If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   In case you were wondering, it's illegal to project cheese advertisements onto the moon   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 79
    More: Amusing, NASA, International Space Station, corporate video  
•       •       •

9749 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 Dec 2012 at 12:13 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



79 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-11 09:26:27 PM
I would contest that law. I bet the legislation is full of holes.
 
2012-12-11 10:05:26 PM
What about chair advertisements?
 
2012-12-11 11:57:49 PM
Beer ads are still ok, though, right?
 
2012-12-12 12:03:02 AM

kmmontandon: What about chair advertisements?


cdn.static.ovimg.com

Approves.
 
2012-12-12 12:03:13 AM
But can you moon in cheese ads?
 
2012-12-12 12:06:44 AM
CHE
 
2012-12-12 12:14:30 AM
Came for CHA

leaving satisfied.
 
2012-12-12 12:17:23 AM

bingethinker: I would contest that law. I bet the legislation is full of holes.


Enough to fill the Albert Hall.
 
2012-12-12 12:17:39 AM
Who is going to prosecute you? Moon men?
 
2012-12-12 12:20:24 AM
Could we just stop linking the Daily Fail?
It's all bullshiat.
 
2012-12-12 12:21:20 AM
In other news, I don't believe anything the Daily Mail has to say.
 
2012-12-12 12:21:32 AM
Also:
Link
 
2012-12-12 12:22:17 AM
http://what-if.xkcd.com/13/

This is one of those things that you really don't want people to attempt even though it's wildly impractical to get even a smidgen of the way there.
 
2012-12-12 12:23:46 AM
What if the moon is actually smooth and some crater company has been projecting craters onto it this whole time..
 
M-G
2012-12-12 12:24:18 AM
Approves:

static.guim.co.uk
 
2012-12-12 12:25:27 AM
Personally, I think it's a foolish world that doesn't take advantage of the wide open sky for advertising. The heavens should be littered with Pepsi ad satellites and such, for the whole world to see - blinking large and loud as moons of their own. I would love to read Burma Shave ads backgrounded by the Milky Way, and see spectacular, cosmic underwear ads in the skies at night.
 
2012-12-12 12:26:39 AM
Good. If if it isn't sacrilege, it's vandalism and creating a public eyesore.
 
2012-12-12 12:29:17 AM

Hector Remarkable: Personally, I think it's a foolish world that doesn't take advantage of the wide open sky for advertising. The heavens should be littered with Pepsi ad satellites and such, for the whole world to see - blinking large and loud as moons of their own. I would love to read Burma Shave ads backgrounded by the Milky Way, and see spectacular, cosmic underwear ads in the skies at night.


That would be awesome. You'd be so distracted by all that light pollution you'd never even hear the sound of the bullet you'd fire to end your own life.
 
2012-12-12 12:30:31 AM

brantgoose: Good. If if it isn't sacrilege, it's vandalism and creating a public eyesore.


And unfair to the few still-uncontacted tribes out there.

/not sure how much energy it would take to make just a visible spot on the moon, never mind a whole image. SOunds like it would be a LOT.
 
2012-12-12 12:31:14 AM

bingethinker: I would contest that law. I bet the legislation is full of holes.


You'd have a gouda case.
 
2012-12-12 12:31:15 AM
No wonder it has been 40 years since we were last on the moon. If NASA employs people that are incapable of doing a quick back of the cigarette pack calculation to check how much energy it would take to actually project enough light to make an image visible from earth on a quarter of the near surface of the moon, then there surely is no hope of us ever going back.

Then again, maybe it has been 40 years because we all stopped smoking and don't have cigarette packs handy to do those quick calculations.
 
2012-12-12 12:33:03 AM
Personally,I wonder what effect something like that would have on uncontacted peoples.
 
2012-12-12 12:35:19 AM
Damn Obama and his job killing regulations!
 
2012-12-12 12:35:47 AM

NJR_ZA: No wonder it has been 40 years since we were last on the moon. If NASA employs people that are incapable of doing a quick back of the cigarette pack calculation to check how much energy it would take to actually project enough light to make an image visible from earth on a quarter of the near surface of the moon, then there surely is no hope of us ever going back.

Then again, maybe it has been 40 years because we all stopped smoking and don't have cigarette packs handy to do those quick calculations.


Maybe they should read more xkcd...
 
2012-12-12 12:37:31 AM
I'd broadcast pornography so the whole world could see...
 
2012-12-12 12:37:37 AM
Are the Lunarians getting peeved again?
 
2012-12-12 12:38:16 AM
www.jasperfforde.com

You are warned!
 
2012-12-12 12:39:13 AM
All advertising should be illegal.
 
