Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Dolt)   Fox News correspondent is as tired as everyone else of all of Fox News' Benghazi coverage   (thedailydolt.com ) divider line
    More: Ironic, Fox News, coverages, White House correspondent, correspondents, reasonable person  
•       •       •

3337 clicks; posted to Politics » on 07 Dec 2012 at 11:02 AM (3 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



137 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread
 
2012-12-07 09:14:29 AM  
Good.
 
2012-12-07 11:04:44 AM  
Fired in 3.....2......1......
 
2012-12-07 11:04:57 AM  
Does this mean that poor chicken will be given a respite, however brief?
 
2012-12-07 11:06:01 AM  
i.imgur.com
 
2012-12-07 11:06:41 AM  
FTA:
"I wouldn't lie to you. I see that we're covering Benghazi a lot, and I think that should be something that we're asking about. ... We've had the proper emphasis. But I would not be so deluded to say that some of our shows, some of our commentators, have covered it more than it needed to be covered."

Am I having a stroke? Am I having trouble parsing English? Because it looks like this guy said the exact opposite of what Subby says he says.
 
2012-12-07 11:07:30 AM  
I really want to see a Fox News on-air personality have a real moment of clarity and just quit, right then and there, Half-Baked style.

The horndog in me really wants it to be Megyn Kelly. Logically, I bet Shep does it first.

/fark you, fark you, fark you, you're cool, fark you. I'm out
 
2012-12-07 11:09:27 AM  

THIS IS NOT
A BENGHAZI
SCANDAL

 
2012-12-07 11:09:31 AM  
The Benghazi conspiracy theories is a new low for foxnews, you wouldn't think that was even possible but here we are.
 
2012-12-07 11:09:32 AM  
But there's still so many questions. Like why did Obama read Chris Stevens' emotional plea for more security, laugh derisively, then fly to Libya to personally shoot him, while yelling, "THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR BEING A WHINER!"

Why, lib-eraces?
 
2012-12-07 11:10:27 AM  

Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: FTA:
"I wouldn't lie to you. I see that we're covering Benghazi a lot, and I think that should be something that we're asking about. ... We've had the proper emphasis. But I would not be so deluded to say that some of our shows, some of our commentators, have covered it more than it needed to be covered."

Am I having a stroke? Am I having trouble parsing English? Because it looks like this guy said the exact opposite of what Subby says he says.


Nope, it's also the opposite of what the article says. Just before that:

"Fox News White House correspondent and actual reasonable person Ed Henry told the AP recently that Fox News probably over-covered the Benghazi attacks just a wee bit:"

Not really. In typical Fox fashion, he defended the coverage and then doubled down and said that no on on the network has over covered it.

"It's the bubble!"
 
2012-12-07 11:11:25 AM  

Car_Ramrod: But there's still so many questions. Like why did Obama read Chris Stevens' emotional plea for more security, laugh derisively, then fly to Libya to personally shoot him, while yelling, "THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR BEING A WHINER!"

Why, lib-eraces?


And what about the billions of taxpayer dollars he spent on TeabagBot, the horrifying cyborg with the 50 lb scrotum with realistic taint stink, that he brought with him to humiliate Stevens' corpse? What about that?
 
2012-12-07 11:11:27 AM  
Ben who?
 
2012-12-07 11:11:33 AM  

Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: Am I having a stroke? Am I having trouble parsing English? Because it looks like this guy said the exact opposite of what Subby says he says.


It's as close to an admission of fault as you'll ever see from anyone affiliated with that channel.
 
2012-12-07 11:12:52 AM  

Carn: "It's the bubble!"


Thank God, I was beginning to worry about my brain.
 
2012-12-07 11:13:30 AM  
Remember that MSNBC is just as bad. I don't have any specific examples, just that they are equally bad
 
2012-12-07 11:14:42 AM  
Henry also emphasized that it was an important story to cover since four Americans were killed and there's still some mystery about what the administration knew and when they knew about the attack, and he asserted that other news outlets (ahem, MSNBC, he's looking at you) have under-covered the story

That's a hell of a thing to bring up on Pearl Harbor Day Not that my in-law is at a Japanese Air Force base right now..
 
2012-12-07 11:18:26 AM  

ts1.mm.bing.net

Fox producer in his natural state

 
2012-12-07 11:19:09 AM  

Britney Spear's Speculum: Remember that MSNBC is just as bad. I don't have any specific examples, just that they are equally bad


So vote Republican.
 
2012-12-07 11:23:15 AM  

HMS_Blinkin: It's as close to an admission of fault as you'll ever see from anyone affiliated with that channel.


No this is:

Ms Rice said: "The talking points provided by the intelligence community, and the initial assessment upon which they were based, were incorrect in a key respect: there was no protest or demonstration in Benghazi."

Looking forward to your partisan attacks! Love 16.5
 
2012-12-07 11:23:28 AM  

Rattlehead: Ben who?


Ben Wa?
 
2012-12-07 11:24:06 AM  
This is a thing that's still going on?
 
2012-12-07 11:25:06 AM  
President Obama could end all of the questions regarding Benghazi by admitting that he personally planned the attack on the consulate and by resigning in disgrace. This continued coverage is therefore his fault.
 
2012-12-07 11:25:16 AM  

halfof33: Looking forward to your partisan attacks! Love 16.5


troofers usually get it from all sides.
 
2012-12-07 11:25:31 AM  

Summer Glau's Love Slave: Rattlehead: Ben who?

Ben Wa?


Balls.
 
2012-12-07 11:26:40 AM  

halfof33: HMS_Blinkin: It's as close to an admission of fault as you'll ever see from anyone affiliated with that channel.

No this is:

Ms Rice said: "The talking points provided by the intelligence community, and the initial assessment upon which they were based, were incorrect in a key respect: there was no protest or demonstration in Benghazi."

Looking forward to your partisan attacks! Love 16.5


But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....
 
2012-12-07 11:28:23 AM  

SigilBear: Summer Glau's Love Slave: Rattlehead: Ben who?

