If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Dolt)   Fox News correspondent is as tired as everyone else of all of Fox News' Benghazi coverage   (thedailydolt.com) divider line 137
    More: Ironic, Fox News, coverages, White House correspondent, correspondents, reasonable person  
•       •       •

3335 clicks; posted to Politics » on 07 Dec 2012 at 11:02 AM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



137 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-12-07 12:41:32 PM

halfof33: justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....

No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.


i18.photobucket.com

Nope. Still not stickin'.
 
2012-12-07 12:44:50 PM
I had no idea there was still a Benghazi scandal. I thought they farked that chicken into the ground weeks ago. Then again I don't get my news from Faux and I don't click on the Muriken Stinker links that greened here.
 
2012-12-07 01:06:01 PM

halfof33: rufus-t-firefly: Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.

Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda.

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"

That is such bullshiat, and it COMPLETELY misses the point. Lying about whether there was a protest outside the embassy caused by the release of an anti-islamic video does not release any confidential information whatsoever.

Unless you are dumb enough to believe that the people who attacked the embassy just thought to themselves "Say, I wonder how we missed those protests."

Cripes, wise up.


Please answer these 2 questions. What difference does it make whether they said the attack began with a protest over the video - or - it was a planned terrorist attack that had nothing to do with the video? And if the attack was not motivated by the video... what do you think the motivation was? Because they hate our freedoms?
 
2012-12-07 01:14:12 PM
We're STILL worried about Ben-Gay-Z??
 
2012-12-07 01:30:47 PM

rufus-t-firefly: justtray: halfof33: justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....

No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.

I stand corrected. They were indeed wrong.

So?

So? It's obvious!

The president must explain everything to us in detail, regardless of national security interests. He must release every classified briefing he gets, because FREEDOM.


Unless it's Bush. Then we can get lied into a war and you know, no big deal right?
 
2012-12-07 01:39:05 PM

Britney Spear's Speculum: Remember that MSNBC is just as bad. I don't have any specific examples, just that they are equally bad


This actually irritates me a lot. First, MSNBC is straight-forward that they're biased. They don't pretend to be "Fair and Balanced". In addition, MSNBC rarely flat-out lies. They distort, they're not infrequently simply displaying the usual bad analysis that you get from journalists (but bad analysis biased in the liberal direction), but they rarely flat-out make-up facts. Fox does. Fox also distorts with malice of forethought, and unreservedly pushes the conservative agenda, even if they have to be gross hypocrites to do so.

The two are not anywhere NEAR mirror images of themselves. If Fox wants to find one, it's going to have as much luck as a vampire looking into the mirror.
 
2012-12-07 02:02:30 PM
1000 hours of coverage by Fox News and not once did they blame or even investigate the terrorists. You know, the actual people who killed Americans.
 
2012-12-07 02:15:45 PM

vygramul: malice of forethought


malice aforethought

/pet peave
 
2012-12-07 03:07:17 PM

Clutch2013: I really want to see a Fox News on-air personality have a real moment of clarity and just quit, right then and there, Half-Baked style.
The horndog in me really wants it to be Megyn Kelly. Logically, I bet Shep does it first.


I think Shep and Kelly are both Poes. They drop character on occasion, Shep does it more often but Kelly telling Rove on election night "Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better" was the big illuminating indicator that she doesn't believe half the bullshiat she spouts on a daily basis. Also, there was that time she ridiculed a fellow conservative for daring to bash maternity leave..... which indicates that she's for a lot of progressive causes after all.
 
2012-12-07 03:08:37 PM

basham: halfof33: rufus-t-firefly: Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.

Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda.

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"

That is such bullshiat, and it COMPLETELY misses the point. Lying about whether there was a protest outside the embassy caused by the release of an anti-islamic video does not release any confidential information whatsoever.

Unless you are dumb enough to believe that the people who attacked the embassy just thought to themselves "Say, I wonder how we missed those protests."

Cripes, wise up.

Please answer these 2 questions. What difference does it make whether they said the attack began with a protest over the video - or - it was a planned terrorist attack that had nothing to do with the video? And if the attack was not motivated by the video... what do you think the motivation was? Because they hate our freedoms?


Yeah, I don't really get the outrage either, but it does seem like a stupid thing to lie about.
 
