If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo) NewsFlash Susan Rice withdraws her name from consideration for Secretary of State. Is Benghazi a scandal yet?   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 53
    More: NewsFlash, Susan Rice, Republican Sen, Janet Napolitano, obama, Yahoo News, Malia, CFR, Member states of the United Nations  
•       •       •

1468 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Dec 2012 at 5:20 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»


Want to get NewsFlash notifications in email?

Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-12-13 04:32:17 PM  
8 votes:
Obama should do something like appoint her WH Chief of Staff. Make the Republicans go through her if they want to talk to the President.
2012-12-13 06:36:36 PM  
6 votes:
i.imgur.com
2012-12-13 04:48:21 PM  
6 votes:
Jackson Herring: I think this means Sarah Palin gets to fart on Obama's tongue for 10-15 minutes

.
Well, it was a mistake for Obongo to nominate in the first place a woman who, based on what I read on my favorite conservative websites, walked into the Libyan Embassy and massacred the staff while sporting a Pam Grier-style afro. You get what you deserve in life, that's what Jesus said
2012-12-13 08:35:34 PM  
4 votes:
images.politico.com
"Yeah, but what should we do when we are attacked? Pull together, stand united and find the culprits, right?"


www.nydailynews.com
"That sounds like hard work.
Let's just shoot the messenger."


l.yimg.com
"Yes, besides this is like the only card in our deck right now. We could really use one of those senate seats the vast majority of the American public decided to refuse us. Let's shoot the messenger."


i.i.com.com
"You can't be serious?! This is America, we are the most powerful nation on earth. We shouldn't be making political hamburger out of our valuable assets. This is petty and wrong and a complete distraction from real issues."

"You're senior Senators for God's sake. Surely you have more important battles to fight???"



www.slate.com
2012-12-13 06:40:15 PM  
4 votes:

FlashHarry: that's a shame. she had ZERO to do with the benghazi attack. she gave talking points dictated to her by the CIA. this is her only crime. would john mccain and lindsay graham have gone against the CIA were they in her position?


She didn't challenge the information the CIA gave her. That is not leadership. When Bush was told by the CIA that Osama Bin Laden was targeting the US he didn't just roll-over and accept it. When the CIA told Bush that they didn't have anything reliable showing WMD's in Iraq, he challenged it until he got the answers he wanted. That's leadership.
2012-12-13 05:26:09 PM  
4 votes:

Marcus Aurelius: halfof33: The claim that it arose out of a protest at the Embassy was pure bullshiat, and they should have known better.

I believe you made that claim in the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this.

Or am I mistaken?


I think you missed a thread.
2012-12-13 04:41:12 PM  
4 votes:
I think this means Sarah Palin gets to fart on Obama's tongue for 10-15 minutes
2012-12-14 02:36:56 AM  
3 votes:

cameroncrazy1984: Brian Ryanberger: Raharu: Hey Brian, would you describe yourself as a log cabin republican?

I should have learned to expect you to attack me sexually and I don't care I actually like it that was because it lets everybody see who we both really are when you come at me with the sex.

We already have a Meow Said the Dog

Try again later.


Who is this individual upon which is doing the trolling of the Susan Rice thread? I am someone who has the support of this woman and do not know what Brian Ryanberger is making the attempt of. I wish he would stop this however as it is not the polite thing. Also I did not order the truth but instead did the ordering of the turkey sandwich on wheat bread. You are welcome for this.
2012-12-13 06:25:41 PM  
3 votes:

halfof33: But remember folks, I'm the bad guy!


No, you're just a dumb guy. Fark is probably not the best place to think you have an engaging hero arc.
2012-12-13 05:36:47 PM  
3 votes:
The obvious replacement:

i.i.com.com
2012-12-13 05:20:42 PM  
3 votes:

halfof33: The claim that it arose out of a protest at the Embassy was pure bullshiat, and they should have known better.


I believe you made that claim in the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this.

Or am I mistaken?
2012-12-13 07:19:48 PM  
2 votes:

The Jami Turman Fan Club: Silly Jesus: The Jami Turman Fan Club: Silly Jesus:IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes ...

Lol 9/10. Subject was in the first paragraph though.

Sure, in the same way that...

I strongly condemn the outrageous attack on our diplomatic facility in Benghazi, which took the lives of four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. Right now, the American people have the families of those we lost in our thoughts and prayers. They exemplified America's commitment to freedom, justice, and partnership with nations and people around the globe, and stand in stark contrast to those who callously took their lives.

mentions Benghazi. The Declaration of Independence does not mention splitting from England or a new country until the last paragraph, and the Benghazi speech does not mention the act of terror until near the end.