Ben Wa?

Balls.


Insert Archer pic here.
 
2012-12-07 11:29:47 AM  

justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....


No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.
 
2012-12-07 11:29:48 AM  
www.bitlogic.com
 
2012-12-07 11:32:26 AM  

halfof33: Looking forward to your partisan attacks! Love 16.5


I think you are a wonderful, useful person, and you should continue doing and saying all of the things you've been doing and saying since before the last election. I think you should encourage, loudly (and especially during primaries) your representatives to do the same. I think you should continue doing this forever. Never, ever, ever let Benghazi go. Ever. You're just peaches, friend.
 
2012-12-07 11:33:07 AM  

halfof33: justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....

No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.


It really is unprecedented for the federal government to ever get a fact wrong. Do you think impeachment will be enough, or should everyone involved be tried for treason and shot?
 
2012-12-07 11:36:16 AM  

halfof33: justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....

No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.


I stand corrected. They were indeed wrong.

So?
 
2012-12-07 11:37:38 AM  
Let me follow up with - was it a scandal when we invaded Iraq because they were "building weapons of mass destruction?"
 
2012-12-07 11:37:46 AM  
Is Milhouse asking whether Benghazi is a scandal yet a meme yet?
 
2012-12-07 11:38:08 AM  

Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: halfof33: Looking forward to your partisan attacks! Love 16.5

I think you are a wonderful, useful person, and you should continue doing and saying all of the things you've been doing and saying since before the last election. I think you should encourage, loudly (and especially during primaries) your representatives to do the same. I think you should continue doing this forever. Never, ever, ever let Benghazi go. Ever. You're just peaches, friend.


I'm adding him to my Christmas card mailing list.
 
2012-12-07 11:38:52 AM  

Philip Francis Queeg: It really is unprecedented for the federal government to ever get a fact wrong. Do you think impeachment will be enough, or should everyone involved be tried for treason and shot?


Well we can sweep it under the rug, post pictures of Milhouse and attack the messenger. That seems to be the approach here.

Don't worry, the Government is here to take care of you.
 
2012-12-07 11:40:26 AM  

justtray: Let me follow up with - was it a scandal when we invaded Iraq because they were "building weapons of mass destruction?"


massive deflection noted.

I'll answer though: No.
 
2012-12-07 11:41:44 AM  
Awww.... Poor Fox News. Tried so hard to make this into a "scandal" and nobody cared except for the unhinged, partisan clowns who watch their shiatty programs.
 
2012-12-07 11:42:18 AM  
25.media.tumblr.com
 
2012-12-07 11:42:32 AM  

halfof33: justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....

No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.


:YAWN:

Link

Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.


Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda. 

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"
 
2012-12-07 11:42:41 AM  

halfof33: Philip Francis Queeg: It really is unprecedented for the federal government to ever get a fact wrong. Do you think impeachment will be enough, or should everyone involved be tried for treason and shot?

Well we can sweep it under the rug, post pictures of Milhouse and attack the messenger. That seems to be the approach here.

Don't worry, the Government is here to take care of you.


So, treason trials and firing squads then?
 
2012-12-07 11:43:32 AM  
These sheeple just don't know the truth, Romney landslide, benghazi conspiracy, climate change, mayan apocalypse how can you libs trust the lamestream-drieby-liebral-media when they are always wrong?
 
2012-12-07 11:44:25 AM  

justtray: halfof33: justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....

No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.

I stand corrected. They were indeed wrong.

So?


So? It's obvious!

The president must explain everything to us in detail, regardless of national security interests. He must release every classified briefing he gets, because FREEDOM.
 
2012-12-07 11:44:28 AM  

HMS_Blinkin: Duke Phillips' Singing Bears: Am I having a stroke? Am I having trouble parsing English? Because it looks like this guy said the exact opposite of what Subby says he says.

It's as close to an admission of fault as you'll ever see from anyone affiliated with that channel.


Actually I think he misspoke and said "have" instead of "haven't", given the context. He was trying to admit that MAAAAYBE it was a tad much, even though he countered himself with an arthritis-jarring dose of MSNBC liberal mainstream birth MSM mediacertificate.
 
2012-12-07 11:47:41 AM  

halfof33: justtray: Let me follow up with - was it a scandal when we invaded Iraq because they were "building weapons of mass destruction?"

massive deflection noted.

I'll answer though: No.


Why? Because Costanza?

Or is it OK to lie about the justification for a war you choose to have, but it's not OK to avoid the truth so the enemy doesn't know you're reading their communications?

We really need to know the rules for this.
 
2012-12-07 11:47:45 AM  

halfof33: justtray: Let me follow up with - was it a scandal when we invaded Iraq because they were "building weapons of mass destruction?"

massive deflection noted.

I'll answer though: No.


I think it's only a deflection if you DON'T think the Iraq lies should be a scandal. Otherwise, it exposes...

Well, wait. Why don't you think a failure of the intelligence community was a scandal when it led to $1 trillion spent and 4,000 lives lost, yet when everything is scaled down by a factor of 1,000 suddenly it's the biggest scandal to ever scandal a scandal? I'm willing to allow for differences, but I think they'll more than likely expose-

...your partisanship (which is fine, just own it) or have you thinking, correctly, that Iraq should have been MORE of a scandal than it was and that Benghazi may have gotten overblown a bit (especially in comparison).
 
2012-12-07 11:48:10 AM  

halfof33: justtray: Let me follow up with - was it a scandal when we invaded Iraq because they were "building weapons of mass destruction?"

massive deflection noted.

I'll answer though: No.


Deflection of what? I asked you, so? They were wrong, exactly like my example where you said that wasn't a scandal.

So, please extrapolate.
 
2012-12-07 11:52:16 AM  

rufus-t-firefly: halfof33: justtray: Let me follow up with - was it a scandal when we invaded Iraq because they were "building weapons of mass destruction?"

massive deflection noted.

I'll answer though: No.

Why? Because Costanza?

