If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WTVR)   ♫ It's beginning to look a lot like FARK YOU ♫   (wtvr.com) divider line 193
    More: Followup, Marjorie Esman, Denham Springs  
•       •       •

13512 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Dec 2012 at 8:46 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



193 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-21 08:49:24 PM
You're Number one baby!
 
2012-12-21 08:50:26 PM
She is just stating what she wants to do to everyone who walks by, otherwise it would be UNFARK YOU!
 
2012-12-21 08:50:52 PM
This makes my holiday brighter.
 
2012-12-21 08:51:56 PM
How to explain this to a small child:

Its sign language for a bad word.
 
2012-12-21 08:53:02 PM
Moonfisher: This makes my holiday brighter.
 
2012-12-21 08:53:59 PM
cdn.motinetwork.nethotrink
 
2012-12-21 08:54:13 PM
+1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights
 
2012-12-21 08:54:26 PM
img.gawkerassets.com

Oh c'mon, it's just a miniature menorah.
 
2012-12-21 08:55:16 PM
"How do you explain to a 4-year-old kid or a 2-year-old kid that doesn't know what that means yet, and you try to shield them from stuff like that."

Just tell them it's the secret hand sign for Santa Claus.
 
2012-12-21 08:55:16 PM
Christ, what an asshole.
 
2012-12-21 08:55:26 PM

Happy Hanukkah!


img827.imageshack.us

 
2012-12-21 08:56:43 PM
Has she explained why this is important to her?
 
2012-12-21 08:57:19 PM
"However, neighbors said they have no problem with Childs' free speech claim, but worry about the display's affect on little ones."

www.ronanlyons.com
 
2012-12-21 08:57:38 PM
I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.
 
2012-12-21 08:59:28 PM
The have no problem with freedom of speech except when they don't like the message?!?!

/faceplam
 
2012-12-21 08:59:51 PM
However, neighbors said they have no problem with Childs' free speech claim, but worry about the display's affect on little ones.

"Kids are going to look at those lights and wonder... what does that mean," Todd Traylor, one of Childs' neighbors, said. "How do you explain to a 4-year-old kid or a 2-year-old kid that doesn't know what that means yet, and you try to shield them from stuff like that."


SHUT THE FARK UP.
 
2012-12-21 08:59:57 PM

SpookyEyes: I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.


I'm pretty sure the kids already know what it means
 
2012-12-21 09:00:02 PM
I would like to know WHY she's doing this. I mean, I don't care one way or the other. I'm just curious what her reasoning is.

Also, it's probably less offensive than the number of "Griswald" houses in my neighborhood.
 
2012-12-21 09:01:02 PM

diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights


Any kids young enough to be scarred by such a gesture are too young to understand it. And those that understand it do it all of the time.
 
2012-12-21 09:01:41 PM

traylor: "How do you explain to a 4-year-old kid or a 2-year-old kid that doesn't know what that means yet, and you try to shield them from stuff like that."

Just tell them it's the secret hand sign for Santa Claus.


It's a tribute to The Tall Man, from that song The Wiggles do.
 
2012-12-21 09:02:19 PM
Police originally told Sarah Childs to take down her outdoor Christmas lights display in the shape of two hands extending the middle finger.

Sorry, moron cops--you can't supersede the 1st Amendment.

However, Childs was awarded a temporary restraining order against the city - and reinstalled the lights.

That's better.

Is this the new style of journalism?

One sentence per paragraph to make your column look longer?
 
2012-12-21 09:02:25 PM

SpookyEyes: I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.


Those that do already have them should have them taken away and given to a gay or lesbian couple that can actually raise children.
 
2012-12-21 09:04:41 PM
There seems to be some kind of divide between people who do the finger with the thumb extended and those who keep all four curled.

This woman obviously is in the extended camp.
 
2012-12-21 09:05:12 PM

fatassbastard: However, neighbors said they have no problem with Childs' free speech claim, but worry about the display's affect on little ones.

