If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Al Jazeera)   Seven killed, many injured in apparent chemical weapons attack in Syria   (blogs.aljazeera.com) divider line 258
    More: News, chemical weapons, blurred vision, shortness of breaths  
•       •       •

20536 clicks; posted to Main » on 24 Dec 2012 at 12:18 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



258 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-24 08:23:47 AM
NewportBarGuy
2012-12-23 11:07:17 PM
Bontesla: You've already lost the publicity war if news articles are making these claims against you.

Assad is a billionaire. All he has to do is say No Mas and he can go live in Dubai for the rest of his life. If he uses these weapons, I can tell you right now the Joint Chiefs will recommend that Obama kill him and his whole family.

Biological weapons release... it's not going to need any help from the media. NATO and US leadership will assault without much question.

Not to be a weapons Nazi, but Sarin is a chemical weapon, not a biological weapon. A biological weapon is something like Anthrax, Tularemia, Plague, Smallpox and is bacterial, viral, or fungi.
 
2012-12-24 08:23:59 AM
NewportBarGuy: webthing01: Don't bother the president.......... He's in Hawaii on vacation.

Would you kindly shut the f*ck up.

doglover: NewportBarGuy: It would do a lot more damage than 7 dead.

Not if you're ready for it.

It's a nerve agent. I doubt these people have MOPP 4


So I wiki'd MOPP 4, and there are pictures of guys buried up to their chests in sand. I feel as if I've been tricked somehow.
 
2012-12-24 08:24:56 AM
It appears the media is doing their job and waiting for information before throwing the world into a gottamned panic.
 
2012-12-24 08:30:59 AM
If the government forces are now authorized to use chemical weapons, why aren't they launching missiles?  And why is there only one report from one town?  Are there rogue elements in the government forces?  If so, do they have a stockpile of chemical weapons?

We need to find out more about what's going on over there.
 
2012-12-24 08:51:13 AM
flahorsegirl: RoyFokker'sGhost: Still no verification from CNN, but apparently, the government sent the rebels a holiday arrangement of Scuds on the 21st. Any millitary farkers know how long it takes to swap out the conventional warhead on a Scud for a chemical payload?

as a former AMMO troop, not very long at all.


Flahorsegirl speaks wisdom. Assuming they had ready warheads, it wouldn't take more than an hour or so to swap out something that big. You also have to swap out the

What I wish we had was video w/audio of the actual attack - if you see an impact and hear a BOOM, it's HE, and though it's bad news for the poor bastards under it, it's not a CBW strike. But if you hear a flat, sharp CRACK above the ground,that's another matter entirely. Chem warheads use a bursting charge that's designed to just pop the warhead and disperse the filler, and it's much smaller and (comparatively) quieter than an HE warhead. A good example was during Desert Storm, when we were watching the first Scud attacks on Israel live on CNN. As soon as we saw/heard what was happening we knew that there were a lot of people in bad shape...but the world wasn't going to end just yet.

/USAF Ammo 78-98
 
2012-12-24 08:52:27 AM
Crap, meant to type "swap out the fuzing system as well".

/PIMF
 
2012-12-24 08:59:22 AM
elchip: Al Jazeera is owned by the government of Qatar.

The government of Qatar supports the Syrian rebels.

That doesn't mean they're wrong, but there could be some urge to jump the gun here.


Quoted for truth. Don't believe anything you see in the Arab press, people. If you think "fair and balanced" is a running joke in American mass media, we've got nothing on the Arabs. Lying bastards, the lot of them.
 
2012-12-24 09:06:19 AM
croesius: How DARE a country use chemical weapons! No one is allowed to...oh, wait...
[static.guim.co.uk image 460x276]

Well, how DARE anyone ELSE use them!


I'm sorry, are you trying to compare tear gas with nerve gas?

