If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(US Senate)   Senator Feinstein introduces bill in support of 2nd American Civil War   (feinstein.senate.gov) divider line 959
    More: Asinine, assault weapons ban, American Journal of Public Health, Baltimore Police Department, Urban Institute, Violence Policy Center, National Firearms Act, assault weapons  
•       •       •

8009 clicks; posted to Politics » on 27 Dec 2012 at 1:44 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



959 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-27 04:37:51 AM
So basically she's going the same route her little chuckle farking friend in NJ tried because he couldn't get his gun grabbing rocks off.

That law under the current SCOTUS would be struck down in less than 6 months. Repeal the Second if you want bans, folks, otherwise you're farked.
 
2012-12-27 05:06:19 AM
Hilarious how, even as a kid, I knew that first was the worst and second was the best, but the liberal spendocrats do not care that they are the ones with the hairy chest.  And like those chest hairs, the American government's addiction to higher taxes keeps on growing.
 
2012-12-27 09:45:44 AM
It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.
 
2012-12-27 09:58:25 AM

tudorgurl: It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.


i.chzbgr.com
 
2012-12-27 11:31:44 AM
For myself, Feinstein can go fark herself.  She's totally OK with allowing the government to have extra-Constitutional powers to surveil  and detain citizens.  Which brings us back to the reason for the 2nd amendment in the first place.

Funny how much we hear about hunting and personal security from the gun nuts, and how little about the original purpose of the amendment.
 
2012-12-27 11:43:12 AM

iq_in_binary: So basically she's going the same route her little chuckle farking friend in NJ tried because he couldn't get his gun grabbing rocks off.

That law under the current SCOTUS would be struck down in less than 6 months. Repeal the Second if you want bans, folks, otherwise you're farked.


How is a ban on fully automatic and burst fire modes constitutional but a ban on 11+ round magazines unconstitutional?
 
2012-12-27 11:54:22 AM
I own guns, I enjoy shooting guns. I understand wanting to own guns for home protection. However if you need more than a standard hunting rifle or handgun with more than 10 shot magazine to defend yourself you likely: a) did something illegal and the police are at your door or b) did something illegal and some other criminal is at your door looking for payback. Other than that there is no legitimate reason that you need a sniper rifle that can shoot armor piercing bullets accurately at up to 1000 yards or a semi-automatic with a 30 round magazine.
 
2012-12-27 12:10:36 PM
to stop the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of.....high-capacity ammunition feeding devises


*rapid left eye twitch*
 
2012-12-27 12:12:41 PM

tudorgurl: It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.


I'm OK with your rant.

Your passionate description of gun lovers was pretty accurate, particularly with Mike_LowELL's post preceding yours (basically his weak attempt to deflect blame and change the subject). While I'm not a fan of Senator Feinstein, I'm OK with her bill.

If gun owners want to arm themselves to the level of police and military units, join an organized militia with a purpose other than play soldier and shoot their toys. Organize a hunters' club. Or join the US military instead of being a poser.

I defended my freedom and my fellow Americans very much while serving in the Air Force for over 20 years.

Could you?
 
2012-12-27 12:13:34 PM

NuttierThanEver: I own guns, I enjoy shooting guns. I understand wanting to own guns for home protection. However if you need more than a standard hunting rifle or handgun with more than 10 shot magazine to defend yourself you likely: a) did something illegal and the police are at your door or b) did something illegal and some other criminal is at your door looking for payback. Other than that there is no legitimate reason that you need a sniper rifle that can shoot armor piercing bullets accurately at up to 1000 yards or a semi-automatic with a 30 round magazine.


It bears repeating: Jared Lee Loughner fired his first and only volley from a 33-round magazine.  He has tackled while he reloaded (after 6 were dead and 13 injured).  That's from one pistol with one high capacity magazine.
 
2012-12-27 12:19:38 PM

Diogenes: For myself, Feinstein can go fark herself.  She's totally OK with allowing the government to have extra-Constitutional powers to surveil  and detain citizens.  Which brings us back to the reason for the 2nd amendment in the first place.

Funny how much we hear about hunting and personal security from the gun nuts, and how little about the original purpose of the amendment.


Before any word or grammar Nazis harp in, "surveil" is a correct term and in its usage in Diogenes' second sentence.

I agree with your second paragraph entirely. Not sure where you were going with the first paragraph however. Just don't like Feinstein, I guess. I've not been happy with her since USFSPA. But, that's me.
 
2012-12-27 12:48:33 PM
I think this is the point where Americans finally learn that there is a difference between democracy and liberty. The right to own guns is NOT an inherent value of democracy. Democracy guarantees you a vote equal to everyone else and nothing else. If the majority of the country is against the right to own a gun, then those in the minority need to suck it up or leave. It's either that or civil war, but for whatever reason I don't see Obama as the next Lincoln.
 
