If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Duplicate of another approved link: 7480567


(US News)   Apparently it's not your genes that make you gay... it's the fact that your genes are covered in gay which makes you gay   (usnews.com) divider line 24
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

1351 clicks; Favorite

24 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-12-12 08:41:14 AM
Gay!
 
2012-12-12 08:42:17 AM
Apparently its not being a repeat that makes a headline redundant... it's the fact that the headline is covered in redundant which makes it redundant.
 
2012-12-12 08:42:55 AM
Trust me subby, it's my skinny jeans that make me gay.
 
2012-12-12 08:44:09 AM
Repeat thread, bad moderators.
 
2012-12-12 08:44:42 AM

Raharu: Repeat thread, bad moderators.


Admins.
 
2012-12-12 08:48:38 AM
Paging Jon is teh kewl.
 
2012-12-12 08:49:24 AM
...I've been saying that for a long time
 
2012-12-12 08:49:46 AM
Hm... so men are responsible for all those totally hot lesbians in the word and women are responsible for all the dirty queers?
 
2012-12-12 08:50:36 AM

Raharu: Repeat thread, bad moderators.


Apparently, there was womb for one more
 
2012-12-12 08:50:55 AM
Ehh, I think it's an interesting idea but I don't know how much credence I put in it. I'm a gay lady and once they got to the "masculinization" bit I laughed- I am way, WAY less masculine than 99% of straight women I know. Granted I know that my being as femme as I am is the exception and not the norm for gay ladies, but still.
 
2012-12-12 08:54:03 AM
Yo dawg, I heard you liked gay in your genes so covered your genes in...oh screw it
 
2012-12-12 09:01:58 AM
Isn't this a modeling paper?
 
2012-12-12 09:04:20 AM

pivazena: Isn't this a modeling paper?


Models are usually gay.
 
2012-12-12 09:06:16 AM
Yeah... No biology in this over, just giving a plausible explanation for the heritability without it being genetic. Not clear why they reject the genetic hypothesis, or proposed advantage of hyper-strong methylation. However, this can explain how it looks genetic but maybe, due to environmental factors, appears to be on the rise
 
2012-12-12 09:12:44 AM

breadprincess: Ehh, I think it's an interesting idea but I don't know how much credence I put in it. I'm a gay lady and once they got to the "masculinization" bit I laughed- I am way, WAY less masculine than 99% of straight women I know. Granted I know that my being as femme as I am is the exception and not the norm for gay ladies, but still.


A lipstick lesbian, is what they label your type.
 
2012-12-12 09:20:26 AM
Well there are many examples of homosexuality in nature, it's very common.

I grew up on a farm, and I've seen 2 bulls farking each other before. To be fair, though, it's usually when bulls are cooped up together with no cows around, which I think just makes them "prison gay".
 
2012-12-12 09:24:25 AM
so homosexuals are genetically sick or retarded according to this info.
 
2012-12-12 09:25:56 AM

soakitincider: so homosexuals are genetically sick or retarded according to this info.


... No, that's not what this means.
 
2012-12-12 09:27:20 AM

Billy Bathsalt: Paging Jon is teh kewl.


i am totally the KING when it comes to gay articles on FARK. first off i want to thank my family
, Jesus, and Joe McKewl for making me so friendly
 
2012-12-12 09:29:47 AM

pivazena: Not clear why they reject the genetic hypothesis


From the article, because there are identical twins with different orientations. I've met some before.
 
2012-12-12 09:33:32 AM

Jon iz teh kewl: Billy Bathsalt: Paging Jon is teh kewl.

i am totally the KING when it comes to gay articles on FARK. first off i want to thank my family
, Jesus, and Joe McKewl for making me so friendly


Or perhaps the queen? :O
 
2012-12-12 09:34:43 AM
Read the article comments for a hefty dose of fundie derp.
 
2012-12-12 09:57:36 AM

Delecrious: breadprincess: Ehh, I think it's an interesting idea but I don't know how much credence I put in it. I'm a gay lady and once they got to the "masculinization" bit I laughed- I am way, WAY less masculine than 99% of straight women I know. Granted I know that my being as femme as I am is the exception and not the norm for gay ladies, but still.

A lipstick lesbian, is what they label your type.


Thank God you are around to educate me, I had no idea!!!!11one
 
2012-12-12 06:31:55 PM

Beer It's What's For Dinner: pivazena: Not clear why they reject the genetic hypothesis

From the article, because there are identical twins with different orientations. I've met some before.


Yeah but even height isn't 100% heritable. I'd anticipate some environmental component-- if it's a quantitative trait, which it seems like it is
 
Displayed 24 of 24 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report