2012-12-07 03:17:22 PM

Ishkur: Clutch2013: I really want to see a Fox News on-air personality have a real moment of clarity and just quit, right then and there, Half-Baked style.
The horndog in me really wants it to be Megyn Kelly. Logically, I bet Shep does it first.

I think Shep and Kelly are both Poes. They drop character on occasion, Shep does it more often but Kelly telling Rove on election night "Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better" was the big illuminating indicator that she doesn't believe half the bullshiat she spouts on a daily basis. Also, there was that time she ridiculed a fellow conservative for daring to bash maternity leave..... which indicates that she's for a lot of progressive causes after all.


In both cases, Megyn was speaking out of self-interest: "How DARE you suggest my maternity leave wasn't important!" & "How DARE you make me look stupid on national TV! I'm gonna go get the numbers guys to cite chapter and verse on how wrong and dumb you are."

In Shep's case, I believe it. It's his occasional incredulity at the company line - "This is AMERICA! WE. DO. NOT. FARKING. TORTURE!" - that makes me think he's definitely in Blue Dog territory (i.e. not a lefty libbertygibbert liberalpants, but not a psychotic mouthbreathing potatobagger).
 
2012-12-07 04:30:48 PM

winterbraid: vygramul: malice of forethought

malicemallets, aforethought fourth hot

/pet peaieve


FTFY. Mallets were originally invented because they only became 1/4 as hot as a hammer after repeated use. The more you know.
 
2012-12-07 04:37:09 PM
Maybe they should consider that poor poor chicken's butthole and stop politicizing it, then.
 
2012-12-07 04:37:51 PM

Dr Dreidel: Ishkur: Clutch2013: I really want to see a Fox News on-air personality have a real moment of clarity and just quit, right then and there, Half-Baked style.
The horndog in me really wants it to be Megyn Kelly. Logically, I bet Shep does it first.

I think Shep and Kelly are both Poes. They drop character on occasion, Shep does it more often but Kelly telling Rove on election night "Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better" was the big illuminating indicator that she doesn't believe half the bullshiat she spouts on a daily basis. Also, there was that time she ridiculed a fellow conservative for daring to bash maternity leave..... which indicates that she's for a lot of progressive causes after all.

In both cases, Megyn was speaking out of self-interest: "How DARE you suggest my maternity leave wasn't important!" & "How DARE you make me look stupid on national TV! I'm gonna go get the numbers guys to cite chapter and verse on how wrong and dumb you are."

In Shep's case, I believe it. It's his occasional incredulity at the company line - "This is AMERICA! WE. DO. NOT. FARKING. TORTURE!" - that makes me think he's definitely in Blue Dog territory (i.e. not a lefty libbertygibbert liberalpants, but not a psychotic mouthbreathing potatobagger).


I wonder if Shep's got some serious dirt on anyone else there. It's the only reason I can come up with as to why he remains there.
 
2012-12-07 06:02:33 PM

Elandriel: This is a thing that's still going on?


They had to find something after they fell flat on their faces with the fake Fast and Furious scandal.
 
2012-12-07 06:33:42 PM

MFAWG: Yeah, I don't really get the outrage either, but it does seem like a stupid thing to lie about.


Exactly. When did they lie, again?
 
2012-12-07 06:34:53 PM

MFAWG: basham: halfof33: rufus-t-firefly: Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.

Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda.

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"

That is such bullshiat, and it COMPLETELY misses the point. Lying about whether there was a protest outside the embassy caused by the release of an anti-islamic video does not release any confidential information whatsoever.

Unless you are dumb enough to believe that the people who attacked the embassy just thought to themselves "Say, I wonder how we missed those protests."

Cripes, wise up.

Please answer these 2 questions. What difference does it make whether they said the attack began with a protest over the video - or - it was a planned terrorist attack that had nothing to do with the video? And if the attack was not motivated by the video... what do you think the motivation was? Because they hate our freedoms?

Yeah, I don't really get the outrage either, but it does seem like a stupid thing to lie about.


Here's a link to a question I asked Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (who's on the House Intelligence Committee investigating Benghazi) regarding this very topic - the talking points, and who changed them. 

/ For what it's worth, I also used the word "derpy" in my question, as in, "I've heard both Mike Rogers and Joe Heck say some pretty derpy things."  
// derp
 
2012-12-08 02:47:07 PM
Again, it appears that most people are missing the point. We are talking about two different things:

1. That someone made a decision to omit the reference to Al Quaeda from the talking points.

2. That someone made the decision to repeatedly tell the false story that there was a protest over a video outside the embassy prior to the attack, despite having substantial information that the story was false no later than 9/13, and which was confirmed as false by interviews in Germany no later than 9/14.
 