Or is it OK to lie about the justification for a war you choose to have, but it's not OK to avoid the truth so the enemy doesn't know you're reading their communications?

We really need to know the rules for this.


Its funny to watch him simultaneously deflect and project when painted into a corner. I think i owned a troll today. Im proud of myself
 
2012-12-07 11:53:21 AM  

vygramul: [www.bitlogic.com image 300x300]


That was some funny shiat.

/Still chuckling.
 
2012-12-07 11:55:34 AM  

rufus-t-firefly: Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.

Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda.

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"


That is such bullshiat, and it COMPLETELY misses the point. Lying about whether there was a protest outside the embassy caused by the release of an anti-islamic video does not release any confidential information whatsoever.

Unless you are dumb enough to believe that the people who attacked the embassy just thought to themselves "Say, I wonder how we missed those protests."

Cripes, wise up.
 
2012-12-07 12:32:09 PM  

halfof33: rufus-t-firefly: Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.

Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda.

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"

That is such bullshiat, and it COMPLETELY misses the point. Lying about whether there was a protest outside the embassy caused by the release of an anti-islamic video does not release any confidential information whatsoever.

Unless you are dumb enough to believe that the people who attacked the embassy just thought to themselves "Say, I wonder how we missed those protests."

Cripes, wise up.


You sounded tired even before the superblack meganazi acorned the election; now you're like the latest season of "two and a half men."

/believe it or not, I watched two sheen-free episodes
//used to like that show, in small doses :(
 
2012-12-07 12:41:32 PM  

halfof33: justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....

No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.


i18.photobucket.com

Nope. Still not stickin'.
 
2012-12-07 12:44:50 PM  
I had no idea there was still a Benghazi scandal. I thought they farked that chicken into the ground weeks ago. Then again I don't get my news from Faux and I don't click on the Muriken Stinker links that greened here.
 
2012-12-07 01:06:01 PM  

halfof33: rufus-t-firefly: Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.

Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda.

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"

That is such bullshiat, and it COMPLETELY misses the point. Lying about whether there was a protest outside the embassy caused by the release of an anti-islamic video does not release any confidential information whatsoever.

Unless you are dumb enough to believe that the people who attacked the embassy just thought to themselves "Say, I wonder how we missed those protests."

Cripes, wise up.


Please answer these 2 questions. What difference does it make whether they said the attack began with a protest over the video - or - it was a planned terrorist attack that had nothing to do with the video? And if the attack was not motivated by the video... what do you think the motivation was? Because they hate our freedoms?
 
2012-12-07 01:14:12 PM  
We're STILL worried about Ben-Gay-Z??
 
2012-12-07 01:30:47 PM  

rufus-t-firefly: justtray: halfof33: justtray: But there was. The terrorists used it as cover so.....

No there wasn't.

Obama's administration lied to you.

I stand corrected. They were indeed wrong.

So?

So? It's obvious!

The president must explain everything to us in detail, regardless of national security interests. He must release every classified briefing he gets, because FREEDOM.


Unless it's Bush. Then we can get lied into a war and you know, no big deal right?
 
2012-12-07 01:39:05 PM  

Britney Spear's Speculum: Remember that MSNBC is just as bad. I don't have any specific examples, just that they are equally bad


This actually irritates me a lot. First, MSNBC is straight-forward that they're biased. They don't pretend to be "Fair and Balanced". In addition, MSNBC rarely flat-out lies. They distort, they're not infrequently simply displaying the usual bad analysis that you get from journalists (but bad analysis biased in the liberal direction), but they rarely flat-out make-up facts. Fox does. Fox also distorts with malice of forethought, and unreservedly pushes the conservative agenda, even if they have to be gross hypocrites to do so.

The two are not anywhere NEAR mirror images of themselves. If Fox wants to find one, it's going to have as much luck as a vampire looking into the mirror.
 
2012-12-07 02:02:30 PM  
1000 hours of coverage by Fox News and not once did they blame or even investigate the terrorists. You know, the actual people who killed Americans.
 
2012-12-07 02:15:45 PM  

vygramul: malice of forethought


malice aforethought

/pet peave
 
2012-12-07 03:07:17 PM  

Clutch2013: I really want to see a Fox News on-air personality have a real moment of clarity and just quit, right then and there, Half-Baked style.
The horndog in me really wants it to be Megyn Kelly. Logically, I bet Shep does it first.


I think Shep and Kelly are both Poes. They drop character on occasion, Shep does it more often but Kelly telling Rove on election night "Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better" was the big illuminating indicator that she doesn't believe half the bullshiat she spouts on a daily basis. Also, there was that time she ridiculed a fellow conservative for daring to bash maternity leave..... which indicates that she's for a lot of progressive causes after all.
 
2012-12-07 03:08:37 PM  

basham: halfof33: rufus-t-firefly: Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.

Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda.

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"

That is such bullshiat, and it COMPLETELY misses the point. Lying about whether there was a protest outside the embassy caused by the release of an anti-islamic video does not release any confidential information whatsoever.

Unless you are dumb enough to believe that the people who attacked the embassy just thought to themselves "Say, I wonder how we missed those protests."

Cripes, wise up.

Please answer these 2 questions. What difference does it make whether they said the attack began with a protest over the video - or - it was a planned terrorist attack that had nothing to do with the video? And if the attack was not motivated by the video... what do you think the motivation was? Because they hate our freedoms?


Yeah, I don't really get the outrage either, but it does seem like a stupid thing to lie about.
 
2012-12-07 03:17:22 PM  

Ishkur: Clutch2013: I really want to see a Fox News on-air personality have a real moment of clarity and just quit, right then and there, Half-Baked style.
The horndog in me really wants it to be Megyn Kelly. Logically, I bet Shep does it first.

I think Shep and Kelly are both Poes. They drop character on occasion, Shep does it more often but Kelly telling Rove on election night "Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better" was the big illuminating indicator that she doesn't believe half the bullshiat she spouts on a daily basis. Also, there was that time she ridiculed a fellow conservative for daring to bash maternity leave..... which indicates that she's for a lot of progressive causes after all.


