Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Deadline)   The Hobbit passes the $600 million mark, reigning supreme at the box office. Django Unchained takes second with $31 million, and the movie about the bread crumbles to third   (deadline.com ) divider line
    More: Followup, Quentin Tarantino, box offices, The Hobbit, Bette Midler, django, Zero Dark Thirty, Les Miserables, Rise of the Guardians  
•       •       •

3501 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 30 Dec 2012 at 2:08 PM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



85 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2012-12-30 01:17:16 PM  
That's alot of bored movie goers.
 
2012-12-30 01:42:05 PM  
I don't have three hours to watch a bunch of people walk across New Zealand, I don't have three hours to listen to a bunch of pointless dialogue from a guy who had one good idea and stretched it over a multi-decade career and I definitely don't have three hours to watch a musical I have seen performed live. Did I get everything?
 
2012-12-30 02:12:13 PM  
Django was great. Needed to lose a half hour or so, and

SPOILER ALERT

I wish the two best actors/characters didn't die with so much time left. Still good though.
 
2012-12-30 02:14:18 PM  
Even though Thorin finally accepts Bilbo into the company by the end of the movie. Bilbo will betray him by the time the third movie ends and Thorin will end up dead.
 
2012-12-30 02:15:10 PM  
I saw Django...the D is silent...Unchained last night. The theater was packed. There was only one time I was taken out of the movie

Spoilers


When Django kills the sister from upstairs and she goes flying into the next room. I kept trying to figure out how that was possible.
 
2012-12-30 02:24:59 PM  

thecpt: Django was great. Needed to lose a half hour or so, and

SPOILER ALERT

I wish the two best actors/characters didn't die with so much time left. Still good though.


I agree completely. I kept wanting to yell "Shake his damn hand already". I really wish he had been around for the big shootout.
 
2012-12-30 02:26:04 PM  

texdent: I saw Django...the D is silent...Unchained last night. The theater was packed. There was only one time I was taken out of the movie

Spoilers


When Django kills the sister from upstairs and she goes flying into the next room. I kept trying to figure out how that was possible.



It's pretty simple. They tie a rope or a cable to the actress, then when the gunshot goes off, someone off screen jerks and pulls her into the other room. Then, you just digitally remove the cable and you're done.

All in all, I liked Django a lot, even though it could have been trimmed by about 20 minutes.
 
2012-12-30 02:33:45 PM  
I just went and saw Lincoln again.  It remained awesome.
 
2012-12-30 02:33:58 PM  

texdent: I saw Django...the D is silent...Unchained last night. The theater was packed. There was only one time I was taken out of the movie

Spoilers


When Django kills the sister from upstairs and she goes flying into the next room. I kept trying to figure out how that was possible.


Sounds like a job for myth busters
 
2012-12-30 02:36:38 PM  

duffblue: I don't have three hours to watch a bunch of people walk across New Zealand, I don't have three hours to listen to a bunch of pointless dialogue from a guy who had one good idea and stretched it over a multi-decade career and I definitely don't have three hours to watch a musical I have seen performed live. Did I get everything?


You are dead to me.

Not that you were ever alive to me to begin with.
 
2012-12-30 02:40:25 PM  
Django Unchained was my Christmas day escape from family for a couple hours. Awesome movie though I agree it could have lost a half hour, in the middle act. I'm planning on seeing the Hobbit and Les Mis before returning to work after New Year's. Finally, there are some movies I actually want to see in the theater!
 
2012-12-30 02:41:13 PM  
I thought the Hobbit great. Much better than ROTK.

Also, the actor who played Bilbo was so much better than Frodo.

Good fun and not boring at all. It could have used a ten minute intermission though.
 
2012-12-30 02:59:08 PM  

Agent Smiths Laugh: duffblue: I don't have three hours to watch a bunch of people walk across New Zealand, I don't have three hours to listen to a bunch of pointless dialogue from a guy who had one good idea and stretched it over a multi-decade career and I definitely don't have three hours to watch a musical I have seen performed live. Did I get everything?

You are dead to me.

Not that you were ever alive to me to begin with.


Stop liking what I don't like.
 
2012-12-30 03:10:10 PM  

Marisyana: I just went and saw Lincoln again.  It remained awesome.


I don't go to the movies (not a snobby thing, there are plenty of movies I want to see I just can't get around to seeing them), but I made an effort to see both Lincoln and Argo and both movies make you feel proud to be an American.

I saw Lincoln with my dad and when it finished he started to clap and everybody else joined in.

zero dark thirty is next.
 
2012-12-30 03:14:39 PM  
oh yeah, the Hobbit was complete shiate too.

if I hear that Neil Finn monstrosity one the radio one more time, I'm personally going over to Tasmania to kick that dwarf from Split Enz in the nutsack until he needs six months in a leaky hospital whilst yelling "I got you!!".

