If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(C|Net)   Google has altered SafeSearch. Pray they don't alter it further   (news.cnet.com) divider line 56
    More: Stupid, Safesearch, search algorithms, Google Images, e-book reader  
•       •       •

22254 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 Dec 2012 at 8:35 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-12-12 08:40:42 PM
4 votes:
I'd post the "Challenge Accepted" pic, but GIS is failing me.
2012-12-12 08:40:17 PM
4 votes:
But slutty Asian cum junkies still returns the appropriate pics
2012-12-12 08:38:46 PM
4 votes:
Maybe now people will use Bing.
2012-12-12 10:28:36 PM
3 votes:

Cyno01: How about just an "Unsafe search" option where when checked it returns nothing but porn.


img202.imageshack.us
2012-12-12 10:21:30 PM
3 votes:

generallyso: blowjob.


www.lolphotos.net
2012-12-12 09:29:20 PM
3 votes:

Yuri Futanari: Begoggle: RIP rule 34
2009-2012

For all your rule34 needs

/do I really need to say NSFW?


img546.imageshack.us

RULE 34 FAIL
2012-12-12 09:21:42 PM
3 votes:
It is a sad day when "shaved beaver" returns pictures of hairless water-mammals.
2012-12-12 10:49:02 PM
2 votes:
2012-12-12 10:16:41 PM
2 votes:

Do the needful: ...or does google have some sort of genital recognition algorithm?"


img152.imageshack.us
2012-12-12 10:15:28 PM
2 votes:

tetsuo02: It is a sad day when "shaved beaver" returns pictures of hairless water-mammals.


farm1.staticflickr.com
2012-12-12 09:58:43 PM
2 votes:

natmar_76: Sounds like if I search for "tits" I still get tits, but if I search for "little red riding hood" I don't get porn.


news.bbc.co.uk
2012-12-12 09:54:27 PM
2 votes:

tetsuo02: It is a sad day when "shaved beaver" returns pictures of hairless water-mammals.


4.bp.blogspot.com
2012-12-12 09:53:49 PM
2 votes:
The real question here is "does someone have a job looking at and filtering out all of the 'porn', or does google have some sort of genital recognition algorithm?"
2012-12-12 09:48:49 PM
2 votes:
img7.imageshack.us

Results with SafeSearch "off"
2012-12-12 09:30:48 PM
2 votes:

tetsuo02: It is a sad day when "shaved beaver" returns pictures of hairless water-mammals.


Shaved pussy agrees.

www.naughty-nature.com
2012-12-12 09:16:26 PM
2 votes:

ReapTheChaos: natmar_76: Sounds like if I search for "tits" I still get tits, but if I search for "little red riding hood" I don't get porn.

I don't see the problem here.

Actually if you search for tits you don't get tits, well, not naked ones anyway. It's basically what you used to get if you had safe search turned on.


I think the complaint is that "naked" is just way too hard to type with one hand.
2012-12-12 09:06:09 PM
2 votes:
I just noticed that Bing's "nice tits" has a lot better results than Google's "nice tits" all of a sudden.

Maybe Bing is good for something after all.
2012-12-12 09:04:45 PM
2 votes:
you just may need to be more explicit in your query if your search terms are potentially ambiguous.

C'mon, I just want to fap to it, I don't want to have to talk about it. It was working fine when my search terms were how about a little somethin' somethin' or yeah Google you know what I like you nasty minx.

If I have to be all explicit and properly format it like site:http://trannymidgets.com vintage bdsm "age 40..60" -"herve villechaize" it takes me out of the mood.
2012-12-12 09:03:54 PM
2 votes:

Jument: Actually that seems like a pretty decent feature. Not everyone is a porn hound, you guys.

I mean, well, everyone reading this is a porn hound. I meant other people. The "squares". Your Mom, for example. Ok bad example. Your Mom probably surfs for porn all day. But you know what I mean.


Some people turn all the lights out, close the curtains, take the phone off the hook, turn the monitor, and peek out to make sure no one notices. Some people check /d/ on their 72" TV while blaring porn sound effects. But everyone, everywhere, eventually seeks porn on the internet.
2012-12-12 09:00:45 PM
2 votes:

Begoggle: RIP rule 34
2009-2012


For all your rule34 needs

/do I really need to say NSFW?
2012-12-12 08:41:06 PM
2 votes:
GIS for "Jesus farking Christ" will never be the same
2012-12-12 08:40:19 PM
2 votes:
But, but, how will I still have plausible denial?
2012-12-13 09:00:28 AM
1 votes:
Eh, maybe bing is not so good either. "Pussy lips" brought an adult content warning, which is fine, and the results were fine, but on mobile you can't click through to the page it's on - but there's a "share on Facebook" link? WTF?!
2012-12-13 04:36:57 AM
1 votes:
porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn porn still provides many porny gis results, one in particular that appears to be a rather distressing torture-porn image on the first page.

Interestingly, what I'm most interested in: gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay turns up a whole bunch of images, non of which are erotic in any way, except for the third photo, which is of a beautiful nekkid wet gentleman in a bathtub, but with nothing more than a bare hip showing.

