If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(WOODTV Grand Rapids)   "Guns are not the problem...mental illness is the problem," says mom who keeps a gun because she lives in fear for her life from her mentally ill son   (woodtv.com) divider line 62
    More: Obvious, mental health professional, mom, guns  
•       •       •

6468 clicks; posted to Main » on 20 Dec 2012 at 7:52 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-12-20 08:00:48 PM
7 votes:
This new trend of parents going on the record and exposing the confidential and highly sensitive medical information of their minor children does not sit well with me at all.
2012-12-20 08:51:00 PM
4 votes:
Jesus, can we stop acting like it's one or the other? Can't the problem be guns AND crazy people?
2012-12-20 10:47:41 PM
3 votes:
Maybe nothing needs to change, other than people turning off the damn tv and not freaking out and emotionally calling for drastic changes in law based on a single event. That's how stupid laws that diminish rights get put into place. Maybe you agree with this one, but what about the next law that takes YOUR rights because some rare sensationalistic event caused an outcry for the greater good?

Mass shootings are gruesome and disturbing, but rare, and violent crime in general is dropping.

There is not a shooter or a kiddie diddler waiting around every corner, as the media would have you believe.

Your risk of dying in a car wreck is far greater than being shot, so if you want to protect yourself and your family make sure to drive a safe car, watch out for bad drivers, and be a responsible driver yourself. Teach your kids to do the same.

I agree that mental health services need to be overhauled, but even that is unlikely to make much of a difference in these rare instances. No matter what, we can't prevent them all. Since the extremely violent people are like a needle in a haystack compared to the mentally ill that are no danger to anyone but themselves, trying to profile and guess who needs locked up is a pretty futile practice.
And I personally am not willing to quash the rights of millions, in hopes that we snag a few future shooters with them. The amount of people that ARE willing to go that route is disturbing.
2012-12-20 08:50:17 PM
3 votes:

CygnusDarius: pxlboy: CygnusDarius: Maybe, just maybe, if Americans stop glorifying guns, and death, and combat, and the army, and focused more on the well-being of nation (both in body and in mind), it would be great.

Movies and video games are not the cause, they are the by-product of a recent embellishment of Death, while forsaking health.

Healthcare for the masses is bad, but killing brown people is good.

Sadly, this. Also, I can understand getting a handgun to protect yourself and those around you, I can understand getting a hunting rifle and a shotgun to hunt, but why the hell do you need an m-15, or hollow-points (ok, maybe this one might work against large game, like hogs)?.

And, by the same token, why the US keeps cutting funds on mental health?.


The AR15 is just kind of a toy for most of its owners. It can also be used for competitive shooting. It's very accurate, relatively light, light-recoiling, and easy to use. The 5.56mm or .223 is generally considered by hunters to be marginal for humanely dispatching anything larger than squirrels. Hollowpoints are because, in defensive situations, your best chance of getting an assailant quickly stopped is to blow a huge farking hole in them. Most people are not tolerant enough of recoil to want to use the hand-cannons that can do this with a simple round-nose lead projectile.
2012-12-20 08:29:50 PM
3 votes:
Rant On!
 