/verily!
//I thought the Hobbit shiate!
 
2012-12-30 03:22:50 PM  

Komplex: Marisyana: I just went and saw Lincoln again.  It remained awesome.

I don't go to the movies (not a snobby thing, there are plenty of movies I want to see I just can't get around to seeing them), but I made an effort to see both Lincoln and Argo and both movies make you feel proud to be an American.

I saw Lincoln with my dad and when it finished he started to clap and everybody else joined in.

zero dark thirty is next.



I'm looking forward to that to, even though some farkers claim it will suck because a political blogger said so 2 months before the movie was even finished. Because if anyone knows movies, it's bloggers. That's why "Snakes On A Plane" made more money than T2 and Jurassic Park combined.
 
2012-12-30 03:24:06 PM  
I HAVE MORE FRIENDS ON GOOGLE +!!!!
 
2012-12-30 03:29:40 PM  

duffblue: Agent Smiths Laugh: duffblue: I don't have three hours to watch a bunch of people walk across New Zealand, I don't have three hours to listen to a bunch of pointless dialogue from a guy who had one good idea and stretched it over a multi-decade career and I definitely don't have three hours to watch a musical I have seen performed live. Did I get everything?

You are dead to me.

Not that you were ever alive to me to begin with.

Stop liking what I don't like.


cache.ohinternet.com
 
2012-12-30 03:32:21 PM  

duffblue: I don't have three hours to watch a bunch of people walk across New Zealand, I don't have three hours to listen to a bunch of pointless dialogue from a guy who had one good idea and stretched it over a multi-decade career and I definitely don't have three hours to watch a musical I have seen performed live. Did I get everything?


You didn't tell us if you have enough time to come on Fark and whine about movies you don't like.
 
2012-12-30 03:32:27 PM  
Saw Django last night and thought it was excellent. Could have trimmed a half hour only because I really had to pee.

Spoiler

The scene with the hoods had me in tears!
 
2012-12-30 03:36:19 PM  
Django could have trimmed the winter bounty hunting scenes and Les Mis... could've just ended the damn movie like almost an hour earlier than it did. Jesus, that movie dragged on.

Didn't like being left waiting for the sequel to The Hobbit. I am seriously starting to hate those deus ex machina giant eagles.
 
2012-12-30 03:36:23 PM  

mialynneb: Saw Django last night and thought it was excellent. Could have trimmed a half hour only because I really had to pee.

Spoiler

The scene with the hoods had me in tears!



Can't help but think Foxx helped write that one. Seemed almost like it could have been an In Living Color sketch.
 
2012-12-30 03:38:32 PM  

texdent:
When Django kills the sister from upstairs and she goes flying into the next room. I kept trying to figure out how that was possible.


I was tempted to point this out in the last thread but I figured someone would just write it off to being a homage to spaghetti westerns or whatever.
 
2012-12-30 03:40:30 PM  
Django is QT's worst film.
 
2012-12-30 03:48:46 PM  

Plant Rights Activist: texdent:
When Django kills the sister from upstairs and she goes flying into the next room. I kept trying to figure out how that was possible.

I was tempted to point this out in the last thread but I figured someone would just write it off to being a homage to spaghetti westerns or whatever.


What's there to point out? It's an effect to make the shooting over the top, just like all the other violence in the movie was over the top. FFS, the second person to die in the movie was blown to pieces by one pistol shot.

Whether or not it is an homage to spaghetti westerns is debatable, although in some Sergio Leone movies, a single stick of dynamite was enough to blow up an entire room, but it was a stylistic choice.

Best not to biatch about inaccuracies in a Western that had songs by Jim Croce and Rick Ross.
 
2012-12-30 03:50:39 PM  

stoli n coke: mialynneb: Saw Django last night and thought it was excellent. Could have trimmed a half hour only because I really had to pee.

Spoiler

The scene with the hoods had me in tears!


Can't help but think Foxx helped write that one. Seemed almost like it could have been an In Living Color sketch.


It reminded me of Blazing Saddles.

Also - I really love Christoph Waltz.
 
2012-12-30 03:51:46 PM  
I was kind of stunned to hear Django Unchained was so long. Who makes a B-movie even close to 2-hours, much less far longer?
 
2012-12-30 03:53:16 PM  
Something I really didn't understand about Django was Dr Schultz's extreme reaction to being asked to shake Candy's hand.  Seemed like QT struggled to find a way to get the film the the place he wanted it to go.
 
2012-12-30 03:55:44 PM  

duffblue: I don't have three hours to watch a bunch of people walk across New Zealand, I don't have three hours to listen to a bunch of pointless dialogue from a guy who had one good idea and stretched it over a multi-decade career and I definitely don't have three hours to watch a musical I have seen performed live. Did I get everything?


