (hypothetical) action in the past, so the correct usage should have been, "If she had seen those . . . "

Grammar Heil!
 
2013-01-05 11:47:46 AM  

Lionel Mandrake: "If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done"

"...I mean, holy shiat, I would have had to talk to my kid about...you know...(whispers) ess-ee-ex!!"


Religion just gives these people an out, doesn't it? Conveniently avoid that responsibility because you've convinced yourself that your kids shouldn't be seeing it in the first place, because the Lerd dun said so.
 
2013-01-05 11:47:59 AM  

andyfromfl: Don't pretend you have any more idea of what's going on than I do.


We're not pretending.
 
2013-01-05 11:48:22 AM  
Am I the only person who had parents who walked around nude?
 
2013-01-05 11:49:31 AM  

Coco LaFemme: What is with this country's puritanical obsession with sex?  "ZOMG A TITTY!!" For fark's sake, dude.  I'd rather see some guy's wang on the news accidentally than see heaps of bloody dead bodies.


You're welcome.

NSFW.
 
2013-01-05 11:49:39 AM  
a refurbished Nintendo DS
AKA used.
 
2013-01-05 11:51:24 AM  
OMG! my kiddie was almost exposed to a easy to understand chart of the big bang theory! i...i just don't know what i would have done.

/ idiots, the country is full of
 
2013-01-05 11:51:48 AM  

Vern: You know, if these parents wouldn't be cheapskates and pay for a new console as opposed to a refurbished one, this wouldn't be an issue.And seriously, if you shop at Gamestop, used/refurbished is only $10 maybe $20 less than a new console. If it's a game, I've seen used copies of games at $2 or less than new copies. It's not worth it to buy used from Gamestop unless you're talking games that are 5 or 10 years old, that's when they might start marking them down. Otherwise, pony up the few extra dollars, get a new copy that supports the developer(Or the publisher), and avoid having to deal with a copy that someone dropped into a pile of Doritos, put it in the console, and poured a few more Doritos on it before closing the tray.


Not everyone found a jar of pennies under their porch, Vern. Two for fkinching.
 
2013-01-05 11:53:32 AM  

Glancing Blow: offmymeds: Sybarite: "Multiple pictures, multiple positions, just not a good Christmas present,"

Let me show you my sexual positions.
My sexual positions, let me show them to you.

[cdn.publishme.se image 492x566]

You should be punished for doing this do my eyes - you could have had a spoiler alert, something like: this will spoil you breakfast.


Sorry. Try this. Hope it helps.

incogman.net

/compliments of the house
 
2013-01-05 11:54:39 AM  
I guess you really can't trust the minimum wage earning part time clerk at Gamestop to do his/her job of properly reformatting the game systems internal storage device on the pre-owned devices.
 
2013-01-05 11:55:28 AM  
Yeah, every time this kind of thing comes up, I wish we had more information. Nudity? No big deal. Sex? I wouldn't especially worry about. But there's some pretty warped porn out there that I would worry about a kid seeing.

Also, I weep for the past participle.
 
2013-01-05 11:57:57 AM  

Vern: You know, if these parents wouldn't be cheapskates and pay for a new console as opposed to a refurbished one, this wouldn't be an issue.And seriously, if you shop at Gamestop, used/refurbished is only $10 maybe $20 less than a new console. If it's a game, I've seen used copies of games at $2 or less than new copies. It's not worth it to buy used from Gamestop unless you're talking games that are 5 or 10 years old, that's when they might start marking them down. Otherwise, pony up the few extra dollars, get a new copy that supports the developer(Or the publisher), and avoid having to deal with a copy that someone dropped into a pile of Doritos, put it in the console, and poured a few more Doritos on it before closing the tray.


I laugh when I see their used new releases marked down to $54.99 from $59.99. Wow, for saving $5 bucks, I might not get a scratched disc, and I now have to pay for any online passes or promotional content that was provided free with a new copy?

WHAT A DEAL!
 
2013-01-05 11:58:11 AM  

andyfromfl: There are a lot of people on here that fall into the same trap a lot of atheists (not agnostics) do- I don't like how the Bible says God is, so he can't be real.
If he wants to say violence is OK and nudity isn't, you've got no moral authority to judge. Don't pretend you have any more idea of what's going on than I do.


There are a lot of people here who think religion = morals.

Fact is, whether or not morals are fabricated by may, they can be justified or denigrated by employing intellectual reason.

There is nothing inherently wrong with nudity, unless, you know, it's cold out, or it's an issue of being sanitary, or modest in the interest of not being distracting.

Violence, on the other hand, is offensive, literally. It's placing one individual over another. Sure, there are a lot of mitigating factors(IE self defense, defending the weak) that may legitimize it, but as a vague notion that you put forth, violence is pretty cut and dry "wrong". It's sort of the reason we have laws against it for the most part.
 
2013-01-05 11:58:12 AM  
What if it were pics of boobs and wangs of dead folks like is popular on - oh no I am not giving away that website address again---
 
2013-01-05 11:58:52 AM  
born_yesterday:

Now, if one of her friends texts him a naked photo of her, the circle of life will be complete.

media.tumblr.com

/ obscure ?
 