ENOUGH!  I AM TIRED OF THE SCREAMING FROM BOTH SIDES!
I am sick of the Right Screaming it is because we have taken God out of the Schools and Society, BS! If you are a true Christian you know where you faith is and resides and no it isn't having your snowflake say a prayer over the School PA system to show how "godly" they are.  Nor is it in insisting that YOUR FAITH be plastered all over the public square!  A very good friend of mine who is a Pastor told me, "If you have to tell people or make a spectacle to show them you are a Christian you are doing it wrong."
I am sick of the left blaming guns, a gun is inanimate object it is not good or evil, it does nothing until it is in the hands of a human. It is we humans that are the problem.
Now if you really give a damn about what happened then let's have a real discussion about this without the political posturing that has been going on
Let's start by looking at some facts about firearms
The Weapon types used have been around for over 100 years
The first semi auto "assault rifle" was the 1903 Mondragón Mexican battle rifle
The First magazine fed semi auto rifle was made by Winchester in 1905 , followed by  the  commercially successful Remington model 8 in 1906
The First Semi auto pistol was the c-93 Borchardt of 1893
The most popular semi auto pistol type is based on the 1911 Colt .45 ACP of -you guessed it- 1911
The first Hi Capacity magazine pistol was the Browning Hi Power of 1935
The "AR" type of Rifles such as the Bushmaster was introduced in 1963
In WW 1 the Axis powers used Machine Pistols and sub machine guns
In WW 2 Paratroopers were equipped with semi auto, collapsible stock hi capacity magazine fed M1 Carbines that also has a "pistol grip"
All of these weapons or variations of them were and are available on the Civilian Market for purchase, even the notorious "Chicago typewriter" the Thompson has been available in the semi auto version since before the 1934 gun control act that regulated the select fire versions and was available at the corner hardware store.
If we look at these incidents we see that even including the Criminal syndicate acts like the Valentine's Day Massacre, that up until the early 1980s these events were very rare in the United States. 
Now the reason I show these facts is twofold; first that the tools used by those who commit the atrocities were more easily available in the past, remember prior to the gun control act of 1968 you could buy guns through the mail and second, to show that contrary to some peoples assertions these tools have been around and easily available for decades yet we did not see these acts committed.
Which makes one wonder if the tools were available why didn't the disturbed commit these acts as they are now?
If we actually review the possible reasons two factors immediately become apparent; Mental Health Treatment and the Media.
The Mental  Health Care issues began with the case of O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975), a landmark decision in mental health law.  The United States Supreme Court ruled that a state cannot constitutionally confine a non-dangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely in freedom by themselves or with the help of willing and responsible family members or friends.  While this affirmed the  rights of those who  any consider "different" it also opened up the  doors for polticos from both parties to  empty out  State Mental Hospitals while slashing mental health budgets insuring  that those freed from  the hospital and those with problems in the  future would not receive the treatment needed to be able to integrate into society. This issue was recognized with President Carter signed the Mental Health Systems act of 1980 to create the system needed for treatment of these people.  When Ronald Reagan took office in 1981 he was responsible for slashing the Budget for this program despite signing massive spending increases and deficits into law, this underfunding has continued to today with BOTH parties being responsible!
The next issue with Mental Health was the "correction" of mental health laws to supposedly comply with O'Connor v Donaldson, when in fact what these laws did was insure that the State would not have to properly budget for treatment of those severely mentally ill by redefining what constituted a danger to oneself or others, this is what allows involuntary commitment to Mental Health Hospitals.  Here in CA all one has to do is look around us to see the result, daily we can see those whose grip on reality (or lack of) endangers themselves or others yet unless they are actively trying to harm themselves or others, there is no option for treatment and even when they reach the high threshold it is in many  if not most cases  treated as a purely criminal matter instead of the Medical issue it is or if they are committed for treatment they are stabilized and instead of being put into a functioning community mental health program that can guide them they are turned back onto  the  streets to begin  the  cycle anew.  Even families who are trying to help their family members get needed care get no help from the system  and must jump through sometimes impossible hoops in an attempt to get needed care (this is the picture emerging from CT) or in many cases are forced to turn loved ones out into the  streets and/or watch helplessly as  they  enter the Criminal Justice system due to the  lack of treatment Kelly Thomas and his death is a good example of this. 
The next item is the Media, prior to 1980s most media was a local affair and the National News was heard at 6 and 9 on your local station.  The 1980s brought us a national saturation of cable and satellite TV; now instead of the news being on twice in the evening we now had 24 hour news channels such as CNN relaying any all stories that would fill the program between commercials.  This also led to an explosion of available Stations creating the need for more and more stories that would grab the viewers' attention and make them watch.  With the  ever increasing  need to fill "airtime" we saw more and more "human Interest" stories on people who in an earlier decade would not be not be newsworthy if not for the need to fill that airtime.  It was at this time we first started seeing the occurrence of these atrocities. I can remember driving home from Tucson AZ and listening about the Atrocity at the  San Ysidro CA McDonalds at the hands of James  Huberty,  who had the day of  the  atrocity called a mental health center who did not return his call because they  did not fell he was a danger to himself or others- It is a sad testament when a unreturned phone call can be attributed to causing the  deaths of so many. Then along comes the internet and fame is just a click away and yet another massive expansion of  the  media  with more space to fill and quicker responses to any acts like those being  discussed.  This is where we see the increase not only in these acts but in the severity of the actions, since along with the increased coverage comes the media recognition which equates to these people as the fame and notoriety that they seek- remember all the foiled plots to shoot and blow up schools after Columbine, and this week?   The increased coverage helps trigger these people into acting and thus becoming "somebody!"
When one looks at the facts surrounding the acts we see that even though the tools-firearms- used to commit the atrocities have been around for a century or more it was not until the two issues I have mentioned came into being that we started to see the rise of these acts.  Now it would be easy to scream like many are doing and want the Press to be regulated or violates ones rights just because they might think be "odd," but that is wrong and goes against the principals set forth by our Founding Fathers and thus cannot be done.
Instead I propose some actual intelligent (as we have been shown there is no such thing as "common sense in elected officials) legislation and voluntary guidelines for the press to combat and prevent these atrocities, they are:
Restore and fully fund the Mental Health Systems act of 1980 to create the system and professionals needed for treatment of these people, this includes group homes and independent living centers that provide minimal but needed supervision to guide those with mental illness back into society and yes -gasp- Hospitals to provide treatment for those with severe mental health issues that are now on the streets.
Expand mental health clinics into Colleges, Universities and High Schools, for many the signs of Mental illness do not manifest until later teens or early twenties.
Change the mental health evaluation laws to allow for up to 30 days of evaluation as our Federal laws now do.
Make any evaluation be done by a Psychiatric Doctor, in to many states we have para-professionals or Family Practice MDs making these decisions and as skilled and caring they are this is still a medical issue requiring specialized evaluation from a Psychiatric Medical Doctor.
Change the involuntary commitment laws to allow families and advocates to be able to have easier access to involuntary commitment while at the same time allowing those who have successfully completed treatment a procedure to expunge the commitment form their records based on their successful recovery and ongoing treatment, after 60 months of success.
For the Press
When this type of incident occurs REFUSE to identify who committed the act,  or instead identify them and also use a disparaging and comical name, such as calling the Tucson Shooter "Uncle Fester" or the Aurora Shooter as "Side Show Bob"
Do not interview the doers Family friends etc.  Deny them the notoriety they crave.
If you do report on the doer do no human Interest things such as asking why?  Instead report just the facts of the case such as court appearances etc. 
Do report on every aspect on the Victims, it was the doers intent to destroy them to promote himself, show him that he is nothing and they are everything.
 Give it time before you play the political game, yes we know it will occur but this also emboldens these people since their act can "Change the course of the Nation" and once again bring them notoriety.
Will this stop these acts?  No but it will have a more positive effect on decreasing them than all of the ineffective gun laws being  pushed as we can see by  the rarity of these events prior to 1980. 
If we truly want to have a Conversation on steps to take here is the place to Start! 
 
 
Rant Off!
2012-12-20 08:09:52 PM
3 votes:

mgshamster: Genevieve Marie: This new trend of parents going on the record and exposing the confidential and highly sensitive medical information of their minor children does not sit well with me at all.

They're allowed to, though, aren't they?  Just like they can release information about themselves, they can also release information about their kids.  Parents are the ones who give consent for medical procedures and transfer of medical records from one hospital to the next, so why can't they talk about them publicly, too?
 
/Not saying they should


Oh they're absolutely legally allowed to, I just personally think it's a very bad decision. This kid is 13. The kid from that "I am Adam Lanza's Mother" piece is 11. Their parents have chosen to publicly label them as likely threats to society, in spite of the fact that mass shootings are actually still pretty rare, and in spite of the fact that mentally ill people are actually more likely to be the victims of crime than the perpetrators.

Yes, the mental health system needs major overhaul, but people are making a lot of assumptions about Adam Lanza right now without a whole lot of evidence to go on. I'm sure mental illness was a factor, but we don't know how big a factor or exactly what happened and why yet, and we probably won't for a long time.

I seem to recall some of the same issues being discussed after Columbine, and it turned out later that almost all of the media narrative on the story was false and had very little to do with what actually happened.
2012-12-20 08:05:04 PM
3 votes:
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) - They have rigged their bedroom door to make noise when it's opened, for fear their mentally ill son will try to kill them in their sleep.

Their other children know when to lock themselves in another room. They've locked kitchen knives in their safe.

"At the worst of it last year, I had to come to terms with the idea that I may have to kill my own child in order to protect my family," said the boy's dad, Paul Ledford.