Other than mentioning that you're a twit...but that's self-evident.

/you apparently have ample time to FARK
//stop not liking what I like
 
2012-12-30 03:56:10 PM  
Saw Les Mis yesterday. It was good but Russel Crowe brought down the whole movie. He is a good actor but he can't sing and act at the same time. The whole movie would have been improved had they cast Jason Segel as Javert.
 
2012-12-30 03:57:29 PM  

Scorpitron is reduced to a thin red paste: I was kind of stunned to hear Django Unchained was so long. Who makes a B-movie even close to 2-hours, much less far longer?


Spaghetti westerns can run on the long side. Good, the Bad, and the Ugly was almost 3 hours, as was Once Upon A Time in the West and Duck You Sucker. Since QT steals a lot from Sergio Leone, the run time seemed about right.

With the exception of Reservior Dogs and Death Proof, all his movies have been at least 2 and a half hours (Kill Bill was a 4-hour movie), so I was expecting it.
 
2012-12-30 04:02:07 PM  

mialynneb: Also - I really love Christoph Waltz.


After Inglorious Basterds and now Django, I'll check out anything Christoph Waltz shows up in. The fact that he's starring in a Terry Gilliam Sci-Fi movie coming out next year has me really excited.
 
2012-12-30 04:07:12 PM  

Carth: Saw Les Mis yesterday. It was good but Russel Crowe brought down the whole movie. He is a good actor but he can't sing and act at the same time. The whole movie would have been improved had they cast Jason Segel as Javert.


I haven't seen it yet, but it was obvious before the movie came out that this one their one big mistake. It's one of those things that looks great on paper: "Hey Russell Crowe is a great actor, he'll look natural playing a hardass police man, AND he was a singer in his own band". Great, until you put down the casting sheet and say "wait a second, I am thinking about casting Russell Crowe as Javert. Why the fark would I do something stupid like that?"
 
2012-12-30 04:10:47 PM  

stoli n coke:
What's there to point out? It's an effect to make the shooting over the top, just like all the other violence in the movie was over the top.


I think a lot of us can suspend disbelief when it comes to most of the violence since we fortunately don't see much of it. The thing texdent and I were talking about was more of a problem of physics than degree of violence, though. Django shoots her while she is slightly to the left and below him so logically she would tumble directly away from him but is instead yanked through the door to another room far to the left of Django. It's admittedly minor but just threw off the rest of the biggest scene in the movie for me.
 
2012-12-30 04:12:27 PM  

NeoCortex42: mialynneb: Also - I really love Christoph Waltz.

After Inglorious Basterds and now Django, I'll check out anything Christoph Waltz shows up in. The fact that he's starring in a Terry Gilliam Sci-Fi movie coming out next year has me really excited.


Just stay the fark away from The Green Hornet. Even he couldn't save that piece of crap, which is disappointing because Eternal Sunshine is such a good movie.
 
2012-12-30 04:48:32 PM  

Popcorn Johnny: Something I really didn't understand about Django was Dr Schultz's extreme reaction to being asked to shake Candy's hand.  Seemed like QT struggled to find a way to get the film the the place he wanted it to go.


Candy had an equally extreme reaction to Schultz not wanting to shake his hand. Schultz was either completely disgusted by him at that point and wanted nothing to do with him, or he suspected him of being up to no good.
 
2012-12-30 04:50:29 PM  

NeoCortex42: mialynneb: Also - I really love Christoph Waltz.

After Inglorious Basterds and now Django, I'll check out anything Christoph Waltz shows up in. The fact that he's starring in a Terry Gilliam Sci-Fi movie coming out next year has me really excited.


Agreed!
 
2012-12-30 04:54:16 PM  

Popcorn Johnny: Django is QT's worst film.


Inglorious Basterds takes that prize and it was awesome.
 
2012-12-30 04:58:03 PM  

The Incredible Sexual Egg: Popcorn Johnny: Something I really didn't understand about Django was Dr Schultz's extreme reaction to being asked to shake Candy's hand.  Seemed like QT struggled to find a way to get the film the the place he wanted it to go.

Candy had an equally extreme reaction to Schultz not wanting to shake his hand. Schultz was either completely disgusted by him at that point and wanted nothing to do with him, or he suspected him of being up to no good.


That's the way I took it. They're almost out the door and Candie is standing awkwardly in the next room and wants to shake his hand. It felt like shenanigans was afoot.

The sister being shot I thought was meant to be overly dramatic and comedic. The way he had the girl say goodbye to her and then shot her I thought was funny. Not as funny as the big lady running full-tilt out of the house holding up her dress.
 
2012-12-30 05:00:37 PM  

Plant Rights Activist: I am seriously starting to hate those deus ex machina giant eagles.


