If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post)   Ann Coulter likens gun control advocates to "hysterical women". Well, if there's anyone that knows hysterical women, it's Ann Coulter   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 297
    More: Asinine, Ann Coulter, Cenk Uygur, NYC Subway, New York Observer, abortions, gun controls  
•       •       •

1260 clicks; posted to Politics » on 04 Jan 2013 at 2:21 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



297 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2013-01-04 12:50:16 PM
"Why can't we get a record of women who have had abortions?" Coulter asked. "They get money from Planned Parenthood; they get money from Medicare and Medicaid, much of these are tax subsidies. I think mothers might want to know what other women on their street might be willing to murder a child."

she sounds kind of...hysterical.
 
2013-01-04 12:50:38 PM
Sharp knees.
 
2013-01-04 12:51:41 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2013-01-04 01:00:24 PM
She's an attention whore that can't go a month without needing confirmation. She should be ignored and shunned.
 
2013-01-04 01:01:10 PM
HIPPA?
 
2013-01-04 01:03:13 PM
Ann Coulter knows what it's like to be a woman?  News to me.
 
2013-01-04 01:09:44 PM
Hysterical.  Unlike her comedy.
 
2013-01-04 01:09:55 PM
He's probably dated plenty of them
 
2013-01-04 01:12:55 PM

shameless: HIPPA?


pffft. Laws are for liberal losers.
 
2013-01-04 01:25:47 PM
img.photobucket.com

I know...I know you want to save that erection for someone special...Use Instant Flaccid Ann to get rid of that annoying, bothersome erection at the workplace or at school! Works in seconds!

Warning: Overuse may result in permanent loss of BV.
 
2013-01-04 01:27:38 PM
We're assuming that SkeleCoulter is a woman now?
 
2013-01-04 01:41:10 PM
That headline was like shooting fish in a barrel, eh subby?
 
2013-01-04 02:08:48 PM
To all those gun nuts who think the President is coming to take their guns, read on: 


I see a president who I was told repeatedly by gun owners that if he was elected the first time that "oh lordy lord! He's gonna take our guns away!" and so I waited, because I was curious, and lo and behold, the man did not do a damn thing about guns. He did not do a damn thing about pot legalization either (which I was warned was inevitable with a "dumbocrat" in the White House) and that we'd become a socialist paradise like Europe or Canada (neither of which are actually socialist). So I waited some more and was told that if Obama was reelected that "Don't ya see? This was his plan all along. Get reelected and then he'll take our guns away for sure! Cause he has nothin' left to lose! IT'S A CONSPIRACY!!" and so he got reelected and I waited and waited and you know what? It took 20 dead children before he even made a goddamn peep about gun control, and it wasn't even "I'm takin' your guns, you buck-toothed yokels." No, it was "we have 20 dead kids. This shiat needs to stop. We need to find an effective way of ending senseless violence like this" but not once did I ever hear the man utter "we need to take your guns. It's the only way to be sure." 

So I dunno what crazy, paranoid delusion you're living in, but I think you need to get your eyes checked. Cause it ain't Obama that's trying to take your guns away. It's not Obama trying to create a socialist paradise. It's not Obama causing the end of the world, or bringing about the lizard people for world domination or hunting you down with predator drones because you're some nut in the woods. No, *that* Obama that you fear is coming to take your shiat away. That's a figment of your messed up imagination and you should get that checked, because if you're playing with firearms and you can't figure out the difference between reality and fiction, I don't want your finger on the damn trigger.



Now if you were pissed at him for enacting laws that may violate your civil liberties or the rights of your fellow citizens to a free and fair trial, or cracking down on freedoms of speech or press or assembly or *anything* that has to do with the bill of rights, then I'll back you and probably join your cause and speak out. But if you're gonna make stupid comments like this that have no basis in reality and only further the divide in this country, then god help you.
 
2013-01-04 02:14:08 PM
No, please guys, keep submitting headlines about what Ann Coulter thinks. Whatever keeps her 15 minutes of fame going, right?
 
2013-01-04 02:23:56 PM
She only opens up her clap trap to get in the news to sell more books to tea tards. What she says is usually irrelevant.
 
2013-01-04 02:25:03 PM

Weaver95: "Why can't we get a record of women who have had abortions?" Coulter asked. "They get money from Planned Parenthood; they get money from Medicare and Medicaid, much of these are tax subsidies. I think mothers might want to know what other women on their street might be willing to murder a child."

she sounds kind of...hysterical.


Her evaluation of Mitt Romney's campaign was...delusional. Even Laura Ingrham didn't buy her BS.
 
2013-01-04 02:28:09 PM
"Why can't we get a record of women who have had abortions?" Coulter asked

Because medical records aren't public information, Ann. Ask your buddy Rush about it.

"They get money from Planned Parenthood; they get money from Medicare and Medicaid, much of these are tax subsidies. I think mothers might want to know what other women on their street might be willing to murder a child."

Ohhh, she wants to specifically target poor women. Got it.
 
