If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN)   Seventy-two-year old man gets convicted of murder from 1957 based on eyewitness photo id in 2010   (cnn.com) divider line 78
    More: Unlikely, cold case, life imprisonments, sycamores, police corruption, Eisenhower, McCullough, Illinois State Police, missing children  
•       •       •

10081 clicks; posted to Main » on 10 Dec 2012 at 9:48 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



78 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-10 09:51:51 PM  
Gotcha.
 
2012-12-10 09:52:54 PM  
I have the dumb tonight, none of that made sense. How did they figure out it was him besides some eyewitness interviewed too many years too late to seem reliable?
 
2012-12-10 09:55:26 PM  

gadian: I have the dumb tonight, none of that made sense. How did they figure out it was him besides some eyewitness interviewed too many years too late to seem reliable?


The judge tossed out all the exculpatory evidence, leaving only the witness and the broken alibi as evidence.
 
2012-12-10 09:55:39 PM  
He was originally the prime suspect. Had an alibi that chief wiggum and lou didn't apparently investigate too thoroughly. Supposedly his train ticket was unused, which means his alibi may have been a lie. Then yes, extremely unreliable eye witness testimony.

//local resident
///interesting to watch unfold here.
 
2012-12-10 09:58:05 PM  
H mmmm
 
2012-12-10 09:59:46 PM  
i2.cdn.turner.com

files.abovetopsecret.com
 
2012-12-10 10:01:32 PM  
 
2012-12-10 10:03:11 PM  
Massively outdated testimony and sparked by a sudden deathbed confession?

I'm gonna go with blah on this. Not to mention if we really wanna get nitpicky this part bugs me too

McCullough was sentenced under laws that were in effect in 1957. So..if he's sentenced by laws that are effective then, shouldn't you also sentence him as his age back then as well?

This whole thing seems to be a mess and I don't doubt appeals will free him.
 
2012-12-10 10:03:26 PM  
McCullough's youngest sister, a baby at the time of the crime, contacted an Illinois State Police tip line in 2008

And he would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for those meddling kids!
 
2012-12-10 10:03:47 PM  

jaytkay: .


Yeah, I got that bit. But that seems, well, not something you could prosecute on. I think I mixed up the bit with the ticket and how they finally figured out it was unused.
 
2012-12-10 10:04:45 PM  
So if we just rule the defense's evidence inadmissable, we can sentence anyone to anything 57 years after the fact.

I don't care if the guy IS the perp, this ain't justice. This is a kangaroo court, pure and simple. Two week trial for life in prison? 1,800 FBI documents directly related to case inadmissable? Eyewittness 55 years after the fact? Pure bullshiat. The ends don't justify the means. The DA and the Judge should both be hung out to dry for this.
 
2012-12-10 10:05:44 PM  
Reasonable doubt I has a.
 
2012-12-10 10:05:57 PM  

Sandusky Knows Best: He was originally the prime suspect. Had an alibi that chief wiggum and lou didn't apparently investigate too thoroughly. Supposedly his train ticket was unused, which means his alibi may have been a lie. Then yes, extremely unreliable eye witness testimony.

//local resident
///interesting to watch unfold here.


Okay, here's what I don't get: if his alibi was that he was enlisting in the military at the time, couldn't the police have just called up the military and check when the guy was enlisting? Seems like that would have taken all of 10 minutes.
 
2012-12-10 10:06:52 PM  
Beyond a reasonable doubt? Eyewitness I.D. isn't reliable from 55 minutes ago let alone 55 years ago.
 
2012-12-10 10:07:13 PM  
This sounds a lot like Nifong and the Duke non-rape case.
"Here you go girlie, these are pictures of all the guys at the party. Just pick three of them and we will do the rest".

What is strange is that Chapman was an initial suspect, so why didn't the kid identify him then. The police are suppose to put Chapman's picture in a line up of other suspects, which apparently was not the case.
 
2012-12-10 10:07:32 PM  

gadian: jaytkay: .

Yeah, I got that bit. But that seems, well, not something you could prosecute on. I think I mixed up the bit with the ticket and how they finally figured out it was unused.


You are correct, it's absolutely hearsay. Not admissible in court.

I just meant to counteract the idea that the guy picked out of the blue.
 