2012-12-08 04:55:14 PM

halfof33: Again, it appears that most people are missing the point.


hurr
 
2012-12-08 05:28:49 PM

whidbey: halfof33: Again, it appears that most people are missing the point.

hurr


The partisan trolls on fark are getting farking lazy.
 
2012-12-08 05:59:57 PM

halfof33: whidbey: halfof33: Again, it appears that most people are missing the point.

hurr

The partisan trolls on fark are getting farking lazy.


2.bp.blogspot.com

looks like somebody dropped his flashlight
 
2012-12-08 06:31:18 PM

winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight


Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...
 
2012-12-08 07:16:29 PM

halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...


Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.
 
2012-12-08 08:00:50 PM

winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...

Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.


Newsflash. The government lied, but it is ok.

It is Obama.

/partisan troll gonna troll
 
2012-12-08 08:08:45 PM

halfof33: winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...

Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.

Newsflash. The government lied, but it is ok.

It is Obama.

/partisan troll gonna troll


southofheaven.typepad.com

I know in my heart that Taxbongo is LYING!!!111 why won't anyone take me seriously!?!

wwwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!

/cry moar troll
 
2012-12-08 09:20:26 PM

winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...

Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.

Newsflash. The government lied, but it is ok.

It is Obama.

/partisan troll gonna troll

[southofheaven.typepad.com image 638x476]

I know in my heart that Taxbongo is LYING!!!111 why won't anyone take me seriously!?!

wwwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!

/cry moar troll


Lolz. Noobs like when their government lies to them. Post more funny pictures!

/curious that an obvious troll calls me one. Yes there was an anti-video protest in Benghazi. The govmint told me so! Slurp
 
2012-12-08 09:24:50 PM

halfof33: winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...

Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.

Newsflash. The government lied, but it is ok.

It is Obama.

/partisan troll gonna troll

[southofheaven.typepad.com image 638x476]

I know in my heart that Taxbongo is LYING!!!111 why won't anyone take me seriously!?!

wwwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!

/cry moar troll

Lolz. Noobs like when their government lies to them. Post more funny pictures!

/curious that an obvious troll calls me one. Yes there was an anti-video protest in Benghazi. The govmint told me so! Slurp


wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!

stamp those little feet!
 
2012-12-08 09:58:35 PM
winterbraid:

wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!

stamp those little feet!

I don't get it, forget that I showed they lied, I mean they admitted that the story they told was wrong, it is the slurping pro-government trolls in these threads.

Fascinating really. This guy is really, really mad at me for showing that the government fable was incorrect. I don't get the unquestioning slurping of the government tit. I know your response will be some worthless troll, there is literally no way whatsoever you will address the substance.

So why the pro-government slurping, troll?

Or just post "you mad" or something. It is cool. Welcome to fark! We need a pro government troll, lulz
 
2012-12-08 10:04:42 PM

halfof33: wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!

I don't get it, I threw a tantrum and held my breath and they still don't think I'm right!


keep at it sweetie
 
2012-12-08 10:15:55 PM

winterbraid: halfof33: wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!

I don't get it, I threw a tantrum and held my breath and they still don't think I'm right!

keep at it sweetie


I will noob, seriously, it is just you and me

Why the unquestioning pro-government slurping? I don't get it, I'll admit it. You are far too persistent to merely be a partisan troll. I get that you might be stupid. You don't understand what I'm writing. I assume that is it at this point.

I mean there is no doubt, no doubt in my mind that your response will be some mindless idiocy that you honed on YouTube or 4chan. You are new here and you are throwing around the heavy armor you learned on troll sites, but I'm curious, can you respond with substance? I mean if challenged, like now, can you put together a coherent sentence addressing the issue? The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.

Your turn, go!
 
2012-12-08 10:23:58 PM

halfof33: /partisan troll gonna troll


Project much?

Let me see. You didn't vote for either Bush. You're a Fark Independent&trade and you're above both parties. Even though you think, act and post just like a Republican.
 
2012-12-08 10:31:17 PM

halfof33: wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!


waaa! I demand substance while offering none!
waaa! I call them liars so they must be! I don't need proof!
waaa! nobody agrees with me they must all be sheeples!


halfof33: The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.