It's very fitting that you should refer to them in that manner since that is quite literally what they are. They are direct agents of Heaven on Middle Earth, and like all divine processes they operate according to God's plans, not man's. So in that respect any intervention at all is a boon not to be questioned - especially concerning the lengths or convenience of that intervention.

But yeah, woulda been nice if they'd flown them a little closer ;)
 
2012-12-30 05:17:23 PM  

Hollie Maea: Carth: Saw Les Mis yesterday. It was good but Russel Crowe brought down the whole movie. He is a good actor but he can't sing and act at the same time. The whole movie would have been improved had they cast Jason Segel as Javert.

I haven't seen it yet, but it was obvious before the movie came out that this one their one big mistake. It's one of those things that looks great on paper: "Hey Russell Crowe is a great actor, he'll look natural playing a hardass police man, AND he was a singer in his own band". Great, until you put down the casting sheet and say "wait a second, I am thinking about casting Russell Crowe as Javert. Why the fark would I do something stupid like that?"


I don't think that Crowe can't sing...but growling in a rock band is a bit different than the nuanced singing required in what is essentially an opera, and it definitely was the wrong key for his voice.

Hvaing said that, i thought the the change in movie where they had ValJean push Javert off the bridge made the whole life-long pursuit of ValJean much more reasonable.
 
2012-12-30 05:18:38 PM  

The Incredible Sexual Egg: Popcorn Johnny: Something I really didn't understand about Django was Dr Schultz's extreme reaction to being asked to shake Candy's hand.  Seemed like QT struggled to find a way to get the film the the place he wanted it to go.

Candy had an equally extreme reaction to Schultz not wanting to shake his hand. Schultz was either completely disgusted by him at that point and wanted nothing to do with him, or he suspected him of being up to no good.


The handshake scene works either way. I also thought that D'Artagnan being ripped apart was obviously going to haunt him forever, so Schultz decided that dying wouldn't be all that awful, after all. So, why not take out Candie while he had the chance? No matter which way you read that scene, Schultz realized he wasn't getting out alive.

Great movie altogether. I didn't feel it needed an edit--you needed the exposition during the winter of bounty hunting to explain why Django's sharpshooting skills, ability to ride a horse so well, and the massive change in his demeanor (going from childlike as Schultz is telling the story of Seigfried to being able to pull off acting like a black slaver).
 
2012-12-30 05:32:37 PM  

Plant Rights Activist: stoli n coke:
What's there to point out? It's an effect to make the shooting over the top, just like all the other violence in the movie was over the top.

I think a lot of us can suspend disbelief when it comes to most of the violence since we fortunately don't see much of it. The thing texdent and I were talking about was more of a problem of physics than degree of violence, though. Django shoots her while she is slightly to the left and below him so logically she would tumble directly away from him but is instead yanked through the door to another room far to the left of Django. It's admittedly minor but just threw off the rest of the biggest scene in the movie for me.



So, the physics of what looked like a side pocket shot in a game of pool bothers you, but the fact that one person got their head blown off, while another person, who was shot with the same gun, only got a tiny hole in their chest was totally cool?
I'm sorry, but it sounds like internet nit-picking to me.

Filmmakers aren't physicists, and to expect so is foolish.
 
2012-12-30 05:44:00 PM  

PIP_the_TROLL: Plant Rights Activist: I am seriously starting to hate those deus ex machina giant eagles.

It's very fitting that you should refer to them in that manner since that is quite literally what they are. They are direct agents of Heaven on Middle Earth, and like all divine processes they operate according to God's plans, not man's. So in that respect any intervention at all is a boon not to be questioned - especially concerning the lengths or convenience of that intervention.

But yeah, woulda been nice if they'd flown them a little closer ;)


I think you are confusing the eagles with the wizards
 
2012-12-30 05:46:41 PM  
Went to see Les Mis yesterday.

GOD that movie dragged in parts. Granted... I have not seen the musical; this is my first experience with it. However it was too long for what it was. It had a serious problem with its narrative structure.

What I mean by this is that every time there was an exciting sequence, whether it be action, nationalist singing, or events related to the main crux of the story (the conflict between Javert and Valjean) it would be follow by a slow sequence easily 3 or 4 times as long as the preceding one.

Maybe that's fine for another story, but one that is almost 3 hours long can't be sustained that way. Case in point... the end. Spoilers. It takes a long farking time for him to die, and then you see a sequence of the dead rebels on the barricades which lasts about a minute. It doesn't work.

And if anyone wants to say that I have no attention span, that's BS. Not two days ago I watch Ran again and loved it. I'm going to get to Spartacus in a couple of days and that one is almost an hour longer than Les Mis.
 