In both cases, Megyn was speaking out of self-interest: "How DARE you suggest my maternity leave wasn't important!" & "How DARE you make me look stupid on national TV! I'm gonna go get the numbers guys to cite chapter and verse on how wrong and dumb you are."

In Shep's case, I believe it. It's his occasional incredulity at the company line - "This is AMERICA! WE. DO. NOT. FARKING. TORTURE!" - that makes me think he's definitely in Blue Dog territory (i.e. not a lefty libbertygibbert liberalpants, but not a psychotic mouthbreathing potatobagger).
 
2012-12-07 04:30:48 PM  

winterbraid: vygramul: malice of forethought

malicemallets, aforethought fourth hot

/pet peaieve


FTFY. Mallets were originally invented because they only became 1/4 as hot as a hammer after repeated use. The more you know.
 
2012-12-07 04:37:09 PM  
Maybe they should consider that poor poor chicken's butthole and stop politicizing it, then.
 
2012-12-07 04:37:51 PM  

Dr Dreidel: Ishkur: Clutch2013: I really want to see a Fox News on-air personality have a real moment of clarity and just quit, right then and there, Half-Baked style.
The horndog in me really wants it to be Megyn Kelly. Logically, I bet Shep does it first.

I think Shep and Kelly are both Poes. They drop character on occasion, Shep does it more often but Kelly telling Rove on election night "Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better" was the big illuminating indicator that she doesn't believe half the bullshiat she spouts on a daily basis. Also, there was that time she ridiculed a fellow conservative for daring to bash maternity leave..... which indicates that she's for a lot of progressive causes after all.

In both cases, Megyn was speaking out of self-interest: "How DARE you suggest my maternity leave wasn't important!" & "How DARE you make me look stupid on national TV! I'm gonna go get the numbers guys to cite chapter and verse on how wrong and dumb you are."

In Shep's case, I believe it. It's his occasional incredulity at the company line - "This is AMERICA! WE. DO. NOT. FARKING. TORTURE!" - that makes me think he's definitely in Blue Dog territory (i.e. not a lefty libbertygibbert liberalpants, but not a psychotic mouthbreathing potatobagger).


I wonder if Shep's got some serious dirt on anyone else there. It's the only reason I can come up with as to why he remains there.
 
2012-12-07 06:02:33 PM  

Elandriel: This is a thing that's still going on?


They had to find something after they fell flat on their faces with the fake Fast and Furious scandal.
 
2012-12-07 06:33:42 PM  

MFAWG: Yeah, I don't really get the outrage either, but it does seem like a stupid thing to lie about.


Exactly. When did they lie, again?
 
2012-12-07 06:34:53 PM  

MFAWG: basham: halfof33: rufus-t-firefly: Chaffetz was responding to a report in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal that CIA "officials" wanted the terrorist origins of the attack kept from the public because the spy agency did not want certain al-Qaeda operatives to know it was monitoring its communications.

Leave it to the right-wing to damage national security in the service of their own agenda.

Idiots like our Fark Independents would have wanted investigations to find out why FDR and Churchill didn't tell the Nazis "We've broken the Enigma Code! Suck it, Adolf!" and "Hey, Tojo! See you at Midway!"

That is such bullshiat, and it COMPLETELY misses the point. Lying about whether there was a protest outside the embassy caused by the release of an anti-islamic video does not release any confidential information whatsoever.

Unless you are dumb enough to believe that the people who attacked the embassy just thought to themselves "Say, I wonder how we missed those protests."

Cripes, wise up.

Please answer these 2 questions. What difference does it make whether they said the attack began with a protest over the video - or - it was a planned terrorist attack that had nothing to do with the video? And if the attack was not motivated by the video... what do you think the motivation was? Because they hate our freedoms?

Yeah, I don't really get the outrage either, but it does seem like a stupid thing to lie about.


Here's a link to a question I asked Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (who's on the House Intelligence Committee investigating Benghazi) regarding this very topic - the talking points, and who changed them. 

/ For what it's worth, I also used the word "derpy" in my question, as in, "I've heard both Mike Rogers and Joe Heck say some pretty derpy things."  
// derp
 
2012-12-08 02:47:07 PM  
Again, it appears that most people are missing the point. We are talking about two different things:

1. That someone made a decision to omit the reference to Al Quaeda from the talking points.

2. That someone made the decision to repeatedly tell the false story that there was a protest over a video outside the embassy prior to the attack, despite having substantial information that the story was false no later than 9/13, and which was confirmed as false by interviews in Germany no later than 9/14.
 
2012-12-08 04:55:14 PM  

halfof33: Again, it appears that most people are missing the point.


hurr
 
2012-12-08 05:28:49 PM  

whidbey: halfof33: Again, it appears that most people are missing the point.

hurr


The partisan trolls on fark are getting farking lazy.
 
2012-12-08 05:59:57 PM  

halfof33: whidbey: halfof33: Again, it appears that most people are missing the point.

hurr

The partisan trolls on fark are getting farking lazy.


2.bp.blogspot.com

looks like somebody dropped his flashlight
 
2012-12-08 06:31:18 PM  

winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight


Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...
 
2012-12-08 07:16:29 PM  

halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...


Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.
 
2012-12-08 08:00:50 PM  

winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...

Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.


Newsflash. The government lied, but it is ok.

It is Obama.

/partisan troll gonna troll
 
2012-12-08 08:08:45 PM  

halfof33: winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...

Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.

Newsflash. The government lied, but it is ok.

It is Obama.

/partisan troll gonna troll


southofheaven.typepad.com

I know in my heart that Taxbongo is LYING!!!111 why won't anyone take me seriously!?!

wwwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!

/cry moar troll
 
2012-12-08 09:20:26 PM  

winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...

Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.

Newsflash. The government lied, but it is ok.

It is Obama.

/partisan troll gonna troll

[southofheaven.typepad.com image 638x476]

I know in my heart that Taxbongo is LYING!!!111 why won't anyone take me seriously!?!

wwwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!