I'm sure if you say it a few more times, it will magically become true. In the meantime, feel free to continue demanding that other people grow up; that is by far the best thing to demand while acting like a ten year old.

/WWWAAAHHH
//I'm sure your next post will make me see the light. Keep it up!
 
2012-12-08 10:40:56 PM

halfof33: but I'm curious, can you respond with substance?

The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.


lol
 
2012-12-08 10:45:15 PM

whidbey: halfof33: but I'm curious, can you respond with substance?

The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.

lol


This is another example of why I favorited you as "succinct."
 
2012-12-08 11:13:02 PM

winterbraid: 'm sure if you say it a few more times, it will magically become true. In the meantime, feel free to continue demanding that other people grow up; that is by far the best thing to demand while acting like a ten year old.


Fascinating. I predicted that you were not going to come back with substance, instead you come back with slurping for known Troll Whidbey, interesting!

Yes the administration lied. Lets take a look:

Link

Fact Check missed two things: 1. articles in the press on 9/13 saying there was no protest; 2. the fact that staff from the Embassy was interviewed before 9/14 confirming no protest; yet they sent sent bag girl Rice to lie on FIVE shows on 9/16.

There will be no substantive response. Whidbey and his noob admirer are incapable of responding with substance.

It is fascinating. Why do they post? Slurping pro-government trolls, fascinating...
 
2012-12-08 11:23:09 PM

halfof33: Yes the administration lied. Lets take a look

Link

"I hope he doesn't actually read the link that doesn't support my nonsense..."


bad news kid, I've got a link that entirely debunks your flailing tinfoil masturbatory fantasy:

Exact same link, putz

*deep breath*
waaaaaaahh!
 
2012-12-08 11:30:34 PM

winterbraid: halfof33: Yes the administration lied. Lets take a look

Link

"I hope he doesn't actually read the link that doesn't support my nonsense..."

bad news kid, I've got a link that entirely debunks your flailing tinfoil masturbatory fantasy:

Exact same link, putz

*deep breath*
waaaaaaahh!


Now THAT is trolling! Posting the exact same link I just posted, that says:

There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack.

God, you are like a complete government lickspittle. I am fascinated by this. Why are you posting? I really want to know, I mean there is absolutely no question whatsoever that you will do nothing but vomit up the discredited administration position.
 
2012-12-08 11:47:38 PM

halfof33: fascinated


halfof33: fascinating


halfof33: fascinating


halfof33: Fascinating


You know, if you simply say 'fascinating' a few more times, I'll have no choice but to assume you're above all of this petty squabbling and really a genius of Spock-like rapacity.

Of course, no amount of half-cited half-read factchecks, repeatedly repeated talking points, or childish tantrums will make it true.

/Don't let that stop you from trying though!
//waaaaaaahh!
 
2012-12-09 12:00:15 AM

winterbraid: You know, if you simply say 'fascinating' a few more times, I'll have no choice but to assume you're above all of this petty squabbling and really a genius of Spock-like rapacity.

Of course, no amount of half-cited half-read factchecks, repeatedly repeated talking points, or childish tantrums will make it true.

/Don't let that stop you from trying though!
//waaaaaaahh!


THAT seemed like work! Shall I post the article from 9/13/2012 contradicting the administration's story from three days later, government sycophant?

Lets!

Looking forward to your next non-substantive post bitterly complaining about having your government talking points being ground into troll dust.

Type WAAAAA, again troll!

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

I bet this is easier on youtube, huh troll?
 
2012-12-09 12:16:46 AM

winterbraid: You know, if you simply say 'fascinating' a few more times, I'll have no choice but to assume you're above all of this petty squabbling and really a genius of Spock-like rapacity.


No more? ah well. If you refer to me as 'troll' a bit more, that will also make you the winner! That's some substantive debatin there lou.

Don't worry though, I'm sure you can't be more than 2 or 3 more factless, pointless, self-congratulating rants from convincing me that you know a damn thing about what you're talking about.

halfof33: Type WAAAAA, again troll!


waaaaah!

/your welcome
 
2012-12-09 12:45:29 AM

halfof33: The government lied, but it is ok.


Well, let's be fair: It only started to matter after January 20, 2009, didn't it?

The previous decade of lies, deceptions, frauds, forgeries, and outright propaganda and manufacturing of untruths went without much complaint.
 