2012-12-30 05:48:45 PM  

Bill Frist: PIP_the_TROLL: Plant Rights Activist: I am seriously starting to hate those deus ex machina giant eagles.

It's very fitting that you should refer to them in that manner since that is quite literally what they are. They are direct agents of Heaven on Middle Earth, and like all divine processes they operate according to God's plans, not man's. So in that respect any intervention at all is a boon not to be questioned - especially concerning the lengths or convenience of that intervention.

But yeah, woulda been nice if they'd flown them a little closer ;)

I think you are confusing the eagles with the wizards


The Eagles are agents of Manwe. The wizards' origin is less clear but could be from Iluvatar.

Of course in the actual Hobbit book there was no reference to this and the Eagles were portrayed as being potentially wicked, evil creatures.
 
2012-12-30 05:53:57 PM  

snowshovel:
Hvaing said that, i thought the the change in movie where they had ValJean push Javert off the bridge made the whole life-long pursuit of ValJean much more reasonable.


What movie did you see?
 
2012-12-30 05:58:43 PM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: The Eagles are agents of Manwe.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle_(Middle-earth)#Nature_of_the_Eagle s
 
2012-12-30 06:01:56 PM  

Bill Frist: The All-Powerful Atheismo: The Eagles are agents of Manwe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle_(Middle-earth)#Nature_of_the_Eagle s


So you've discovered that Tolkien wrote conflicting things. Spectacular.

Especially since I said that in my own post.
 
2012-12-30 06:04:52 PM  
I do have to mention the bag scene in Django.  Easily the best scene of the film and one of the best scenes of the year.
 
2012-12-30 06:07:36 PM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: Of course in the actual Hobbit book there was no reference to this and the Eagles were portrayed as being potentially wicked, evil creatures.


Except for Joe Walsh.
 
2012-12-30 06:10:26 PM  
I watched the Rankin Bass version of The Hobbit again the other day. From what I've heard it's better than Jackson's abomination.

/The greaaaaaaaaa-test ad-ven-tuuuure
 
2012-12-30 06:11:14 PM  
I was afraid Hobbit was going to drag, but it kept my attention and looked great. I will say that if that's the best that 3D can do, then I'll continue to only watch 2D movies. I only saw the 3D to see what the 48fps looked like, which was a little weird at first but was fine the rest of the time.

As for Les Mis:

sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net
/hotlink from Facebook
 
2012-12-30 06:13:03 PM  

MacWizard: The All-Powerful Atheismo: Of course in the actual Hobbit book there was no reference to this and the Eagles were portrayed as being potentially wicked, evil creatures.

Except for Joe Walsh.


lol
 
2012-12-30 06:27:08 PM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: snowshovel:
Hvaing said that, i thought the the change in movie where they had ValJean push Javert off the bridge made the whole life-long pursuit of ValJean much more reasonable.

What movie did you see?


In my area, they are running Les Mis like the movie "Clue" did in the theatres. We saw the "Ending B" version.

Also, the victory march of the Revolutionaries was glorious.
 
2012-12-30 06:35:16 PM  
I really loved Django. As QT movies go, I'd only put it behind Pulp Fiction. Fantastic performances from everyone involved. Although I will say that the film needed more Leo, as his character was amazing and I think he should have been the last, final, most-deserved death (though Jackson's character getting this role, especially after that speech given to Django about what the rest of his life will be, wasn't a bad choice).
 
2012-12-30 06:38:18 PM  

Mad_Radhu: NeoCortex42: mialynneb: Also - I really love Christoph Waltz.

After Inglorious Basterds and now Django, I'll check out anything Christoph Waltz shows up in. The fact that he's starring in a Terry Gilliam Sci-Fi movie coming out next year has me really excited.

Just stay the fark away from The Green Hornet. Even he couldn't save that piece of crap, which is disappointing because Eternal Sunshine is such a good movie.


I do agree that Waltz and Gondry's talents were wasted on The Green Hornet, but I thought it was pretty funny otherwise.
 
2012-12-30 06:54:28 PM  

PIP_the_TROLL: Plant Rights Activist: I am seriously starting to hate those deus ex machina giant eagles.

It's very fitting that you should refer to them in that manner since that is quite literally what they are. They are direct agents of Heaven on Middle Earth, and like all divine processes they operate according to God's plans, not man's. So in that respect any intervention at all is a boon not to be questioned - especially concerning the lengths or convenience of that intervention.

But yeah, woulda been nice if they'd flown them a little closer ;)


The Lord of the Rings movies are full of deus ex machina.

"Hey, it's a big battle and we're getting our ass kicked! Wait! there's some elves coming over the hill, we're saved!"

"Hey, it's a big battle and we're getting our ass kicked! Wait, there's this army of the undead I had stored in my ass, we're saved!"

