If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(KGWN Cheyenne)   Today's campus shooting brought to you by.... Wyoming. Weapon was a deadly AK47M16 assault bow and arrow   (kgwn.tv) divider line 22
    More: Scary, Casper College, third floor, next of kin  
•       •       •

7863 clicks; posted to Main » on 30 Nov 2012 at 8:29 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-12-01 01:31:36 AM
3 votes:

that bosnian sniper: How the fark do you commit suicide with a bow and arrow?


Aim it at a cop?
2012-11-30 09:33:46 PM
3 votes:

xander450: Alrighty, since I seem to be the only liberal not yet out at the bars, I'll bite.

What's your damned solution, if it annoys you so very much that we keep trying to reduce the number of people that get shot?


I think we've covered this ad nauseum but one more time:

- improve NICS system
- introduce earlier and better mental health screenings.
- introduce better systems for reporting troubled people and getting them help.
- introduce measures to help combat poverty and urban decay.
- stop the war on drugs and legalize

That being said, crime rates are at a 40 year low, and continue to decline. Violent crime as a whole continues to drop. Number of victims of gunshots continue to be far smaller than the number of people killed by pools, cars, or other objects.

Frankly, guns are a tool of convenience, much like a power nailer. People will still stab, poison, bludgeon, run over, or find other ways of killing each other. You can continue to nerf the world until everyone is sealed in a neat little vacuum packed container, hermetically sealed and kept away from all possible sources of harm. People will still die.

Until you cure mankind of all his ills and evils, it won't stop people from behaving poorly and sometimes killing his fellow man.

So, you go figure out how to stop people from being evil and leave me the hell alone, since none of my guns, Including a couple of assault rifles and a few legal fully automatic machine guns, have ever killed or hurt anyone.
2012-11-30 08:38:00 PM
2 votes:
How the fark do you commit suicide with a bow and arrow?
2012-11-30 08:37:53 PM
2 votes:

Kazan: oh you poor poor oppressed second amendment worshipper.. let me count how many national restrictions on guns, reasonable or otherwise, have been passed since 2000


zero, add zero, carry zero.. times 5 for your panic factor. that comes to zero.


So, you didn't just not read the article, you didn't even bother to read the entire headline?
2012-12-01 06:00:39 AM
1 votes:

that bosnian sniper: How the fark do you commit suicide with a bow and arrow?


I'm shocked that no one posted this...

dl.dropbox.com
2012-12-01 02:01:31 AM
1 votes:

omnibus_necanda_sunt: So calling conservatives trolls is perfectly logical, as their only purpose in this world is to annoy in order to attract attention.


Bingo. My point is proven.
2012-11-30 11:56:27 PM
1 votes:

xander450: Alrighty, since I seem to be the only liberal not yet out at the bars, I'll bite.

What's your damned solution, if it annoys you so very much that we keep trying to reduce the number of people that get shot?


No, just that you are enabling the wrong people to do the shooting without worry about someone shooting back.
2012-11-30 11:33:43 PM
1 votes:

EVERYBODY PANIC:
Pardon me a moment, but would you please define the word "troll" which I see so often on Fark threads. As I understand it, it's just another word used to demean somebody with whom one does not agree on a topic. It seems poorly used in most apoplications, and in too many uses, indicates an inability of the user to articulate a reasoned response. But maye I just don't get it.

So please concoct a definition, I mean a real definition for the word "troll". Please give me an example of it's useage by someonw who shares your own opinion on a topic, indicating that it is a workable definition and not just juvenile slander.Thank you.


