TimonC346: This whole "GET OBAMA OVER BENGHAZI" thing is only marginalizing Republicans as the morons they've become. It's sad only the most devout Republicans (and those in charge) don't seem to see this scandal is hurting them more than it will ever hurt President Obama.

No, it's not sad, it's hilarious.

The video wouldn't load. Is it Bush?

That was before the War on Vagina.

Please proceed, Republicans.

The usual strategy, if you want to smear someone, is to throw all of your mud at him or her, in the hopes that some of it sticks.

The GOP variation on this strategy is apparently to keep throwing the same single clump of mud, expecting that one piece to stick sooner or later.

yeah but what was the ramifications of that? Nothing compared to Benghazi I assure you. This coverup is earth shattering I tell you. *waves bloody shirt*

Smoking Gun

Crabs_Can_Polevault: The usual strategy, if you want to smear someone, is to throw all of your mud at him or her, in the hopes that some of it sticks.

The GOP variation on this strategy is apparently to keep throwing the same single clump of mud, expecting that one piece to stick sooner or later.

I honestly think this is all they have at this point. Which makes me feel much better about Obama as President; if all they have against him is the birther nonsense and this bullshiat, he must be squeaky clean.

Cletus C.: The video wouldn't load. Is it Bush?

No, headline was referring to the 1995 NFL Receiving Yards leader Jerry Rice.

But Condi misslead the public to the effect of making the US thirsty for blood. Suzy misslead the public, causing us to respond with measured patience.
Which is worse?

TimonC346: This whole "GET OBAMA OVER BENGHAZI" thing is only marginalizing Republicans as the morons they've become. It's sad only the most devout Republicans (and those in charge) don't seem to see this scandal is hurting them more than it will ever hurt President Obama.

Is this anything new? It was the same with the whole birther thing, fast and furious, arugula and several others. They don't seem to realize that moderates are turning away from them and the only ones that are still supporting them are the super rich and the mouth breathing idiots that are happy to vote against their own interest because of minorities.

Headline is misleading. Rice University was never a high ranking government official or in line to be Secretary of State. I'll have to check on those "misleading intelligence" and "black woman" claims later.

thurstonxhowell: Headline is misleading. Rice University was never a high ranking government official or in line to be Secretary of State. I'll have to check on those "misleading intelligence" and "black woman" claims later.

This would be funny if the headline didn't say "last name"

It's a running tragic comedy.

New Republican talking point:

Why did the time-traveling Obama administration force John McCain, Lindsay Graham, and Condoleeza Rice to deliver false information?

bdMurray: But Condi misslead the public to the effect of making the US thirsty for blood. Suzy misslead the public, causing us to respond with measured patience.
Which is worse?

Duh. Thirst for blood always wins over measured patience because apparently that's what the GOP thinks Jesus would've wanted.

Cletus C.: The video wouldn't load. Is it Bush?

Bush Rice, inventor of genital lice.

cameroncrazy1984: This would be funny if the headline didn't say "last name"

I fact-checked this claim. You're lying. It just says "name".

The three Obama cabinet members TeaTards have specifically singled out and demanded resignations....

Corvus: I actually look forward to the Benghazi threads. I find it funny asking the right wingers what the problem they have with it and they are unable to explain it.

It's pretty funny.

Maybe if they offered you a bogus explanation you would find it more to your liking.

I am still confused why any of this is important.

Who cares if there were uninvolved protesters present or not? That fact is a completely unimportant bit of minutia that had zero impact on the realities of the situation. I don't recall much outrage over the trivialities of previous attacks on Americans. The administration makes a tiny and unimportant mistake that has zero impact on the investigation and response - and the GOP won't let it go. Obama must be literally doing everything right if THIS is all they can come up with.

tinyarena: Cletus C.: The video wouldn't load. Is it Bush?

[www.billymeade.com image 235x163]
I'm sorry the video didn't load,
But you could at least read the Headline.
No, it isn't Bush.

Why do libs deny Mrs. Bush Rice's involvement in 9/11 and the Iraq? Is it because she's black?

4 dead Americans in Libya based on faulty intelligence = outrage

3000+ dead in Iraq based on faulty intelligence = ?

InmanRoshi: The three Obama cabinet members TeaTards have specifically singled out and demanded resignations....


[blogs.houstonpress.com image 400x426]

[media.washtimes.com image 229x286]

[www.washingtonpost.com image 454x339]

Yes, and odd that the administration would pick the black woman to spread the manure. Hmmm.

Also found this regarding Milhouse:



Good Times

What I have learned from FOX news this week...

BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZI FISCAL CLIFF NORQUIST PLEDGE OBUMMER TAXES JOB CREATORS!!!

And that right there is 24 hours of programming... All the time...

Cletus C.: The video wouldn't load. Is it Bush?

How convenient, wouldnt want any facts to get in that small Republican brain of yours.

monoski: 4 dead Americans in Libya based on faulty intelligence = outrage

3000+ dead in Iraq based on faulty intelligence = ?

Even that's not a fair comparison though, the 4 Americans dying in Bengazi was in no way the result of faulty intelligence, it was the explanation of why the attack took place that was faulty.

Thousands died in Iraq as a direct result of faulty intelligence, that's much worse.

NateGrey: Cletus C.: The video wouldn't load. Is it Bush?

How convenient, wouldnt want any facts to get in that small Republican brain of yours.

When your target demo is 85 year olds likely suffering from some stage of Alzheimers, you have to repeat yourself a lot.

Crabs_Can_Polevault: The usual strategy, if you want to smear someone, is to throw all of your mud at him or her, in the hopes that some of it sticks.

The GOP variation on this strategy is apparently to keep throwing the same single clump of mud, expecting that one piece to stick sooner or later.


That's exactly what happened with the Whitewater investigations during the Clinton presidency. Three separate investigations found no wrongdoing by the Clintons, and the second special prosecutor they brought on board the fourth investigation after the first guy wasn't getting anywhere eventually found a "high crime or misdemeanor" that they used as a pretext for Clinton's impeachment.

They never did find the Clintons guilty of any wrongdoing with the Whitewater land deal, though $70,000,000.00+ of the taxpayers' money eventually did buy them the right to call Clinton's "the most investigated administration in U.S. History".

Corvus: Cletus C.: The video wouldn't load. Is it Bush?

No it was McCain and Lindsey Graham seeming to have two very different standards depending if someone has an R or D next to their name.

Well suck my d*ck. Seriously, so many people have called me a Republican I'm suddenly craving man love.

Hypocrisy rules!

Corvus: Cletus C.: The video wouldn't load. Is it Bush?

No it was McCain and Lindsey Graham seeming to have two very different standards depending if someone has an R or D next to their name.

Waaaaay back I remember reading an article about how Lindsey Graham was this up and comer who was all bipartisan and willing to reach across the aisle, and how he was going places because of his ability to look behind party lines and do what was best for the country.

Apparently he never read that article.