If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(LA Times)   Farmers' pesticides and water diversions ruining rural Northern California forest ecosystem and poisoning wildlife. Oh wait, it's pot farmers -- HOW DARE SCIENTISTS MAKE THIS STUFF UP AND SLANDER OUR HOLY, HARMLESS PLANT   (latimes.com) divider line 114
    More: Interesting, water diversion, forest ecosystem, Department of Fish, growers, pesticides, Humboldt counties, wildlife  
•       •       •

4868 clicks; posted to Main » on 23 Dec 2012 at 5:21 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



114 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-23 07:06:15 PM
I assume most of the posts in this thread are angry stoners telling OP that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem.
 
2012-12-23 07:21:38 PM
uh... i've seen people murdered with carbofuran / furadan - :( -

how the hell is this a drug of 'peace and love' with the havoc these growers are doing ? ! ? ! - - whatever happens to garlic sprays on indoor grows ?
 
2012-12-23 07:22:35 PM
now thats what I call winning the drug war. force a blackmarket, let inexperinced cartels and newbies tear up the land to get this product to market. then the gov. and head up their butts people can say "look how dangerous pot can be". what a day.
 
2012-12-23 07:25:24 PM

jeblis: I assume most of the posts in this thread are angry stoners telling OP that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem.


I'm an angry non-stoner telling subs that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem. Not only for our ecosystem, but if  you go hiking in  a  national forest you would  no longer have to worry about being shot at for getting  too close to a grow.
 
2012-12-23 07:29:59 PM

BronyMedic: ModernLuddite: So smoke meth?

[25.media.tumblr.com image 500x423]

Why smoke that crap? It's 40 bucks for a 30 days supply. Just say you're having trouble concentrating to a family physician.

there's less than 1,000 scripts for that nationwide. - - it's really really controlled. :(

 
2012-12-23 07:31:25 PM
Hey, if we grew hemp everywhere and let it grow wild then it would ruin all these outdoor crops and the cartels would have to figure something else out. But we can't do that. Because reasons.
 
2012-12-23 07:32:32 PM
The simple solution to this problem is to grow inside. Of course you have to pay for the electricity but you don't use any pesticides,etc.It's as "organic" as you'll find. No seeds, usually MUCH better quality. Why bother growing, working on something substandard? All it takes is the nuts to live with your work and not go "check" on it once in a while.
 
2012-12-23 07:35:48 PM
Maybe like we should just let the stoners and the tree huggers duke it out, dude
 
2012-12-23 07:38:18 PM

Real Women Drink Akvavit: jeblis: I assume most of the posts in this thread are angry stoners telling OP that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem.

I'm an angry non-stoner telling subs that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem. Not only for our ecosystem, but if  you go hiking in  a  national forest you would  no longer have to worry about being shot at for getting  too close to a grow.


OP was making fun of angry stoners, not the validity of their arguments.
 
2012-12-23 07:39:28 PM
BTW Desoxin is a killer upper. You really don't want to start with that. You end up running with your high beams on all the time. You feel 9' tall and bullet proof. AND your stuff won't stand up even with Niagra spray starch. Bad stuff, stay away.
 
2012-12-23 07:40:17 PM

jeblis: Real Women Drink Akvavit: jeblis: I assume most of the posts in this thread are angry stoners telling OP that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem.

I'm an angry non-stoner telling subs that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem. Not only for our ecosystem, but if  you go hiking in  a  national forest you would  no longer have to worry about being shot at for getting  too close to a grow.

OP was making fun of angry stoners, not the validity of their arguments.


That's what I was hoping for, and that's what I figured. Thanks for the confirmation of my suspicions.
 
2012-12-23 07:43:35 PM

Onkel Buck: Ha ha instant gratification farks you too.

/no good deed goes unpunished, hippies.
//Just teasing, if anyone can figure out how to fix this fast it's you guys
////Please hurry! Im down to my last jar
[i26.photobucket.com image 320x240]


Heavens to Betsy! However will you manage?

This post brought to you by the deadly sin of "envy".
 
2012-12-23 07:45:46 PM

Urbanfarmr: BTW Desoxin is a killer upper. You really don't want to start with that. You end up running with your high beams on all the time. You feel 9' tall and bullet proof. AND your stuff won't stand up even with Niagra spray starch. Bad stuff, stay away.


oh plz i sprinkle that shiat on my salad
 
2012-12-23 07:54:40 PM

Real Women Drink Akvavit: jeblis: I assume most of the posts in this thread are angry stoners telling OP that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem.

I'm an angry non-stoner telling subs that if it was legal this wouldn't be a problem. Not only for our ecosystem, but if  you go hiking in  a  national forest you would  no longer have to worry about being shot at for getting  too close to a grow.