"Kids are going to look at those lights and wonder... what does that mean," Todd Traylor, one of Childs' neighbors, said. "How do you explain to a 4-year-old kid or a 2-year-old kid that doesn't know what that means yet, and you try to shield them from stuff like that."

SHUT THE FARK UP.


I was going to go with "fark me and the same to you." It seemed more polite at the time.
 
2012-12-21 09:05:58 PM

diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights


You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.
 
2012-12-21 09:06:43 PM
It's a Christmas profanicle! God fark us, everyone!

vni.s3.amazonaws.com
 
2012-12-21 09:07:02 PM
"How do you explain to a 4-year-old kid or a 2-year-old kid that doesn't know what that means yet"

You don't! Don't tell them anything. If you don't act like it's a big deal your kids won't pay any attention to it! Sweet, Jesus, these people are idiots.
 
2012-12-21 09:07:26 PM

star_topology: brigid_fitch: [6q4u.files.wordpress.com image 500x353]

I prefer this one:

[img.photobucket.com image 400x400]


Grumpy Cat is the best meme to come along in a while. I posted mine because the f*ck you was appropriate but my favorite is

socialeyezer.com
 
2012-12-21 09:07:38 PM

SpookyEyes: I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.


This. My two year old's favorite video is the beheading of Daniel Pearl. Welcome to reality, son!
 
2012-12-21 09:07:46 PM

brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.


Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?
 
2012-12-21 09:08:31 PM
"How do you explain to a 4-year-old kid or a 2-year-old kid that doesn't know what that means yet?"

How about you don't?  Chances are no kid is going to ask anyway, but if one does just shrug your shoulders and say "I dunno kid, just some weird string of lights."  How hard is that?
 
2012-12-21 09:08:38 PM

Inquisitive Inquisitor: SpookyEyes: I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.

Those that do already have them should have them taken away and given to a gay or lesbian couple that can actually raise children.


I find your idea intriguing.
 
2012-12-21 09:10:41 PM

diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?


Our freedom of speech is meaningless if we do not defend the rights of people we disagree with.
 
2012-12-21 09:11:27 PM

Ed Grubermann: diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?

Our freedom of speech is meaningless if we do not defend the rights of people we disagree with.


You didn't answer the question...
 
2012-12-21 09:13:17 PM

diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?


You seem to be unfamiliar with the 1st Amendment.  Why don't you do some research and then come back to the thread.  There are many notable SCOTUS cases that would explain why your question is ridiculous but, since you're obviously not a student of history, why don't you just look up the challenges against the WBC.  That should be recent enough for you to Google.
 
2012-12-21 09:13:29 PM

SpookyEyes: I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.


Oh you're right I should have to explain every cold hard reality of life to my kids at any age because some "grown up child" thinks its their right to do whatever the hell they want in public. Here's a little bit of free advice - don't have any kids until you decide you'd like to raise them first as kids then turn them into adults when they are mentally and physically able to comprehend certain "truths".
 
2012-12-21 09:13:34 PM

drjekel_mrhyde: SpookyEyes: I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.

I'm pretty sure the kids already know what it means


If not, I'm sure there's a catholic priest out there somewhere who would be willing to explain it to them.
 
2012-12-21 09:14:07 PM

diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?


It's not a requirement to be a giant dickhead but it allows you to, and protects you from the reprisal of people and government who try to restrict that right through force.

/probably a troll.
 
2012-12-21 09:14:30 PM

diaphoresis: Ed Grubermann: diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?

Our freedom of speech is meaningless if we do not defend the rights of people we disagree with.

You didn't answer the question...


Yes he did.
 
2012-12-21 09:14:53 PM

brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?

You seem to be unfamiliar with the 1st Amendment.  Why don't you do some research and then come back to the thread.  There are many notable SCOTUS cases that would explain why your question is ridiculous but, since you're obviously not a student of history, why don't you just look up the challenges against the WBC.  That should be recent enough for you to Google.