"Hey, Sauroman is...oh he's dead. That's in the deleted scenes."

"Hey, we're dying here on this volcano! Might as well suck each other off like we've been talking about! Wait, here's some eagles to carry us to safety? Why didn't they just....nevermind. We're saved!"
 
2012-12-30 07:42:19 PM  

Mugato: PIP_the_TROLL: Plant Rights Activist: I am seriously starting to hate those deus ex machina giant eagles.

It's very fitting that you should refer to them in that manner since that is quite literally what they are. They are direct agents of Heaven on Middle Earth, and like all divine processes they operate according to God's plans, not man's. So in that respect any intervention at all is a boon not to be questioned - especially concerning the lengths or convenience of that intervention.

But yeah, woulda been nice if they'd flown them a little closer ;)

The Lord of the Rings movies are full of deus ex machina.

"Hey, it's a big battle and we're getting our ass kicked! Wait! there's some elves coming over the hill, we're saved!"

"Hey, it's a big battle and we're getting our ass kicked! Wait, there's this army of the undead I had stored in my ass, we're saved!"

"Hey, Sauroman is...oh he's dead. That's in the deleted scenes."

"Hey, we're dying here on this volcano! Might as well suck each other off like we've been talking about! Wait, here's some eagles to carry us to safety? Why didn't they just....nevermind. We're saved!"


Your point is not wrong, but in the book this was handled much better. The army of the dead never showed up at Minas Tirith at all, they lifted the siege of Pelargir, and Gondorian forces from that city sailed north to Minas Tirith. I'm also upset that they didn't depict the Rohirrim dismount and form a shield wall. I also always thought the wide shots of the orcs lined up in nice neat rectangles was silly.
 
2012-12-30 07:56:35 PM  

miniflea: Your point is not wrong, but in the book this was handled much better. The army of the dead never showed up at Minas Tirith at all, they lifted the siege of Pelargir, and Gondorian forces from that city sailed north to Minas Tirith. I'm also upset that they didn't depict the Rohirrim dismount and form a shield wall. I also always thought the wide shots of the orcs lined up in nice neat rectangles was silly.


Well it's like the fate of Sauroman. There was a lot of stuff left as required reading to the books. Not that I'm saying they aren't well made films, I couldn't do any better. Maybe.
 
2012-12-30 08:16:23 PM  
If you haven't seen Les Mis yet, SEE IT, if for no other reason then Anne Hathaway's Dream a Dream. I don't get emotional at movies, that's what I have a wife for. But damn if that didn't move me.

Although you can't see her sing, here is a link to her singing it.
 
2012-12-30 08:24:09 PM  
I just got back from the hobbit. It was pretty great. And no I've never read the book, but it worked as a movie. It's just a different pace than LOTR.
 
2012-12-30 08:31:31 PM  
I saw Les Mis, and I didn't really like it all that much. Even though I love musicals, I did not enjoy this.

I think I may like it more on a second viewing. Perhaps I didn't like it because 1. I never saw the play and 2. I went to a 10:40 show and spent 2 of the 3 hours just trying to stay awake.
 
2012-12-30 09:06:30 PM  

Mugato: "Hey, it's a big battle and we're getting our ass kicked! Wait, there's this army of the undead I had stored in my ass, we're saved!"


So it's more of a deus ex culus then?
 
2012-12-30 10:26:06 PM  

Mugato: miniflea: Your point is not wrong, but in the book this was handled much better. The army of the dead never showed up at Minas Tirith at all, they lifted the siege of Pelargir, and Gondorian forces from that city sailed north to Minas Tirith. I'm also upset that they didn't depict the Rohirrim dismount and form a shield wall. I also always thought the wide shots of the orcs lined up in nice neat rectangles was silly.

Well it's like the fate of Sauroman. There was a lot of stuff left as required reading to the books. Not that I'm saying they aren't well made films, I couldn't do any better. Maybe.


I can sit around and nitpick all the little things I would have liked to be different, but at the end of the day I love the films. Maybe someone could have done better than Jackson, but I think the vast majority would have done far worse. I am aware that as someone knowledgeable about the books I see the films differently than someone who has never read them though.
 
2012-12-30 11:10:45 PM  
Read the Hobbit, loved it. Saw the Hobbit, also loved it. I remembered lines from the book during certain scenes, and at the same time felt like I was watching a D&D game.

My favorite sequence has to be the storm giant battle.
 
2012-12-31 12:33:05 AM  
Yeah, well, Les Miz performed a lot better than Subby's mom on Opening Legs Night. So take THAT.
 
2012-12-31 01:37:58 AM  

texdent:
When Django kills the sister from upstairs and she goes flying into the next room. I kept trying to figure out how that was possible.