/This is truly the trap most parents fall in when they have a mentally unstable child that they fear could harm them or their families. You can call the police, emergency services, but they will say, "What have they done? We can't do anything unless they have threatened or caused injury to themselves or someone else.". It's the law, they can't touch them unless they have already hurt someone, or are armed and threatening. Otherwise...we can't arrest or commit someone for being weird. Weird isn't against the law.

This is sad, as i had a mentally ill sister who was a paranoid schizophrenic. She acted odd, but the could do nothing until she tried to drown my child in the tub. Then, yes, they could act. Until that point, you live in fear that the person will wake you up with a knife in your neck, or hearing gunshots. I feel very sad for this family.
2012-12-20 08:04:02 PM
3 votes:

Genevieve Marie: This new trend of parents going on the record and exposing the confidential and highly sensitive medical information of their minor children does not sit well with me at all.


Maybe people should actually talk about mental illness publicly instead of pretending it doesn't exist and treating it like a leper colony.
2012-12-20 08:03:42 PM
3 votes:
There have always been crazy people, and there will always be crazy people. There is no simple solution to improve mental healthcare. The real problem here is "crazy got a gun." If this dipshiat had been armed with a kitchen knife or some shiatty "bombs" of the type that the Columbine @ssholes tried unsuccessfully to use, there wouldn't be 20 dead 6 year-olds in Newtown a week before Christmas. The guns are the problem, and everyone who isn't a biased gun nut can see it. The only question is what to do about it.
 
And if you have a crazy person in your house, you should not have any guns. Even in a safe, kids are crafty. I knew quite a few kids growing up who knew how to get into the family safe, and their parents had no farking clue. The fact that this wacko's mom TRAINED HIM to use a gun is so impossibly stupid (but legal! yay America!).
2012-12-20 08:48:31 PM
2 votes:

Thisbymaster: We need to return to the old system of the mentally illguns being in locked institutionsarmories away from everyone else.

2012-12-20 08:43:04 PM
2 votes:
My jimmies have been rustled. I have a mental illness and I'm tired of being painted as a violent sociopath who will shoot everyone at work at the drop of a hat. I have good days and bad days, and on bad days I call in sick and sleep for 15 or 20 hours. The stigma has gotten worse.

Mental Healthcare needs to be changed. It takes me 2 weeks for an appointment to talk to someone, and it's expensive as well.
2012-12-20 08:32:25 PM
2 votes:

CPennypacker: Funny how conservatives only started giving a shiat about mental health when they realized they could use it as a scapegoat to protect their pea shooters.


Funny how the libs ignore it when it does not advanc e their agenda!
2012-12-20 08:28:45 PM
2 votes:
Funny how conservatives only started giving a shiat about mental health when they realized they could use it as a scapegoat to protect their pea shooters.
2012-12-20 08:23:02 PM
2 votes:

CygnusDarius: pxlboy: CygnusDarius: Maybe, just maybe, if Americans stop glorifying guns, and death, and combat, and the army, and focused more on the well-being of nation (both in body and in mind), it would be great.

Movies and video games are not the cause, they are the by-product of a recent embellishment of Death, while forsaking health.

Healthcare for the masses is bad, but killing brown people is good.

Sadly, this. Also, I can understand getting a handgun to protect yourself and those around you, I can understand getting a hunting rifle and a shotgun to hunt, but why the hell do you need an m-15, or hollow-points (ok, maybe this one might work against large game, like hogs)?.

And, by the same token, why the US keeps cutting funds on mental health?.


Re: m-16. Because it's fun to shoot at a range; at least, that's why my gun loving friends tell me.  It is fun to shoot bigger guns, though.
 
Re: mental health.  I have no clue to the full extent of it, and am by no means an expert, but it may have something to do with the fact that only a few generations ago (like my great-grandparents), being labeled with a mental health problem would ruin you.  And women would be put in mental health facilities just for going through menopause (that happened to my great-great-grandmother, my mother tells me). It's a stigma you do not want.  It's only recently, such as the past 20 years, that we're seeing a better acceptance of mental health.  Younger generations are ok with getting therapy when it's needed.  I hear lots of stuff on the news about helping soldiers with PTSD.  We're just now actually starting to bring it back to an acceptable level in our culture.  It still has a long way to go, but I believe we're on the path to recovery.
2012-12-20 08:22:29 PM
2 votes:

Gabrielmot: The kid *isn't* crazy. The parents are the ones who are batshiat insane. But either way, an international article with the kid's parents saying he's insane is going to make it pretty hard for him to get into a good school, or get a good job later in life isn't it?


Maybe there should not be expectations placed on the very mentally ill that they need to integrate with society as if they are normal.
I think the parents are brave for speaking out like this.
2012-12-20 08:18:40 PM
2 votes:
This is pathetic. Unable to look themselves squarely in the face after a horrific tragedy, Americans instead start demonizing the mentally ill.
2012-12-20 08:13:39 PM
2 votes:

mrlewish: Genevieve Marie: This new trend of parents going on the record and exposing the confidential and highly sensitive medical information of their minor children does not sit well with me at all.

Why not? They are in charge of the minor and are in charge of all their medical decisions including the right to or not to talk about medical info.


Well, here's a scenario...

The kid *isn't* crazy. The parents are the ones who are batshiat insane. But either way, an international article with the kid's parents saying he's insane is going to make it pretty hard for him to get into a good school, or get a good job later in life isn't it?

I have a feeling we'll be seeing some easily won massive lawsuits from these kids for defamation of character against their parents in a few years.

/whether or not they are crazy.
2012-12-20 08:12:58 PM
2 votes:
This is what I've been saying all week. Guns are not the problem, they are only the tool of the mentally ill that are not being helped, and have more rights than we do.
2012-12-20 08:11:47 PM
2 votes:

Bit'O'Gristle: GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) - They have rigged their bedroom door to make noise when it's opened, for fear their mentally ill son will try to kill them in their sleep.

Their other children know when to lock themselves in another room. They've locked kitchen knives in their safe.

"At the worst of it last year, I had to come to terms with the idea that I may have to kill my own child in order to protect my family," said the boy's dad, Paul Ledford.

/This is truly the trap most parents fall in when they have a mentally unstable child that they fear could harm them or their families. You can call the police, emergency services, but they will say, "What have they done? We can't do anything unless they have threatened or caused injury to themselves or someone else.". It's the law, they can't touch them unless they have already hurt someone, or are armed and threatening. Otherwise...we can't arrest or commit someone for being weird. Weird isn't against the law.