Sorry, mod alt. You lose.


I would also like to point out that "Benghazi" is not in the Constitution even ONCE. If it was important, don't you think the Founding Fathers would have mentioned it, at least in passing?
2012-12-13 06:12:35 PM  
2 votes:
I found that poor chicken!

www.chillhour.com
2012-12-13 06:04:11 PM  
2 votes:

BalugaJoe: She lied to everyone on TV.


There are a LOT of people on TV. Are you sure she lied to ALL of them?
2012-12-13 05:37:18 PM  
2 votes:

Lt. Cheese Weasel: It's not a scandal subby. It's a national disgrace.


He said with an erection
2012-12-13 05:22:18 PM  
2 votes:

ToxicMunkee: Well what the hell is McCain going to shake his fist at now?


The hippety hop music that kids like nowadays?
2012-12-13 04:34:37 PM  
2 votes:
Need a new SecState? Why not Zoidberg?
2012-12-14 09:03:19 AM  
1 votes:

beta_plus: EyeballKid: The GOP's trophies, since 2009:

[assets.nydailynews.com image 240x347]
[www.americanprogress.org image 200x279]
[media.washtimes.com image 229x286]

...but don't you dare call them racist.

Your tears of impotent liberal race card rage, so sweet, so delicious!

/blatantly lying about the 1st Amendment causing the death of an Ambassador when it was actually a planned terrorist attack has consequences


Are you forgetting who lost the election? impotent rage? Hilarious, victorious rage, I think you mean.

And......your second sentence. What in the everloving fark does that even mean?
2012-12-14 05:30:03 AM  
1 votes:

Raharu: Goodfella: Witch hunt was successful.

Republicans must be proud of themselves.

I'm sure it's circle jerks all around the GOP right now.




www.palzoo.net


"You farking people... you have no idea how to defend a nation. All you did was weaken a country today, McCain. That's all you did. You put people's lives in danger. Sweet dreams, son. "
2012-12-14 02:44:43 AM  
1 votes:

Brian Ryanberger: And now you attack the way I talk. Making fun of people is the liberal way.


Listen to me very much if you do not wish to say the nice thing of Mrs. Susan the Rice then try to not make any saying at all because I believe this is the honest woman who was doing the sayofing what was known of she by the administration. If you have the questions then perhaps you are one who is willing to make the payments for the independent investigation of this. Perhaps you could try the simulation with the G.I. Joe toys...ahem, collectibles...of you and see if you can come to the conclusion. Or you can maybe you can just admit you are the individual who has wrongness and is also the person who wishes for the trolling of threads. I am thinking you might be the alternative of the other poster but would appreciate if you could see this from two sides as I am also one who does this and both of these sides are saying that Susan who graduated from Rice University is the perfect candidate for the office of Secretary of Treasury to take the place of Timothy Geithner.
2012-12-14 02:35:41 AM  
1 votes:

Brian Ryanberger: Raharu: Hey Brian, would you describe yourself as a log cabin republican?

I should have learned to expect you to attack me sexually and I don't care I actually like it that was because it lets everybody see who we both really are when you come at me with the sex.


You are the last person I would come at with sex.

No I was only wondering if my google-fu came up with a correct hit on a popular social media site.
2012-12-14 02:26:35 AM  
1 votes:
Hey Brian, would you describe yourself as a log cabin republican?
2012-12-14 02:15:34 AM  
1 votes:

Brian Ryanberger: I like how the liberals here go on and on arguing things long since settled as in Susan Rice was told to lie. The real scandal should be focused on the racial brinksmanship Obama plays with making appointments for people like Susan Rice because he knows he can't lose. Obama will make sure anyone brave enough to question him will be called a racist and they lose or else they have to let it slide in and then Obama wins. Obama always wins when it comes to these racial wars.


You are right about that Obama always wins.

Oh hey I know! There is a handy way you can remind yourself of that... A lot of our other OLDER political tab trolls use it..

Replace the O in Obamas name with a zero, like this.

0bama, rather then Obama.

It will remind you of how many times he's lost an election to republicans, or the number of times that he lied about Benghazi, or the number of times in which Benghazi was a scandal.

I hope that helps, you being new and all.
2012-12-14 02:06:33 AM  
1 votes:
Does this mean we get the sweet, sweet goodness of Scott Brown losing all over again? I bet Markey can spank Brown twice as hard as Warren did.
2012-12-13 11:34:11 PM  
1 votes:

Aar1012: The obvious replacement? Mitt Romney


who?
2012-12-13 07:34:16 PM  
1 votes:
Ah Republicans. All that energy spent and on what? She wasn't even nominated yet. So now you look more petty and yet you've gained what?
2012-12-13 07:04:48 PM  
1 votes:

Silly Jesus: Keizer_Ghidorah: Silly Jesus: Keizer_Ghidorah: Silly Jesus: biyaaatci: Silly Jesus: He didn't call it that.