/cry moar troll


Lolz. Noobs like when their government lies to them. Post more funny pictures!

/curious that an obvious troll calls me one. Yes there was an anti-video protest in Benghazi. The govmint told me so! Slurp
 
2012-12-08 09:24:50 PM  

halfof33: winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: halfof33: winterbraid: looks like somebody dropped his flashlight

Case in point... Worthless newbie trolls...

Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.

why don't you just call us all sheeple and turn in for the night. I'll go plug your nite lite in so Obama can't get you.

Newsflash. The government lied, but it is ok.

It is Obama.

/partisan troll gonna troll

[southofheaven.typepad.com image 638x476]

I know in my heart that Taxbongo is LYING!!!111 why won't anyone take me seriously!?!

wwwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh!

/cry moar troll

Lolz. Noobs like when their government lies to them. Post more funny pictures!

/curious that an obvious troll calls me one. Yes there was an anti-video protest in Benghazi. The govmint told me so! Slurp


wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!

stamp those little feet!
 
2012-12-08 09:58:35 PM  
winterbraid:

wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!

stamp those little feet!

I don't get it, forget that I showed they lied, I mean they admitted that the story they told was wrong, it is the slurping pro-government trolls in these threads.

Fascinating really. This guy is really, really mad at me for showing that the government fable was incorrect. I don't get the unquestioning slurping of the government tit. I know your response will be some worthless troll, there is literally no way whatsoever you will address the substance.

So why the pro-government slurping, troll?

Or just post "you mad" or something. It is cool. Welcome to fark! We need a pro government troll, lulz
 
2012-12-08 10:04:42 PM  

halfof33: wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!

I don't get it, I threw a tantrum and held my breath and they still don't think I'm right!


keep at it sweetie
 
2012-12-08 10:15:55 PM  

winterbraid: halfof33: wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!

I don't get it, I threw a tantrum and held my breath and they still don't think I'm right!

keep at it sweetie


I will noob, seriously, it is just you and me

Why the unquestioning pro-government slurping? I don't get it, I'll admit it. You are far too persistent to merely be a partisan troll. I get that you might be stupid. You don't understand what I'm writing. I assume that is it at this point.

I mean there is no doubt, no doubt in my mind that your response will be some mindless idiocy that you honed on YouTube or 4chan. You are new here and you are throwing around the heavy armor you learned on troll sites, but I'm curious, can you respond with substance? I mean if challenged, like now, can you put together a coherent sentence addressing the issue? The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.

Your turn, go!
 
2012-12-08 10:23:58 PM  

halfof33: /partisan troll gonna troll


Project much?

Let me see. You didn't vote for either Bush. You're a Fark Independent&trade and you're above both parties. Even though you think, act and post just like a Republican.
 
2012-12-08 10:31:17 PM  

halfof33: wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!


waaa! I demand substance while offering none!
waaa! I call them liars so they must be! I don't need proof!
waaa! nobody agrees with me they must all be sheeples!


halfof33: The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.


I'm sure if you say it a few more times, it will magically become true. In the meantime, feel free to continue demanding that other people grow up; that is by far the best thing to demand while acting like a ten year old.

/WWWAAAHHH
//I'm sure your next post will make me see the light. Keep it up!
 
2012-12-08 10:40:56 PM  

halfof33: but I'm curious, can you respond with substance?

The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.


lol
 
2012-12-08 10:45:15 PM  

whidbey: halfof33: but I'm curious, can you respond with substance?

The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.

lol


This is another example of why I favorited you as "succinct."
 
2012-12-08 11:13:02 PM  

winterbraid: 'm sure if you say it a few more times, it will magically become true. In the meantime, feel free to continue demanding that other people grow up; that is by far the best thing to demand while acting like a ten year old.


Fascinating. I predicted that you were not going to come back with substance, instead you come back with slurping for known Troll Whidbey, interesting!

Yes the administration lied. Lets take a look:

Link

Fact Check missed two things: 1. articles in the press on 9/13 saying there was no protest; 2. the fact that staff from the Embassy was interviewed before 9/14 confirming no protest; yet they sent sent bag girl Rice to lie on FIVE shows on 9/16.

There will be no substantive response. Whidbey and his noob admirer are incapable of responding with substance.

It is fascinating. Why do they post? Slurping pro-government trolls, fascinating...
 
2012-12-08 11:23:09 PM  

halfof33: Yes the administration lied. Lets take a look

Link

"I hope he doesn't actually read the link that doesn't support my nonsense..."


bad news kid, I've got a link that entirely debunks your flailing tinfoil masturbatory fantasy:

Exact same link, putz

*deep breath*
waaaaaaahh!
 
2012-12-08 11:30:34 PM  

winterbraid: halfof33: Yes the administration lied. Lets take a look

Link

"I hope he doesn't actually read the link that doesn't support my nonsense..."

bad news kid, I've got a link that entirely debunks your flailing tinfoil masturbatory fantasy:

Exact same link, putz

*deep breath*
waaaaaaahh!


Now THAT is trolling! Posting the exact same link I just posted, that says:

There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack.

God, you are like a complete government lickspittle. I am fascinated by this. Why are you posting? I really want to know, I mean there is absolutely no question whatsoever that you will do nothing but vomit up the discredited administration position.
 
2012-12-08 11:47:38 PM  

halfof33: fascinated


halfof33: fascinating


halfof33: fascinating


halfof33: Fascinating


You know, if you simply say 'fascinating' a few more times, I'll have no choice but to assume you're above all of this petty squabbling and really a genius of Spock-like rapacity.

Of course, no amount of half-cited half-read factchecks, repeatedly repeated talking points, or childish tantrums will make it true.

/Don't let that stop you from trying though!
//waaaaaaahh!
 
2012-12-09 12:00:15 AM  

winterbraid: You know, if you simply say 'fascinating' a few more times, I'll have no choice but to assume you're above all of this petty squabbling and really a genius of Spock-like rapacity.