C'mon Bud, you know better than this. It's sad really. Just because a person points out when someone else is trolling, doesn't preclude them from sharing the same or a similar opinion. Same thing goes for the trolls; just because they said one thing doesn't mean that is their true opinion. You know how it works. It's a slow night, the old lady is giving you any lately, so you slide on over to Fark. You find a juicy thread, you see which way the general opinion is going and then you drop some liberal or conservative bait, and wait for the attention to roll in. I would be tempted to give you 6/10 for this stunt, but you lose 3 points for sounding like a sanctimonious asshat and another 4 point deduction based on the other asinine comments you have excreted in this thread. Now crawl back into your cave and don't come out until you are summoned. Silly goose!!!
2012-11-30 11:07:31 PM
1 votes:

EVERYBODY PANIC: Butthurted: tenpoundsofcheese: The Constitution says nothing about allowing people to have sharp edged objects.

Time to ban them to make the liberals happy.

0/10 too obvious and there are already a few trolls in before you.

Pardon me a moment, but would you please define the word "troll" which I see so often on Fark threads. As I understand it, it's just another word used to demean somebody with whom one does not agree on a topic. It seems poorly used in most apoplications, and in too many uses, indicates an inability of the user to articulate a reasoned response. But maye I just don't get it.

So please concoct a definition, I mean a real definition for the word "troll". Please give me an example of it's useage by someonw who shares your own opinion on a topic, indicating that it is a workable definition and not just juvenile slander.Thank you.


If you have to ask, you're probably not smart enough to understand any of the definitions in the first place.
2012-11-30 10:56:14 PM
1 votes:

HalEmmerich: Kazan: oh you poor poor oppressed second amendment worshipper.. let me count how many national restrictions on guns, reasonable or otherwise, have been passed since 2000


zero, add zero, carry zero.. times 5 for your panic factor. that comes to zero.

So, you didn't just not read the article, you didn't even bother to read the entire headline?


rotflamo! And - based on his profile - I'm not sure he actually knows how to read at all. He seems to operate on the "I'll just absorb and regurgitate Progressive talking points and that will make me look smart" principle.
2012-11-30 10:49:34 PM
1 votes:
This is why killing people should be illegal. Why isn't the Government doing more to stop this?
2012-11-30 10:27:53 PM
1 votes:

DutchDynamite: confirming again why i do not want to go the greatest nation in the world


Why, because people in the US have the same flaws as those in the rest of the world? I'm not even a Yank and I can spot the flaw in your logic.
2012-11-30 09:09:29 PM
1 votes:

tenpoundsofcheese: The Constitution says nothing about allowing people to have sharp edged objects.

Time to ban them to make the liberals happy.


0/10 too obvious and there are already a few trolls in before you.
2012-11-30 08:56:39 PM
1 votes:
You mean a "Sherwood Forest Gat"?
2012-11-30 08:46:22 PM
1 votes:

Snargi: [www.webdemons.com image 450x352]
Ban all edged weapons! Society doesn't need something that can cut, slice or puncture.


You laugh, but that's pretty much the UK's approach, no?
2012-11-30 08:41:31 PM
1 votes:
www.webdemons.com
Ban all edged weapons! Society doesn't need something that can cut, slice or puncture.
2012-11-30 08:40:30 PM
1 votes:
We need to talk about Kevin.
2012-11-30 08:39:03 PM
1 votes:

Nothing To See Here: Makes me quiver .


oh you brilliant bastard
2012-11-30 08:37:26 PM
1 votes:

Kazan: oh you poor poor oppressed second amendment worshipper.. let me count how many national restrictions on guns, reasonable or otherwise, have been passed since 2000


zero, add zero, carry zero.. times 5 for your panic factor. that comes to zero.


When the farking CANADIANS can get a TAR-21 and I can't, I have a right to gripe. Oh yeah, they can get MP7s too. Not to mention SPAS 12s. The import restrictions are bullshiat, and they were passed after 2000.
2012-11-30 08:34:40 PM
1 votes:
Makes me quiver .
2012-11-30 08:34:18 PM
1 votes:
I blame Skyrim.
2012-11-30 08:32:12 PM
1 votes:

iq_in_binary: I give it a day before they try to blame it on a certain TV show.


I blame Ted Nugent.
 
Displayed 22 of 22 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report