Are you really that farking stupid?

fotos.halabja.eu

That's what Sarin Does, you internet tough guy piece of shiat. You die a horrible, painful death while you choke on your own secretions which you uncontrollably produce.

www.kdp.se

That's Halabja, in 1988, when Sadaam decided to use Sarin against a mostly civilian population. Women died cradling their dead babies in their arms trying to flee.

hellinahandbasket.net

That's the effect of tear gas.

THE UNITED STATES HAS NOT HAD OFFENSIVE CHEMICAL WEAPONS SINCE 1973. PLEASE STFU.
 
2012-12-24 09:13:49 AM
BronyMedic: croesius: How DARE a country use chemical weapons! No one is allowed to...oh, wait...
[static.guim.co.uk image 460x276]

Well, how DARE anyone ELSE use them!

I'm sorry, are you trying to compare tear gas with nerve gas?

Are you really that farking stupid?

[fotos.halabja.eu image 423x300]

That's what Sarin Does, you internet tough guy piece of shiat. You die a horrible, painful death while you choke on your own secretions which you uncontrollably produce.

[www.kdp.se image 296x203]

That's Halabja, in 1988, when Sadaam decided to use Sarin against a mostly civilian population. Women died cradling their dead babies in their arms trying to flee.

[hellinahandbasket.net image 390x594]

That's the effect of tear gas.

THE UNITED STATES HAS NOT HAD OFFENSIVE CHEMICAL WEAPONS SINCE 1973. PLEASE STFU.


Alright, first off, that picture he reference was from an Israeli offensive on Gaza using white phosphorous.
It is NOT tear gas.
White phosphorous is pretty horrendous stuff when used against soft targets. It is classified as a chemical weapon, but just like the US back in '04, weaseled its way out by saying "illumination purposes only!"

Citation
 
2012-12-24 09:16:18 AM
DeathCipris: Alright, first off, that picture he reference was from an Israeli offensive on Gaza using white phosphorous.
It is NOT tear gas.
White phosphorous is pretty horrendous stuff when used against soft targets. It is classified as a chemical weapon, but just like the US back in '04, weaseled its way out by saying "illumination purposes only!"


Which is shameful. And it's especially shameful that Israel would use it against a civilian population. But it still doesn't equate to Sarin gas.
 
2012-12-24 09:23:27 AM
BronyMedic: DeathCipris: Alright, first off, that picture he reference was from an Israeli offensive on Gaza using white phosphorous.
It is NOT tear gas.
White phosphorous is pretty horrendous stuff when used against soft targets. It is classified as a chemical weapon, but just like the US back in '04, weaseled its way out by saying "illumination purposes only!"

Which is shameful. And it's especially shameful that Israel would use it against a civilian population. But it still doesn't equate to Sarin gas.


It is still a violation of International Law and considered a chemical attack, which I believe was his point. And yes, white phosphorous is deadly and can be even more painful than Sarin gas.
See the following:
Linky because picture is very graphic and could be NSFW

Those are burns from the use of white phosphorous on a soft target, almost like Napalm. This is why their use as a weapon is banned. Please get your facts straight.
 
2012-12-24 09:25:30 AM
webthing01: Don't bother the president.......... He's in Hawaii on vacation.

[img822.imageshack.us image 500x709]


on Christmas eve? the nerve of that guy. he should be lowered into whatever state Syria is in and go door-to-door giving apology blowjobs to everyone until webthing01 is satisfied.

BTW that photoshop reminds me of that pic of Bush playing the six-string during Katrina, and even though it's a shoop as well at least it actually happened,

www.funnyandjokes.com
 
2012-12-24 09:40:03 AM
YouPeopleAreCrazy: RoyFokker'sGhost: Still no verification from CNN, but apparently, the government sent the rebels a holiday arrangement of Scuds on the 21st. Any millitary farkers know how long it takes to swap out the conventional warhead on a Scud for a chemical payload?

as a former AMMO troop, not very long at all.

As a former WPNS troop, I agree. Any competent crew could repurpose them very quickly. Assuming the new payload was available.