2013-01-05 11:59:04 AM  
So was the porn any good at least?

In any case, you'd think Gamestop would've started formatting the systems & sd cards that come in after the 1st time.
 
2013-01-05 11:59:26 AM  

omeganuepsilon: whether or not morals are fabricated by man


oops, FTFM
 
2013-01-05 11:59:36 AM  

andyfromfl: There are a lot of people on here that fall into the same trap a lot of atheists (not agnostics) do- I don't like how the Bible says God is, so he can't be real.
If he wants to say violence is OK and nudity isn't, you've got no moral authority to judge. Don't pretend you have any more idea of what's going on than I do.


" I don't like how the Bible says God is, so he can't be real. " Nope. Not that. More of- this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Who could possibly believe so much absurdity. And not only that, but the morals it tries to convey are either basic common sense or quite silly, and often contradictory.
 
2013-01-05 12:02:50 PM  
nathantimmel.com
 
2013-01-05 12:05:51 PM  

Enormous-Schwanstucker: Mystery Vortex: There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.

This, all of this. But I suspect those without children will never understand the difference.

Of course, the dad is a cheap bastard for not buying his kid a brand new DS so it's his fault and he shall be shamed for it.


Agreed.

It also depends a lot on what the images were. 'Porn' is pretty vague. I wouldn't have too much trouble explaining to my 11 y/o why those people are naked and swinging from a chandelier. We've already had the basic sex talk, so expanding on it wouldn't be too terrible.

Trying to explain it to my 6 y/o, however, would be a different story.
 
2013-01-05 12:05:54 PM  
Not the dads fault, we all make cheapo decisions sometimes.
Subby headline is ridiculous.
Nudity isn't a problem, porn from dad for christmas is a lil' not cool.
Atheists aren't judging. (wtf was that, andyfromfl?)
 
2013-01-05 12:08:12 PM  

cig-mkr: I demand that Obama create a Porn On Refurbished Nintendos commission, with me in charge.


Just what we need--President Bawack O'Chicka administrating socialist porn for every red-blooded

Oh, Fark it; I can't do it. Not enough troll DNA.
 
2013-01-05 12:11:19 PM  

Four Horsemen of the Domestic Dispute: Coco LaFemme: What is with this country's puritanical obsession with sex?  "ZOMG A TITTY!!" For fark's sake, dude.  I'd rather see some guy's wang on the news accidentally than see heaps of bloody dead bodies.

Perhaps it was male on male? What if it was horse on chick? We don't know. Certainly you wouldn't want your pre-pubescent daughter witnessing two guys doing a rumple still skin would ya?

/don't buy "re-furbished" electronics without checking the contents first.


I don't have children, but if I did, no I wouldn't want them seeing pornography.  That being said, I wouldn't act like it was the end of the farking world, either.  I'd tell them it was grown-up stuff, and when they were older, I would explain to them more what it was.  The more mysterious and spooky you make something to a child, the more interested in it they become.  Also, the more you act like it's a big deal and ZOMG what will the neighbors say, the more they're going to want to know what it is.  If you don't react to it like it's a hydrogen bomb, they're not going to give a damn and move on to something else.  Kids aren't known for their impressive attention spans.


Horse-on-chick is bestiality and illegal, anyway.  If I bought a refurbished electronic that had illegal material on it, I'd be more concerned with alerting authorities then what to tell my kid if they inadvertently caught a glimpse of it.  It would be the same if it was child porn.

 
2013-01-05 12:18:32 PM  

Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.


I have a few friends from Europe and they were shocked at the violence on TV here. They were doubly shocked at how draconian we are with anything sex related.
 
2013-01-05 12:19:53 PM  
A few years ago I bought a USB key from "The Source by Circuit City" (I still think of it as Radio Shack though). Turns out what I bought was a returned key, repackaged. There was something on it - a movie.

A Disney movie. Not porn. I felt so ripped off.
 
2013-01-05 12:23:44 PM  
Whoa!!!! Samus is getting double penetrated!!!
 
2013-01-05 12:23:51 PM  

Great Janitor: I guess you really can't trust the minimum wage earning part time clerk at Gamestop to do his/her job of properly reformatting the game systems internal storage device on the pre-owned devices.


Worked at Gamestop when I was younger; it's as bad as everyone says it is.

All those things we're supposed to be doing, like checking systems for operability/user uploaded content? Checking discs (at more than a cursory level) for flaws or scratches, making sure the accessories bundled with a refurb system actually function? Yeah, we didn't do any of that, but not out of laziness- management at all levels thinks there are better things to do with your time, like update price tags (on 10,000 items! Yay!), hang up/put up this week's marketing crap from whatever publisher paid to put a lifesize cardboard main character in our store, inventory, inventory, inventory, vacuum the carpet, wash the windows, or call every single person on the Halo 3 preorder list and inform them we're having a midnight launch. (I called my boss out on this one and simply said I wasn't going to do it, unless I was getting paid to do that and only that during a workday. When I explained that calling 385 people will take the better part of a week, she realized how stupid it was as well.)