Of course, no amount of half-cited half-read factchecks, repeatedly repeated talking points, or childish tantrums will make it true.

/Don't let that stop you from trying though!
//waaaaaaahh!


THAT seemed like work! Shall I post the article from 9/13/2012 contradicting the administration's story from three days later, government sycophant?

Lets!

Looking forward to your next non-substantive post bitterly complaining about having your government talking points being ground into troll dust.

Type WAAAAA, again troll!

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

I bet this is easier on youtube, huh troll?
 
2012-12-09 12:16:46 AM  

winterbraid: You know, if you simply say 'fascinating' a few more times, I'll have no choice but to assume you're above all of this petty squabbling and really a genius of Spock-like rapacity.


No more? ah well. If you refer to me as 'troll' a bit more, that will also make you the winner! That's some substantive debatin there lou.

Don't worry though, I'm sure you can't be more than 2 or 3 more factless, pointless, self-congratulating rants from convincing me that you know a damn thing about what you're talking about.

halfof33: Type WAAAAA, again troll!


waaaaah!

/your welcome
 
2012-12-09 12:45:29 AM  

halfof33: The government lied, but it is ok.


Well, let's be fair: It only started to matter after January 20, 2009, didn't it?

The previous decade of lies, deceptions, frauds, forgeries, and outright propaganda and manufacturing of untruths went without much complaint.
 
2012-12-09 12:52:59 AM  

winterbraid: winterbraid: You know, if you simply say 'fascinating' a few more times, I'll have no choice but to assume you're above all of this petty squabbling and really a genius of Spock-like rapacity.

No more? ah well. If you refer to me as 'troll' a bit more, that will also make you the winner! That's some substantive debatin there lou.

Don't worry though, I'm sure you can't be more than 2 or 3 more factless, pointless, self-congratulating rants from convincing me that you know a damn thing about what you're talking about.

halfof33: Type WAAAAA, again troll!

waaaaah!

/your welcome


Lulz, another no substance, all troll.

Ishkur: Well, let's be fair: It only started to matter after January 20, 2009, didn't it?


Well, this thread has made it god damn clear that it sure as fark doesn't matter after 1/20/2009, huh hypocrite?

lolz, god damn I love you government slurping trolls.

Shall I quote it again? Hell yeah!

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

Post your trolling nonsense again

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack."

Lolz
 
2012-12-09 01:02:09 AM  

halfof33: lolz, god damn I love you government slurping trolls


you're not fooling anyone; no one is buying your bullshiat and it's driving you up the wall.

but really, just another ragepost or two and we'll all come to our senses!
and join you in your III citadel timeshare!

and buy your book of course.

4.bp.blogspot.com 

/waaah!
 
2012-12-09 01:06:34 AM  

winterbraid: no one is buying your bullshiat and it's driving you up the wall.


"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

Fact Check did, but you've really come up with some hard facts.

Post something again, government slurper, SLURP!
 
2012-12-09 01:14:59 AM  

halfof33: Well, this thread has made it god damn clear that it sure as fark doesn't matter after 1/20/2009, huh hypocrite?


Either it's always mattered or it has never ever mattered.... ever. It can't suddenly start to matter just because the Democrats are in office.

So which is it?

/I'm not a hypocrite. I'm Canadian. To us, every American President since the Second World War should have been hanged. Violently. With extreme prejudice.
 
2012-12-09 01:21:37 AM  

halfof33: trololol

slurper, SLURP!


What a compelling argument. But I'm still not convinced - you should repeat it several more times in the most shrill and obnoxious way you can think of, while dodging facts like Jackie Chan and letting propagandists lead you around by the nose. That will certainly move me to abandon logic and "slurp" some koch.

/when you're done with it I mean.
 
2012-12-09 01:27:59 AM  

Ishkur: Either it's always mattered or it has never ever mattered.... ever. It can't suddenly start to matter just because the Democrats are in office.

So which is it?


Do they teach logic in Canada? You have posted a false dichotomy, couple with a tu quoque fallacy. I mean there was nothing you posted that was not an outright assault of basic logic.

But I bet you were pretty pleased with yourself when you hit "add comment" huh?

"hey Honey, I'm aboot to post this post here, eh. Gonna make dem Yankees think aboot sometin dere eh? Oh cripes, I'm doon to aboot my last looney, god save the queen and get my Moose scrapper, de darn kid hit another one on de ro-hud."
 
2012-12-09 01:29:27 AM  

winterbraid: What a compelling argument. But I'm still not convinced -


"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

Convinced yet?
 
2012-12-09 01:58:23 AM  

halfof33: Lulz, another no substance, all troll.


Dude, trolling is so 2008. Why not give this alt a rest?

Nobody believes Benghazi is an issue.

No one could possibly be as butthurt as this.
 
2012-12-09 02:03:06 AM  
So you open with:

halfof33: Do they teach logic in Canada?


and then open a school of logic all over...

halfof33: "hey Honey, I'm aboot to post this post here, eh. Gonna make dem Yankees think aboot sometin dere eh? Oh cripes, I'm doon to aboot my last looney, god save the queen and get my Moose scrapper, de darn kid hit another one on de ro-hud."


oh, wait, no. you just continue to pull things out of your ass.

halfof33: trololol. Convinced yet?


Oh, yes. Clearly Taxbongo airlifted some Canadian Muslims into the airstrip to shoot down videographers while dragging dead americans through the streets and... wait, it seems I've lost track.

Remind me again which half-baked, delusional conspiracy theory you're actually defending?

/you forgot to say 'slurp'
//and 'fascinating'
///and 'troll'
////you sound tired
 
2012-12-09 02:11:06 AM  

halfof33: Do they teach logic in Canada?


No, they teach us how to answer the farking question. And it's not a fallacy because it's not asserting an either-or factual proposition through an ultimatum. I'm simply asking for your clarification on a matter in which you feel very strongly toward:

Does it ALWAYS matter to you when the government lies? If not, why? If so, where was your vitriol back then?
 