The film is designed to be an Italian western. They were sort of the John Woo movies of the mid-20th century, realism was not usually the highest priority (with a few exceptions, the Clint Eastwood ones toned down the craziness of the action scenes a bit).

The specific movie on which the Tarantino flick was based, Django, had action scenes usually described as outright surreal.

So... basically what's bothering you is intentional, and it's actually stranger that you missed the other 80% of the movie that's essentially throwing the bird at physics as it speeds by on a neon plaid rocket-bear toward Alpha Centauri. Maybe you watch too many '90s action movies and have become desensitized.
 
2012-12-31 01:47:34 AM  
Saw Les Miserables today:

Nearly every song is a reprise, and Russel Crowe can't sing a single one of them.

If ever a musical needed a re-edit for movie form, this was it. They could have cut about an hour. Not every song in les mis is a gem.

At least on the stage there's an intermission.

/DJ was rather good, but again, a half-hour shorter wouldn't have hurt. Eliminating Quentin Tarantino's "Australian" cameo would have been first to go. It probably could have ended after the first big bloody house battle or alternatively made that fight shorter. How many hillbillies? Infinite hillbillies.

//haven't seen the hobbit yet. it also sounds too damn long.
 
2012-12-31 02:00:27 AM  

Brick-House: If you haven't seen Les Mis yet, SEE IT, if for no other reason then Anne Hathaway's Dream a Dream. I don't get emotional at movies, that's what I have a wife for. But damn if that didn't move me.


I honestly thought Susan Boyle's was more powerful.

Tax Boy: At least on the stage there's an intermission.


TRUTH. My wife loves Les Mis but didn't care for the film. I commented on the length and she pointed this fact out to me and it makes a ton of sense.
 
2012-12-31 02:05:01 AM  

Gig103: Tax Boy: At least on the stage there's an intermission.

TRUTH. My wife loves Les Mis but didn't care for the film. I commented on the length and she pointed this fact out to me and it makes a ton of sense.


It also suffers from a common issue in musicals -- it's heavily front-loaded. There are almost no new songs after intermission (they're all reprises), which means that the last hour of the movie is zzzzzzzzz.
 
2012-12-31 04:21:22 AM  

Tax Boy: Saw Les Miserables today:

Nearly every song is a reprise, and Russel Crowe can't sing a single one of them.

If ever a musical needed a re-edit for movie form, this was it. They could have cut about an hour. Not every song in les mis is a gem.

/DJ was rather good, but again, a half-hour shorter wouldn't have hurt. Eliminating Quentin Tarantino's "Australian" cameo would have been first to go. It probably could have ended after the first big bloody house battle or alternatively made that fight shorter. How many hillbillies? Infinite hillbillies.



Get out of my head
 
2012-12-31 05:34:17 AM  

The Incredible Sexual Egg: Popcorn Johnny: Something I really didn't understand about Django was Dr Schultz's extreme reaction to being asked to shake Candy's hand.  Seemed like QT struggled to find a way to get the film the the place he wanted it to go.

Candy had an equally extreme reaction to Schultz not wanting to shake his hand. Schultz was either completely disgusted by him at that point and wanted nothing to do with him, or he suspected him of being up to no good.


I read it as Schultz always having all these big, elaborate plans and they always go perfectly, now here's one of his grand schemes that just went spectacularly to shiat, damn near getting himself and Django killed and Broomhilda maimed. He's sensible and far more enlightened than most of the people he deals with, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have an ego that just got beat to hell. Schultz is always the one who is a step ahead of everyone else and he just got seriously one-upped. He's embarrassed as can be as it is, and Candy's now trying to force him do another thing he doesn't want to do. Schultz is thinking that worst case scenario, Candy's going to pull some shenanigans to try to kill me; best case scenario, me going over there and shaking his hand is just going to be him getting the upper hand on me again. Either way, he just wanted to be out of the situation and finally did what he did to salvage what was left of his pride.
 
2012-12-31 10:10:21 AM  
Django Unchained was off the Chain!!
 
2012-12-31 10:11:28 AM  

duffblue: I don't have three hours to watch a bunch of people walk across New Zealand, I don't have three hours to listen to a bunch of pointless dialogue from a guy who had one good idea and stretched it over a multi-decade career and I definitely don't have three hours to watch a musical I have seen performed live. Did I get everything?



you need a couple of beers. take a break and think things over.
 
2012-12-31 10:13:42 AM  

texdent: I saw Django...the D is silent...Unchained last night. The theater was packed. There was only one time I was taken out of the movie

Spoilers


When Django kills the sister from upstairs and she goes flying into the next room. I kept trying to figure out how that was possible.



it isn't. that it Tarantino, my friend. he is using that prop to express the audiences pent up desire to see that biatch being blown into the next room.

don't take it literally. it would take a grenade launcher to do it in real life.
 
