If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(C|Net)   Google has altered SafeSearch. Pray they don't alter it further   (news.cnet.com) divider line 272
    More: Stupid, Safesearch, search algorithms, Google Images, e-book reader  
•       •       •

22254 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 Dec 2012 at 8:35 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



272 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-12 08:15:59 PM
GIS may never be the same.
 
2012-12-12 08:27:58 PM
I just noticed that. I am disappoint.
 
2012-12-12 08:37:42 PM
Puritans FTW!
 
2012-12-12 08:38:11 PM
To No Boobs
 
2012-12-12 08:38:46 PM
Maybe now people will use Bing.
 
2012-12-12 08:38:54 PM
To TYwelve.
 
2012-12-12 08:39:08 PM
The company says the move is designed to ensure adult content is shown only to those who explicitly request it.

Nicely done.
 
2012-12-12 08:39:18 PM
Sooooo. . .

Anyone got info on a good search engine that isn't run by a douchebag company?
 
2012-12-12 08:39:55 PM
To the Chron-O-John! Bing!
 
2012-12-12 08:40:17 PM
But slutty Asian cum junkies still returns the appropriate pics
 
2012-12-12 08:40:19 PM
But, but, how will I still have plausible denial?
 
2012-12-12 08:40:38 PM
It's about time Google put the Jesus (and possibly Mohamed) back in GIS.
 
2012-12-12 08:40:42 PM
I'd post the "Challenge Accepted" pic, but GIS is failing me.
 
2012-12-12 08:40:49 PM
So now I can't search for random word combinations to see what kind of porn it'll turn up? Damn you, Mountain View Chocolate Factory.
 
2012-12-12 08:40:54 PM

EnglishMan: Maybe now people will use Bing.


Or perhaps DuckDuckGo will develop an adult version...
 
2012-12-12 08:41:06 PM
GIS for "Jesus farking Christ" will never be the same
 
2012-12-12 08:41:31 PM
In other news, Tumblr is down, leaving thousands without a date tonight.
 
2012-12-12 08:43:18 PM

Peki: Sooooo. . .

Anyone got info on a good search engine that isn't run by a douchebag company?


AskJeeves
 
2012-12-12 08:43:38 PM
makes it tougher to stumble across adult pictures, whether or not you're searching for them.

This is pretty farking stupid. If you're doing a search for pussy, chances are you're NOT looking for 528,000,000 images of Pussy Riot.
 
2012-12-12 08:43:47 PM
In other news, Booble and Jughunter shares skyrocket.
 
2012-12-12 08:43:55 PM
GIS for Anne Hathaway came back null. So sad.
 
2012-12-12 08:44:30 PM

Kuroshin: I'd post the "Challenge Accepted" pic, but GIS is failing me.


That's not a challenge.

*)
 
2012-12-12 08:44:50 PM
R.I.P. Google. You're no use to anyone anymore.
 
2012-12-12 08:46:54 PM
Combined with the "improved" search filters (let's get rid of exact image size searches!), this is turning into a pile of suck.
 
2012-12-12 08:48:04 PM
RIP rule 34
2009-2012
 
mjg
2012-12-12 08:48:37 PM
Google is for losers.

Moved over to DuckDuckGo.com and haven't looked back.
 
2012-12-12 08:48:39 PM

Canton: The company says the move is designed to ensure adult content is shown only to those who explicitly request it.

Nicely done.


Also: "where it wants users to work a bit harder.

/hehe
 
2012-12-12 08:50:34 PM

WhippingBoy: R.I.P. Google. You're no use to anyone anymore.


Amen. Just like my cable service (we're old, not hip) that censors and bleeps broadcasts to a two adult household. Sometimes I feel life is not worth living.
 
2012-12-12 08:51:47 PM
That's fine with me.

When I use Google, I'm usually not looking for porn, I'm looking for other things. It's not like there's any shortage of porn on the Internet!

Oh my, where can I possibly find porn now?
 
2012-12-12 08:52:34 PM

phrawgh: It's about time Google put the Jesus (and possibly Mohamed) back in GIS.


Well, Mohammed was only into kiddie porn. Glad my diety didn't pick a kiddie diddler as his prophet.

Religion of (a 12 year old) piece!
 
2012-12-12 08:52:35 PM
And in other news, Drew still hasn't added a discreet Foobies.com link to the Fark main page. And Foobies has great content.
 