Problems with ANYTHING at Gamestop are handled with a "we'll cross that bridge when we get there" attitude by ALL levels of management.

I was amused at the people who would buy games during the "buy one get one" sale, and come in the next day to return the game that they got for free for cash or store credit. The exchanges would frequently go like this:

"I wanna return this game I got yesterday."
"Ok, not a problem. Did you want a different copy?"
"No, I want my money back."
"Well, it says right here on your receipt that you paid nothing for this game; I can give you what you paid for it."
"No, the game cost $20, I want my $20. The price sticker says $20."
"Well, you bought it during the promotion, so it actually cost you nothing. It says that right here on the receipt. I'm happy to give you what you paid for it, but I'd advise against that, because then you'll be giving the game away for nothing."

/so glad I don't work retail anymore
 
2013-01-05 12:24:23 PM  

JRoo: Am I the only person who had parents who walked around nude?


No
 
2013-01-05 12:29:39 PM  
IT'S A FEATURE, NOT A BUG!
 
2013-01-05 12:31:32 PM  

JRoo: Am I the only person who had parents who walked around nude?


PICS OR GTFO.
 
2013-01-05 12:31:42 PM  

Enormous-Schwanstucker: But I suspect those without children will never understand the difference.


Yeah, that blatantly obvious distinction is just too damn complex for the childless people to puzzle out, what with their Darwin disapproved genetics and those cold, black, selfish hearts.
 
2013-01-05 12:32:09 PM  
i liked the part about the 9 y/o and the "new" tablet from target. having our believes confirmed that returns just go back on the shelf unchecked is nice. plus a 9 y/o and her family got to see some amateur porn.
 
2013-01-05 12:34:36 PM  
Daddy, what's a penis for and why does mommy put one in your butt?

/awkward
 
2013-01-05 12:35:40 PM  
I love all of you pedophiles so desperate for little children to see porn.
 
2013-01-05 12:35:59 PM  
Although i agree that for a 9 year old such content is still too mature, certainly I would not have raised a shaitstorm like this guy did, I would have erased the pics. Someone obviously had it before. Duh, it was refurbished. Call me a prude but that's my stance. It would be interesting to hear other opinions as to what age IS appropriate, and why. I know, it really depends on multiple factors such as maturity of the child AND parents, etc, but for me I'm thinking 15 ish? thoughts?
 
2013-01-05 12:36:37 PM  
i.imgur.com
 
2013-01-05 12:37:43 PM  

I_Can't_Believe_it's_not_Boutros: "If she would have saw those, it would have, I mean God, I'm glad she didn't, I don't know what I would have done"

I guess we can rule out "properly use the subjunctive."


Derpers don't like edumacation

/ makes people stop believing in the sky fairies
 
2013-01-05 12:40:22 PM  

Via Infinito: Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.

I think this backwards view stems from a biblical perspective. Burning animal flesh is a sweet smell unto the Lord. Not turning your head away from your dad's nakedness is a crime punishable by curse. Naked is shameful, blah blah. Oh but dashing pregnant women on the rocks because they're heathens? Oh yeah. The Lord likes that shiat. Violence good. Naked bad.


I'd assume,then that if i went to a country without our backward biblical views, like Iran or China or India, I would see plenty of sex on TV and not too much violence?

Or would I see, as I think I would, that TV is pretty much the same sex-violence-wise all around the world, regardless of religion?
 
2013-01-05 12:43:48 PM  

Coco LaFemme: "ZOMG A TITTY!!"


Clearly you have not been following the level of depravity existing online these days.
"Only a titty" is by far the minority.
 
2013-01-05 12:45:35 PM  

Mystery Vortex: There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.


What's wrong with a kiss, boy? Hmm? Why not start her off with a nice kiss? You don't have to go leaping straight for the clitoris like a bull at a gate.
 
2013-01-05 12:46:59 PM  
Had there been places like GameStop when I were a lad, and had I worked there, I would likely have loaded tentacle porn on a few just for the lulz.
 
2013-01-05 12:47:12 PM  

JRoo: Am I the only person who had parents who walked around nude?


As someone that was raised in a nudist colony from birth to five years old I can say no.
 
2013-01-05 12:47:39 PM  

Brick-House: Step 1. Buy Refurbished Game System
Step 2. Load it with Porn
Step 3. Complain about the Porn
Step 4. Profit


I just never buy their story. farking hair-in-food scammers. Ban complainers!
 
2013-01-05 12:50:49 PM  

scruffynerfherder: Although i agree that for a 9 year old such content is still too mature, certainly I would not have raised a shaitstorm like this guy did, I would have erased the pics. Someone obviously had it before. Duh, it was refurbished. Call me a prude but that's my stance. It would be interesting to hear other opinions as to what age IS appropriate, and why. I know, it really depends on multiple factors such as maturity of the child AND parents, etc, but for me I'm thinking 15 ish? thoughts?