2012-12-12 12:40:16 AM
www.ironmanmode.com

What the results of messing with the International Space Station might look like
 
2012-12-12 12:41:00 AM
NJR_ZA: No wonder it has been 40 years since we were last on the moon. If NASA employs people that are incapable of doing a quick back of the cigarette pack calculation to check how much energy it would take to actually project enough light to make an image visible from earth on a quarter of the near surface of the moon, then there surely is no hope of us ever going back.


But on the plus side, they do have the right percent of brown, white, female people now that qualifications beyond gender and skin tone are out the window and space related goals are grounded.
 
2012-12-12 12:41:05 AM

My Bologna Has A Maiden Name: All advertising should be illegal.


This. fark the first amendment.
 
2012-12-12 12:42:22 AM

NJR_ZA: No wonder it has been 40 years since we were last on the moon. If NASA employs people that are incapable of doing a quick back of the cigarette pack calculation to check how much energy it would take to actually project enough light to make an image visible from earth on a quarter of the near surface of the moon, then there surely is no hope of us ever going back.

Then again, maybe it has been 40 years because we all stopped smoking and don't have cigarette packs handy to do those quick calculations.


You got that from the article? What I got was they didn't want any lasers pointed that could hit the IS, nothing about the notion that the stunt could be accomplished.
 
2012-12-12 12:46:39 AM
You all suck... I now have 'the Tick' theme stuck in my head...

/duh dweee, duh duh duh duh dwee dow
 
2012-12-12 12:47:18 AM

fusillade762: kmmontandon: What about chair advertisements?

[cdn.static.ovimg.com image 400x300]

Approves.


Never enough mention of Cobra Commander, who drew his FACE on the moon first
 
2012-12-12 12:47:35 AM
Hold on, I'll be right back. I've gotta go learn how to make cheese & start a company called Mooncheeze real quick.
 
2012-12-12 12:48:11 AM
wearethemasses.com

Deep water, deep water, senseless denial...
 
2012-12-12 12:50:41 AM
Didn't we have this the other day? Moon's not made of cheese. Cheese advertisement on moon.
/You can't explain that
 
2012-12-12 12:51:18 AM
If anyone could pull it off, I'm betting on the Swiss.
/and I'm out
 
2012-12-12 12:53:22 AM

OnlyM3: But on the plus side, they do have the right percent of brown, white, female people now that qualifications beyond gender and skin tone are out the window and space related goals are grounded.


you what now?
 
2012-12-12 12:58:05 AM

Begoggle: Could we just stop linking the Daily Fail?
It's all bullshiat.


Ditto. Didn't they get caught making up articles a while back? They're a step away from Weekly World News.
 
2012-12-12 12:58:19 AM
The moon landing was faked.
 
2012-12-12 12:58:22 AM
img.gawkerassets.com
 
2012-12-12 01:04:43 AM

Old Man Winter: Personally,I wonder what effect something like that would have on uncontacted peoples.


Set up some hidden cameras.
 
2012-12-12 01:05:48 AM
LaughingRadish

http://what-if.xkcd.com/13/

This is one of those things that you really don't want people to attempt even though it's wildly impractical to get even a smidgen of the way there.
 
i45.tinypic.com 


/// the only nasa graph you'll ever need.
 
2012-12-12 01:13:40 AM

Wayne 985: Begoggle: Could we just stop linking the Daily Fail?
It's all bullshiat.

Ditto. Didn't they get caught making up articles a while back? They're a step away from Weekly World News.


Don't sully the Weekly World News like that. I happen to really miss them and was thinking that just the other day as I was standing in line at the grocery store.
 
2012-12-12 01:13:46 AM

ImpendingCynic: bingethinker: I would contest that law. I bet the legislation is full of holes.

You'd have a gouda case.


I'd pursue it, but I don't really give edam.
 
2012-12-12 01:15:32 AM
6+
 
2012-12-12 01:17:00 AM

OnlyM3: LaughingRadish

http://what-if.xkcd.com/13/

This is one of those things that you really don't want people to attempt even though it's wildly impractical to get even a smidgen of the way there. 
[i45.tinypic.com image 553x525] 


/// the only nasa graph you'll ever need.


Was there a joke in there, somewhere?

Show us on the doll where NASA touched you, M3.
 
2012-12-12 01:18:26 AM
That picture taken in the dark with the police car - the person on the right really looked to me like it was a woman wearing a panty or bikini bottom. Had to watch the video. Unfortunately, I am disappointed.
 
2012-12-12 01:20:54 AM

bingethinker: ImpendingCynic: bingethinker: I would contest that law. I bet the legislation is full of holes.

You'd have a gouda case.

I'd pursue it, but I don't really give edam.


Whey not?
 
Displayed 50 of 79 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report