This is sad, as i had a mentally ill sister who was a paranoid schizophrenic. She acted odd, but the could do nothing until she tried to drown my child in the tub. Then, yes, they could act. Until that point, you live in fear that the person will wake you up with a knife in your neck, or hearing gunshots. I feel very sad for this family.


Wow. God that's horrible.
2012-12-20 08:10:27 PM
2 votes:

Belias: Left out the part where they're in a safe. If the 13 year old is intent upon killing them, I expect cracking the safe would not be the path of least resistance.


I would also expect the mom to be dead before she could get the gun. And if she EVER EVER EVER leaves it unlocked or the combination gets leaked...
2012-12-20 08:07:15 PM
2 votes:

syrynxx: What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?


There isn't anything to do.
I was listening to a local psychiatrist describe how the funding simply dried up and many facilities shut down decades ago. Patients have no where to go, there was no treatment for many. A good number end up homeless or in jail.
They'll probably just keep the kid till he's old enough to wander off someplace on his own. God only knows what will happen.

The government, meanwhile, is trying to decide how many clips should fit in the magazine of an assault pistol.
2012-12-20 08:02:55 PM
2 votes:
Mental illness isn't the problem, the fact that the ACLU brought a series of suits saying that you can't lock people up for just being crazy you have to prove that they are a threat to themselves or others. If the police had dropped by the Lanzas that morning before he shot his mother there is nothing they could have done to save her or the kids at that school.
2012-12-20 08:01:39 PM
2 votes:
Oh, look...another gun control thread.
 
/bails
2012-12-20 08:00:13 PM
2 votes:
No, mental illness is a problem. As is the easy availability of firearms. The two are only tangentially related.

The harping about mental illness is driven by conservatives rationalizing their violent crime enablement and liberals polishing their nonpartisan bona fides.
2012-12-20 07:54:45 PM
2 votes:

syrynxx: What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?


Euthanize and try again?
2012-12-20 06:37:29 PM
2 votes:
What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?
2012-12-21 02:24:42 AM
1 votes:
<b>(Sigh!!)</b>

Many of you know me for my rants, especially those concerning the Mental health System, which President Reagan slashed brutally under the excuse that the big State hospitals were no longer needed. We all knew he and congress did it to save billions during the economic crisis.

Without regard to the repercussions.

<i>See my last post on the subject:http://www.fark.com/comments/7488394/I-live-with-a-son-who-is -mentally -ill-I-love-my-son-But-he-terrifies-me</i>;

I worked in the mental health system and prior to that, in the medical field. I took college courses in both nursing and psychiatry.

Just as we were making <b>HUGE</b> strides in Mental Health, developing new treatments, dumping barbaric old ones, cutting the Patient's Bill Of Rights, educating the public to get past the 'Horror Hill' stigma Hollywood had created over mental illness and were getting folks to come in for treatment BEFORE their illnesses got too bad -- Congress slashed the budget
.
It has never recovered though other budgets for various program slashed then also have been fully re-funded. Since at least 1997, the mental health system has repeatedly had it's budget slashed, partially restored, then slashed again.

It's set us back nearly 100 years. Now, you get the best care only if you have the bucks. Before, we did it on a sliding scale. A lot of the homeless dumped from the state institutions never got better and actually got sicker causing much more problems
.
In the long run, the decision to close the state institutions and slash the cost us billions more than it saved. It still does and the amount is increasing as the mentally ill, especially among the homeless, get thrown in jail, given little to no treatment and then thrown out, with no backup plan, to go crazy again and wreck havoc among you, the citizens through theft, property damage, crimes and medical costs.

Now, Society has changed in the short time I've been alive. We've made huge technological strides comparable only to the other period of explosive advances: the Victorian Age. Actually, we've gone even faster and further.
Since I was born, our global population has tripled. With new technology comes new abuses -- such as the 'disposable years' which nearly covered our planet with trash. Companies pushed cars on the public until the highways snaked all over our country and became packed with traffic. That caused massive pollution. That also drained the finite fossil fuel reserves as we gobbled them down as if they would never run dry.

The internet opened the borders of nations many of us would only read about and now we can communicate nearly directly with people all over the globe or use street view Google Maps to seem like we're standing right there.

It also opened the door for abuse: from far too much information -- like how to build bombs, to hackers and pervs, the Lunatic Fringe, spammers and runaway advertising, information stealing and scams by the ton. The media seeks sensationalism for ratings, exaggerating stories and slanting them in various angles and we're hammered steadily with often conflicting and confusing information.

Our leaders slap together equally confusing and poorly thought out laws, lawyers find new ways to twist the truth and sue the krap out of everyone for everything, what was good is now bad and what was bad has an excuse. Loyalty is no longer treasured and a person is no longer treated like a valued being.

Everything seems to cause cancer. Leaving your house can get you killed, molested, poisoned, arrested or injured. Previously honorable businesses now find a hundred ways to skin you out of your cash while they invest in crude oil for profit, which in turn keeps gas prices high, which screws you over as expenses soar and the rich get massively richer.

TV shows how the history books lied, challenge and investigate religion, destroy our heroes, destroy our traditions and the difference between good and bad begins to blur.

Everyone has rights -- even if those rights infringe on your rights. Kids acting like kids can be expelled, tossed in jail and branded a sexual offender for life
.
Now is when we need a fully functional, actively developing Mental Health Care System. We need to once again make it easy for people to get help without going bankrupt. Hammered by confusing and conflicting social morals, laws and actions with every nutcase pointing out how deadly everything is and the economy stressing the public -- people are going to crack.

Reaganonomics wiped out the major progress we had in helping people back from the edge. Congress throws money at special interest groups and corrupt bills, but ignores the Mental Health System.

Anyone in my fields, with half a brain and an understanding of society would have seen this coming. Especially those who are supposed to guide us towards our future, who we elect to keep us safe and to use wisdom we don't have.

You don't turn a couple of hundred thousand mentally ill people loose without a support system, especially if many have been institutionalized for decades and <b>not</b> see the potential problems there and in the near future.
We can't reclaim most of the old institutions. They were left to rot and be vandalized. (GIS abandoned mental institutions.) The cost to restore them would be huge. We can establish limited care clinics and the new programs we were building in the middle 70's.

Then, we can rebuild the major institutions.