I'm also a non-stoner who sees very clearly that prohibition has failed and causes FAR more real harm to society than legalization will
 
2012-12-23 08:12:50 PM
So, if pot became legalized, what are the chances that cocoa plants might take the places of pot plants in illegal grow locations?
 
2012-12-23 08:14:04 PM

Dr Jack Badofsky: So, if pot became legalized, what are the chances that cocoa plants might take the places of pot plants in illegal grow locations?


probably slim to nil

now coca, probably not either, due to the fact they only will grow in South America
 
2012-12-23 08:17:15 PM

Gyrfalcon: Farming is bad for the environment. Period. It doesn't matter how "sustainable" it is. Planting one crop, that is, putting more of one type of plant in an area to the exclusion of other plants that would normally be in the area is environmentally unsound. It's possible to MINIMIZE the damage, to MINIMIZE the harm done by fertilizing, irrigating, etc., but the simple fact is that settling down in one area and emphasizing one or two sorts of crop and removing other types of plants ("weeds"), allowing certain animals and disallowing other animals ("pests" or "vermin") is ecologically unsound.

It can be done in such a way as to keep the impact smaller; but it's going to have an impact.


Aren't you just special.
 
2012-12-23 08:20:12 PM
Illegal grows are illegal.
I like my weed grown indoors, in dirt, sans pesticides, fertilized with guano.. and that's how I get it.

/ colorado
 
2012-12-23 08:24:34 PM

Jon iz teh kewl: Dr Jack Badofsky: So, if pot became legalized, what are the chances that cocoa plants might take the places of pot plants in illegal grow locations?

probably slim to nil

now coca, probably not either, due to the fact they only will grow in South America


Better chance of opium poppies.
 
2012-12-23 08:26:09 PM

utah dude: there's less than 1,000 scripts for that nationwide. - - it's really really controlled. :(


Well, it also has to do with the fact there are safer and less addictive formulations out there. Vyvance is the one I take.
 
2012-12-23 08:29:33 PM

FunkOut: Jon iz teh kewl: Dr Jack Badofsky: So, if pot became legalized, what are the chances that cocoa plants might take the places of pot plants in illegal grow locations?

probably slim to nil

now coca, probably not either, due to the fact they only will grow in South America

Better chance of opium poppies.


So, we'd be looking at a bunch of doped-out morphine addicts instead of cheeto-crazed, laughing hippies?
 
2012-12-23 08:33:03 PM

Dr Jack Badofsky: So, we'd be looking at a bunch of doped-out morphine addicts instead of cheeto-crazed, laughing hippies?


24.media.tumblr.com
 
2012-12-23 08:49:12 PM
You know, I've been kicking around this rock for a bit and so far, all I've managed to discern is that the best we can do for running things is a bunch of motherf*ckers carrying signs that say "NO, OUR SIDE!" and a lot of people riding their backs by putting IOUs on a stick in front of them. And they only thing they have in common is they want to wipe their ass with the earth for THEIR cause. It's sort of pathetic.
 
2012-12-23 08:52:37 PM

Jon iz teh kewl: Dr Jack Badofsky: So, if pot became legalized, what are the chances that cocoa plants might take the places of pot plants in illegal grow locations?

probably slim to nil

now coca, probably not either, due to the fact they only will grow in South America



Global Warming, dude.
 
2012-12-23 08:54:02 PM

Dr Jack Badofsky: So, if pot became legalized, what are the chances that cocoa plants might take the places of pot plants in illegal grow locations?


It's not illegal to grow cocao anywhere.
 
2012-12-23 08:57:19 PM

OregonVet: Gyrfalcon: Farming is bad for the environment. Period. It doesn't matter how "sustainable" it is. Planting one crop, that is, putting more of one type of plant in an area to the exclusion of other plants that would normally be in the area is environmentally unsound. It's possible to MINIMIZE the damage, to MINIMIZE the harm done by fertilizing, irrigating, etc., but the simple fact is that settling down in one area and emphasizing one or two sorts of crop and removing other types of plants ("weeds"), allowing certain animals and disallowing other animals ("pests" or "vermin") is ecologically unsound.

It can be done in such a way as to keep the impact smaller; but it's going to have an impact.

Aren't you just special.


Aren't you retarded.
 
2012-12-23 08:57:24 PM

WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.

wat

As in farking the chicken, I do believe.


Wat wat


I can't leave the "speaking in code" to just the conservatives.
YES THE CHICKEN WILL NOT fark ITSELF. So we have LEOs and laws against the pot. Lots of property not yet seized and people not imprisoned.
 
