Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(YouTube)   First trailer for 'Oblivion' starring Tom Cruise as Wall-E   (youtube.com) divider line 113
    More: Cool, oblivion, Tom Cruise, Morgan Freeman, previews  
•       •       •

6962 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 09 Dec 2012 at 6:25 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



113 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-09 09:08:18 PM  
Is this the Windows 8 of 2013 movies?

/ Meh
 
2012-12-09 09:09:23 PM  
"60 years ago..." Doesn't seem like 60 years from the level of decay.
 
2012-12-10 12:11:15 AM  

coeyagi: I am arguing that you have made a baseless claim about there being a weak story, and I countered that you must be the screenwriter (or maybe producer / director) to know it's a weak story since this is so far from release that no one save a few executives have seen extensive footage.

Maybe you should shut the hell up before you start dropping dog shiat in a thread about a movie whose only critique you can make is by poorly contrasting it to previous Tom Cruise movies, many of which have been critically acclaimed.


You know, I wouldn't put it beyond Scientologists to troll internet forums in support of Tom Cruise.
 
2012-12-10 12:48:25 AM  

Shadowknight: I want to hate Cruise, because he's nuttier than squirrel poop, but he's a pretty good actor and makes a pretty damn entertaining action film. The fact he apparently has an anti aging gene (or a portrait of an old man in his attic) makes him still viable for the role, so hey.

I'll watch it.


I want to be as awesome as Tom Cruise.

I just don't know if I want to be as crazy as him, too.
 
2012-12-10 02:50:45 AM  
Maybe I'll download a cam version and get the full effect of suckage
 
2012-12-10 07:40:15 AM  

cousin-merle: coeyagi: I am arguing that you have made a baseless claim about there being a weak story, and I countered that you must be the screenwriter (or maybe producer / director) to know it's a weak story since this is so far from release that no one save a few executives have seen extensive footage.

Maybe you should shut the hell up before you start dropping dog shiat in a thread about a movie whose only critique you can make is by poorly contrasting it to previous Tom Cruise movies, many of which have been critically acclaimed.

You know, I wouldn't put it beyond Scientologists to troll internet forums in support of Tom Cruise.


I wouldn't put it beyond the average Farker to not be able to follow a thread in the slightest. The guy comes in here and starts a bunch of noise about how there is a weak story in this movie. His only evidence was that Tom Cruise is in it. I was responding to his derp, not by defending Tom Cruise, but by saying how retarded a claim it is to say that a movie has a weak story based on one person's involvement in it, a person who has a decent track record in making movies for critical acclaim, and I provided a few examples just from the past decade. Do I think his record is stellar? Hell no, he has some duds like Knight and Day and Far and Away and a few others.

So, again, I wouldn't put it past you to not realize that the initiator of this discussion wasn't me and that the initiator of this conversation is in fact the trolling douchebag.
 
2012-12-10 08:39:15 AM  

coeyagi: I wouldn't put it beyond the average Farker to not be able to follow a thread in the slightest. The guy comes in here and starts a bunch of noise about how there is a weak story in this movie. His only evidence was that Tom Cruise is in it. I was responding to his derp, not by defending Tom Cruise, but by saying how retarded a claim it is to say that a movie has a weak story based on one person's involvement in it, a person who has a decent track record in making movies for critical acclaim, and I provided a few examples just from the past decade. Do I think his record is stellar? Hell no, he has some duds like Knight and Day and Far and Away and a few others.

So, again, I wouldn't put it past you to not realize that the initiator of this discussion wasn't me and that the initiator of this conversation is in fact the trolling douchebag.


If he's trolling, he sure made you look stupid. If he's not trolling, you sure made you look stupid. They're just movies, dude. Get a grip.
 