Same here. 461 AF. Couple hours, maybe.
 
2012-12-24 09:41:09 AM
cig-mkr: Will Obama fly home?
Will the Senate return to the capital?
Will the House return to the capital?
This and more on Fox News tonight @ 11


Obama's flight home a publicity stunt, say sources
Obama's flight home cost 44 million, says source close to president
Why has Obama started a march to war?
This and more on Fox News tomorrow @ 11
 
2012-12-24 09:41:42 AM
BronyMedic: THE UNITED STATES HAS NOT HAD OFFENSIVE CHEMICAL WEAPONS SINCE 1973. PLEASE STFU.

Well, that's not entirely correct. We've had them, just been in the process of destroying our stockpiles and only literally in April 2012 are we almost done doing that. Still have roughly 10% of the original stockpiles to go (we didn't meet the deadline we imposed on ourselves).

*shrugs*
 
2012-12-24 09:50:00 AM
elchip: webthing01: Don't bother the president.......... He's in Hawaii on vacation.

How dare he! He should be acting like a responsible President and clearing brush on his Texas play ranch instead!


Oh for fark's sake. We are now 2 elections removed from Bush. Is that really the best you got? Time to move on.


Oh, and go ahead and take that Gore bumper sticker off your car. It makes you look like a bitter tool.
 
2012-12-24 09:57:03 AM
KellyX: . Still have roughly 10% of the original stockpiles to go (we didn't meet the deadline we imposed on ourselves).

*shrugs*


to be fair, 10% of a stockpile with 0% Delivery Capability.
 
2012-12-24 10:02:02 AM
blanchae: MIRV888: OK, I know I'm going to regret this because it's fark, but is aljazeera considered a reliable enough news service to make this credible? I'm asking out of genuine ignorance here. I have no dog in the fight over news agencies.

Yeah they are one of the few reliable and believe it or not neutral. I followed the Libya and Egypt uprisings and they reported the good, bad and ugly. Surprisingly they don't lean one way or the other. If the report is false, they will correct it but normally they get it right the first time.


Same. I followed these stories and I can vouch for them.
 
2012-12-24 10:03:38 AM
BronyMedic: KellyX: . Still have roughly 10% of the original stockpiles to go (we didn't meet the deadline we imposed on ourselves).

*shrugs*

to be fair, 10% of a stockpile with 0% Delivery Capability.


If they choose to use, it wouldn't be hard, but I was just being technical ;)

Besides, nuclear fireballs if you use chemical/biological weapons against the US is so much more fun...
 
2012-12-24 10:31:30 AM
webthing01: Don't bother the president.......... He's in Hawaii on vacation.

[img822.imageshack.us image 500x709]


Good.

That shiat, like most of the Middle East, is none of our business.

/never understood people, left or right, who don't like a given president, yet complain he spends too much time on vacation...
//wouldn't you want him doing less?
 
2012-12-24 10:37:56 AM
Seven?
 
2012-12-24 10:44:06 AM
Bontesla: crypticsatellite: NewportBarGuy: Bontesla: You've already lost the publicity war if news articles are making these claims against you.

Assad is a billionaire. All he has to do is say No Mas and he can go live in Dubai for the rest of his life. If he uses these weapons, I can tell you right now the Joint Chiefs will recommend that Obama kill him and his whole family.

Biological weapons release... it's not going to need any help from the media. NATO and US leadership will assault without much question.

I hope so, but I question Obama's resolve.

Obama has been incredibly aggressive at certain times. I'm not as concerned for his resolve as I am about the type of intervention that almost appears inevitable at this point...


Obama couldn't sit idly by while tens of thousands died in Lybia because the Arab League said it was ok for him to act. There has been no such proclamation here, so he's ok with sitting idly.

Once he gets the green light, he'll act. The problem is that after Lybia, the Arab league is likely to come to a unanimous decision without serious outside pressure.
 