2012-12-27 12:57:01 PM
What are the responsibilities of the Second Amendment?
 
2012-12-27 12:57:49 PM

ihopOVERpancakes: I think this is the point where Americans finally learn that there is a difference between democracy and liberty. The right to own guns is NOT an inherent value of democracy. Democracy guarantees you a vote equal to everyone else and nothing else. If the majority of the country is against the right to own a gun, then those in the minority need to suck it up or leave. It's either that or civil war, but for whatever reason I don't see Obama as the next Lincoln.


Lincoln couldn't play basketball.  Obama would be a terrible rail splitter.
 
2012-12-27 12:59:08 PM

ihopOVERpancakes: I think this is the point where Americans finally learn that there is a difference between democracy and liberty. The right to own guns is NOT an inherent value of democracy. Democracy guarantees you a vote equal to everyone else and nothing else. If the majority of the country is against the right to own a gun, then those in the minority need to suck it up or leave. It's either that or civil war, but for whatever reason I don't see Obama as the next Lincoln.


I'm wondering how the gun lobby is going to buy they're way outta this one.
 
2012-12-27 01:31:26 PM

I_C_Weener: Lincoln couldn't play basketball.  Obama would be a terrible rail splitter.


Lincoln couldn't brew beer. Obama would be a terrible wrestler.
 
2012-12-27 01:36:55 PM

AirForceVet: I_C_Weener: Lincoln couldn't play basketball.  Obama would be a terrible rail splitter.

Lincoln couldn't brew beer. Obama would be a terrible wrestler.


See, we didn't even have to look at the skin color issue.  (One needs a lot of sunscreen.  The other is a natural Summer.)
 
2012-12-27 01:39:06 PM
Watch out US Armed Forces, these guys are coming to take their freedom back!

encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.comencrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com
 
2012-12-27 01:39:46 PM
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. It would be nice to see the list of the "120 specifically-named firearms" so we could start griping and grumbling now. LOL.

I don't see how any of that would prevent another Sandy Hook.
 
2012-12-27 01:45:13 PM
There are common sense ways to reduce the carnage and still protect the 2nd amendment, and the proposals by Feinstein and Bloomburg do a decent job of it. I look at the two mass shootings we had locally. In the first, a white power idiot shot up a place of worship. That probably would have happened no matter what. He was a member of a hate group and could have gotten any firearms underground through his connections. In the second, an abusive husband received an injunction against him and was ordered to turn in his weapons. He did. The next day, he went to a local gun show and bought more and proceeded to shoot up his wife's place of business killing 3 plus himself. This could possibly have been avoided by closing the "gun show loophole".

No, we will never stop people from killing other people but why do we have to make it so dang easy?
 
2012-12-27 01:46:49 PM

Lumpmoose: iq_in_binary: So basically she's going the same route her little chuckle farking friend in NJ tried because he couldn't get his gun grabbing rocks off.

That law under the current SCOTUS would be struck down in less than 6 months. Repeal the Second if you want bans, folks, otherwise you're farked.

How is a ban on fully automatic and burst fire modes constitutional but a ban on 11+ round magazines unconstitutional?


Because those things are not in common use and common use is the test the supreme court established.
 
2012-12-27 01:47:55 PM

tudorgurl: You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students.


I'm sure if a crazy asshole comes in with just two pistols blazing, you'll be thinking, "Well, at least it's not an assault rifle!"
 
2012-12-27 01:48:00 PM
I think someone just stole all my guns.  Guess I better file a police report.
 
2012-12-27 01:48:41 PM

tudorgurl: It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students.


I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess you teach in a lily white school.....cause schools in the black neighborhoods have had armed security officers and even satellite police precints in them for decades.

You just sound racist.....
 
2012-12-27 01:48:48 PM
Pro-gun control people are just scared children who have zero concept of reality.
 
2012-12-27 01:49:21 PM

violentsalvation: It will be interesting to see how this plays out. It would be nice to see the list of the "120 specifically-named firearms" so we could start griping and grumbling now. LOL.

I don't see how any of that would prevent another Sandy Hook.


Nothing will accomplish anything short-term, but addressing the problem on many fronts - including banning some weapons - may pay-off down the line.

Not that Americans are willing to sacrifice short-term fun for future generations.
 
2012-12-27 01:50:35 PM

BillCo: I think someone just stole all my guns.  Guess I better file a police report.


Why didn't you shoot them?
 
2012-12-27 01:51:19 PM

Weaver95: ihopOVERpancakes: I think this is the point where Americans finally learn that there is a difference between democracy and liberty. The right to own guns is NOT an inherent value of democracy. Democracy guarantees you a vote equal to everyone else and nothing else. If the majority of the country is against the right to own a gun, then those in the minority need to suck it up or leave. It's either that or civil war, but for whatever reason I don't see Obama as the next Lincoln.

