If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Topeka Capital-Journal)   Sometimes, it just doesn't pay to masturbate for money from strangers you meet on Craigslist   (cjonline.com) divider line 25
    More: Weird, Craigslist, Topeka, William Marotta, cash assistance, court cases, Department of Children, foster children, blood donors  
•       •       •

19000 clicks; posted to Main » on 28 Dec 2012 at 10:20 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-12-28 10:56:48 PM  
6 votes:
Nice to see a bunch of people who couldn't be bothered to read the article assume that the women are pinching him for money, rather than the state pursuing him despite the women telling the state about the contract.
2012-12-28 10:35:16 PM  
3 votes:
Hmmm this sounds like the sort of case that would cause men to avoid being a sperm donor.
2012-12-29 02:48:57 AM  
2 votes:
2012-12-28 10:50:30 PM  
2 votes:
" WE are going to have a perfect baby who will have TWO mommies and we don't need any MAN except for the sperm which we can just PURCHASE and, uh, you know, all the money we'll need to raise it. From him. Cause, um, it's his sperm." I don't if anybody that childish, self-involved or borderline sociopathic should be in charge of a child.
2012-12-28 10:34:37 PM  
2 votes:
Even lesbians need a man.
2012-12-28 10:32:29 PM  
2 votes:

xant: JerkyMeat: Schroller said that after consulting with his wife, Marotta decided to donate free of charge rather than taking the $50.


Amature move.

This may actually be his biggest problem. Not accepting any money makes it a whole different transaction, and could possibly invalidate the contract. That's what the lesbians are betting on, anyway.

Based on the contract terms quoted in the article, I can't imagine a court giving them the win, but stranger things have happened.


It doesn't sound like the lesbians are actually seeking support, the state is, because one of the lesbians went on public assistance for a spell, and the state doesn't give a shiat, they'll stick anybody they can with the bill, whether it's right or not.
2012-12-29 10:05:58 PM  
1 votes:

GF named my left testicle thundercles: this study says that lesbians are 167% more likely to divorce than other marriages.
therefore, lesbians create broken homes --> broken homes create bad children ---> lesbians create bad children


--> GFnmltt is an anti-gay bigot.
2012-12-29 07:26:41 AM  
1 votes:

Aussie_As: fusillade762: GF named my left testicle thundercles: [i1172.photobucket.com image 617x571]

as a man, the state does not consider you to be a human being. you are a paycheck. you are a number.

Yeah, about that.

the study doesn't document the failure of same-sex marriage. It documents the failure of the closeted, broken, and unstable households that preceded same-sex marriage.

...the entire sample was born between 1971 and 1994, when same-sex marriage was illegal throughout the United States, and millions of homosexuals were trying to pass or function as straight spouses...

In short, these people aren't the products of same-sex households. They're the products of broken homes.

Thanks for that link. It shows just how dodgy the graphic put up by GF is. Whoever put that set of stats together while pretending that it was about real gay couples raising kids and not largely people cheating on their partners with other same-sex partners has got agendas up the arse. Probably in a "no, there's nothing gay about me putting a 13-inch black rubber agenda up my arse" kind of way.


I try to avoid ad hominem attacks, but I will freely attack Mark Regnerus for having no knowledge of how to set up a research study, and I will treat the results of any of his future studies as garbage until I have the opportunity to pick through the methodology with a fine-toothed comb myself.

/the same rules apply to John Lott
2012-12-29 05:35:11 AM  
1 votes:
Lesson of the Story:

If your sperm is going inside a woman, make sure your penis is penetrating her somehow.
2012-12-29 04:40:14 AM  
1 votes:

fusillade762: GF named my left testicle thundercles: [i1172.photobucket.com image 617x571]

as a man, the state does not consider you to be a human being. you are a paycheck. you are a number.

Yeah, about that.

the study doesn't document the failure of same-sex marriage. It documents the failure of the closeted, broken, and unstable households that preceded same-sex marriage.

...the entire sample was born between 1971 and 1994, when same-sex marriage was illegal throughout the United States, and millions of homosexuals were trying to pass or function as straight spouses...

In short, these people aren't the products of same-sex households. They're the products of broken homes.


Thanks for that link. It shows just how dodgy the graphic put up by GF is. Whoever put that set of stats together while pretending that it was about real gay couples raising kids and not largely people cheating on their partners with other same-sex partners has got agendas up the arse. Probably in a "no, there's nothing gay about me putting a 13-inch black rubber agenda up my arse" kind of way.

Meanwhile, my two cents about the actual article is it's wrong, but that's bound to happen if you get into these situations without doing the correct legal/medical research. Shame on those Farkers claiming that this is because the lesbian couple are behind the legal action, and shame on the lesbian couple for naming the sperm donor to authorities and not just claiming it was all a first-names-only Craigslist arrangement.
2012-12-29 01:10:52 AM  
1 votes:

epoch_destroi: Nice to see a bunch of people who couldn't be bothered to read the article assume that the women are pinching him for money, rather than the state pursuing him despite the women telling the state about the contract.


it surprises me how many there are. is reading comprehension a lost art now?
2012-12-28 11:53:44 PM  
1 votes:
This may actually be his biggest problem. Not accepting any money makes it a whole different transaction, and could possibly invalidate the contract. That's what the lesbians are betting on, anyway.

The lesbian parents aren't seeking anything from him. The breadwinner of the couple lost her job and applied for financial assistance from the government.

The state is trying to save a buck and extract the money from the biological father rather than have it come from the state welfare funds.