2012-12-09 02:39:39 AM  

halfof33: Do they teach logic in Canada?


Ishkur: logical biatch slap


I guess they do...
 
2012-12-09 10:17:09 AM  

Ishkur: And it's not a fallacy because it's not asserting an either-or factual proposition through an ultimatum.


I see the trolls were out IN FORCE last night, good for them!

It is funny, you just defined a false dichotomy. So to sum up, you have committed the following logical fallacies:

1.false dichotomy
2. tu quoque fallacy
3. moving the goal posts.

The third is the CLASSIC troll tactic.... unfortunately you wield it very poorly. It is so obvious that you are desperately trying to change the subject from:

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

to, what, anything else I guess?

Why don't you ask the same question to the multiple people in this thread who keep repeating "Benghazi is not teh scandal." There is no one behind the screen and the government never lies.

I'll pity you for a moment, thread changer, my concern about lying is evidenced by the fact I quoted Fact Check in this thread.

Looking forward to your tu quoque attack, sport, it is sadly predictable....

/Whidbey: "Stop talking about things I don't like!" Lolz, I love you Hugo.
 
2012-12-09 10:45:13 AM  

whidbey: No one could possibly be as butthurt as this.


Despite all evidence to the contrary?
 
2012-12-09 10:57:29 AM  

vygramul: whidbey: No one could possibly be as butthurt as this.

Despite all evidence to the contrary?


Great point, you wouldn't think that three persistent knuckleheads would be trolling the thread, but there you are: butt hurt galore.

I know I know, stop pointing out that the Administration lied, and they'll go back under the bridge.
 
2012-12-09 11:00:58 AM  

halfof33: vygramul: whidbey: No one could possibly be as butthurt as this.

Despite all evidence to the contrary?

Great point, you wouldn't think that three persistent knuckleheads would be trolling the thread, but there you are: butt hurt galore.

I know I know, stop pointing out that the Administration lied, and they'll go back under the bridge.


Case in point...
 
2012-12-09 11:04:41 AM  

vygramul: Case in point...


whoops! Four trolls.
 
2012-12-09 11:10:20 AM  
Dude, will you please look up what the word "troll" means?

When every single person in a forum considers you delusional, they are not trolling you.
 
2012-12-09 11:35:36 AM  

Hickory-smoked: Dude, will you please look up what the word "troll" means?

When every single person in a forum considers you delusional, they are not trolling you.


Five!
 
2012-12-09 11:36:19 AM  

Hickory-smoked: Dude, will you please look up what the word "troll" means?

When every single person in a forum considers you delusional, they are not trolling you.


Trolling is marked by personal attacks and attempts to avoid discussing the substance of the issue. This thread is absolutely filled with trolls, I mean look at Whidbey's responses.

Heck, your response is nothing but a personal attack. I mean I have provided several links, all of which have been ignored. Like this one from Fact Check dot org.

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."

You consider me delusional for posting this, yet you deny being a troll?

/your post is also an an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it to be true. But thanks for giving me the chance to further educate you.
 
2012-12-09 01:38:27 PM  

halfof33: troll troll troll trolled trollling trolls.


I honestly have never seen a more blatant act of projection on Fark in my ten years posting here.
 
2012-12-09 01:51:22 PM  
whidbey: halfof33: Again, it appears that most people are missing the point.

hurr


whidbey: halfof33: but I'm curious, can you respond with substance?

The administration lied about the pre attack protest at Benghazi.

lol


whidbey: halfof33: Lulz, another no substance, all troll.

Dude, trolling is so 2008. Why not give this alt a rest?

Nobody believes Benghazi is an issue.

No one could possibly be as butthurt as this.


whidbey: halfof33: troll troll troll trolled trollling trolls.

I honestly have never seen a more blatant act of projection on Fark in my ten years posting here.


whidbey:
Maybe they should consider that poor poor chicken's butthole and stop politicizing it, then.

No substance, just personal attacks. My favorite post of yours was "hurr."

Did you read any of the links I posted?? Any?
 
2012-12-09 01:54:50 PM  

halfof33: Trolling is marked by personal attacks and attempts to avoid discussing the substance of the issue.


The term you're looking for is "flame war."

And the subsistence of this issue is that even Fox News correspondents think your scandal is fabricated.
 
2012-12-09 02:06:43 PM  

halfof33: It is funny, you just defined a false dichotomy


No I haven't. I asked for your opinion on something; I didn't ask for you to make a false choice between two facts. Neither have I committed a tu qoque or a moving the goalpost. The question has remained the same and I'm not accusing you of anything that I'm doing. It doesn't appear like you even understand what those logical fallacies are.

Can you just answer the question? I'm not really interested in anything else going on in this thread.

Does it ALWAYS matter to you when the government lies?

Yes or no question. Seriously.
 
2012-12-09 02:20:28 PM  
Anatomy of a tantrum:

halfof33: the Administration lied


www.serenejourney.com

halfof33: The government lied, Obama lied!


www.bestofyoutoday.com

Hickory-smoked: When every single person in a forum considers you delusional, they are not trolling you.

winterbraid: Wingnut 101: everyone else is crazy.


image.listpipe.com

halfof33: wwwaaahhhh! Benghazi IS IS IS a scandal!


www.hersheyicecream.com
 
2012-12-09 03:46:39 PM  

winterbraid: Anatomy of a tantrum:


I've pointed out repeatedly that this thread is filled with trolls and I come back to find an hilariously over the top example, and no one calls him on it. Lolz.

Hickory-smoked: And the subsistence of this issue is that even Fox News correspondents think your scandal is fabricated.


The what? And then you double down and wildly exaggerate, if fact so much so that I am being very, very charitable in not calling you a liar.

Thanks for the hilarity. Do some homework next time.

"There were no protesters at the Benghazi consulate prior to the attack, even though Obama and others repeatedly said the attackers joined an angry mob that had formed in opposition to the anti-Muslim film that had triggered protests in Egypt and elsewhere. The State Department disclosed this fact Oct. 9 - nearly a month after the attack."
 