2012-12-24 10:57:56 AM
croesius: How DARE a country use chemical weapons! No one is allowed to...oh, wait...
[static.guim.co.uk image 460x276]

Well, how DARE anyone ELSE use them!


That's smoke, not a chemical weapon. It's not exactly something you want to breathe in large quantities but neither is what comes off most high explosives.

The purpose wasn't to harm anybody, but rather to keep the people in the building behind from being able to see as Israel didn't want to smash the building to stop them from shooting.

BronyMedic: croesius: How DARE a country use chemical weapons! No one is allowed to...oh, wait...
[static.guim.co.uk image 460x276]

Well, how DARE anyone ELSE use them!

I'm sorry, are you trying to compare tear gas with nerve gas?

Are you really that farking stupid?


What he was comparing was white phosphorus. That shot is commonly used for Israel-bashing, it's a perfectly ordinary smoke mission to cover some exposed troops but it's routinely reported as a chemical weapons attack.
 
2012-12-24 11:12:01 AM
zerkalo: Syria is a major regional producer of phosphates that could conceivably be used for WMD. The country produces 2 million tons of phosphate per year and has an estimated reserve of around 2 billion tons. In October 2002 it was announced that a major "super" phosphate plant was to be constructed near Palmyra with a partnership between Russia and the state-owned General Company for Phosphate and Mines. A similar project is underway with the Indian firm, Dharmasi Morarji Chimicals Ltd.

BS-LIKE REPORTING DETECTED

Something like 90% of phosphate production goes right back into the ground as fertilizer. I'm betting that an entire national WMD program would consume less "phosphate" than a single good-sized farm. Pointing to phosphate production as a marker of chemical-weapons activity is beyond ridiculous.

I can believe the production figures they report, and yes, it's true that some of that total could "conceivably" be used in WMD production. As could the water they annually produce/consume. But that doesn't get you to "this is more evidence of WMD activity", as the original report apparently would like you to conclude.
 
2012-12-24 11:37:05 AM
Gee, I wonder if they were stamped Made in Iraq? Naw, it couldn't be. That would make George Bush right.
 
2012-12-24 11:43:43 AM
jfarkinB: Something like 90% of phosphate production goes right back into the ground as fertilizer. I'm betting that an entire national WMD program would consume less "phosphate" than a single good-sized farm. Pointing to phosphate production as a marker of chemical-weapons activity is beyond ridiculous.

I can believe the production figures they report, and yes, it's true that some of that total could "conceivably" be used in WMD production. As could the water they annually produce/consume. But that doesn't get you to "this is more evidence of WMD activity", as the original report apparently would like you to conclude.


You'd think Chemotherapy drugs wouldn't need to be reported to the CWC Oversight Committee by any country either, but you'd be wrong.
 
2012-12-24 11:47:47 AM
BronyMedic: croesius:


Enjoy your vacation. Use this time for some self reflection.
 
2012-12-24 11:55:30 AM
KellyX: BronyMedic: THE UNITED STATES HAS NOT HAD OFFENSIVE CHEMICAL WEAPONS SINCE 1973. PLEASE STFU.

Well, that's not entirely correct. We've had them, just been in the process of destroying our stockpiles and only literally in April 2012 are we almost done doing that. Still have roughly 10% of the original stockpiles to go (we didn't meet the deadline we imposed on ourselves).

*shrugs*


KellyX also speaks wisdom. In 84-85 in PACAF, we practiced receiving/prepping chem weapons on a regular basis.
 
2012-12-24 12:10:53 PM
BronyMedic ...... Posting pictures of dead children. This isn't 4chan... I hope.
 
2012-12-24 12:12:57 PM
This just in: Arabs know that manipulating Western media works
Gulf War/Nayirah Testimony
 
2012-12-24 12:25:22 PM
Jumpedthefark: BronyMedic ...... Posting pictures of dead children. This isn't 4chan... I hope.