2013-01-04 02:29:53 PM
A few kids getting killed is the price we have to pay to keep our kids safe.
 
2013-01-04 02:31:17 PM
So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?
 
2013-01-04 02:33:22 PM
blogs.ajc.com
 
2013-01-04 02:33:43 PM

Apos: We're assuming that SkeleCoulter is a woman now?


I want that to be my new Fark handle now
 
2013-01-04 02:34:04 PM

HotWingConspiracy: Ohhh, she wants to specifically target poor women. Got it.


No, she wants to sell books and continue building her business. She's just found an easy route to do so. It's no different with Beck, Malkin, Limbaugh, etc. Some of them believe what they say, or at least a watered down version of it, but mostly it's staged bluster. If they could make the same money and have the same prestige convincing people that dragons were coming to eat their babies, they'd say that. But it turns out that rabble-rousing neofundacons is really good business. To put it simply - hate is great for the bottom line.

/Good ol' USA
 
2013-01-04 02:34:27 PM
Ah. One of her more obnoxious troll moves- the "I hate women more than anyone does, I can totally be in the Old White Dude Power Club right? RIGHT?! CAN I AT LEAST SIT QUIETLY IN THE CORNER WHILE YOU GUYS ENJOY YOUR CIGARS AND BRANDY? PLEASE LOVE ME" maneuver.

There are few things I find more obnoxious but also more sad than a woman who's happy to say horrible things about other women in exchange for a few cookies from the patriarchy.
 
2013-01-04 02:34:42 PM

Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?


Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?
 
2013-01-04 02:36:33 PM
I liken Ann Coulter to an Afghan hound with a throat like a pulsating cockroach thorax.
 
2013-01-04 02:37:10 PM
Oh look another gun thread. Can we just make a "guns" tab at the top? To 1k with a quickness!
 
2013-01-04 02:37:58 PM

Doom MD: Oh look another gun thread. Can we just make a "guns" tab at the top? To 1k with a quickness!


I may have missed it. Did you have something to add to the conversation?
 
2013-01-04 02:39:39 PM

NateGrey: [blogs.ajc.com image 615x445]


Good luck taking on an elephant with .223
 
2013-01-04 02:39:44 PM

carpbrain: Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?

Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?


Since the chances that their exists a nigh 100% chance that a public record exists connecting your name to your address, I'm sure you would be OK if a paper did the same to you. Maybe you piss someone off and he decides to publish the names and addresses of your whole family. As long as he can get that information by searching public records, that should be OK with you, right?
 
2013-01-04 02:39:51 PM
This may be an insensitive question, but I have to wonder: Why hasn't Ann Coulter been raped yet?

I understand the answer is within the question itself, but I still have to wonder. Also, she needs an education in what it means to be truly hysterical about something, and a good old-fashioned "aggressive dicking" might be just the ticket.
 
2013-01-04 02:40:36 PM

thurstonxhowell: Since the chances that their exists...


This should say "Since there is..."

Instead comment post is tempting, but it's a harsh mistress.
 
2013-01-04 02:41:54 PM

carpbrain: Doom MD: Oh look another gun thread. Can we just make a "guns" tab at the top? To 1k with a quickness!

I may have missed it. Did you have something to add to the conversation?


When was the last gun thread where something new was added to the conversation?
 
2013-01-04 02:42:11 PM
Y'all are just afraid of a strong, vocal conservative woman!
 
2013-01-04 02:42:20 PM

thurstonxhowell: carpbrain: Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?

Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?

Since the chances that their exists a nigh 100% chance that a public record exists connecting your name to your address, I'm sure you would be OK if a paper did the same to you. Maybe you piss someone off and he decides to publish the names and addresses of your whole family. As long as he can get that information by searching public records, that should be OK with you, right?


It certainly wouldnt be illegal.
 
2013-01-04 02:42:30 PM

Crabs_Can_Polevault: This may be an insensitive question, but I have to wonder: Why hasn't Ann Coulter been raped yet?

I understand the answer is within the question itself, but I still have to wonder. Also, she needs an education in what it means to be truly hysterical about something, and a good old-fashioned "aggressive dicking" might be just the ticket.


Probably because everyone's too busy getting domed out by your mom.
 
2013-01-04 02:42:32 PM

Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?


My previous post should not be taken to mean I agree with this guy's asinine question. It is entirely possible to believe both that that paper was at fault and that Ann Coulter has never been correct and not horrible for even one instant in her horrid life.
 
2013-01-04 02:43:05 PM

thurstonxhowell: carpbrain: Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?

Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?

Since the chances that their exists a nigh 100% chance that a public record exists connecting your name to your address, I'm sure you would be OK if a paper did the same to you. Maybe you piss someone off and he decides to publish the names and addresses of your whole family. As long as he can get that information by searching public records, that should be OK with you, right?


Works for me. I'm not afraid. Also, "there". Still have no idea what your, or OP's, point is.
 
2013-01-04 02:44:18 PM

thurstonxhowell: carpbrain: Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?

Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?

Since the chances that their exists a nigh 100% chance that a public record exists connecting your name to your address, I'm sure you would be OK if a paper did the same to you. Maybe you piss someone off and he decides to publish the names and addresses of your whole family. As long as he can get that information by searching public records, that should be OK with you, right?


Are you against sex offenders having their names and addresses published? Both they, and gun owners increase the risk of crime to all those around them.
 
2013-01-04 02:44:23 PM

NateGrey:


"I know jack shiat about guns"
 
2013-01-04 02:46:58 PM

carpbrain: thurstonxhowell: carpbrain: Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?

Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?

Since the chances that their exists a nigh 100% chance that a public record exists connecting your name to your address, I'm sure you would be OK if a paper did the same to you. Maybe you piss someone off and he decides to publish the names and addresses of your whole family. As long as he can get that information by searching public records, that should be OK with you, right?

Works for me. I'm not afraid. Also, "there". Still have no idea what your, or OP's, point is.


That what the newspaper did was a dick move. It's not complicated if you're not trying not to understand it. The guy I responded to seemed to go a bit further than that, but that was my point.
 
2013-01-04 02:47:52 PM
25.media.tumblr.com BREAKING! 25.media.tumblr.com

Professional attention whore makes outrageous statement to increase her notoriety and sell more books!
 
2013-01-04 02:47:59 PM

Doom MD: carpbrain: Doom MD: Oh look another gun thread. Can we just make a "guns" tab at the top? To 1k with a quickness!

I may have missed it. Did you have something to add to the conversation?

When was the last gun thread where something new was added to the conversation?


Do you not think that there is a useful discussion to be had? Reminders: 20 dead six year--olds, and 13k or so gun-based homicides a year in the US.
 
2013-01-04 02:48:01 PM

Crabs_Can_Polevault: This may be an insensitive question, but I have to wonder: Why hasn't Ann Coulter been raped yet?

I understand the answer is within the question itself, but I still have to wonder. Also, she needs an education in what it means to be truly hysterical about something, and a good old-fashioned "aggressive dicking" might be just the ticket.


You're advocating she be raped?

Once again, the tolerant fark liberals show thier universal acceptance of others who hold different opinions than them.
 
2013-01-04 02:48:22 PM

NateGrey: [blogs.ajc.com image 615x445]


That's pretty stupid, considering there are plenty of non-assault weapons that are hunting guns and are far more powerful than an "assault rifle". These silly cartoonists hear the word "high powered" and wet themselves.
 
2013-01-04 02:48:37 PM

justtray: thurstonxhowell: carpbrain: Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?

Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?

Since the chances that their exists a nigh 100% chance that a public record exists connecting your name to your address, I'm sure you would be OK if a paper did the same to you. Maybe you piss someone off and he decides to publish the names and addresses of your whole family. As long as he can get that information by searching public records, that should be OK with you, right?

Are you against sex offenders having their names and addresses published? Both they, and gun owners increase the risk of crime to all those around them.


Wow, that is a breathtakingly stupid question.
 
2013-01-04 02:48:44 PM

justtray: thurstonxhowell: carpbrain: Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?

Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?

Since the chances that their exists a nigh 100% chance that a public record exists connecting your name to your address, I'm sure you would be OK if a paper did the same to you. Maybe you piss someone off and he decides to publish the names and addresses of your whole family. As long as he can get that information by searching public records, that should be OK with you, right?

Are you against sex offenders having their names and addresses published? Both they, and gun owners increase the risk of crime to all those around them.


If you feel so strongly about the subject I suggest you go picket outside of know gun owners place of residence.
 
2013-01-04 02:48:48 PM

thurstonxhowell: carpbrain: Danger Mouse: So you guys are Ok with printing the names of people who have gun permits in the paper.

Why?

Why not? Public record, right? Should that be kept secret?

Since the chances that their exists a nigh 100% chance that a public record exists connecting your name to your address, I'm sure you would be OK if a paper did the same to you. Maybe you piss someone off and he decides to publish the names and addresses of your whole family. As long as he can get that information by searching public records, that should be OK with you, right?


Yes.

I guess I could be mature about it and resort to domestic terrorism or something.
 
2013-01-04 02:49:09 PM
"Why can't we get a record of women who have had abortions?" Coulter asked. "They get money from Planned Parenthood; they get money from Medicare and Medicaid, much of these are tax subsidies. I think mothers might want to know what other women on their street might be willing to murder a child."

Ann's just jealous because Medicare won't cover the cost of her penis removal surgery.
 
2013-01-04 02:50:06 PM
www.troycitydesign.com
 
2013-01-04 02:51:10 PM
Just the other day, (D)ann was ranting about "silent dishwashers" and how she is too stupid, as a single woman, to tell if she has started the dishwahser unless wshe waits three days and discovers it full of still-dirty dishes.
Or something like that.

Yeah, I know it's Newsbusters, but I can't find the link I had yesterday
 
Displayed 50 of 297 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report