2012-12-12 08:52:56 PM
I didn't read the article but i think Im going to join the herd and say this sounds dumb, just from pieced together comments.

/lazy and watching A.H.S
 
2012-12-12 08:53:27 PM

kendelrio: Canton: The company says the move is designed to ensure adult content is shown only to those who explicitly request it.

Nicely done.

Also: "where it wants users to work a bit harder.

/hehe


//p.s. i am capable of working the filters...*)
 
2012-12-12 08:53:32 PM
No change, image search for "subby's mom nude' still shows a naked fat woman.
 
2012-12-12 08:56:17 PM

bmihura: When I use Google, I'm usually not looking for porn, I'm looking for other things.



Like what? Porn?
 
2012-12-12 08:57:33 PM
Also, doesn't this kind of defeat the whole purpose of safe search? I thought the point of turning it off was to find "explicit" images?
 
2012-12-12 08:57:49 PM
Search for porn using Google Image Search today and you might not find much.

usasoccerstud.com
 
2012-12-12 08:58:23 PM
I do not comprehend the objections to this move, especially as regards puritanical interests, which Google is not an advocate of nor biased for. This simply lessens the ability to accidentally view pornography. If someone wants to view naked people farking with each other or animals or whatnot, type precisely that in, the same as one would do with anything else.
 
2012-12-12 08:58:40 PM

MarkMartinFan: No change, image search for "subby's mom nude' still shows a naked fat woman.


Oh lol.
 
2012-12-12 08:59:03 PM
Actually that seems like a pretty decent feature. Not everyone is a porn hound, you guys.

I mean, well, everyone reading this is a porn hound. I meant other people. The "squares". Your Mom, for example. Ok bad example. Your Mom probably surfs for porn all day. But you know what I mean.
 
2012-12-12 08:59:31 PM
If only Google would search for what I actually type instead of anything it feels like I might have meant, usually while ignoring the most important words. Having to specify exact words and inclusion every time gets to be a bit much, and even then it often ignores specifically included words. Perhaps if I were illiterate it'd be easier.

/Any regular web search term plus "TGP"
 
2012-12-12 08:59:40 PM

Skywolf Philosopher: I do not comprehend the objections to this move, especially as regards puritanical interests, which Google is not an advocate of nor biased for. This simply lessens the ability to accidentally view pornography. If someone wants to view naked people farking with each other or animals or whatnot, type precisely that in, the same as one would do with anything else.


It's the principle of the thing.
 
2012-12-12 09:00:44 PM

WhippingBoy: It's the principle of the thing.


What do you expect principals to do all day?
 
2012-12-12 09:00:45 PM

Begoggle: RIP rule 34
2009-2012


For all your rule34 needs

/do I really need to say NSFW?
 
2012-12-12 09:00:57 PM
To principal
 
2012-12-12 09:01:33 PM

Skywolf Philosopher: WhippingBoy: It's the principle of the thing.

What do you expect principals to do all day?


Gotcha.
 
2012-12-12 09:02:23 PM
Because I have such a difficult time finding porn on the internet.... Is there a bet on when porn on the internet will surpass the 50% mark of all content on the internet, or has it already happened?
 
2012-12-12 09:03:49 PM
Hopefully someday they can make separate filters for gay and straight pr0n.
 
2012-12-12 09:03:54 PM

Jument: Actually that seems like a pretty decent feature. Not everyone is a porn hound, you guys.

I mean, well, everyone reading this is a porn hound. I meant other people. The "squares". Your Mom, for example. Ok bad example. Your Mom probably surfs for porn all day. But you know what I mean.


Some people turn all the lights out, close the curtains, take the phone off the hook, turn the monitor, and peek out to make sure no one notices. Some people check /d/ on their 72" TV while blaring porn sound effects. But everyone, everywhere, eventually seeks porn on the internet.
 
2012-12-12 09:04:07 PM

aremmes: So now I can't search for random word combinations to see what kind of porn it'll turn up? Damn you, Mountain View Chocolate Factory.


I have come across nekkid wimminz through Google image searches on several occasions while trying to find something completely unrelated. I don't really care as long as I'm on my home/work at home computers, but I'd be kinda pissed if that happened while on a school or work computer. You can get in tons of trouble for that (as I'm sure we're all aware).
 
Displayed 50 of 272 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report