That used to get you a 24 hour ban with a warning. Since the pics are still up and he's still posting I assume hes a mod who's trolling or the mod's are still asleep. But yea welcome to fark, 4chan light. Slowly turning into 4chan regular. Anybody want to start a GORE thread to really get the ball rolling?
 
2012-12-24 12:38:21 PM
Jumpedthefark: BronyMedic ...... Posting pictures of dead children. This isn't 4chan... I hope.

No, it's real life and every person should see images like these so they can come out of their patriotic shells and do something good to change this f**king planet for the better. That blood is on the hands of every ignorant human out there. We live in a world of "If I don't see it, it's not happening" and that needs to change.
 
2012-12-24 12:46:26 PM
MIRV888: OK, I know I'm going to regret this because it's fark, but is aljazeera considered a reliable enough news service to make this credible? I'm asking out of genuine ignorance here. I have no dog in the fight over news agencies.

According to Drew,in the Google hangouts thing , their probably the only news source that actually care about the content of their news as opposed just the entertainment value.

/Sorry about being to lazy to find where he says it
//Great analogy involving fruit stands
///trust me
 
2012-12-24 01:09:44 PM
orclover: BronyMedic: croesius: Enjoy your vacation. Use this time for some self reflection.

You do realize this is the fourth time I've posted those pictures, right? As they're not intended to troll, the mods won't ban me for it. And the fact you seem to think I get some sick pleasure out of posting pictures of children who died in a way that I wouldn't wish on Adolf Hitler himself makes me want to reach through the internet, and cockpunch you.

orclover: That used to get you a 24 hour ban with a warning. Since the pics are still up and he's still posting I assume hes a mod who's trolling or the mod's are still asleep. But yea welcome to fark, 4chan light. Slowly turning into 4chan regular. Anybody want to start a GORE thread to really get the ball rolling?

Do you think I would tolerate your Bullshiat like this if I were a mod? No. You'd be going back to Reddit with a permaban.

legalhighproviders.info
I'm sorry you're a panty wearing pussy who can't face the fact that innocent men, women, and children will die horrifically if this is allowed to continue. Allow me to apologize for offending your sensibilities with reality.
 
2012-12-24 01:14:48 PM
JonnyG: Jumpedthefark: BronyMedic ...... Posting pictures of dead children. This isn't 4chan... I hope.

No, it's real life and every person should see images like these so they can come out of their patriotic shells and do something good to change this f**king planet for the better. That blood is on the hands of every ignorant human out there. We live in a world of "If I don't see it, it's not happening" and that needs to change.


I kinda agree with this. Insulating citizens from what carnage ACTUALLY looks like allows us to make assumptions based on Hollywood movies or video games. The result is a complete disconnect from the realities of war.

We need to throw up in horror once in a while. It'll make sure we stop this crap before it shows up on our front porch.
 
2012-12-24 01:20:21 PM
Peki: I kinda agree with this. Insulating citizens from what carnage ACTUALLY looks like allows us to make assumptions based on Hollywood movies or video games. The result is a complete disconnect from the realities of war.

We need to throw up in horror once in a while. It'll make sure we stop this crap before it shows up on our front porch.


What's ironic is that orclover is mad at me for posting those pictures, yet pictures of an execution in the Vietnam war, and holocaust victims - men, women and children, both dead and dying are posted as jokes all the time on FARK.

I guess it's not as nice to have the results of your apathy thrown in your face. Everyone wants to eat the hamburger, but no one wants to meat the cow.
 
2012-12-24 01:40:16 PM
BronyMedic: Peki: I kinda agree with this. Insulating citizens from what carnage ACTUALLY looks like allows us to make assumptions based on Hollywood movies or video games. The result is a complete disconnect from the realities of war.

We need to throw up in horror once in a while. It'll make sure we stop this crap before it shows up on our front porch.