15 ish for what exactly? Full on porn, skin-e-max soft core, network tv sex where it is more implied than anything?
 
2013-01-05 12:58:34 PM  

JRoo: Am I the only person who had parents who walked around nude?


Probably not, but mine sure as hell didn't.  I'd have gouged out my own eyes with a screwdriver.  My parents chose to talk to my sister and I about sex, nudity, all that stuff when we were older, as opposed to walking around starkers.  I know that not all nudity is sexual (see: Classical art), and I love my parents, but no.  Just keep your farking clothes on when I'm around.
 
2013-01-05 01:01:09 PM  
Hey, at least this guy didn't go and blame Nintendo and try to start some crusade against video games. Yet.
 
2013-01-05 01:09:56 PM  

YouPeopleAreCrazy: Coco LaFemme: "ZOMG A TITTY!!"

Clearly you have not been following the level of depravity existing online these days.
"Only a titty" is by far the minority.


True but the single titty will likely elicit this same result. Americans are such ridiculous puritan prudes.
 
2013-01-05 01:12:14 PM  
Refurbished electronics should always be checked for the reasons stated in the article and this thread. Dad's at fault for not practicing due diligence. My only personal experience with this was I had to return a cell phone to my ex-inlaws when I filed for divorce (we were on a family plan, so the phone was legally theirs). But. I was smart enough to take my phone in, have it wiped and afterwards checked to ensure it was back on the setup screen with no data, photos, texts, etc., stored in the phone before returning it. .
 
2013-01-05 01:18:58 PM  

RickN99: Via Infinito: Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.

I think this backwards view stems from a biblical perspective. Burning animal flesh is a sweet smell unto the Lord. Not turning your head away from your dad's nakedness is a crime punishable by curse. Naked is shameful, blah blah. Oh but dashing pregnant women on the rocks because they're heathens? Oh yeah. The Lord likes that shiat. Violence good. Naked bad.

I'd assume,then that if i went to a country without our backward biblical views, like Iran or China or India, I would see plenty of sex on TV and not too much violence?

Or would I see, as I think I would, that TV is pretty much the same sex-violence-wise all around the world, regardless of religion?


Other countries, England specifically, show plenty of actual tits on free TV(albeit later in the evening). As in topless, no clothing, maybe full frontal IIRC, but not graphic nudity(splayed genitals and such). And not national geographic "nude" either...
Of course, it's not always sexualised/eroticized, just tits, glorious tits.

Ukraine
Britain in general and much of Europe
Turkey
Japan(after midnight)
Canada maybe(from what I've read)

This just from a quick google. US is pretty much part of a minority when it comes to nudity.

Instead of imagining what you'd see, you may want to actually look into it.

Also, religion is usually the common factor when it comes to limiting what others do that is not harmful to others, as it is the source of "morals" of that sort, of nudity being "bad", masturbation being bad, sex out of wedlock, etc. Morals like that don't just spring up from nothing. And yes, regardless of religion, most of the worlds major religions have F*d views on sexual freedoms, though differing. If you don't do it their way, you're doing it wrong.

Part of why the US is as strict as it is, is the sort of puritanical religions that sprouted here when the nation was just beginning. Mormon to Amish to devout Christianity. All differing, but also all very similar.
 
2013-01-05 01:19:27 PM  

sorebones: Enormous-Schwanstucker: But I suspect those without children will never understand the difference.

Yeah, that blatantly obvious distinction is just too damn complex for the childless people to puzzle out, what with their Darwin disapproved genetics and those cold, black, selfish hearts.


I like sarcasm. Well done.
 
2013-01-05 01:29:23 PM  

gingerjet: What his kid may of looked like:

[images3.wikia.nocookie.net image 300x456]

/obscure?


Jesus, that is obscure. I recognize the pixels but I doubt anybody else here has seen that artist's work. Nice find.
 
2013-01-05 01:32:19 PM  

Gunslinger013: True but the single titty will likely elicit this same result. Americans are such ridiculous puritan prudes.


No we're not. Some are, but by far not all.
 
2013-01-05 01:34:52 PM  
Forget about the porn, you might want to shine a blacklight on the console, and particularly... the controllers.
 
2013-01-05 01:36:13 PM  

RickN99: Via Infinito: Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.

I think this backwards view stems from a biblical perspective. Burning animal flesh is a sweet smell unto the Lord. Not turning your head away from your dad's nakedness is a crime punishable by curse. Naked is shameful, blah blah. Oh but dashing pregnant women on the rocks because they're heathens? Oh yeah. The Lord likes that shiat. Violence good. Naked bad.

I'd assume,then that if i went to a country without our backward biblical views, like Iran or China or India, I would see plenty of sex on TV and not too much violence?

Or would I see, as I think I would, that TV is pretty much the same sex-violence-wise all around the world, regardless of religion?


Iran has backward bilbical views, they just derp from a different biblical. Try Germany, Sweden, Netherlands for example of a more enlightened approach.
 