2012-12-09 12:52:59 AM

winterbraid: winterbraid: You know, if you simply say 'fascinating' a few more times, I'll have no choice but to assume you're above all of this petty squabbling and really a genius of Spock-like rapacity.

No more? ah well. If you refer to me as 'troll' a bit more, that will also make you the winner! That's some substantive debatin there lou.

Don't worry though, I'm sure you can't be more than 2 or 3 more factless, pointless, self-congratulating rants from convincing me that you know a damn thing about what you're talking about.

halfof33: Type WAAAAA, again troll!

waaaaah!

/your welcome


Lulz, another no substance, all troll.

Ishkur: Well, let's be fair: It only started to matter after January 20, 2009, didn't it?


Well, this thread has made it god damn clear that it sure as fark doesn't matter after 1/20/2009, huh hypocrite?

lolz, god damn I love you government slurping trolls.

Shall I quote it again? Hell yeah!

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

Post your trolling nonsense again

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack."

Lolz
 
2012-12-09 01:02:09 AM

halfof33: lolz, god damn I love you government slurping trolls


you're not fooling anyone; no one is buying your bullshiat and it's driving you up the wall.

but really, just another ragepost or two and we'll all come to our senses!
and join you in your III citadel timeshare!

and buy your book of course.

4.bp.blogspot.com 

/waaah!
 
2012-12-09 01:06:34 AM

winterbraid: no one is buying your bullshiat and it's driving you up the wall.


"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

Fact Check did, but you've really come up with some hard facts.

Post something again, government slurper, SLURP!
 
2012-12-09 01:14:59 AM

halfof33: Well, this thread has made it god damn clear that it sure as fark doesn't matter after 1/20/2009, huh hypocrite?


Either it's always mattered or it has never ever mattered.... ever. It can't suddenly start to matter just because the Democrats are in office.

So which is it?

/I'm not a hypocrite. I'm Canadian. To us, every American President since the Second World War should have been hanged. Violently. With extreme prejudice.
 
2012-12-09 01:21:37 AM

halfof33: trololol

slurper, SLURP!


What a compelling argument. But I'm still not convinced - you should repeat it several more times in the most shrill and obnoxious way you can think of, while dodging facts like Jackie Chan and letting propagandists lead you around by the nose. That will certainly move me to abandon logic and "slurp" some koch.

/when you're done with it I mean.
 
2012-12-09 01:27:59 AM

Ishkur: Either it's always mattered or it has never ever mattered.... ever. It can't suddenly start to matter just because the Democrats are in office.

So which is it?


Do they teach logic in Canada? You have posted a false dichotomy, couple with a tu quoque fallacy. I mean there was nothing you posted that was not an outright assault of basic logic.

But I bet you were pretty pleased with yourself when you hit "add comment" huh?

"hey Honey, I'm aboot to post this post here, eh. Gonna make dem Yankees think aboot sometin dere eh? Oh cripes, I'm doon to aboot my last looney, god save the queen and get my Moose scrapper, de darn kid hit another one on de ro-hud."
 
2012-12-09 01:29:27 AM

winterbraid: What a compelling argument. But I'm still not convinced -


"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

Convinced yet?
 
2012-12-09 01:58:23 AM

halfof33: Lulz, another no substance, all troll.


Dude, trolling is so 2008. Why not give this alt a rest?

Nobody believes Benghazi is an issue.

No one could possibly be as butthurt as this.
 
2012-12-09 02:03:06 AM
So you open with:

halfof33: Do they teach logic in Canada?


and then open a school of logic all over...

halfof33: "hey Honey, I'm aboot to post this post here, eh. Gonna make dem Yankees think aboot sometin dere eh? Oh cripes, I'm doon to aboot my last looney, god save the queen and get my Moose scrapper, de darn kid hit another one on de ro-hud."


oh, wait, no. you just continue to pull things out of your ass.

halfof33: trololol. Convinced yet?


Oh, yes. Clearly Taxbongo airlifted some Canadian Muslims into the airstrip to shoot down videographers while dragging dead americans through the streets and... wait, it seems I've lost track.

Remind me again which half-baked, delusional conspiracy theory you're actually defending?

/you forgot to say 'slurp'
//and 'fascinating'
///and 'troll'
////you sound tired
 
Displayed 50 of 137 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report