What's ironic is that orclover is mad at me for posting those pictures, yet pictures of an execution in the Vietnam war, and holocaust victims - men, women and children, both dead and dying are posted as jokes all the time on FARK.

I guess it's not as nice to have the results of your apathy thrown in your face. Everyone wants to eat the hamburger, but no one wants to meat the cow.


Yeah, I'm not sure about the outrage there. I purposefully try to avoid pictures like that, but my reasons are two-fold: I have PTSD and don't need the fodder for my dreams, and I am perfectly well aware of the grotesque nature of weapons of war, whether kinetic, biological, or chemical.

However, the dumb biatch I heard yesterday that said something about how her bf could own Assad because he was number one in world standings on CoD? Both of those folks need to sit for awhile in front of pictures and documentaries.

On an unrelated note: everyone here has been talking about how horrible tear gas is. My bro is in the Navy, and I got exposed to it after an ex-husband of mine was gassed as part of his training to be a prison guard (stuck to his clothes, I didnt know and put it to my face to smell if it needed washing). Bro and I both describe it as sweet-smelling, might make the eyes a little watery, but we never got the snot problems everyone here is describing--a minor inconvenience at worst. Are there genetic predispositions to not being affected by tear gas?
 
2012-12-24 01:42:50 PM
Bontesla: crypticsatellite: NewportBarGuy: Bontesla: You've already lost the publicity war if news articles are making these claims against you.

Assad is a billionaire. All he has to do is say No Mas and he can go live in Dubai for the rest of his life. If he uses these weapons, I can tell you right now the Joint Chiefs will recommend that Obama kill him and his whole family.

Biological weapons release... it's not going to need any help from the media. NATO and US leadership will assault without much question.

I hope so, but I question Obama's resolve.

Obama has been incredibly aggressive at certain times. I'm not as concerned for his resolve as I am about the type of intervention that almost appears inevitable at this point...


He's shown a pretty impressive amount of competence and restraint. Out of all the players to be worried about, he's low on my list.
 
2012-12-24 01:58:32 PM
BronyMedic: orclover: BronyMedic: croesius: Enjoy your vacation. Use this time for some self reflection.

You do realize this is the fourth time I've posted those pictures, right? As they're not intended to troll, the mods won't ban me for it. And the fact you seem to think I get some sick pleasure out of posting pictures of children who died in a way that I wouldn't wish on Adolf Hitler himself makes me want to reach through the internet, and cockpunch you.

orclover: That used to get you a 24 hour ban with a warning. Since the pics are still up and he's still posting I assume hes a mod who's trolling or the mod's are still asleep. But yea welcome to fark, 4chan light. Slowly turning into 4chan regular. Anybody want to start a GORE thread to really get the ball rolling?

Do you think I would tolerate your Bullshiat like this if I were a mod? No. You'd be going back to Reddit with a permaban.

[legalhighproviders.info image 570x428]
I'm sorry you're a panty wearing pussy who can't face the fact that innocent men, women, and children will die horrifically if this is allowed to continue. Allow me to apologize for offending your sensibilities with reality.


Trolling. Flaunting. Yep mods are asleep or you give great hummers to one of them. Enjoy your reign o king of trolls, you have the golden pass. The only defense we mortals have is the ignore button, till they take that away too.
 
2012-12-24 02:03:05 PM
spideyknix: Assad is a billionaire. All he has to do is say No Mas and he can go live in Dubai for the rest of his life

He can't. You are forgetting one of the fundamental aspects of arab society - tribalism. If he does his tribe the Alawites will be slaughtered.
I said before in Syrian related Fark threads that he will use whatever he has when his back is to the wall. I believe worse is yet to come.
 
2012-12-24 02:07:49 PM
i1182.photobucket.com
 
2012-12-24 02:17:08 PM
orclover: Trolling. Flaunting. Yep mods are asleep or you give great hummers to one of them. Enjoy your reign o king of trolls, you have the golden pass. The only defense we mortals have is the ignore button, till they take that away too.