Awwww... poor baby.. do you feel better now? You want me to get you a bottle of milk?
 
2012-12-21 09:15:31 PM

brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?

You seem to be unfamiliar with the 1st Amendment.  Why don't you do some research and then come back to the thread.  There are many notable SCOTUS cases that would explain why your question is ridiculous but, since you're obviously not a student of history, why don't you just look up the challenges against the WBC.  That should be recent enough for you to Google.


The 1st amendment applies to the government. It does not apply to private individuals.
 
2012-12-21 09:16:50 PM

DarkSoulNoHope: diaphoresis: Ed Grubermann: diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?

Our freedom of speech is meaningless if we do not defend the rights of people we disagree with.

You didn't answer the question...

Yes he did.


Not with that response...
 
2012-12-21 09:17:00 PM

Fizpez: SpookyEyes: I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.

Oh you're right I should have to explain every cold hard reality of life to my kids at any age because some "grown up child" thinks its their right to do whatever the hell they want in public. Here's a little bit of free advice - don't have any kids until you decide you'd like to raise them first as kids then turn them into adults when they are mentally and physically able to comprehend certain "truths".


You sound concerned.
 
2012-12-21 09:17:29 PM

brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.


Supporting the first amendment means I will protest the government trying to silence anyone.

If someone is spewing vitriol and a citizen walks up and punches him in the face I'm totally going to cheer for him in private. Externally I will acknowledge their crime and agree they should be punished if caught.
 
2012-12-21 09:18:27 PM

diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights


How progressive of you.

She just wants to tell the neighborhood she's number one.
 
2012-12-21 09:20:54 PM

twistofsin: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Supporting the first amendment means I will protest the government trying to silence anyone.

If someone is spewing vitriol and a citizen walks up and punches him in the face I'm totally going to cheer for him in private. Externally I will acknowledge their crime and agree they should be punished if caught.


Finally... a voice of reason.

duffblue: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

How progressive of you.


Oh gawd I hope not...
 
2012-12-21 09:21:54 PM
Listened to the video... "how would you explain that to a 2 yr old, a 4 yr old, what that means?"

WHY WOULD THEY ASK?? It's a vague shape, I don't know why they'd even notice it.
 
2012-12-21 09:21:59 PM

diaphoresis: Ed Grubermann: diaphoresis: brigid_fitch: diaphoresis: +1 for Freedom of Speech
-1,000,000 for doing in a child-filled neighborhood

+100 for whomever accidentally cuts the power cords to the lights

You've got an odd way of promoting free speech: "He's allowed to say whatever he wants, unless I'm offended. Then, it's perfectly okay to vandalize his stuff"

Your precious snowflake will survive life if he sees a light display of a cartoonish middle finger.

Since when did 1st Amendment require you to be a giant dickhead?

Our freedom of speech is meaningless if we do not defend the rights of people we disagree with.

You didn't answer the question...


Looks to me like you started the whole being a giant dickhead bit, what with wanting someone to commit vandalism. I'm sure your delicate crotchdroppings appreciate you for it.
 
2012-12-21 09:25:40 PM

Fizpez: SpookyEyes: I'm so farking sick of the "how am I supposed to explain XYZ to my child?" bullshiat. If you can't talk to your kids about the realities of life then don't farking have any.

Oh you're right I should have to explain every cold hard reality of life to my kids at any age because some "grown up child" thinks its their right to do whatever the hell they want in public. Here's a little bit of free advice - don't have any kids until you decide you'd like to raise them first as kids then turn them into adults when they are mentally and physically able to comprehend certain "truths".


That light display is on private property.
 
2012-12-21 09:26:00 PM
I'll never understand why some people are compelled to show off their utter lack of class.
 
Displayed 50 of 193 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report