who is more stupid, the actress that makes a stupid joke, or the submitter who interprets the stupid joke as a legitimate concern of the stupid actress?

As she has not responded to my letter assuring her that the only way to prevent the Mayan Apocalypse is by allowing me to flail around atop her for (possibly up to) nine seconds before I collapse into a tearful apology perhaps she's more astute that it would seem.

Mr. Coffee Nerves: As she has not responded to my letter assuring her that the only way to prevent the Mayan Apocalypse is by allowing me to flail around atop her for (possibly up to) nine seconds before I collapse into a tearful apology perhaps she's more astute that it would seem.


or she can't read

I don't even like megan fox but you can go fark yourself submitter

VERY weak sauce, submitter.

To everyone calling submitter stupid for taking her words literally, remember this: She had to have either read the Twilight books or saw the movies to make that reference. Either of these actions can qualify as stupid.

scottydoesntknow: To everyone calling submitter stupid for taking her words literally, remember this: She had to have either read the Twilight books or saw the movies to make that reference. Either of these actions can qualify as stupid.


Bullshiat.  I haven't seen the movies or read the books and I know there was some weird birth of a vampire baby or something.

scottydoesntknow: She had to have either read the Twilight books or saw the movies to make that reference.


Yes, scottydoesntknow is exactly as stupid as you always thought he was

I don't care what my fellow farkers think...I'd hit that like a fist of an angry god.  She doesn't have to be smart, she's hot...
 
/will anxiously await Studman69 comments

scottydoesntknow: To everyone calling submitter stupid for taking her words literally, remember this: She had to have either read the Twilight books or saw the movies to make that reference. Either of these actions can qualify as stupid.


Or she has a publicist that writes "banter" for her.

AdolfOliverPanties: scottydoesntknow: To everyone calling submitter stupid for taking her words literally, remember this: She had to have either read the Twilight books or saw the movies to make that reference. Either of these actions can qualify as stupid.
 
 
Bullshiat.  I haven't seen the movies or read the books and I know there was some weird birth of a vampire baby or something.
 
 
So you reference stuff without having read or watched it? I find it hard to believe that she did not see those movies (or read the books), yet chose to make a specific reference without any provocation.

Krieghund: scottydoesntknow: To everyone calling submitter stupid for taking her words literally, remember this: She had to have either read the Twilight books or saw the movies to make that reference. Either of these actions can qualify as stupid.


Or she has a publicist that writes "banter" for her.

I don't even think it's a publicist. I remember hearing once (but I could be misremembering) that many of the actors that make the rounds on talk shows to pimp tv/movies/etc. are so dull in real life that there are services that will write stories for them to talk about on the shows.

<img src="http://www.meganfoxfans.co.uk/celebrity/photos/853_megan-fox-as-s upergirl-megan-fox-supergirl-824755918.jpg">

<p>Um, who cares if she's too dumb to tie her own shoes? </p>

I put it down to her hormone unbalance during pregnancy. Women say and do the craziest shiat.

scottydoesntknow: So you reference stuff without having read or watched it? I find it hard to believe that she did not see those movies (or read the books), yet chose to make a specific reference without any provocation.


Oh shut up.  If you've read any of the hundreds of Kristen Stewart threads on Fark, or have ever seen TMZ.com, or any of the myriad "stars" from the movies, or seen some of them on The Daily Show or other talk shows there is a distinct possibility that you find out that Kristen Stewart's character gives birth to Robert Pattinson's baby in the story somewhere.  I think the werewolf dude even has a hard on for the baby or some such shiat.  This is not some unknown secret from deep inside the books or films (again, which I've not read or seen.)
 
So stop acting like you are superior or entertainment-ally pure because you aren't aware of these things (or are pretending to be unaware of them.)

scottydoesntknow: AdolfOliverPanties: scottydoesntknow: To everyone calling submitter stupid for taking her words literally, remember this: She had to have either read the Twilight books or saw the movies to make that reference. Either of these actions can qualify as stupid.
 
 
Bullshiat.  I haven't seen the movies or read the books and I know there was some weird birth of a vampire baby or something.
 
 
So you reference stuff without having read or watched it? I find it hard to believe that she did not see those movies (or read the books), yet chose to make a specific reference without any provocation.

Hi Scotty! It's always good to see new Farkers around here. You'll learn really, really, really fast - if you haven't already - that it's one of the main policies on Fark to make comments about things we've never seen nor read. Typically this is a very direct and intentional ignorance about the article in question; unless it has boobies in it, most Farkers read the thread, make some stupid comments, then read the article and spend the next 10 posts trying to make it seem like we actually read the article and our Weeners is actually quite smart. We tend to do this for quite a few other things - at the best of times, we'll look at Wikipedia (or Conservapedia, or on rare occasions Wookiepedia) and quote something off there, but that's the normal extent of our actual knowledge on the subject.
 
Not to worry if you actually attempt to read things or watch things that you want to reference, though - that's a habit you'll get out of after the fifth or sixth time you quote something directly from the source and another Farker calls shenanigans on you, with most of the thread backing up the ignorant farker. That's how we roll around here, and man, it's fun sometimes.
 
Once again, Welcome To Fark!
 

thomps: who is more stupid, the actress that makes a stupid joke, or the submitter who interprets the stupid joke as a legitimate concern of the stupid actress?


 

I give the headline toe thumbs up!

slayer199: She doesn't have to be smart, she's hot


Not smart isn't hot.  Sorry.

Mrs.Sharpier: I don't know what part of the article, other than the 'getting old' comment she made, that seemed to come across as stupid. She was describing her pregnancy, what's the big deal?


a photo of submitter:
 

Pregnant woman is crazy. News at 11!

slayer199: I don't care what my fellow farkers think...I'd hit that like a fist of an angry god.  She doesn't have to be smart, she's hot...
 
/will anxiously await Studman69 comments

I wouldn't fark her with Studman69's dick. I'd use my own.

Better to remain silent and appear a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

"I would do things with my cell phone like I would go to get the juice out of the refrigerator and I would leave my phone"
 
Damnit, I wish the Cosby Show had more scene specific image files floating around

wee: slayer199: She doesn't have to be smart, she's hot


Not smart isn't hot.  Sorry.

You know what's more repulsive than not smart? Fake smart.