2012-12-23 09:01:00 PM

jso2897: Dr Jack Badofsky: So, if pot became legalized, what are the chances that cocoa plants might take the places of pot plants in illegal grow locations?

It's not illegal to grow cocao anywhere.


Sorry, I was, as John is teh kewl is referring, to the plant that cocaine is produced from. I suspect that something would fill the void at illegal grow sites if mj were to become legalized. As someone pointed out earlier, maybe opium/poppy plants?
 
2012-12-23 09:10:37 PM

Dr Jack Badofsky: jso2897: Dr Jack Badofsky: So, if pot became legalized, what are the chances that cocoa plants might take the places of pot plants in illegal grow locations?

It's not illegal to grow cocao anywhere.

Sorry, I was, as John is teh kewl is referring, to the plant that cocaine is produced from. I suspect that something would fill the void at illegal grow sites if mj were to become legalized. As someone pointed out earlier, maybe opium/poppy plants?


It is my understanding that those need full sunlight, which is why the Afghani producers grow them in open fields. I think that would stick out a bit too much, even in California.
 
2012-12-23 09:15:07 PM

OregonVet: Gyrfalcon: Farming is bad for the environment. Period. It doesn't matter how "sustainable" it is. Planting one crop, that is, putting more of one type of plant in an area to the exclusion of other plants that would normally be in the area is environmentally unsound. It's possible to MINIMIZE the damage, to MINIMIZE the harm done by fertilizing, irrigating, etc., but the simple fact is that settling down in one area and emphasizing one or two sorts of crop and removing other types of plants ("weeds"), allowing certain animals and disallowing other animals ("pests" or "vermin") is ecologically unsound.

It can be done in such a way as to keep the impact smaller; but it's going to have an impact.

Aren't you just special.


1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2012-12-23 09:16:37 PM
while we ignore the rest of the country's decimated aquifers due to all sorts of non-mary jane chemical applications.
 
2012-12-23 09:18:48 PM

rev. dave: WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.

wat

As in farking the chicken, I do believe.

Wat wat

I can't leave the "speaking in code" to just the conservatives.
YES THE CHICKEN WILL NOT fark ITSELF. So we have LEOs and laws against the pot. Lots of property not yet seized and people not imprisoned.


i.imgur.com
 
2012-12-23 09:36:05 PM

rev. dave: WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.

wat

As in farking the chicken, I do believe.


Wat wat

I can't leave the "speaking in code" to just the conservatives.
YES THE CHICKEN WILL NOT fark ITSELF. So we have LEOs and laws against the pot. Lots of property not yet seized and people not imprisoned.


What do you have against chickens masturbating in the privacy of their own homes? You may not want to do it yourself, but don't try to impose your morality on them, you conservative derptard.
 
2012-12-23 09:47:14 PM
+1 subby as far as I am concerned.

I have been on the receiving end of more than one lecture from my Humboldt county kinfolk about how reactionary and unsubstainable my middle class lifestyle is. TFA confirms what I suspected all along--they're all a bunch of hypocrites.
 
2012-12-23 09:48:23 PM
about-tera.com
 
2012-12-23 09:52:24 PM

BronyMedic: rev. dave: WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.

wat

As in farking the chicken, I do believe.


Wat wat

I can't leave the "speaking in code" to just the conservatives.
YES THE CHICKEN WILL NOT fark ITSELF. So we have LEOs and laws against the pot. Lots of property not yet seized and people not imprisoned.

What do you have against chickens masturbating in the privacy of their own homes? You may not want to do it yourself, but don't try to impose your morality on them, you conservative derptard.



Chickens do not "own homes". They are there at the pleasure of the landlords.
 
2012-12-23 10:00:00 PM

MagicMissile: This headline demonstrates the thought process of a retarded liberal quite clearly.


I bet the source of every ill in your life is a result of the Great Liberal Conspiracy/Agenda. Do you peek under your bed before going to sleep to make sure Obama isn't hiding under there?
 
2012-12-23 10:00:22 PM

Amos Quito: BronyMedic: rev. dave: WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.
wat
As in farking the chicken, I do believe.
Wat wat
I can't leave the "speaking in code" to just the conservatives.
YES THE CHICKEN WILL NOT fark ITSELF. So we have LEOs and laws against the pot. Lots of property not yet seized and people not imprisoned.
What do you have against chickens masturbating in the privacy of their own homes? You may not want to do it yourself, but don't try to impose your morality on them, you conservative derptard.

Chickens do not "own homes". They are there at the pleasure of the landlords.



Coops. Chickens live in coops. He missed the chance to say "What do you have against chickens masturbating in the privacy of their own coops?" which would have been the funnier joke.