From an emotional standpoint, I think the state should pay and this guy shouldn't owe anything. From a logical standpoint, this is why I avoid Craigslist. Too many deals which have little to no protection under the law.
2012-12-28 11:48:31 PM  
1 votes:

jtown: "Direct deposits" get the same protections as going through a sperm bank or fertility specialist.


Damnit. They don't get the same protections. Don't do what Donny Don't Does.
2012-12-28 11:48:03 PM  
1 votes:
On Oct. 3, attorney Mark McMillan filed a petition on behalf of the Department of Children and Families seeking a ruling that Marotta is the father of Schreiner's child and owes a duty to support her. It said the department provided cash assistance totaling $189 for the girl for July through September 2012 and had paid medical expenses totaling $5,884.96.

Schroller, an attorney with Topeka-based Swinnen & Associates, said the state became involved after the mother fell on hard times and applied for financial assistance through the state.

She said of Schreiner: "My understanding is that after being pressed on paternity of the child, she gave them William's name as a sperm donor. The state then filed this suit to determine paternity."

/So much for the "financially stable" lesbian couple. They file for food stamps, and financial assistance, and instead of saying "I dont know who the father is, you decide to throw him to the wolves for doing you a favor. And he didn't even take your lousy fifty bucks. But you're sure going to take his. So much for your word on a contract. farking biatch. And the guy is an idiot, just because you sign a paper saying that you have no parental rights, and they wont come after you, that doesn't mean shiat to the state.
2012-12-28 11:47:17 PM  
1 votes:
"Direct deposits" get the same protections as going through a sperm bank or fertility specialist.

At first I was outraged. Then I skimmed the story. They didn't have a licensed physician perform the insemination. So either they used a turkey baster, went to some back alley inceptionist, or they did it the old fashioned way. I'm guessing it was that last method. Now the "financially stable" couple isn't so stable and someone's seeking assistance from the government and the government expects the father to support his child.

Since the insemination didn't take place within the guidelines that would exempt the guy from financial responsibility, he's proper farked. While the women would be unable to make any financial claim against him, the state made no such agreement. The women don't have the authority to provide an exemption on behalf of a third party. If he had gone through the proper donation procedures, he wouldn't be in this mess. If nobody was requesting financial support from the government, he wouldn't be in this mess.
2012-12-28 11:46:41 PM  
1 votes:
What he should have done is maintained his anonymity throughout the donation process. If he used a throwaway email address and never gave them any personally identifying information then he would never have had to worry about anything. Well I suppose the government could have traced his ip address but there are ways around that too.
2012-12-28 11:07:57 PM  
1 votes:
This is why they should have just blended fifty or so donations together so they could say they don't know who the dad is.
2012-12-28 11:06:43 PM  
1 votes:

Gergesa: Hmmm this sounds like the sort of case that would cause men to avoid being a sperm donor.


Not really. If you donate to a sperm bank or do the donation in a clinic you will be fine. If you try to cut out the sperm bank or clinic and lawyers, you will probably get screwed down the line. There are procedures to protect if you want to do this type of stuff, follow those procedures.
2012-12-28 11:00:20 PM  
1 votes:

epoch_destroi: Nice to see a bunch of people who couldn't be bothered to read the article assume that the women are pinching him for money, rather than the state pursuing him despite the women telling the state about the contract.


This. The state can't handle that gays can be happy
2012-12-28 10:56:06 PM  
1 votes:

DeathCipris: Why does this have to go to court? You already agreed in WRITING that he was not to be held liable. You have no case. You lose. Good day, sir.

 
As I understand it, child support is owed to the child for the benefit of the child, not the parent. The parent has no standing to waive it.


I believe I've heard of a number of cases like this over the years, all of which seemingly amount to "people trying to do something important and life-changing without consulting an attorney before signing their life away on the back of a napkin".
2012-12-28 10:51:56 PM  
1 votes:
Here's another good reason why gay marriage should be legal.  Assuming that the couple has split, then the state could seek its pound of flesh from the mother's wife instead of the innocent dude who stupidly, naively thought he was doing a good deed by spanking it into a cup.

There are enough of these stories going around that men should just automatically assume that they will be held responsible for any child that they have any part in creating, at some point in the future.  The state doesn't care about the circumstances, it only cares about paying as little as possible for the welfare of children.
Oak
2012-12-28 10:50:08 PM  
1 votes:

John Redcorn: Never trust teh gheys government.


FTFY
2012-12-28 10:30:10 PM  
1 votes:

xant: JerkyMeat: Schroller said that after consulting with his wife, Marotta decided to donate free of charge rather than taking the $50.


Amature move.

This may actually be his biggest problem. Not accepting any money makes it a whole different transaction, and could possibly invalidate the contract. That's what the lesbians are betting on, anyway.

Based on the contract terms quoted in the article, I can't imagine a court giving them the win, but stranger things have happened.


Doesn't exactly seem like the lesbians are the ones pushing the suit.
2012-12-28 10:25:53 PM  
1 votes:

JerkyMeat: Schroller said that after consulting with his wife, Marotta decided to donate free of charge rather than taking the $50.


Amature move.


This may actually be his biggest problem. Not accepting any money makes it a whole different transaction, and could possibly invalidate the contract. That's what the lesbians are betting on, anyway.

Based on the contract terms quoted in the article, I can't imagine a court giving them the win, but stranger things have happened.
2012-12-28 08:42:52 PM  
1 votes:
i1079.photobucket.com
Sometimes it does...
 
Displayed 25 of 25 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report