I am really sick of your lies.

He said it once in the tenth paragraph of a twelve paragraph statement and in the most vague of terms. It's a bit of a stretch to construe that as him calling this specific attack a terrorist attack rather than summing up our general views at a nation.

"An act of terror" is the most vague way to refer to it? And halfof33 rants about ME being the one who spins and fibs.

If you were addressing the nation about a terrorist attack that just occurred, and your speech was 12 paragraphs long, would you put the one and only mention of terror in the tenth paragraph? It's sort of the topic. That's how you learn to write papers in the second grade. You open with the topic. It was a throw away line toward the end of a fluff piece.

What should he have done? Screamed "TERRORISTS! AMERICANS DEAD! TERRORISTS! GOD IS ANGRY!" every other line? He farking called the attacks an act of terror, and you're upset that he didn't do it until near the end instead of where you think he should have.

I'm saying that it was a vague throw away line stating our general views as a nation. He wasn't calling it an act of terror.

As I asked another person...under what circumstances would you put the only mention of the topic of your speech in the 10th of 12 paragraphs? This isn't kindergarten. He has educated speech writers. It clearly wasn't the topic of his speech.


IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. - Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. - And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
2012-12-13 07:00:35 PM  
1 votes:
Wow. I finally hit "ignore" on one silly guy, and the comment count drops by fifty.

ah, refreshed.
2012-12-13 06:53:48 PM  
1 votes:

propasaurus: Obama should do something like appoint her WH Chief of Staff. Make the Republicans go through her if they want to talk to the President.


affordablehousinginstitute.org
Trolololo. This needs to happen.
2012-12-13 06:47:54 PM  
1 votes:
Nominate John McCain.

Confirmation!

Fire him on his first day.
2012-12-13 06:43:23 PM  
1 votes:
Obama should nominate Valerie Plame. :)
2012-12-13 06:41:58 PM  
1 votes:

Serious Post on Serious Thread: Silly Jesus: Serious Post on Serious Thread: Silly Jesus: There are consequences for your actions. Adults understand this.

You mean like GOP acts of douchiness having the consequence the entire political party being curb stomped in a national election?

The idiots talking about rape and abortion did that.

So you're saying the idiots talking about rape & abortion weren't Republicans committing acts of douchiness?


I thought you were specifically referring to the Benghazi thing. Sorry for reading your words in context. I won't make that mistake again.
2012-12-13 06:37:27 PM  
1 votes:

biyaaatci: Silly Jesus: He didn't call it that.

I am really sick of your lies.


He said it once in the tenth paragraph of a twelve paragraph statement and in the most vague of terms. It's a bit of a stretch to construe that as him calling this specific attack a terrorist attack rather than summing up our general views at a nation.
2012-12-13 06:25:09 PM  
1 votes:
The GOP would happily confirm one of these Democrats for SoS. Can you guess which one?

www.theblaze.com
2012-12-13 06:24:37 PM  
1 votes:

Rev. Skarekroe: Silly Jesus: [citation needed]

You're sh*tting us, right?

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe. No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.


He's already had his ass handed to him about this. Probably more than a few times.

He's into the wine coolers again.
2012-12-13 06:06:05 PM  
1 votes:

Silly Jesus: He didn't call it that.


Point at it and laugh.
2012-12-13 06:05:30 PM  
1 votes:

Silly Jesus: Philip Francis Queeg: Silly Jesus: Philip Francis Queeg: halfof33: Marcus Aurelius: ry getting him to respond rationally to a good point.

Try making one, champ.

We lied to the American Public because we wanted the perpetrators to think there was a protest at the Embassy they attacked even though there wasn't one!

lolz

Please detail the harm that you believe came from this lie.

The lie didn't kill anyone, but it's still kinda shiatty to lie to everyone about American deaths for political gain. If they were "terrorist attacks" then Obama looks bad before the election. If they were because of some mean man in California and Obama condemns him, then Obama look good (I guess) before the election.

Sort of a shiatty thing to do to those families.

So Obama was sabotaging himself when he called it an "Act of Terror". Got it.

He didn't call it that.


Please Proceed.
2012-12-13 06:05:24 PM  
1 votes:

Lt. Cheese Weasel: Bucky Katt: Lt. Cheese Weasel: It's not a scandal subby. It's a national disgrace.