/because there's no privacy in a chicken coop
 
2012-12-23 10:13:28 PM
And your iPhone (apple is great) took more toxic shiat (apple is so progressive) to make than Chernobyl (Steve Jobs was the fifth Beatle) ever threw up.
 
2012-12-23 10:31:18 PM

KrispyKritter: while we ignore the rest of the country's decimated aquifers due to all sorts of non-mary jane chemical applications.


Yes, I often yell at the clouds! Why won't you produce that precious fluid?
 
2012-12-23 10:36:04 PM

detroitdoesntsuckthatbad: KrispyKritter: while we ignore the rest of the country's decimated aquifers due to all sorts of non-mary jane chemical applications.

Yes, I often yell at the clouds! Why won't you produce that precious fluid?


If the government wasn't so farking stingy with grant money, I might be able to solve the "Booze from rain clouds" problem
 
2012-12-23 10:54:57 PM
Let's tell the truth this is a picture of an illegal alien grow, they also will take "pot" shots at you when hiking if you get too close. It has gotten so bad that rangers are warning people.
 
2012-12-23 11:03:18 PM
This is a federal problem not my problem at all.  If you make it legal and regulate it you make money from fines and taxes.  Right now you just spend taxes on it.
 
2012-12-23 11:08:02 PM

WeenerGord: rev. dave: WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.

wat

As in farking the chicken, I do believe.

Wat wat

I can't leave the "speaking in code" to just the conservatives.
YES THE CHICKEN WILL NOT fark ITSELF. So we have LEOs and laws against the pot. Lots of property not yet seized and people not imprisoned.

[i.imgur.com image 533x800]


Don't get my mom's family involved. Not relevant.
 
2012-12-23 11:12:58 PM

rev. dave: WeenerGord: rev. dave: WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.
wat
As in farking the chicken, I do believe.
Wat wat
I can't leave the "speaking in code" to just the conservatives.
YES THE CHICKEN WILL NOT fark ITSELF. So we have LEOs and laws against the pot. Lots of property not yet seized and people not imprisoned.
[i.imgur.com image 533x800]

Don't get my mom's family involved. Not relevant.



Yeah, right, like ur mom's not already involved.
 
2012-12-23 11:33:17 PM

WeenerGord: Amos Quito: BronyMedic: rev. dave: WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.
wat
As in farking the chicken, I do believe.
Wat wat
I can't leave the "speaking in code" to just the conservatives.
YES THE CHICKEN WILL NOT fark ITSELF. So we have LEOs and laws against the pot. Lots of property not yet seized and people not imprisoned.
What do you have against chickens masturbating in the privacy of their own homes? You may not want to do it yourself, but don't try to impose your morality on them, you conservative derptard.

Chickens do not "own homes". They are there at the pleasure of the landlords.


Coops. Chickens live in coops. He missed the chance to say "What do you have against chickens masturbating in the privacy of their own coops?" which would have been the funnier joke.

/because there's no privacy in a chicken coop



Are you experienced at this sort of thing?
 
2012-12-23 11:51:13 PM

WeenerGord: ThatGuyFromTheInternet: WeenerGord: rev. dave: Local police everywhere still state a preference in certain breeds of chicken. They will not let go until the body is cold.

wat

As in farking the chicken, I do believe.


Wat wat


In the butt butt cloacca?

/Sorry
 
2012-12-24 12:02:31 AM

Morgellons: In the butt butt cloacca?


Amos Quito: /because there's no privacy in a chicken coop

Are you eggsperienced at this sort of thing?



Is this wat wat you two dirty birds are looking for?

i.cdn.turner.com

/Bet you don't even go to church
 
2012-12-24 12:32:07 AM

MagicMissile: This headline demonstrates the thought process of a retarded liberal quite clearly.


Wow. And I was just going to post pot is for stupid people, but damn .... excellent
 
2012-12-24 01:20:40 AM

BronyMedic: ModernLuddite: So smoke meth?

[25.media.tumblr.com image 500x423]

Why smoke that crap? It's 40 bucks for a 30 days supply. Just say you're having trouble concentrating to a family physician.

dryknife: Remember paraquat? Good times.

Good news. At temperatures that pot ignites, Paraquat turns into relatively non-toxic pyridine bases.


We never stock/carry Desoxyn, it's always the analogues- Adderall was like $1 a pill before last year's shortage, but ever since our prices have almost tripled for the IR dosing, but if you have a PBM with your insurance plan there's a sick copay card from the manufacturer that can land you a $0 copay for a year on Vyvanse.
 
Displayed 50 of 114 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report