2012-12-10 10:07:56 PM  
BS. Poor bastard.
Hearsay evidence from a dying old woman (I know, I think that can be admissable in some cases), an expert on a serendipitously appearing old train ticket, and a photo picked out of a lineup 50 years later (when even within weeks this is notoriously unreliable). But of course, the witness testified that she was sure it was him.
Even if it was him, I don't want this precedent set, these low standards used to accuse someone of murder. What if it was you, or me, that looked like Johnny, or your crazy old dying mother that accused you based on who knows what, perhaps only gossip from the time of the crime.
I just don't like one thing about this.
 
2012-12-10 10:08:31 PM  
The FBI documents are inadmissible, but some random train ticket is proof of murder, and so is hearsay from his sister? And he was only identified now, not when his face would have been fresh in the memory of the girl?

Not saying he couldn't have done it, but WTF?
 
2012-12-10 10:09:28 PM  

Spartacus Outlaw: BS. Poor bastard.
Hearsay evidence from a dying old woman



I don't think that was part of the court case.

I introduced that to the thread. Mea culpa.
 
2012-12-10 10:12:46 PM  

jaytkay: Spartacus Outlaw: BS. Poor bastard.
Hearsay evidence from a dying old woman


I don't think that was part of the court case.

I introduced that to the thread. Mea culpa.


I think it was part of the court case. I wrote my post before I saw yours.
 
2012-12-10 10:15:29 PM  

MrEricSir: Sandusky Knows Best: He was originally the prime suspect. Had an alibi that chief wiggum and lou didn't apparently investigate too thoroughly. Supposedly his train ticket was unused, which means his alibi may have been a lie. Then yes, extremely unreliable eye witness testimony.

//local resident
///interesting to watch unfold here.

Okay, here's what I don't get: if his alibi was that he was enlisting in the military at the time, couldn't the police have just called up the military and check when the guy was enlisting? Seems like that would have taken all of 10 minutes.


It's been in the local news for months off and on as new things come up, however, doing simple police work was not brought up. It is interesting that all those FBI files are inadmissible due to all the agents involved are either dead or can't testify. I would think that there would be enough reasonable doubt to let him off.

Not to say that there is any correlation, but he lived a pretty good life. Bronze star recipient as a Captain in Vietnam, police officer, semi retired security guard.
 
2012-12-10 10:16:10 PM  
Our hero has a sheet.
 
2012-12-10 10:17:44 PM  
Killing kids in Illinois, killing kids in Vietnam. What's the difference?
 
2012-12-10 10:18:16 PM  

Spartacus Outlaw: I think it was part of the court case. I wrote my post before I saw yours.


Understood. I am looking at today's stories and it's not clear. I suspect someone around here will soon provide more info.
 
2012-12-10 10:19:01 PM  
If it makes Snarky Subby happy, I'm aware that an axegrinding exgirlfriend's testimony helped get this creep into prison.

I'm as happy about this as I am for Drew Peterson finally getting punched. I hope Casey Anthony finally gets retrialed, too.

May Caylee and Maria RIP.
 
2012-12-10 10:19:12 PM  

SpaceBison: Killing kids in Illinois, killing kids in Vietnam. What's the difference?



Better Pho in Vietnam.
 
2012-12-10 10:19:18 PM  

boinkingbill: This sounds a lot like Nifong and the Duke non-rape case.
"Here you go girlie, these are pictures of all the guys at the party. Just pick three of them and we will do the rest".

What is strange is that Chapman was an initial suspect, so why didn't the kid identify him then. The police are suppose to put Chapman's picture in a line up of other suspects, which apparently was not the case.


The 8 year old friend of the murdered child was a suspect? Reading comprehension, how does it work?
 
2012-12-10 10:19:25 PM  
"Judge James Hallock had ruled the documents inadmissible at McCullough's trial"

How can FBI documents on the investigation be inadmissible? These are Justice Department files and should be considered almost unimpeachable.
 
2012-12-10 10:33:54 PM  

Sandusky Knows Best: MrEricSir: Sandusky Knows Best: He was originally the prime suspect. Had an alibi that chief wiggum and lou didn't apparently investigate too thoroughly. Supposedly his train ticket was unused, which means his alibi may have been a lie. Then yes, extremely unreliable eye witness testimony.