Good idea. I think I'll use it and stop responding to your stupidity.
 
2012-12-24 02:59:48 PM
Is warboner the new weedlord bonerhitler?
 
2012-12-24 03:37:36 PM
orclover: BronyMedic: orclover: BronyMedic: croesius: Enjoy your vacation. Use this time for some self reflection.

You do realize this is the fourth time I've posted those pictures, right? As they're not intended to troll, the mods won't ban me for it. And the fact you seem to think I get some sick pleasure out of posting pictures of children who died in a way that I wouldn't wish on Adolf Hitler himself makes me want to reach through the internet, and cockpunch you.

orclover: That used to get you a 24 hour ban with a warning. Since the pics are still up and he's still posting I assume hes a mod who's trolling or the mod's are still asleep. But yea welcome to fark, 4chan light. Slowly turning into 4chan regular. Anybody want to start a GORE thread to really get the ball rolling?

Do you think I would tolerate your Bullshiat like this if I were a mod? No. You'd be going back to Reddit with a permaban.

[legalhighproviders.info image 570x428]
I'm sorry you're a panty wearing pussy who can't face the fact that innocent men, women, and children will die horrifically if this is allowed to continue. Allow me to apologize for offending your sensibilities with reality.

Trolling. Flaunting. Yep mods are asleep or you give great hummers to one of them. Enjoy your reign o king of trolls, you have the golden pass. The only defense we mortals have is the ignore button, till they take that away too.


Posting pictures of the very real effects of deadly poison in a thread about an attack using deadly poison is "trolling"? Sorry your delicate sensibilities are so easily harmed, but the real world cares not for your wimpiness.
 
2012-12-24 03:56:44 PM
Shot with a gun? Ok. Blown up with a cruise missile? Cool. Get a few parts knocked off by a mine? S'OK. Blasted by artillery? Fine. Chemical weapons? ZOMG OH NOES!!!!!

Seems kind of silly to say that other ways of killing are tolerable, but oh no, not this one. Dead is dead and pain is pain. Getting a bunch of shiat blown off you can cause excruciating, lingering pain too before you snuff it.

Wouldn't care to have any of them happen to me.
 
2012-12-24 04:14:46 PM
Prank Call of Cthulhu: Shot with a gun? Ok. Blown up with a cruise missile? Cool. Get a few parts knocked off by a mine? S'OK. Blasted by artillery? Fine. Chemical weapons? ZOMG OH NOES!!!!!

Seems kind of silly to say that other ways of killing are tolerable, but oh no, not this one. Dead is dead and pain is pain. Getting a bunch of shiat blown off you can cause excruciating, lingering pain too before you snuff it.

Wouldn't care to have any of them happen to me.


cdn.motinetwork.net
 
2012-12-24 04:18:54 PM
Well the cretinous internet tough guy award for this thread goes to bronymedic for doubling down on the derp when his jimmies got rustled by something he misinterpreted. Well done champ!
 
2012-12-24 04:58:03 PM
Popcorn Johnny: If true, it is so farking on.

This. Even Hitler would not use poison gas , having been gassed himself once in world war I so that should tell you something on how nasty the stuff is.
 
2012-12-24 05:28:31 PM

grimlock1972: Popcorn Johnny: If true, it is so farking on.

This. Even Hitler would not use poison gas , having been gassed himself once in world war I so that should tell you something on how nasty the stuff is.




Not sure if serious. Pretty sure there's some Jews that might disagree with that.
 
2012-12-24 05:33:00 PM
Prank Call of Cthulhu: Not sure if serious. Pretty sure there's some Jews that might disagree with that.

It's my understanding that the Wannasee Conference, where Zyklon B was determined as the instrument of extermination, was done without Hitler's influence. He just instructed his underlings to do it in the most efficient manner. Hitler himself had ruled out using poison gas on the Allies, as he was afraid of it being used against Germany's cities.
 
Displayed 50 of 258 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report