Society has changed several times since I was a kid. From trusting and healthy to suspicious, greedy and fat. Greed is rewarded.

It's time you all took a stand.

I still recall the first mass murderer in the bell tower of a college. That shocked the nation. It also helped bring reform to the Mental Health System.

So, how many more will die as you all sit about twiddling your thumbs? Not just in school shootings, but under bridges from neglect, getting killed over a scrap of food or hearing voices telling them to do bad things.

We seem to have a Pedophile problem. To handle it we now ruin their lives forever, even if innocent, cast them onto the outskirts of society so they can barely live, treat them like dirt or the lowest form of scum and create laws which can get our kids branded as sex offenders.

Prior to this, pedophiles left their victims alive most of the time. After the tar and feather mentality spread, the majority started killing them to try and not get caught because of the consequences.

So clamping down so strictly was a good idea? Maybe trying to understand the drive that makes a pedophile do what they do, risking everything should be studied and, maybe a cure found.

Instead, we're ruining innocent lives and getting a lot of kids killed who, years back, would have survived, traumatized, but alive.

We once had about the best Mental Health System in the world. Now we're like number 20.

<b><u>Do something about it!</u></b>
2012-12-21 02:12:06 AM
1 votes:

Gyrfalcon: Is it that talking about mental illness is just too scary for people and you'd rather pretend it doesn't exist; or is it that you don't want to correct the problem because it might come a little too close to home?


I suspect it's more the fact that ANOTHER mother with a troubled son thinks it's just fine to keep guns in her house.
2012-12-20 11:22:01 PM
1 votes:

Gabrielmot: mrlewish: Genevieve Marie: This new trend of parents going on the record and exposing the confidential and highly sensitive medical information of their minor children does not sit well with me at all.

Why not? They are in charge of the minor and are in charge of all their medical decisions including the right to or not to talk about medical info.

Well, here's a scenario...

The kid *isn't* crazy. The parents are the ones who are batshiat insane. But either way, an international article with the kid's parents saying he's insane is going to make it pretty hard for him to get into a good school, or get a good job later in life isn't it?

I have a feeling we'll be seeing some easily won massive lawsuits from these kids for defamation of character against their parents in a few years.

/whether or not they are crazy.


Yes, there has been a worrying tendency in the past few days to equate "mental illness" with violence. The kid in the article suffers from some angry outbursts, and presumably anxiety and depression: emotional problems. These aren't the same as having a psychotic illness.

I sympathise with the person who said their sister with paranoid sz tried to drown their kid, but actually only a minority of people with schizophrenia are a danger to others like that. I did live with someone with very severe Paranoid Sz for a few years, who had a history of violence. What I noticed most in his case was that while he was living with me was the first time he had ever been ill and the people he was with didn't react by wanting him out of the house and in hospital asap. It was also the first time nobody got hurt. I had plenty of time to think about violence and mental illness while he was there - I guess the thing I noticed was that he had been stuck in a spiral of people expecting him to be violent and not listening to him and taking his emotions seriously. It seems this is much more likely with men or boys.

Calling for more controls over "mentally ill" people in general would probably hurt a lot of people who don't deserve it. In the UK at the moment we have new laws whereby people can be forcibly medicated in the community, which were originally brought in to deal with people with severe personality disorders - psychopaths, basically. What has actually happened is that a lot of completely harmless people are being forced to take medications that they don't want. If you think that sounds like a great idea, try a few months on one of the antipsychotics and see how you feel about it then.

Diagnoses of "bipolar" and "ADHD" seem particularly popular with american parents at the moment. I found this video recently which is about a project in California that was shut down after 23 years due to the state financial problems. Apparently they had 100% success with all the kids they treated. They seemed to credit their success on engagement with the kids - once the kids realised that they were listened to and taken seriously they improved. There is too much emphasis on medicalising these problems at the moment, and little serious research on behavioural methods.

Perhaps the system in America really does need to be improved for the sake of genuine psych patients who can't get admitted. But if you are looking for a magic solution to behavioural problems in a pill of any sort it just isn't going to happen. When people are locked up in secure hospitals for violent acts the main focus of their therapy is getting them to take responsibility for their actions. All meds can do is temporarily dope someone up so much that they can't really do anything much at all, and often the treatment that people get in psych hospitals makes their hostility and paranoia worse as well. It is always a BIG mistake for anyone's friends or relatives to think that once someone has been admitted they are "in the best place with people who will take care of them". Modern psych hospitals have very little time for people's innermost thoughts and feelings at all, and can be downright abusive.

Therapeutic means to stop over prescription of anti psychotic medications to children

This is a really big subject, much too big for a fark post. I just want to point out that a witch hunt on "mentally ill" people would probably wind up hurting a lot of people who don't deserve it.
2012-12-20 10:31:03 PM
1 votes:
In the midst of this forum where the concensus is that the mental health "system" is completely ineffective and broken, I would just like to put in a good word for it, and for the medications we have available, and for the range of care and institutions we have. Sure, things could be a lot better, but they have been much, much worse in the past.

There are a lot of broken people, there are a lot of people who can't function well in society, there are a lot of holes in "the system", there are a lot of meds that don't work as well as we wish they could, especially without the side effects.

BUT....there are a lot of people who are functioning well in society because we do have a lot of medications that are wonderful and effective. A huge proportion of people in our society are taking those medications, and while I don't think it's good that they're used to that extent, I believe that much of the overuse is due to caution, to people taking them who don't really need them. But, I'd rather too many people were taking them than not enough were getting them who need them. Many of those meds can literally save peoples' lives; that certainly has been the case for me, and I'm so grateful that I needed them when they were available, and not 10 or 20 or 50 years ago when they wouldn't have been there.

I also had potential access to a gun when I was in an extremely deep valley of depression, and I'm grateful that I told someone that I was worried that I might avail myself of that access; the therapist was able to remove me from the access, and so I did not end up killing myself.
2012-12-20 10:06:47 PM
1 votes:

TofuTheAlmighty: No, mental illness is a problem. As is the easy availability of firearms. The two are only tangentially related.

The harping about mental illness is driven by conservatives rationalizing their violent crime enablement and liberals polishing their nonpartisan bona fides.