//local resident
///interesting to watch unfold here.

Okay, here's what I don't get: if his alibi was that he was enlisting in the military at the time, couldn't the police have just called up the military and check when the guy was enlisting? Seems like that would have taken all of 10 minutes.

It's been in the local news for months off and on as new things come up, however, doing simple police work was not brought up. It is interesting that all those FBI files are inadmissible due to all the agents involved are either dead or can't testify. I would think that there would be enough reasonable doubt to let him off.

Not to say that there is any correlation, but he lived a pretty good life. Bronze star recipient as a Captain in Vietnam, police officer, semi retired security guard.


Wonder who's Wheaties this guy pissed in?
 
2012-12-10 10:34:40 PM  

SirDigbyChickenCaesar: "Judge James Hallock had ruled the documents inadmissible at McCullough's trial"

How can FBI documents on the investigation be inadmissible? These are Justice Department files and should be considered almost unimpeachable.


None of the agents originally involved in the investigation can testify on the file content. I guess that is enough to toss them. Seems retarded. I'm pretty sure there is another document that is over two hundred years old. The um, founders of that document, if you will, aren't alive to discuss it. Maybe this document should be inadmissable during court proceedings. Make things interesting.
 
2012-12-10 10:39:49 PM  

jaytkay: gadian: jaytkay: .

Yeah, I got that bit. But that seems, well, not something you could prosecute on. I think I mixed up the bit with the ticket and how they finally figured out it was unused.

You are correct, it's absolutely hearsay. Not admissible in court.

I just meant to counteract the idea that the guy picked out of the blue.


Is if the Judge says so...good luck overturning a judge's discretion on appeal. Trial court..thats discretion all the way have to show clear error..unless that is what you are arguing.
 
2012-12-10 10:40:51 PM  

MrEricSir: Okay, here's what I don't get: if his alibi was that he was enlisting in the military at the time, couldn't the police have just called up the military and check when the guy was enlisting? Seems like that would have taken all of 10 minutes.


Yeah that bothers me, you'd think the cops would have called the enlistment center and asked if he'd showed up that day. If they said he had, cops would have simply stopped investigating him then and there.
 
2012-12-10 10:45:43 PM  

gibbon1: MrEricSir: Okay, here's what I don't get: if his alibi was that he was enlisting in the military at the time, couldn't the police have just called up the military and check when the guy was enlisting? Seems like that would have taken all of 10 minutes.

Yeah that bothers me, you'd think the cops would have called the enlistment center and asked if he'd showed up that day. If they said he had, cops would have simply stopped investigating him then and there.


Seems like the FBI did and cleared him. The trial judge ruled that the FBI files were inadmissible.
 
2012-12-10 10:45:55 PM  

Oxygen_Thief: jaytkay: gadian: jaytkay: .

Yeah, I got that bit. But that seems, well, not something you could prosecute on. I think I mixed up the bit with the ticket and how they finally figured out it was unused.

You are correct, it's absolutely hearsay. Not admissible in court.

I just meant to counteract the idea that the guy picked out of the blue.

Is if the Judge says so...good luck overturning a judge's discretion on appeal. Trial court..thats discretion all the way have to show clear error..unless that is what you are arguing.


and i can get around hearsay easily as a dying deceleration....probably why it was admitted.
 
2012-12-10 10:50:22 PM  

jaytkay: In January 1994, as she lay dying of cancer, Eileen Tessier pulled Janet close to her hospital bed and confessed her suspicion that her son, John, had been the man who committed the crime.


That's ok, when my mother-in-law was dying from cancer she thought I was an angel.
 
2012-12-10 10:51:27 PM  
Who's mlooking for recognition based on an incredible prosecution record?
 
2012-12-10 10:53:12 PM  

AbbeySomeone: Who's mlooking for recognition based on an incredible prosecution record?


Probably not Clay Campbell. He lost the election as the incumbent prosecuting the case.
 
2012-12-10 10:57:10 PM  

jaytkay: gadian: jaytkay: .

Yeah, I got that bit. But that seems, well, not something you could prosecute on. I think I mixed up the bit with the ticket and how they finally figured out it was unused.

You are correct, it's absolutely hearsay. Not admissible in court.

I just meant to counteract the idea that the guy picked out of the blue.