2012-12-31 10:17:04 AM  

Popcorn Johnny: Django



his best since Pulp Fiction, imo.
 
2012-12-31 11:03:55 AM  

The All-Powerful Atheismo: Bill Frist: PIP_the_TROLL: Plant Rights Activist: I am seriously starting to hate those deus ex machina giant eagles.

It's very fitting that you should refer to them in that manner since that is quite literally what they are. They are direct agents of Heaven on Middle Earth, and like all divine processes they operate according to God's plans, not man's. So in that respect any intervention at all is a boon not to be questioned - especially concerning the lengths or convenience of that intervention.

But yeah, woulda been nice if they'd flown them a little closer ;)

I think you are confusing the eagles with the wizards

The Eagles are agents of Manwe. The wizards' origin is less clear but could be from Iluvatar.

Of course in the actual Hobbit book there was no reference to this and the Eagles were portrayed as being potentially wicked, evil creatures.


IIRC the wizards were archangels in the Silmarillion.

Really wanted to to like this movie, but the later battles came across like 'John Carter and the Temple of Doom.' During those scenes, the thought kept coming to me that I hated it. The council scene wanted to be beautiful and intelligent, but was not. Also, Radagast switches personality abruptly.

Benedict Cumberbatch had billing as the necromancer, but no lines that I could remember.

/Never enough Cate Blanchett in these movies.
 
2012-12-31 11:38:10 AM  
Thought The Hobbit was great. Far better than those boring LotR movies.
 
2012-12-31 12:30:47 PM  

NeoCortex42: .


Popcorn Johnny: .


brigid_fitch: The handshake scene works either way. I also thought that D'Artagnan being ripped apart was obviously going to haunt him forever, so Schultz decided that dying wouldn't be all that awful, after all. So, why not take out Candie while he had the chance? No matter which way you read that scene, Schultz realized he wasn't getting out alive.



here's a link from earlier. QT addresses the handshake. it's interesting to have the "hero" act like a typical bond villain.
 
2012-12-31 02:35:06 PM  
Not that it matters, but I thought The hobbit was great. I only looked at my watch once in the 3 hours it took to complete. Suck it haters.
 
2012-12-31 03:19:30 PM  
To the surprise of absolutely no nerds anywhere. We tried to tell you people this move would be huge.
 
2012-12-31 03:33:38 PM  

Mugato: PIP_the_TROLL: Plant Rights Activist: I am seriously starting to hate those deus ex machina giant eagles.

It's very fitting that you should refer to them in that manner since that is quite literally what they are. They are direct agents of Heaven on Middle Earth, and like all divine processes they operate according to God's plans, not man's. So in that respect any intervention at all is a boon not to be questioned - especially concerning the lengths or convenience of that intervention.

But yeah, woulda been nice if they'd flown them a little closer ;)

The Lord of the Rings movies are full of deus ex machina.

"Hey, it's a big battle and we're getting our ass kicked! Wait! there's some elves coming over the hill, we're saved!"

"Hey, it's a big battle and we're getting our ass kicked! Wait, there's this army of the undead I had stored in my ass, we're saved!"

"Hey, Sauroman is...oh he's dead. That's in the deleted scenes."

"Hey, we're dying here on this volcano! Might as well suck each other off like we've been talking about! Wait, here's some eagles to carry us to safety? Why didn't they just....nevermind. We're saved!"


Hey! I'm a fan of the books and the movies and this... was funny. +1 to you sir.
 
2012-12-31 08:22:34 PM  

duffblue: I don't have three hours to watch a bunch of people walk across New Zealand, I don't have three hours to listen to a bunch of pointless dialogue from a guy who had one good idea and stretched it over a multi-decade career and I definitely don't have three hours to watch a musical I have seen performed live. Did I get everything?


You have to been at the gym in 26 minutes?
 
2013-01-01 02:26:13 AM  
I liked the Hobbit overall, but a couple of the scenes (giants, the Wild Platform Ride) pushed believability too far. Whether or not Gandalf is there with you, if you're on a platform suspended hundreds of feet above solid rock, and that thing lets go, you gonna die.

As for Les Miserables, I'm a huge fan of the musical, and the movie worked for me almost 100%. Yes, Russell Crowe didn't bring operatic tone, but I wasn't off-put by his singing, and he was otherwise so convincing in the role that I wouldn't replace him if I could. Frankly, I thought Jackman went a touch too far in the other direction - his vibrato went beyond most of the other voices I've heard in that role, including Colm Wilkinson's. And SBC convinced me, beyond all remaining doubt, that he is pure acting genius. I'm glad they didn't cut more out, and was incredibly moved by the experience.

Wasn't planning to go see DJ, but I think I will now based on the comments.
 
Displayed 85 of 85 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report