Ummm, no. Mental health professionals have been screaming about the mental health problem ever since JFK was shot. (Long story there, you can look it up if you want.) The two issues are not even tangentially related, as gun control (i.e. legislation) is only effective on those willing to be legislated to. In other words there will always be readily available guns for those who want them. When I was 16 I made a shootable .22 out of wood, screws, and rubber bands. Hell, you can make them with 3D printers now. Mental health is and always has been the only issue. We know this because it is the only common element to exist in every mass murder in this country's history. (Arguments have been made for every mass murder in history, but such claims can obviously not be proven.) But the fact remains that mental illness is the only commonality, and it appears prominently in every single one. It can not, logically speaking, be anything else.
2012-12-20 09:42:22 PM
1 votes:

OscarTamerz: leadmetal: OscarTamerz: Mental illness isn't the problem, the fact that the ACLU brought a series of suits saying that you can't lock people up for just being crazy you have to prove that they are a threat to themselves or others. If the police had dropped by the Lanzas that morning before he shot his mother there is nothing they could have done to save her or the kids at that school.

You do understand how mental illness is traditionally been used? Family members who want another family member's stuff. Neighbor's and family members who don't like each other. Political opponents and dissidents. Then there is how a community just goes after unpopular and different people.

Yes, yes I do. Do you understand how mental illness works? People have demonstrable deficits in logic usually accompanied by auditory but not visual hallucinations. I'd much rather have a few people lose their walking around rights than everybody lose their 2nd amendment rights.


Deficit in logic? Means not sharing the same beliefs and perceptions as the majority of the population. A popular deficit in logic is not agreeing with the government. (which oddly enough disagreement with government usually happens when a person follows logic!) Hallucinations aren't required. The kid in this article isn't having hallucinations. He apparently gets extremely and uncontrollably and violently angry for no apparent reason. Furthermore what's a hallucination but a perception someone else doesn't share?

When the newest psychiatry manual comes out practically everyone will have some sort of mental illness. Why? Because it feeds a the therapeutic state. The alliance between government and "health care" for more and more profits.

Well, I for one am sick and tired of a bunch of farking conformists and collectivists who decide that they get to decide what "normal" is and then lock up or otherwise impair everyone who doesn't fit that mold. Oh, he doesn't have the same opinion as us, must be mental illness lock him up! He doesn't trust the government, mental illness! lock him up!

That's what "mental illness" is about. Getting rid of inconvenient people. The soviet union sent people to Siberia to help their mental illness. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Sov iet_Union

There's no such thing as "mental illness". An Illness is found with objective tests. There's a problem in the blood chemistry, there's a tumor in the brain, etc and so forth. Mental illness is subjective and that's what makes it useful to get rid of inconvenient people. It's also a useful place to dump patients whom doctors can't figure out what is wrong with them. Ever notice that many a physical disease is classified as "mental illness" until someone finally finds the physical problem?
2012-12-20 09:35:57 PM
1 votes:

OscarTamerz: Mental illness isn't the problem, the fact that the ACLU brought a series of suits saying that you can't lock people up for just being crazy you have to prove that they are a threat to themselves or others. If the police had dropped by the Lanzas that morning before he shot his mother there is nothing they could have done to save her or the kids at that school.


Bet you'd have a different opinion if you were locked up in this situation. Defining and identifying "Crazy" is subjective as it gets. Better none locked up than an innocent and undeserving person cast into such a nightmare. I can't believe people think there is a violence free utopia just waiting to be legislated for us.
2012-12-20 09:16:12 PM
1 votes:
Excellent rant, Azlefty

My $0.02:

Television. It radically distorts our perception of reality. It amplifies our fear and distrust for fellow citizens. Over and over TV takes exceptional occurrences and repeats it over and over until everybody thinks its a norm.

- People have been unjustly committed to asylums occasionally in the past, and TV has repeated these stories until everybody thinks it's far more common than it really is. So we can't get public support for committing people who really need it.

- So many movies and TV shows about evil government plots that millions of people get paranoid enough to stock up on guns and ammo. I'm a big supporter of the 2nd amendment, but I simply don't understand people buying guns with huge clips. Do they expect to fight a huge civil war? What gave them this idea?

- Violence in our society was actually more common in the US in the past, but TV hyping present day violence non-stop in news and fiction makes people think it's exploding out of control when it actually isn't

- According to TV, ALL Priests are kiddie diddlers, ALL businessmen are crooked, ALL teenagers wearing trenchcoats are mass shooters, ALL camping trips will be interrupted by bears, aliens, marauding motorcycle clubs (take your pick), etc.

Present day TV is slowly poisoning our society. Nobody trusts anybody anymore, so conditioned and overstimulated we've become by TV. I really wish we could turn off TV for a whole year, just to see if things calm down a bit.
2012-12-20 09:09:51 PM
1 votes:

syrynxx: What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?


He's 13, what are they supposed to do? There are no agencies for them to turn to and the public thinks they are crazy.

I'm all for letting all the non-violent drug offenders go free and having a place parents can turn too with crazy kids. Im also for then allowing them a drug detox program until they prove they aren't fit to live free.

Its obvious out nations approach to mental health and drugs is not working, let's correct that issue.
2012-12-20 09:07:39 PM
1 votes:

atomic-age: mgshamster: CygnusDarius: pxlboy: CygnusDarius: Maybe, just maybe, if Americans stop glorifying guns, and death, and combat, and the army, and focused more on the well-being of nation (both in body and in mind), it would be great.

Movies and video games are not the cause, they are the by-product of a recent embellishment of Death, while forsaking health.

Healthcare for the masses is bad, but killing brown people is good.

Sadly, this. Also, I can understand getting a handgun to protect yourself and those around you, I can understand getting a hunting rifle and a shotgun to hunt, but why the hell do you need an m-15, or hollow-points (ok, maybe this one might work against large game, like hogs)?.

And, by the same token, why the US keeps cutting funds on mental health?.

Re: m-16. Because it's fun to shoot at a range; at least, that's why my gun loving friends tell me.  It is fun to shoot bigger guns, though.

Re: mental health.  I have no clue to the full extent of it, and am by no means an expert, but it may have something to do with the fact that only a few generations ago (like my great-grandparents), being labeled with a mental health problem would ruin you.  And women would be put in mental health facilities just for going through menopause (that happened to my great-great-grandmother, my mother tells me). It's a stigma you do not want.  It's only recently, such as the past 20 years, that we're seeing a better acceptance of mental health.  Younger generations are ok with getting therapy when it's needed.  I hear lots of stuff on the news about helping soldiers with PTSD.  We're just now actually starting to bring it back to an acceptable level in our culture.  It still has a long way to go, but I believe we're on the path to recovery.