2012-12-10 08:58:12 AM  

coeyagi: indarwinsshadow: coeyagi: indarwinsshadow: coeyagi: darwin

Not at all, and why the personal attack? What are you, Cruises agent or something? I've never liked Cruise, and most of his movies are derivative crap. He's the same wooden wannabe action hero in all his movies. And he's a nut. Doesn't improve my desire to run out an watch one of his movies.

You said it has a weak story, which you can't back up with anything. What you meant to say was "I have a weak argument and you should ignore me."

//indeed, I wish I had
//also, Minority Report and the last two Mission Impossible movies didn't suck, not to mention Valkyrie and... you get the idea

You're arguing over nothing with a complete stranger, you realize that right? And I wished you'd ignored me as well. I wasn't talking to you. I was making a comment about Cruise and his movies. I don't like his movies. You obviously do. Personally, I don't care, it's whatever blows your hair back right. I am allowed not to like his movies.

Ok, I'm finished. No point in going on about nothing.

I am arguing that you have made a baseless claim about there being a weak story, and I countered that you must be the screenwriter (or maybe producer / director) to know it's a weak story since this is so far from release that no one save a few executives have seen extensive footage.

Maybe you should shut the hell up before you start dropping dog shiat in a thread about a movie whose only critique you can make is by poorly contrasting it to previous Tom Cruise movies, many of which have been critically acclaimed.

//will argue with complete strangers since a) that is what the f*ck Fark is for and b) dumbasses who use the "but but but... I am a complete stranger!" argument are just walking back their own derp in a not-too-subtle way


F*ck you sh*t for brains.
 
2012-12-10 09:22:02 AM  

cousin-merle: coeyagi: I wouldn't put it beyond the average Farker to not be able to follow a thread in the slightest. The guy comes in here and starts a bunch of noise about how there is a weak story in this movie. His only evidence was that Tom Cruise is in it. I was responding to his derp, not by defending Tom Cruise, but by saying how retarded a claim it is to say that a movie has a weak story based on one person's involvement in it, a person who has a decent track record in making movies for critical acclaim, and I provided a few examples just from the past decade. Do I think his record is stellar? Hell no, he has some duds like Knight and Day and Far and Away and a few others.

So, again, I wouldn't put it past you to not realize that the initiator of this discussion wasn't me and that the initiator of this conversation is in fact the trolling douchebag.

If he's trolling, he sure made you look stupid. If he's not trolling, you sure made you look stupid. They're just movies, dude. Get a grip.



See, that's a BS cop out. Fark is largely about having fun going back and forth. "They're just movies"? Yeah, I suspect the guy you're responding too isn't staying up at night worrying about this film. If they want to have at it with another Farker wtf do you care?
 
2012-12-10 09:41:34 AM  
i2.ytimg.com

Let's get back to bashing butts, and deez nutz!
 
2012-12-10 09:43:12 AM  

downtownkid: See, that's a BS cop out. Fark is largely about having fun going back and forth. "They're just movies"? Yeah, I suspect the guy you're responding too isn't staying up at night worrying about this film. If they want to have at it with another Farker wtf do you care?


Calling people dumb asses or douche bags for not liking movie trailers is what YouTube is for.
 
2012-12-10 11:17:23 AM  

Clutch2013: Shadowknight: I want to hate Cruise, because he's nuttier than squirrel poop, but he's a pretty good actor and makes a pretty damn entertaining action film. The fact he apparently has an anti aging gene (or a portrait of an old man in his attic) makes him still viable for the role, so hey.

I'll watch it.

I want to be as awesome as Tom Cruise.

I just don't know if I want to be as crazy as him, too.


You can't be as Tom Cruise Crazy as Tom Cruise, because only Tom Cruise can be as Tome Cruise Crazy as Tom Cruise.
 
2012-12-10 12:34:32 PM  

Rhames: [i2.ytimg.com image 480x360]

Let's get back to bashing butts, and deez nutz!>

It was only a dream...

/nope
//...better...

 
Displayed 13 of 113 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
Advertisement
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report