That does seem to be a new development; previously that particular gis would have been nothing but turgid dicks and prolapsed assholes.
2012-12-13 02:55:48 AM
1 votes:
I don't mind the extra click to find titties. It means less bullshiat about my pervert coworkers gawking at my screen when a search for pallet racks brings up fat chicks with watermelon tits
2012-12-12 11:41:58 PM
1 votes:
I was searching for pictures of Seth MacFarlane having forced bondage sex with a pack of feral kangaroos but no luck.

Now I'm going to have to get to work with PhotoShop. It's not like this stuff makes itself.
2012-12-12 11:17:33 PM
1 votes:
I would think that since Google records all my searches in order to "personalize" my browsing experience (and sell me stuff) they would know what I want when I'm looking for porn and not give me this.
img534.imageshack.us 
I can't fap to that.
2012-12-12 10:48:08 PM
1 votes:
I'm going to complain to whitehouse.com!
2012-12-12 10:24:59 PM
1 votes:
How about just an "Unsafe search" option where when checked it returns nothing but porn.
2012-12-12 10:24:47 PM
1 votes:

generallyso: saturn badger: Add the word naked. Go ahead.

That is their point.

Do a search for blowjob.


Most men are always searching for one of those.
2012-12-12 10:09:55 PM
1 votes:

I knew something was up when I GIS'd "granny creampie" and all that came up was pictures of pastries.


PICTURES OF PASTRIES
2012-12-12 10:09:45 PM
1 votes:
Hello Bing!

/Gonna miss ya, Google.
2012-12-12 10:06:58 PM
1 votes:
4.bp.blogspot.com
2012-12-12 10:02:25 PM
1 votes:

Nuclear Monk: Accidental porn is the best kind of porn. Why would anyone want to get rid of that!?!


exactly. It's "holy crap, there is porn of this!" - 3 hours gone
2012-12-12 09:29:58 PM
1 votes:
I fu(king knew it! It was at like 9pm eastern time
2012-12-12 09:17:35 PM
1 votes:

Bonanza Jellybean: But how will I find SFW pics of "jizz?"


Search for the cover of Metallica's "Load" album.
2012-12-12 09:14:50 PM
1 votes:
nooooooooooooooo.com
2012-12-12 09:13:08 PM
1 votes:
But how will I find SFW pics of "jizz?"
2012-12-12 09:09:58 PM
1 votes:
BTW this has got to be great for ornithologists.
2012-12-12 09:09:11 PM
1 votes:

Bacontastesgood: They also don't track, so you don't see ads for Taylor Swift popping up on the computer you share with your kid. Or your kid won't see ads for BBC cuckolds I guess.


I think it's the other way around...
2012-12-12 09:08:14 PM
1 votes:

mjg: Google is for losers.

Moved over to DuckDuckGo.com and haven't looked back.


Sorry, I didn't notice you had it covered.
2012-12-12 09:04:14 PM
1 votes:
Now I'm going to have to add "naked" to all my searches.

Just in case.
2012-12-12 09:03:49 PM
1 votes:
Hopefully someday they can make separate filters for gay and straight pr0n.
2012-12-12 09:00:44 PM
1 votes:

WhippingBoy: It's the principle of the thing.


What do you expect principals to do all day?
2012-12-12 08:57:49 PM
1 votes:
Search for porn using Google Image Search today and you might not find much.

usasoccerstud.com
2012-12-12 08:56:17 PM
1 votes:

bmihura: When I use Google, I'm usually not looking for porn, I'm looking for other things.



Like what? Porn?
2012-12-12 08:53:32 PM
1 votes:
No change, image search for "subby's mom nude' still shows a naked fat woman.
2012-12-12 08:48:39 PM
1 votes:

Canton: The company says the move is designed to ensure adult content is shown only to those who explicitly request it.

Nicely done.


Also: "where it wants users to work a bit harder.

/hehe
2012-12-12 08:44:50 PM
1 votes:
R.I.P. Google. You're no use to anyone anymore.
2012-12-12 08:43:47 PM
1 votes:
In other news, Booble and Jughunter shares skyrocket.
2012-12-12 08:43:38 PM
1 votes:
makes it tougher to stumble across adult pictures, whether or not you're searching for them.

This is pretty farking stupid. If you're doing a search for pussy, chances are you're NOT looking for 528,000,000 images of Pussy Riot.
2012-12-12 08:40:49 PM
1 votes:
So now I can't search for random word combinations to see what kind of porn it'll turn up? Damn you, Mountain View Chocolate Factory.
2012-12-12 08:40:38 PM
1 votes:
It's about time Google put the Jesus (and possibly Mohamed) back in GIS.
2012-12-12 08:39:55 PM
1 votes:
To the Chron-O-John! Bing!
2012-12-12 08:39:08 PM
1 votes:
The company says the move is designed to ensure adult content is shown only to those who explicitly request it.

Nicely done.
2012-12-12 08:15:59 PM
1 votes:
GIS may never be the same.
 
Displayed 56 of 56 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report