This does not address the fact that it's virtually impossible to get mental health care unless you are actively homicidal or suicidal, and even then it is hard to get the care you need.


Yeah, it was more addressing why we have such an aversion to it here.  Lots of older generations fear mental health, and want nothing to do with it, including funding it.
2012-12-20 09:06:19 PM
1 votes:

mgshamster: pxlboy: ProfessorOhki: pxlboy: Max Awesome: *your*

/sigh. When is FARK going to join the twenty first century and let us edit our mistakes?

Also this.

Just what we need, people being able to retroactively change their posts to claim "no, I never said that, see!?"

Fair enough. But if it's edited, there should be a mark or something prominent to show that the post was edited.

It's actually one of the things I like about Fark; that you can't go back and change what you said.


Good point. I suppose it is important to enshrine the most egregious examples of DERP on Fark for posterity. Unfortunately my posts have become a bit more incoherent since I recently started drinking whiskey. Yay whiskey!
 
I laughed too hard at this headline. We do need to start providing a safety net for families like these so they (or others) don't end up getting murdered by their own defective offspring. 
 
I know that loony-bins were closed decades ago for primarily economic reasons - and that there are horror-stories of people being committed against their will simply for being depressed or for being gay - but there are far too many mentally-ill homeless people who have nowhere to go and who simply can't care for themselves. That needs to change.
2012-12-20 09:04:15 PM
1 votes:

Azlefty: Rant On!

ENOUGH!  I AM TIRED OF THE SCREAMING FROM BOTH SIDES!

I am sick of the Right Screaming it is because we have taken God out of the Schools and Society, BS! If you are a true Christian you know where you faith is and resides and no it isn't having your snowflake say a prayer over the School PA system to show how "godly" they are.  Nor is it in insisting that YOUR FAITH be plastered all over the public square!  A very good friend of mine who is a Pastor told me, "If you have to tell people or make a spectacle to show them you are a Christian you are doing it wrong."

I am sick of the left blaming guns, a gun is inanimate object it is not good or evil, it does nothing until it is in the hands of a human. It is we humans that are the problem.

Now if you really give a damn about what happened then let's have a real discussion about this without the political posturing that has been going on

Let's start by looking at some facts about firearms

The Weapon types used have been around for over 100 years

The first semi auto "assault rifle" was the 1903 Mondragón Mexican battle rifle

The First magazine fed semi auto rifle was made by Winchester in 1905 , followed by  the  commercially successful Remington model 8 in 1906

The First Semi auto pistol was the c-93 Borchardt of 1893

The most popular semi auto pistol type is based on the 1911 Colt .45 ACP of -you guessed it- 1911

The first Hi Capacity magazine pistol was the Browning Hi Power of 1935

The "AR" type of Rifles such as the Bushmaster was introduced in 1963

In WW 1 the Axis powers used Machine Pistols and sub machine guns

In WW 2 Paratroopers were equipped with semi auto, collapsible stock hi capacity magazine fed M1 Carbines that also has a "pistol grip"

All of these weapons or variations of them were and are available on the Civilian Market for purchase, even the notorious "Chicago typewriter" the Thompson has been available in the semi auto version since before the 1934 gun control act that regulated the selec ...


/I tried to read your whole rant, but really, i lost consciousness after the first thousand words.
2012-12-20 08:57:40 PM
1 votes:
Also, I'm very uncomfortable seeing the dialogue about mental illness focus on protecting "normal" people from the mentally ill rather than focus on helping the mentally ill get the help they need.
2012-12-20 08:48:42 PM
1 votes:

spamdog: I really, really think you have your priorities backwards.
-Somebody- is going to have to start talking about this in order for it to be addressed.


You're making assumptions about my priorities that aren't totally accurate. I'm a big believer in reforming the mental health system. As a teenager, I suffered major depression and was diagnosed with several different things, including ADHD, and put on a lot of different medications. I came out of all of that treatment with a dependence on Adderall that it took a long time to shake and with a complete and total misdiagnosis.

As it turns out, I have a sleep disorder. For the last several years, the only medication I've had to take has been stuff to help me sleep, and I am completely and totally healthy otherwise. But when I was young? I was labelled as bipolar, as possibly as having "oppositional defiance" and I can't imagine what it would have done to my mental state to have my parents go on record as saying that I was a really bad kid. I wasn't- I was a really good kid that was basically constantly operating in a sleep deprived state.
 
Mental illness is incredibly complex and difficult to accurately diagnose and treat. This kid's parents probably are crying out for help, but they're doing it in a way that compromises their child's incredibly private medical information in a way that may result in him being unfairly labelled by those that know him for the rest of his life. That's a terrible thing to do, any way you look at it.

I understand these parents need help. I don't think talking to the media, particularly in this context, is an appropriate way  to try and obtain it.
2012-12-20 08:41:44 PM
1 votes:

Genevieve Marie: Also, the child is only 13. There's still time to work with him, and hopefully get him to a place where he's stable enough to lead some sort of independent life.


FTA:

But his parents said it takes too long to get help, and that drugs don't always help.

"We are running out of drugs to try, and he's only 13 years old," his mom said.

Insurance covered 20 of the 30 days at Pine Rest this year. Doctors want him to stay for 6 months, but at $1,000 or so a day, they can't afford it, they said.


I think these parents talking to the media about this is pretty much a cry for help. It's all very well and good to say that he could become a normal citizen, but the point of the parents talking to the media about it, is that he isn't getting the proper care that he needs in order for this to happen.

I really, really think you have your priorities backwards.
-Somebody- is going to have to start talking about this in order for it to be addressed.
2012-12-20 08:35:41 PM
1 votes:

pxlboy: ProfessorOhki: pxlboy: Max Awesome: *your*

/sigh. When is FARK going to join the twenty first century and let us edit our mistakes?

Also this.

Just what we need, people being able to retroactively change their posts to claim "no, I never said that, see!?"

Fair enough. But if it's edited, there should be a mark or something prominent to show that the post was edited.


It's actually one of the things I like about Fark; that you can't go back and change what you said.
2012-12-20 08:34:00 PM
1 votes:

ProfessorOhki: pxlboy: Max Awesome: *your*

/sigh. When is FARK going to join the twenty first century and let us edit our mistakes?

Also this.

Just what we need, people being able to retroactively change their posts to claim "no, I never said that, see!?"


