Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Sun)   Smoking hot 24-year-old twins are teaching assistants by day, pro wrestlers by night (with 'you would bodyslam it' pics)   (thesun.co.uk ) divider line 143
    More: Spiffy, professional wrestled, teaching assistant, Stockport  
•       •       •

38751 clicks; posted to Main » on 20 Dec 2012 at 5:56 AM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



143 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-20 09:22:30 AM  
I don't know what everyone is complaining about. Two 6s are greater than one 10.
 
2012-12-20 09:27:40 AM  

bark_atda_moon: I don't know what everyone is complaining about. Two 6s are greater than one 10.


ugh, there's a guy that shows up to some parties I attend and he has the same line of thinking, there's usually 3-4 2's and 3's hanging around. Him and his son share them apparently, it's just creepy
 
2012-12-20 09:34:19 AM  
Smoking hot 24-year-old twins are teaching assistants by day, pro wrestlers by night (with 'you would bodyslam it' pics)

You don't seem to understand how this game works Subby: "Smoking hot" should either be the truth (rare) or in the main should be a completely opposite-day kind of a thing with the eye burning Goodyear Blimp kind of pics.

Thanks.
 
2012-12-20 09:35:25 AM  
For the love of god, is the obesity problem so bad that "not fat" = "smoking hot".

I'm convinced that, as a result of all the fatties out there, that the two concepts have been irreversibly conflated.
 
2012-12-20 09:38:48 AM  
Subby is either a very, not let me repeat that a VERY horny Brit or has an endless supply of compazine......

oh Jesus, gag me with a spoon
 
2012-12-20 09:39:12 AM  
They could tag team me any time.

/ A little puffy around the eyes, but as a pale nerd with glasses and big purple streaks under my eyes I won't fault them for that.
 
2012-12-20 09:39:26 AM  
Considering what we usually find when the words "smoking hot" appear in a link to a UK site, I'm pleasantly surprised.
 
2012-12-20 09:52:01 AM  

Girion47: bark_atda_moon: I don't know what everyone is complaining about. Two 6s are greater than one 10.

ugh, there's a guy that shows up to some parties I attend and he has the same line of thinking, there's usually 3-4 2's and 3's hanging around. Him and his son share them apparently, it's just creepy


The sharing with his son is rather creepy. I will say you can't fault a guy for not wanting to go home alone. My friend, who will go home with anything, is known as "The Catfish".
 
2012-12-20 09:58:20 AM  
i50.tinypic.com

You want to have a successful harvest this year, right? Of course you do.
 
2012-12-20 09:58:27 AM  

MyRandomName: Can always tell which subby can't get laid. Cute at best, not hot.


You can also tell which Farker can't get laid, they say dumb shiat like this :)
 
2012-12-20 10:01:54 AM  
How is this okay for a teaching assistant but making pornos is not?
 
2012-12-20 10:08:25 AM  
Perhaps if they didn't have day & night jobs they wouldn't have massive undereye bags. But the real hotness... their teeth are incredibly UNrotten! It's a British teeth miracle!
 
2012-12-20 10:14:08 AM  
Did some searches for "Twins with camel toe" images to lighten up the party here. Found one or two that were so-so, but not really worthy of Farkers. I did find other very interesting images though, so I'll have to come back later. I have more "research" to do.
 
2012-12-20 10:25:05 AM  

dr.zaeus: For the love of god, is the obesity problem so bad that "not fat" = "smoking hot".

I'm convinced that, as a result of all the fatties out there, that the two concepts have been irreversibly conflated.


What gets me is that they look like different women in every picture. I don't think that I'd confuse the cute and perky TAs with the not-bad gym rats nor the tarted-up wrestlers as the same people ever. They're British cute, maybe with some solid slumber they could be Page 3 material.

Has anyone else been to the Sun's Page 3 online tool? NSFW but strictly photos of topless women in panties that you can rotate 360 degrees so not too damning in your browser history and there's a variety of body shapes.
 
2012-12-20 10:27:52 AM  
glasgowuniversityabroad1112.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-12-20 10:33:20 AM  
I would say smoking hot, but yeah I certainly would.
 
2012-12-20 10:33:22 AM  
I don't know if i am just lucky, spoiled, good looking enough to date certain types of women, all of the above, modest, handsome, really picky or what.. but those women are NOT attractive to me at all.

Some of you people, hell.. a LOT of you people have low standards. YOU'RE BETTER THAN THIS!!
 
2012-12-20 10:37:01 AM  
"Well Brain?"

"I dunno Monsoon, they look a little like Davey Boy Smith and the Dynamite Kid."

"You're correct there, Brain"

"NOW I didn't say that was a bad thing!"

(Monsoon slowly raises eyebrows)
 
2012-12-20 10:38:30 AM  
"So are they 'smoking hot' Brain?"

"Why, has someone tried to set them on fire?"
 
2012-12-20 10:39:18 AM  
I'll take one of her over two of them any day. USA USA USA!!!

blog.zap2it.com

img.mixedmartialarts.com

cdn.ientry.com
 
2012-12-20 10:46:25 AM  

skinink: Do you Farkers even have the chance to reproduce? Those women are okay. No they aren't Miss Universe but they aren't the Faces of Meth either.


But that's the point then, isn't it? 
Do you think that they are "smoking hot"?
 