You're right. The GOP needs to stop embarassing this country.

[sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net image 380x295]


Yup, Herman Cain is a national disgrace.
2012-12-13 05:53:31 PM  
1 votes:

Lt. Cheese Weasel: It's not a scandal subby. It's a national disgrace.


i know - can you believe that republicans voted to cut funding for embassy security and still had the farking balls to go after obama and rice on this?
2012-12-13 05:53:07 PM  
1 votes:

Philip Francis Queeg: justme317: What about Jon Huntsman?

Strong Credentials (US Ambassador to China for the first two years of Obama's first term). Truly moderate political views, cool under fire.

Republicans won't have a problem with him.

What do Farkers think?

Republicans will have a problem with anyone Obama nominates.


Sure, they'll hem and haw and make noise as is their wont, but when it comes to hearing time, I think it will be a smooth process.
2012-12-13 05:52:47 PM  
1 votes:

Bucky Katt: Lt. Cheese Weasel: It's not a scandal subby. It's a national disgrace.

You're right. The GOP needs to stop embarassing this country.


sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net
2012-12-13 05:47:46 PM  
1 votes:
img849.imageshack.us
2012-12-13 05:46:49 PM  
1 votes:
Alright, McCain, you finally got a victory over That One. Could you please shove a pacifier in your pie-hole and GBTW now?
2012-12-13 05:42:44 PM  
1 votes:

Lt. Cheese Weasel: It's not a scandal subby. It's a national disgrace.


You're right. The GOP needs to stop embarassing this country.
2012-12-13 05:41:28 PM  
1 votes:

MaudlinMutantMollusk: Marcus Aurelius: "While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character, and an admirable commitment to rise above the politics of the moment to put our national interests first."

Is Obama the biggest troll in America, or what?

And don't forget what happened after the GOP torpedoed Elisabeth Warren for the Consumer Protection department. She ended up on the Senate banking committee. Something tells me the GOP didn't think their cunning plan all the way through.

When have they ever?


When will Baldrick be put on a GOP ballot?
2012-12-13 05:39:37 PM  
1 votes:

Thigvald the Big-Balled: propasaurus: Obama should do something like appoint her WH Chief of Staff. Make the Republicans go through her if they want to talk to the President.

THIS.

And Obama should take advice offered in earlier FARK threads: nominate a Republican for the position, one who would be replaced by a Democrat. Watch the Republicans tear apart one of their own in order to prevent the seat from falling into Democratic hands.


That actually would be fantastic. Like, Susan Collins or something.
2012-12-13 05:30:52 PM  
1 votes:

born_yesterday: Marcus Aurelius: halfof33: The claim that it arose out of a protest at the Embassy was pure bullshiat, and they should have known better.

I believe you made that claim in the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this, and the thread before this.

Or am I mistaken?

I think you missed a thread.


Maybe I'll have to make a note of the thread numbers from now on!
2012-12-13 05:26:38 PM  
1 votes:
Well, there goes Benghazi. The GOP feels like Charlie Brown after Lucy yanks the football away. LOL.
2012-12-13 05:25:54 PM  
1 votes:
Ambivalence: "Any bets on who the next target for GOP outrage will be?"

The next liberal President Obama stands next to.

Or, for that matter, the next person whose conservative bona-fides are so much as *in question*.

/ e.g. even Christie and Boehner catch poutrage depending on which way the wind blows
2012-12-13 04:38:20 PM  
1 votes:

Marcus Aurelius: JerseyTim: I didn't really care for her and I think the Benghazi scandal was bullpucky. I hope Obama doesn't pick Kerry.

Wouldn't THAT frost their freezers.

What's wrong with Kerry as Secretary of State?


The GOP would love to see Scott Walker appointed to his senate seat should Kerry up and go.
2012-12-13 04:29:39 PM  
1 votes:

Jon H: Does this mean we are done with this?

/sitting at a bar
//watching Telemundo
///does not speak Mexican
////drinking a Budweiser!
/slashies


Probably not, although that poor chicken hopes so.
2012-12-13 04:25:41 PM  
1 votes:
scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com

"There can be only one Rice at State!"
2012-12-13 04:21:08 PM  
1 votes:
"While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character, and an admirable commitment to rise above the politics of the moment to put our national interests first."

Is Obama the biggest troll in America, or what?

And don't forget what happened after the GOP torpedoed Elisabeth Warren for the Consumer Protection department. She ended up on the Senate banking committee. Something tells me the GOP didn't think their cunning plan all the way through.
 
Displayed 53 of 53 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report