I'm wondering how the gun lobby is going to buy they're way outta this one.


It has to pass the house and senate right?

NRA doesn't have to do a thing...this will be like any other piece of legislation facing republican obstructionism....and thank god for that.
 
2012-12-27 01:52:19 PM

AirForceVet: If gun owners want to arm themselves to the level of police and military units, join an organized militia with a purpose other than play soldier and shoot their toys. Organize a hunters' club. Or join the US military instead of being a poser.


What newspaper do you work for?
 
2012-12-27 01:52:31 PM

2wolves: What are the responsibilities of the Second Amendment?


Same as the other amendments, misuse is a crime.
 
2012-12-27 01:53:09 PM

BillCo: I think someone just stole all my guns.  Guess I better file a police report.


Heaven forbid you show some personal responsibility with your guns. It's asshole gun owners like you who give the rest of us a bad name.
 
2012-12-27 01:53:55 PM

violentsalvation: It will be interesting to see how this plays out. It would be nice to see the list of the "120 specifically-named firearms" so we could start griping and grumbling now. LOL.

I don't see how any of that would prevent another Sandy Hook.


The law she suggests sounds similiar to CT state law.....which didn't prevent anything.

That AR was licensed and registered....just not to the person who was pulling the trigger.
 
2012-12-27 01:54:02 PM
Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic

So guns that look scary?

Brilliant farking piece fo legislation.

Lets ignore that "assault weapons" are only used in a tiny minority of crimes.

Lets write feel good legislation that we have tried before that has had no efffect.

tudorgurl: It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.


You are just as bad as the gun nuts you are bashing here.

Feel good legislation like this does nothing to adress the real problem and only whips the gun nuts up against any meaningful legislation.
 
2012-12-27 01:54:04 PM

tudorgurl: It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.

24.media.tumblr.com
 
2012-12-27 01:54:32 PM

violentsalvation: It will be interesting to see how this plays out. It would be nice to see the list of the "120 specifically-named firearms" so we could start griping and grumbling now. LOL.

I don't see how any of that would prevent another Sandy Hook.


What you said.  On both counts.  But, something needs to be done.  10-round limit is a reasonable starting point.
 
2012-12-27 01:54:38 PM

tudorgurl: It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.


I find it warming that you know what I need or don't need to protect my family, and yet you're ready to catch a bullet to protect your class. Unarmed, you stand no chance. And no...there shouldn't be guns in your classroom, because you're completely unable to fathom using it to protect yourself or your students. However, that doesn't mean that there shouldn't be armed individuals in schools trained to protect you and your students. The world isn't as nice or safe as you'd like to think it is. Taking guns away from law abiding gun owners doesn't make it any safer.
 
2012-12-27 01:54:53 PM
Read the bill carefully. Thanks for the link, Subby.

I can't argue with the bill. It doesn't go far enough as it doesn't address handguns at all, but it's a start.
 
2012-12-27 01:55:04 PM
i100.photobucket.com
 
2012-12-27 01:55:12 PM
Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:

Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and
Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons

And thus, nothing was accomplished.
 
2012-12-27 01:55:12 PM

Lumpmoose: iq_in_binary: So basically she's going the same route her little chuckle farking friend in NJ tried because he couldn't get his gun grabbing rocks off.

That law under the current SCOTUS would be struck down in less than 6 months. Repeal the Second if you want bans, folks, otherwise you're farked.

How is a ban on fully automatic and burst fire modes constitutional but a ban on 11+ round magazines unconstitutional?


How is a ban on teflon-piercing rounds constitutional? How is a ban on high-explosives, or anti-tank or anti-aircraft weapons constitutional?

AirForceVet: tudorgurl: It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.

I'm OK with your rant.

Your passionate description of gun lovers was pretty accurate, particularly with Mike_LowELL's post preceding yours (basically his weak attempt to deflect blame and change the subject). While I'm not a fan of Senator Feinstein, I'm OK with her bill.

If gun owners want to arm themselves to the level of police and military units, join an organized militia with a purpose other than play soldier and shoot their toys. Organize a hunters' club. Or join the US military instead of being a poser.

I defended my freedom and my fellow Americans very much while serving in the Air Force for over 20 years.

Could you?


When I lay out all my guns and knives on my bed, and lie down naked right down in the middle of them, smearing gun grease all over my body, and thinking of what I would do iffin' anybody tried to take 'em away, I'm doing just as much to protect the country as you did.
 