2013-01-05 01:37:28 PM  

Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.


*Sigh*, how many times do I have to explain this, Farkers? You see, if a boy sees BOOBIES before the appropriate "developmental window" (which...for Boobies...we know to be marriage), then that boy will become all Sandy Hookieish.

However, the more young children see images of violence, the more they (and we as adults) become more sensitive to violence and therefore more apt to remain peaceful citizens, the more violence they can take in from the media.

Remember...YES to pistols, NO to dildos.
 
2013-01-05 01:38:56 PM  
Meh, pony fandom is just as bad as watching any other child intended works, it reflects a child-like mindset-ability-affinity. You know, like we all have denigrated Micheal Jackson for.

People addicted to bright colors as children are.
People who's ability is limited to the short and quick events that need little to no attention span.
People find attraction in puerile stories that need little functioning intellectual ability

The show as a whole is manufactured for people of those "qualities", and they eat it up wholesale. Man-children, no better than ICP asking how magnets work and then cursing those that offer education on the topic. Vehemently defending their infatuation of child-like wonder against those who find it distasteful.

In fact, Ponies are the new ICP. ICP tried to teach acceptance and tolerance(social outcasts all banding together to enjoy life), it is a big part of their culture. Don't judge. Only it's stylized cute, instead of stylized clowns with axes and decapitations. ICP washed of all the make-up and imagery and results in pure inanity.
 
2013-01-05 01:39:09 PM  

Mystery Vortex: There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.


thus
 
2013-01-05 01:40:33 PM  
HM, wrong thread
 
2013-01-05 01:45:49 PM  

7th Son of a 7th Son: Uh dad...hate to break it to you but your daughter is already sending naked pics of herself to strangers on the internet.


With any luck
/EIP
 
2013-01-05 01:48:24 PM  

GypsyJoker: cig-mkr: I demand that Obama create a Porn On Refurbished Nintendos commission, with me in charge.

Just what we need--President Bawack O'Chicka


Heh. Nice.
 
2013-01-05 01:48:24 PM  

boyvoyeur: 7th Son of a 7th Son: Uh dad...hate to break it to you but your daughter is already sending naked pics of herself to strangers on the internet.

With any luck
/EIP


I chuckled at both, bravo
 
2013-01-05 01:51:46 PM  
What I'm wondering is, does this daughter bathe with blinders on? Cuz if not, she's gonna see boobies AND a vagina some day, and then what WILL poor Dad do???

....just wondering
 
2013-01-05 01:52:05 PM  

grinding_journalist: Great Janitor: I guess you really can't trust the minimum wage earning part time clerk at Gamestop to do his/her job of properly reformatting the game systems internal storage device on the pre-owned devices.

Worked at Gamestop when I was younger; it's as bad as everyone says it is.

All those things we're supposed to be doing, like checking systems for operability/user uploaded content? Checking discs (at more than a cursory level) for flaws or scratches, making sure the accessories bundled with a refurb system actually function? Yeah, we didn't do any of that, but not out of laziness- management at all levels thinks there are better things to do with your time, like update price tags (on 10,000 items! Yay!), hang up/put up this week's marketing crap from whatever publisher paid to put a lifesize cardboard main character in our store, inventory, inventory, inventory, vacuum the carpet, wash the windows, or call every single person on the Halo 3 preorder list and inform them we're having a midnight launch. (I called my boss out on this one and simply said I wasn't going to do it, unless I was getting paid to do that and only that during a workday. When I explained that calling 385 people will take the better part of a week, she realized how stupid it was as well.)

Problems with ANYTHING at Gamestop are handled with a "we'll cross that bridge when we get there" attitude by ALL levels of management.

I was amused at the people who would buy games during the "buy one get one" sale, and come in the next day to return the game that they got for free for cash or store credit. The exchanges would frequently go like this:

"I wanna return this game I got yesterday."
"Ok, not a problem. Did you want a different copy?"
"No, I want my money back."
"Well, it says right here on your receipt that you paid nothing for this game; I can give you what you paid for it."
"No, the game cost $20, I want my $20. The price sticker says $20."
"Well, you bought it during the promotion, so ...


I used to work at the corporate office. The two groups I had zero respect for were field management and all HR people.
 
2013-01-05 01:54:43 PM  
America finds this unacceptable:

cdn.blisstree.com

and this kind of naked OK:

redriverpak.files.wordpress.com

Although I know which one is funnier. The one with the Canadian.

/Nice beaver!
 
2013-01-05 01:55:14 PM  
Years ago I set up insurance with Geico and they emailed me my proof of insurance. The attachment turned out to be 18 pages of porn. My plan was to tell the cops I was "barely legal" if I got stoppped.

When I called Customer Service the woman was mortified.,
 
2013-01-05 02:16:58 PM  
Imagine being Jenna Jameson's kids .. . that's gonna be a rough childhood.
 
2013-01-05 02:17:10 PM  

Great Janitor: I used to work at the corporate office. The two groups I had zero respect for were field management and all HR people.