2012-12-20 11:22:53 AM  
Give me a couple fingers of rum and I'll sodomize them
 
2012-12-20 11:31:34 AM  

Smeggy Smurf: Give me a couple fingers of rum and I'll sodomize them


sure having fingers in your bum will make it feel better.. but why would you need that?
 
2012-12-20 11:34:01 AM  

SilentStrider: Apos: *scans headline*

Nice try, subby. Not falling for it.


[media.tumblr.com image 500x375]

 fall for it. they're attractive

/not subby


"Cute", absolutely. "Smoking Hot," even "Regular Hot," no.

//all judgy
 
2012-12-20 11:42:56 AM  

Dr.Knockboots: I don't know if i am just lucky, spoiled, good looking enough to date certain types of women, all of the above, modest, handsome, really picky or what.. but those women are NOT attractive to me at all.

Some of you people, hell.. a LOT of you people have low standards. YOU'RE BETTER THAN THIS!!


People who feel the need to make sure everyone knows they date hot chicks tend not to.
 
I cannot help but think that when people here say 'meh', what they mean to say is "I fap to better" NOT "I can do better"
 
2012-12-20 11:44:52 AM  

NuttierThanEver: British hot


Came here to say this...leaving satisfied.
 
2012-12-20 11:51:56 AM  

Smeggy Smurf: Give me a couple fingers of rum and I'll sodomize them

 
And how much rum will it take for them to allow you touch them?
 
2012-12-20 12:11:40 PM  
As I post this comment, I see no remarks on the company they're trying to join.

I feel alone.
 
2012-12-20 12:35:58 PM  

Thraeryn: As I post this comment, I see no remarks on the company they're trying to join.

I feel alone.


No, I saw that...they are WRESTLERS, and they want to wrestle...they're really not into being sports entertainers.  That is, until Senile Vince offers them a downside contract about $250K, and they each wrestle one 3 minute match every other months.
 
2012-12-20 12:43:35 PM  
Looks like they might actually be able to wrestle. This of course means Vince will never sign them.
 
2012-12-20 12:54:27 PM  

heinrich66: Having been burned too many times by FARK's daily 'smoking hot' hoax, I refuse to even click on the link.


Pussy.
 
2012-12-20 01:02:29 PM  
British women tend to look horsey.
 
2012-12-20 01:06:31 PM  

Abe Vigoda's Ghost: Smeggy Smurf: Give me a couple fingers of rum and I'll sodomize them

And how much rum will it take for them to allow you touch them?


Not much. Broads like smurfs. We're cute and cuddly and full of smurfy goodness
 
2012-12-20 01:33:54 PM  

tinfoil-hat maggie: Meh, I prefer roller derby girls over wrestlers ; )
[farm6.staticflickr.com image 427x640]
/Nice try Sun ; )

 
Good god... Lulu Lockjaw.  She used to scream at me every single time I blew a major on her.  I do not miss reffing that.
 
2012-12-20 02:36:04 PM  
If they asked if I was looking at their breasts, my immediate response would be "please don't kill me. But yes."
 
2012-12-20 03:55:30 PM  
I'd slam it like it was Andre the Giant at Wrestlemania III
 
2012-12-20 03:55:35 PM  
They're okay.
 
2012-12-20 05:54:41 PM  
Nothing looks sexier on a girl, than another girl.
 
2012-12-20 07:58:39 PM  
Girion47: I'd hit it, but they do have the british incest face going.

God DAMN but that's funny... full point.
 
2012-12-20 11:37:35 PM  
Oh hells yes I would...

I know it's fake, and I started laughing at the moves being shown in that video, but they look oh so much better when it's women doing those moves, flips, and throws than any guy wrestler I've ever seen...

I suddenly wished I was John Candy's character in Stripes, for that mud wrestling scene, with those 2 instead... Ah, wishes...
 
2012-12-21 02:11:32 PM  
Even I am a better technical wrestler than these broads.
 
2012-12-21 02:27:49 PM  

John Cena: Even I am a better technical wrestler than these broads.


No one in WWE is better than those broads. As a lifelong wrestling fan who skipped wwe for a long time, I watched several tortuous nights of it on USA this past week. The shiat is unwatchable. Is it the stupid characters? nah, they've been dumber. Is it the stupid storylines? Nah, and I was pleasantly surprised to see the return of 'stables' so to speak (i.e. The Shield).

Why does it suck? They've watered the product down so much...they work so damn safe that the moves are not only all similar (is there a guy who DOESNT finish with some sort of firemans carry?) but they are totally unbelievable. That shiat wouldnt hurt anybody...and it doesnt look like it could, either.
 
2012-12-21 04:37:53 PM  

Madbassist1: John Cena: Even I am a better technical wrestler than these broads.

No one in WWE is better than those broads. As a lifelong wrestling fan who skipped wwe for a long time, I watched several tortuous nights of it on USA this past week. The shiat is unwatchable. Is it the stupid characters? nah, they've been dumber. Is it the stupid storylines? Nah, and I was pleasantly surprised to see the return of 'stables' so to speak (i.e. The Shield).

Why does it suck? They've watered the product down so much...they work so damn safe that the moves are not only all similar (is there a guy who DOESNT finish with some sort of firemans carry?) but they are totally unbelievable. That shiat wouldnt hurt anybody...and it doesnt look like it could, either.


THIS
I'd rather watch Lufisto or Rachel Summerlyn wrestle stuffed toys than watch the latest collection of WWE Battle Barbies going at it.
 
Displayed 43 of 143 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report