2012-12-27 01:55:41 PM

Giltric: Weaver95: ihopOVERpancakes: I think this is the point where Americans finally learn that there is a difference between democracy and liberty. The right to own guns is NOT an inherent value of democracy. Democracy guarantees you a vote equal to everyone else and nothing else. If the majority of the country is against the right to own a gun, then those in the minority need to suck it up or leave. It's either that or civil war, but for whatever reason I don't see Obama as the next Lincoln.

I'm wondering how the gun lobby is going to buy they're way outta this one.

It has to pass the house and senate right?

NRA doesn't have to do a thing...this will be like any other piece of legislation facing republican obstructionism....and thank god for that.


It's facing a tougher battle than just Republican obstacles. The democrats from red states are going to have a hell of a time supporting it and keeping their seats.
 
2012-12-27 01:56:03 PM
I've been curious about the fact we don't seem to have a well organized militia.
 
2012-12-27 01:56:26 PM

Infernalist: Read the bill carefully. Thanks for the link, Subby.

I can't argue with the bill. It doesn't go far enough as it doesn't address handguns at all, but it's a start.


Wait for the amendment process. I'm sure some halfwit will add one on for handguns.
 
2012-12-27 01:56:33 PM
Which will end like the first, with the traitors in the South being destroyed by the North.

But, because fat old white racist crazy Southerners in hoverrrounds are really no threat to anyone, it'll take one day and cost no lives.
 
2012-12-27 01:56:34 PM

AirForceVet: tudorgurl: It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.

I'm OK with your rant.

Your passionate description of gun lovers was pretty accurate, particularly with Mike_LowELL's post preceding yours (basically his weak attempt to deflect blame and change the subject). While I'm not a fan of Senator Feinstein, I'm OK with her bill.

If gun owners want to arm themselves to the level of police and military units, join an organized militia with a purpose other than play soldier and shoot their toys. Organize a hunters' club. Or join the US military instead of being a poser.

I defended my freedom and my fellow Americans very much while serving in the Air Force for over 20 years.

Could you?


Tip: Favorite Mike, and label him as "he makes me laugh". Don't take him seriously.
 
2012-12-27 01:56:53 PM

Scerpes: Giltric: Weaver95: ihopOVERpancakes: I think this is the point where Americans finally learn that there is a difference between democracy and liberty. The right to own guns is NOT an inherent value of democracy. Democracy guarantees you a vote equal to everyone else and nothing else. If the majority of the country is against the right to own a gun, then those in the minority need to suck it up or leave. It's either that or civil war, but for whatever reason I don't see Obama as the next Lincoln.

I'm wondering how the gun lobby is going to buy they're way outta this one.

It has to pass the house and senate right?

NRA doesn't have to do a thing...this will be like any other piece of legislation facing republican obstructionism....and thank god for that.

It's facing a tougher battle than just Republican obstacles. The democrats from red states are going to have a hell of a time supporting it and keeping their seats.


How many Democrats in red states that aren't already having a hard time keeping their seats? 2010 called, they said 'lol'.
 
2012-12-27 01:57:15 PM

Scerpes: Taking guns away from law abiding gun owners doesn't make it any safer.


Good thing then that this proposed law wouldn't do that: "Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by: Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment"
 
2012-12-27 01:57:48 PM

cabbyman: [look who's mad]


Yeah, why would little children being slaughtered make anyone mad?
 
2012-12-27 01:57:52 PM
People who value their life protect themselves. People who don't value their lives depend on the government to protect them.

When seconds count the police are minutes away.
 
2012-12-27 01:58:07 PM

liam76: Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic

So guns that look scary?

Brilliant farking piece fo legislation.

Lets ignore that "assault weapons" are only used in a tiny minority of crimes.

Lets write feel good legislation that we have tried before that has had no efffect.

tudorgurl: It's disgusting to me how you gun nuts (nuts = GIMME MAH GUNZ! MOAR GUNZ!) don't give a right shiat about anything other than your guns and your bastardized second amendment. What a bunch of petulant, selfish children you are.

And I don't give a rat's ass what you think, whether you call me liebrul or twat or whatever. fark you. It's because of you assholes that I have to reassure my students that they are safe in their schools because I would take a bullet for them. It's because of you farktards that people are seriously considering making it a requirement for me to have to carry a gun in my classroom. You assholes have no idea what that would do to our schools and our students. You think it's bad now? Add a gun in each classroom and see how long it takes my ED kid who has anger issues to find that gun and murder his entire class.

I don't give a shiat about your farking AR-15s and your ejaculation over shooting them. I care about the safety of myself in my job and my students in their schools and people in general. You don't need a farking AR-15 or Bushmaster or semi-machine gun to protect your family, Rambo-wannabe.

You are just as bad as the gun nuts you are bashing here.

Feel good legislation like this does nothing to adress the real problem and only whips the gun nuts up against any meaningful legislation.


Which is what?
 
Displayed 50 of 959 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report