The few people at corporate I ever had reason to talk to echoed this sentiment. It doesn't shock me- when you create a promotion/relegation system based on your store "meeting the numbers" everything else takes a backseat. It's a very "I'm only accountable if I get called on it" attitude.
 
2013-01-05 02:17:29 PM  

LDM90: In other words, submitter is ok with showing pornography to children?

No one said anything about a glimpse of a boob or a butt. He said pornography. And no one said anything about violence either. It was Super Mario Bros. on a DS. I get the feeling he'd like to keep his kid away from both sex and violence. Of course, this is the fark echo chamber where any mention of how children shouldn't be exposed to sexually explicit images is always followed up with BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 50 BEHEADINGS OUR CHILDREN SEE EVERYDAY???


No, I think Subby's point is that it's not actually newsworthy. Delete it and STFU. And if they accidentally see it, just explain 'they're doing Mommy and Daddy things that I'll teach you about later'. Or, hell, explain sex. Sex shouldn't be taboo. It's natural, fun, and part of life that they'll enjoy when they're older. Kids don't need to be afraid of it. They need watered-down explanations, yes, but that kind of goes for everything.

/Not Subby
//Still, with my own kids, I don't think I'd ever really lie to them about sex. Murder, rape, torture? Yes. That, they do not get to know about until they're thirty-five and married. But sex? Nope.
 
2013-01-05 02:23:18 PM  

PsiChick: No, I think Subby's point is that it's not actually newsworthy. Delete it and STFU. And if they accidentally see it, just explain 'they're doing Mommy and Daddy things that I'll teach you about later'. Or, hell, explain sex. Sex shouldn't be taboo. It's natural, fun, and part of life that they'll enjoy when they're older. Kids don't need to be afraid of it. They need watered-down explanations, yes, but that kind of goes for everything.


RIght.
The problem is, most stuff you might find online, and what some idiot would put on a Nintendo, is very much not 'watered down'.
 
Ant
2013-01-05 02:28:22 PM  

Mystery Vortex: There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.


This. False equivalence is false.

I wouldn't even want to see the Max Hardcore thing.
 
2013-01-05 02:34:05 PM  
I was at an Apple Store and i went over to an ipad to play around. Opened up Safari, and bam! Youporn.com is the landing page. I was laughing so hard. Every ipad in the row was like that. I assume teenagers were responsible.
 
2013-01-05 02:36:26 PM  

Indypendy: Enormous-Schwanstucker: Mystery Vortex: There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.

This, all of this. But I suspect those without children will never understand the difference.

Of course, the dad is a cheap bastard for not buying his kid a brand new DS so it's his fault and he shall be shamed for it.

Agreed.

It also depends a lot on what the images were. 'Porn' is pretty vague. I wouldn't have too much trouble explaining to my 11 y/o why those people are naked and swinging from a chandelier. We've already had the basic sex talk, so expanding on it wouldn't be too terrible.

Trying to explain it to my 6 y/o, however, would be a different story.


And since most kids who play DS seem to be in elementary school, I think that is probably what most people have a problem with.

Most people don't take their kids to violent R rated movies and most parents don't want their kids watching porn. It's not a difficult concept.

However, that doesn't mean the article is newsworthy. Plenty of "innappropriate" stuff ends up on "used" items, The parent just needs to check and delete it before handing it out...that's also not a difficult concept.
 
2013-01-05 02:36:29 PM  

Coco LaFemme: What is with this country's puritanical obsession with sex?  "ZOMG A TITTY!!" For fark's sake, dude.  I'd rather see some guy's wang on the news accidentally than see heaps of bloody dead bodies.


That can be arranged.
 
2013-01-05 02:36:56 PM  

Mystery Vortex: There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.


Do gag reflex tears count as crying?
 
2013-01-05 02:46:13 PM  

Nestchick: Years ago I set up insurance with Geico and they emailed me my proof of insurance. The attachment turned out to be 18 pages of porn. My plan was to tell the cops I was "barely legal" if I got stoppped.

When I called Customer Service the woman was mortified.,


So you looked all the way through to confirm that there were, in fact, EIGHTEEN pages of pr0n?

You strumpet you.
 
2013-01-05 03:03:43 PM  
No one seems to notice the big problem.

It's not the sex.

It's not the violence.

It's the neck tattoos and ear gauges. When your face looks like a 5th grader's trapper keeper, you have failed as a parent.
 
2013-01-05 03:18:30 PM  

Valiente: America finds this unacceptable:

[cdn.blisstree.com image 400x300]

and this kind of naked OK:

[redriverpak.files.wordpress.com image 300x444]

Although I know which one is funnier. The one with the Canadian.

/Nice beaver!


Thanks, I just had it stuffed
 
2013-01-05 03:31:40 PM  

Sybarite: "Multiple pictures, multiple positions, just not a good Christmas present,"

Let me show you my sexual positions.
My sexual positions, let me show them to you.


Weirdest eBay feedback anyone has ever given me. Strange buyer complaint, there.
 