2012-12-09 04:12:31 PM  

halfof33: No substance, just personal attacks. My favorite post of yours was "hurr."

Did you read any of the links I posted?? Any?


No. You are only posting to disrupt what's left of this thread.

A real poster would reflect on the overwhelming negative criticism he's received and learn from his mistakes. Threadshiatting troll is boring.
 
2012-12-09 04:54:30 PM  

whidbey: Did you read any of the links I posted?? Any?

No.


Ladies and Gentlemen, I present Whidbey,by far and away the most worthless god damn troll on Fark.

The quote above is all you need to know about him.
 
2012-12-09 05:00:12 PM  

halfof33: the most worthless god damn troll on Fark.


Seriously, what is it about trolls projecting their own mechanisms onto others?

It's almost worthy of a psychological treatise.

Once again:

Benghazi is not an issue. The fact that you keep bringing it up tells us that you're only interested in disrupting the thread. The honorable thing to do is admit that you were wrong, that in fact you're a Republican tool, and that you had no intention of bringing any kind of intelligent discussion here.

Really, you need to retire this alt, whoever you "really" are.
 
2012-12-09 05:12:11 PM  

whidbey: Benghazi is not an issue.


Face palm.

Me: "Did you read any of the links I posted?? Any?"

Whidbey: "No."

Of course YOU think "Benghazi is not an issue," you are incapable of exercising objective analysis You are a troll, and a very bad one. For god's sake you just claimed that I should not be posting about Benghazi in a god damn Benghazi thread.

That is stunningly idiotic.

Keep on trolling, sure beats reading something outside your comfort zone, huh Whids?

Me: "Did you read any of the links I posted?? Any?"

Whidbey: "No."


I love you bro. LOLZ!
 
2012-12-09 05:15:07 PM  
Stop trolling halfof33. Get a farking life. Do something productive. Trolling the liberals in power on a humor site does not constitute "productive."
 
2012-12-09 05:34:01 PM  

whidbey: Stop trolling halfof33. Get a farking life. Do something productive. Trolling the liberals in power on a humor site does not constitute "productive."


The liberals in power on a humor site.. Wow

Did you read any of the links I posted whidbey?

/sorry to hear that cancer caught Chavez again though, power liberal. Lolz
 
2012-12-09 05:40:04 PM  

whidbey: Stop trolling halfof33. Get a farking life. Do something productive. Trolling the liberals in power on a humor site does not constitute "productive."

 
2012-12-09 05:44:00 PM  

whidbey: whidbey: Stop trolling halfof33. Get a farking life. Do something productive. Trolling the liberals in power on a humor site does not constitute "productive."


Did you read the links I posted?
 
2012-12-09 05:45:33 PM  
Mods, please delete the last 25 or so posts in this thread.

Thanks
 
2012-12-09 05:55:34 PM  

whidbey: Mods, please delete the last 25 or so posts in this thread.

Thanks


Since you came back and intentionally derailed the thread by personally attacking me, while admitting that you ignored the substantive posts and links I contributed?

I can see why you'd want that deleted.

Did you read my links? No. Game over troll.
 
2012-12-09 07:38:00 PM  

whidbey: you're only interested in disrupting the thread


thread? this is a gangbang. this is one nutjob screaming on the rotary green and four assholes circling and pelting him with our garbage. this is a passed out dork getting dicks drawn on his face.

...
... oh wait, one more:

this thread didn't just jump the tracks - we're airborne now.
 
2012-12-09 08:56:28 PM  

winterbraid: whidbey: you're only interested in disrupting the thread

thread? this is a gangbang. this is one nutjob screaming on the rotary green and four assholes circling and pelting him with our garbage. this is a passed out dork getting dicks drawn on his face.

...
... oh wait, one more:

this thread didn't just jump the tracks - we're airborne now.


Oh man... Holy cripes, I don't think I have ever seen a troll soil themselves so completely.

Fascinating.
 
2012-12-09 09:28:55 PM  

halfof33: Fascinating.


zing!
 
2012-12-09 09:45:14 PM  

halfof33: Did you read the links I posted?


Have you answered my question?
 
2012-12-09 10:21:02 PM  

Ishkur: halfof33: Did you read the links I posted?

Have you answered my question?


Yes.

What do you think of your troll friend? Do you think you are more of a gangbanger or a dick drawer?

Either way, that post was the absolute crowning glory of a complete car wreck of a thread.

Absolutely glorious.
 
2012-12-09 11:16:29 PM  

halfof33: while admitting that you ignored the substantive posts and links I contributed?


halfof33: soil themselves so completely


halfof33: Ishkur: halfof33: Did you read the links I posted?

Have you answered my question?

Yes.



blogs.westword.com
 
2012-12-10 02:31:31 AM  

halfof33: Yes.


No you haven't. Instead of answering it you accused it of being a logical fallacy.
 
2012-12-10 09:12:50 AM  

Ishkur: halfof33: Yes.

No you haven't. Instead of answering it you accused it of being a logical fallacy.


Yes I did. Reread my entire answer. Cripes. And yes it was a logical fallacy and completely off topic.

And considering that it seems to be just me, you and the feces throwing monkey troll from You tube, I'll see you in the next one.
 
2012-12-10 10:35:18 AM  

halfof33: Ishkur: halfof33: Yes.

No you haven't. Instead of answering it you accused it of being a logical fallacy.

Yes I did. Reread my entire answer. Cripes. And yes it was a logical fallacy and completely off topic.

And considering that it seems to be just me, you and the feces throwing monkey troll from You tube, I'll see you in the next one.


Will you be ranting about Obama and Chicago conspiracies in that one?

This Benghazi thing will be a scandal. All you have to do is spend even more time spamming threads on fark.
 
2012-12-10 11:00:41 AM  

halfof33: Yes I did. Reread my entire answer.


It's a yes or no question and you failed to answer it.
 
2012-12-10 01:51:36 PM  
I like halfof33. He's fun.
 
Displayed 137 of 137 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report