Dying declarations are admissible in court, they're not heresay.
 
2012-12-10 10:57:14 PM  

gadian: the ticket and how they finally figured out it was unused.


That would really require some scrutiny.

I can tell you this as a guy who rides Metra trains around Illinois. Sometimes - always mid-day, not during rush hour - the conductor does not make it to my car to punch my ticket.

I probably have some "unused" ticket in a pocket somewhere.

I am not saying this guy is innocent. I don't know the particulars of ticket handling in the years before I was born.

But you are correct to point out that the "unused" ticket claim isn't a simple yes/no.

/ CSI
 
2012-12-10 10:58:07 PM  
Wow and apparently the defense requested a bench trial from the judge that excluded all that evidence...wow...
 
2012-12-10 10:59:23 PM  

jaytkay: I don't know the particulars of ticket handling in the years before I was born.


Since they still punch train tickets in your area, it sounds like you probably do.
 
2012-12-10 11:00:38 PM  

HideAndGoFarkYourself: Dying declarations are admissible in court, they're not heresay.


I did not know that. Thank you.

Wikipedia - Dying declarationn 
 
2012-12-10 11:04:16 PM  

MrEricSir: jaytkay: I don't know the particulars of ticket handling in the years before I was born.

Since they still punch train tickets in your area, it sounds like you probably do.


??

Maybe they had more conductors in the 1950s and ALWAYS punched tickets.

Maybe they trusted people more in the 1950s and NEVER punched tickets.
 
2012-12-10 11:07:11 PM  

jaytkay: Maybe they had more conductors in the 1950s and ALWAYS punched tickets.

Maybe they trusted people more in the 1950s and NEVER punched tickets.


Maybe the conductor was having an off day? That and the ticket just happens to appear? This entire case seems to consist of a magic ticket, a drugged woman at the end of her life, a woman who was a baby at the time of the incident, a woman trying to remember a man from when she was a child and an ex-girlfriend with the magic ticket?
 
2012-12-10 11:11:29 PM  
Unsolved murder from over 55 years ago....
Not admissible: 4000 FBI documents with 1800 witnesses clearing the supposed suspect.
Admissible: Heresay from a death bed telephone conversation. And some unused train ticket.

i1.kym-cdn.com
 
2012-12-10 11:17:54 PM  
That has to be the worst defense lawyer in the entire world.
 
2012-12-10 11:20:19 PM  

SirDigbyChickenCaesar: Wow and apparently the defense requested a bench trial from the judge that excluded all that evidence...wow...


Apparently it was the defendant, and it worked once before for him, he was acquitted in the rape of his sister: Link

Plus the grand jury indicted, so maybe he was down to "judge = good" "jury = bad". Who knows? The whole thing is bizarre.

ModernLuddite: That has to be the worst defense lawyer in the entire world.


Yeah, I'm thinkin Lionel Hutz.
 
2012-12-10 11:21:58 PM  

doglover: This is a kangaroo court, pure and simple.


Yep. Whether he did it or not, this whole thing smells to high heaven.
 
2012-12-10 11:22:41 PM  

Bacontastesgood: Plus the grand jury indicted, so maybe he was down to "judge = good" "jury = bad". Who knows? The whole thing is bizarre.


Even if he's guilty as all hell, if that was truly a good summation of the case and evidence, I wouldn't have voted to convict if a member of the jury. There's a whole lot of reasonable doubt going on there.
 
2012-12-10 11:44:51 PM  

1. Put snakes on plane: The FBI documents are inadmissible, but some random train ticket is proof of murder, and so is hearsay from his sister? And he was only identified now, not when his face would have been fresh in the memory of the girl?

Not saying he couldn't have done it, but WTF?


doglover: So if we just rule the defense's evidence inadmissable, we can sentence anyone to anything 57 years after the fact.

I don't care if the guy IS the perp, this ain't justice. This is a kangaroo court, pure and simple. Two week trial for life in prison? 1,800 FBI documents directly related to case inadmissable? Eyewittness 55 years after the fact? Pure bullshiat. The ends don't justify the means. The DA and the Judge should both be hung out to dry for this.


These^. Hope the guy appeals and wins, then sues the shiat out of the state.
 
Displayed 50 of 78 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report