Fair enough. But if it's edited, there should be a mark or something prominent to show that the post was edited.
2012-12-20 08:32:00 PM
1 votes:

pxlboy: Max Awesome: *your*

/sigh. When is FARK going to join the twenty first century and let us edit our mistakes?

Also this.


Just what we need, people being able to retroactively change their posts to claim "no, I never said that, see!?"
2012-12-20 08:26:30 PM
1 votes:
*your*
 
/sigh. When is FARK going to join the twenty first century and let us edit our mistakes?
2012-12-20 08:21:25 PM
1 votes:
So when the kid did something odd at young age they put him into the hands of the licensed doctors and those doctors started drugging the kid and he got worse. One could say the medical system is broken. This family is likely another victim of the medical cartel.

OscarTamerz: Mental illness isn't the problem, the fact that the ACLU brought a series of suits saying that you can't lock people up for just being crazy you have to prove that they are a threat to themselves or others. If the police had dropped by the Lanzas that morning before he shot his mother there is nothing they could have done to save her or the kids at that school.


You do understand how mental illness is traditionally been used? Family members who want another family member's stuff. Neighbor's and family members who don't like each other. Political opponents and dissidents. Then there is how a community just goes after unpopular and different people.

Dr. Thomas Szasz
2012-12-20 08:16:44 PM
1 votes:

pxlboy: CygnusDarius: Maybe, just maybe, if Americans stop glorifying guns, and death, and combat, and the army, and focused more on the well-being of nation (both in body and in mind), it would be great.

Movies and video games are not the cause, they are the by-product of a recent embellishment of Death, while forsaking health.

Healthcare for the masses is bad, but killing brown people is good.


Sadly, this. Also, I can understand getting a handgun to protect yourself and those around you, I can understand getting a hunting rifle and a shotgun to hunt, but why the hell do you need an m-15, or hollow-points (ok, maybe this one might work against large game, like hogs)?.

And, by the same token, why the US keeps cutting funds on mental health?.
2012-12-20 08:12:58 PM
1 votes:

shower_in_my_socks: There have always been crazy people, and there will always be crazy people. There is no simple " to improve mental healthcare. The real problem here is "crazy got a gun." If this dipshiat had been armed with a kitchen knife or some shiatty "bombs" of the type that the Columbine @ssholes tried unsuccessfully to use, there wouldn't be 20 dead 6 year-olds in Newtown a week before Christmas. The guns are the problem, and everyone who isn't a biased gun nut can see it. The only question is what to do about it.

And if you have a crazy person in your house, you should not have any guns. Even in a safe, kids are crafty. I knew quite a few kids growing up who knew how to get into the family safe, and their parents had no farking clue. The fact that this wacko's mom TRAINED HIM to use a gun is so impossibly stupid (but legal! yay America!).


The worst school "shooting" happened in the 1920s, and it was a maniac who blew up a school using a bomb. And, that assault weapon in the newtown shooting? It was locked in his car, un-used. He shot people with something no reasonable gun law would have prevented.

Don't write when you've given up all your freedoms in the name of temporary safety.
2012-12-20 08:12:30 PM
1 votes:
Maybe, just maybe, if Americans stop glorifying guns, and death, and combat, and the army, and focused more on the well-being of nation (both in body and in mind), it would be great.

Movies and video games are not the cause, they are the by-product of a recent embellishment of Death, while forsaking health.
2012-12-20 08:12:16 PM
1 votes:
Mental illness must be epidemic in the US. Is it a symptom or cause of the insatiable need for guns?
2012-12-20 08:08:00 PM
1 votes:
Welcome to the ugly underbelly of mental health care in America.

Pretty much yes...if you can't fork over the $1000 per day to keep your teenaged danger to society in a place where he can get the treatment he needs, you are forced to keep him in your home essentially without treatment or turn him out on the streets.

This couple is living a nightmare. And the government thinks that taking the guns out of this house is going to prevent this kid from killing his parents. WTF?
2012-12-20 08:07:02 PM
1 votes:

Indubitably: Look in a mirror first, then look at them.


This requires personal responsibility. A trait that, sadly, has become a lost art.
2012-12-20 08:06:37 PM
1 votes:

syrynxx: What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?

They have rigged their bedroom door to make noise when it's opened, for fear their mentally ill son will try to kill them in their sleep.


Off hand, it's time he was institutionalized...ok, past time he was institutionalized.
2012-12-20 08:06:10 PM
1 votes:

Prank Call of Cthulhu: syrynxx: What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?

Put a pillow over his head and smother him in his sleep.

Seriously. Even animals know what to do when they have defective young.


' "At the age of 6, he had a suicide plan," she said. ' It's depressing to think about, but there could very well be a long-developed reason why so many illness have suicidal tendencies as a symptom.
2012-12-20 08:04:07 PM
1 votes:

Genevieve Marie: This new trend of parents going on the record and exposing the confidential and highly sensitive medical information of their minor children does not sit well with me at all.


They're allowed to, though, aren't they?  Just like they can release information about themselves, they can also release information about their kids.  Parents are the ones who give consent for medical procedures and transfer of medical records from one hospital to the next, so why can't they talk about them publicly, too?
 
/Not saying they should
2012-12-20 08:04:01 PM
1 votes:

mc_madness: syrynxx: What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?

Euthanize him for the greater good.


3.bp.blogspot.com

The Greater Good
2012-12-20 08:03:05 PM
1 votes:

Prank Call of Cthulhu: syrynxx: What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?

Put a pillow over his head and smother him in his sleep.

Seriously. Even animals know what to do when they have defective young.


My cat ate hers.
2012-12-20 08:01:59 PM
1 votes:

spamdog: But then I'd have to pay more taxes and I'd rather schools got shot up than pay more taxes.


With less students to teach, your taxes should go down. It's nice that someone has the nerve to cull the herd every once in a while.

/window seat.
2012-12-20 07:58:42 PM
1 votes:
Somebody please explain to me how she's mistaken.
2012-12-20 07:57:22 PM
1 votes:
Look in a mirror first, then look at them.
2012-12-20 07:57:15 PM
1 votes:
Left out the part where they're in a safe. If the 13 year old is intent upon killing them, I expect cracking the safe would not be the path of least resistance.
2012-12-20 07:55:47 PM
1 votes:

syrynxx: What do you do with a child like that?  Do nothing until he snaps and kills someone?


Easy. He's coming right for us!

i98.photobucket.com
 
Displayed 62 of 62 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report