2013-01-05 03:56:39 PM  

grinding_journalist: Great Janitor: I used to work at the corporate office. The two groups I had zero respect for were field management and all HR people.

The few people at corporate I ever had reason to talk to echoed this sentiment. It doesn't shock me- when you create a promotion/relegation system based on your store "meeting the numbers" everything else takes a backseat. It's a very "I'm only accountable if I get called on it" attitude.


when when was there I figured that anyone District Manager or higher was an idiot. Odds are I personally talked to your DM, and if I did, they were probably on my list of people I personally hated. Regional Directors were the worst. Getting me to do their job for them and explaining that company policy did not apply to them because they were a Regional Director. My choice to leave the company came when I told a Regional Director that he had to justify expenses as per the company policy and telling his lack to tell me to approve it did not work. He countered by filing complaint after complaint against me. I told the company that the job did not pay enough for me to fight for it, and if they had no problem letting assholes like him ignore the policy and complain against me for me doing my job the way I was told to do it, then I was going to leave.
 
2013-01-05 04:43:12 PM  

cuzsis: Indypendy: Enormous-Schwanstucker: Mystery Vortex: There's a big difference between nudity and pornography.

My kid seeing an anatomical reference photo? Totally ok. Even encouraged.

My kid seeing Max Hardcore pounding a crying girl in the mouth? Not ok.

This, all of this. But I suspect those without children will never understand the difference.

Of course, the dad is a cheap bastard for not buying his kid a brand new DS so it's his fault and he shall be shamed for it.

Agreed.

It also depends a lot on what the images were. 'Porn' is pretty vague. I wouldn't have too much trouble explaining to my 11 y/o why those people are naked and swinging from a chandelier. We've already had the basic sex talk, so expanding on it wouldn't be too terrible.

Trying to explain it to my 6 y/o, however, would be a different story.

And since most kids who play DS seem to be in elementary school, I think that is probably what most people have a problem with.

Most people don't take their kids to violent R rated movies and most parents don't want their kids watching porn. It's not a difficult concept.

However, that doesn't mean the article is newsworthy. Plenty of "innappropriate" stuff ends up on "used" items, The parent just needs to check and delete it before handing it out...that's also not a difficult concept.


Oh, I agree it should only be considered news worthy in Utah. And I also I agree that parents should check for things like that when purchasing used electronics, especially if they're the type to get their knickers in a bunch over it.

But, a lot of parents aren't that bright. :)
 
2013-01-05 06:22:23 PM  

LDM90: In other words, submitter is ok with showing pornography to children?

No one said anything about a glimpse of a boob or a butt. He said pornography. And no one said anything about violence either. It was Super Mario Bros. on a DS. I get the feeling he'd like to keep his kid away from both sex and violence. Of course, this is the fark echo chamber where any mention of how children shouldn't be exposed to sexually explicit images is always followed up with BUT WHAT ABOUT THE 50 BEHEADINGS OUR CHILDREN SEE EVERYDAY???


A woman in a bathing suit is considered "porn" by some people. Never take anything anyone says about what they think is porn at face value. And I'd rather kids see the process that creates life instead of people losing their lives in various disgusting ways.
 
2013-01-05 07:16:10 PM  
Getting a kick. I am sitting here reviewing Game of Thrones for my 12 year old. He really wants to watch it, and I think it's a hell of a story...so I am marking the times that any lusty Dothraki sexing is going on so I can jump a bit forward. I know he's going to dig it, he's a LARP fanatic and really wants to see it for armor and weapon inspiration (he's working on a set of football pads now, covering them with leather and fur, it looks awesome).

We don't censor nudity, we just try to keep the extended f*cking to a minimum, especially as I remember, those first scenes were pretty much rape. He knows what I'm doing and is laughing at me, but I am damned uncomfortable having him see it... so there you have it.

I admittedly, have rather lax views on censoring (especially according to my mom friends). He can see nudity, but it depends on the kind. If it's a movie that shows actual sex, I just act like a big dork and run screaming for the tv to throw myself in front of it, if we happen to see something unexpected. We treat these things as a joke. He may say "curse words", but only at home, and I give him grief if it's too much or isn't creative enough. Funnily enough, he rarely curses and just seeing boobs is hardly worth more than a giggle.

I was raised by puritanical southern baptists. My partner was raised by Dutch parents and it was as I've described, pretty much. We are following his parents example, because it seemed better than mine. My partner ended up highly intelligent, independent and with excellent self-governing skills. It took me muuuuch longer to sort it all out, because I went nuts upon leaving home. Who knows if the censorship had anything to do with it. Maybe I'm just too lazy to shield him from everything.

Long story short, I have no idea if what I'm (not) doing will affect my kid in the long run, but I do hope that he ends up with better reasoning skills than some of the parents I see in articles like this one.

/sorry for the long post, I've been thinking on this a lot today :)
 
2013-01-05 07:39:40 PM  

rogue_L_chick: /sorry for the long post


Don't be. Sure, some ADHD kids here on fark will turn away, but they aren't worth bothering with in the first place.

rogue_L_chick: He knows what I'm doing and is laughing at me, but I am damned uncomfortable having him see it... so there you have it.


That's the way it goes, about all anyone can do really, which is a shiat ton more than a lot of parents to today.

You're involved and you're modulating consumption, a lot of parents could take a cue from that(but won't, sadly)
 
2013-01-05 08:07:46 PM  

Okay...for all the Farkers who seem to be okay with showing porn to children, how would you explain this to your kid?


Link
 
2013-01-05 08:11:06 PM  
Thanks, sometimes I post here just to see if someone has a better idea. It's nice to get a affirmation occasionally. They are mighty rare these days, in the parenting arena. Sometimes seems like no matter what you do, the kids are going to end up screwed.

/had to add- he just asked me if I was done yet. I hollered back that I was still modulating consumption. Best.wtf.look.ever. Thanks!
 
2013-01-05 08:13:45 PM  

ferretman: Okay...for all the Farkers who seem to be okay with showing porn to children, how would you explain this to your kid?
Link


Mine turns 13 in 3 months. Seems as though this Sasha Grey is a lovely lass. Maybe she has a "best-of" collection I can get for his birthday...
 
2013-01-05 08:15:25 PM  
I have a bad feeling sarcasm might be dead...so just in case, please don't call the fuzz on me?

/heh, fuzz
 
2013-01-05 08:47:49 PM  

ferretman: Okay...for all the Farkers who seem to be okay with showing porn to children, how would you explain this to your kid?
Link


He's taking her temperature with his meat thermometer.
 
2013-01-05 08:50:57 PM  

rogue_L_chick: Thanks, sometimes I post here just to see if someone has a better idea. It's nice to get a affirmation occasionally. They are mighty rare these days, in the parenting arena. Sometimes seems like no matter what you do, the kids are going to end up screwed.

/had to add- he just asked me if I was done yet. I hollered back that I was still modulating consumption. Best.wtf.look.ever. Thanks!


Awesome!

ferretman: Okay...for all the Farkers who seem to be okay with showing porn to children, how would you explain this to your kid?
Link


Your reading comprehension is farking terrible.

We're not advocating showing it to kids, only saying that people shiatting a brick over porn being on used electronics, and a kid getting a look at it, is a dip-shiat move.
 
2013-01-05 09:32:10 PM  

a61sun: What I'm wondering is, does this daughter bathe with blinders on? Cuz if not, she's gonna see boobies AND a vagina some day, and then what WILL poor Dad do???

....just wondering


Yeah, my first thought. Does he make her bathe fully clothed?
 
2013-01-05 10:13:52 PM  

omeganuepsilon: rogue_L_chick: Thanks, sometimes I post here just to see if someone has a better idea. It's nice to get a affirmation occasionally. They are mighty rare these days, in the parenting arena. Sometimes seems like no matter what you do, the kids are going to end up screwed.

/had to add- he just asked me if I was done yet. I hollered back that I was still modulating consumption. Best.wtf.look.ever. Thanks!

Awesome!

ferretman: Okay...for all the Farkers who seem to be okay with showing porn to children, how would you explain this to your kid?
Link

Your reading comprehension is farking terrible.

We're not advocating showing it to kids, only saying that people shiatting a brick over porn being on used electronics, and a kid getting a look at it, is a dip-shiat move.


Oh, no no no, if you don't want to show 7 year old girls hardcore porn you are just a puritanical hypocrite and you are terrified of the naked human body.
 
2013-01-05 10:17:42 PM  
OK, so now it's been said.

/whatever
 
2013-01-05 11:10:49 PM  

omeganuepsilon: OK, so now it's been said.

/whatever


Totes whatevs, dude.
 
2013-01-06 12:51:31 AM  

Weaver95: but we can still see all kinds of violence, right?  because that's what's really important here.


Of course - and we can still see all the porn too. WTF?

The thing is, parents might want to introduce their children into that kind of thing at their own pace.

I'd be a little pissed too I'd be smart enough to check it out before I gave it to my little girl, but I was also smart enough not to have childrens. FFS, you don't have to be l33t uber-hacker dude to plug in the farking used console to see if it works.
I dare say I blame the vendor as well as the father.

BTW, how are all those viagra commercials going? :"Daddy? Was your erection more than 4 hours long when you made me with mommy?"
 
2013-01-06 03:19:08 AM  
Son: What are they doing here?

Dad: They're playing leapfrog.

Son: I never pull my friend's hair when I play leapfrog.

Dad: They're doing it badly. See how they have to keep trying?
 
2013-01-06 04:53:08 AM  
When people become parents, they get weird.
 
2013-01-06 07:14:50 AM  

GypsyJoker: cig-mkr: I demand that Obama create a Porn On Refurbished Nintendos commission, with me in charge.

Just what we need--President Bawack O'Chicka administrating socialist porn for every red-blooded

Oh, Fark it; I can't do it. Not enough troll DNA.


I liked the President Bawack O'Chicka.
 
Displayed 138 of 138 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report