If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail)   Facebook updates their TOS to banish any woman who does not dress to the acceptable Amish style (Not safe for work?)   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 11
    More: Fail  
•       •       •

23159 clicks; posted to Main » on 26 Nov 2012 at 1:41 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Smartest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-11-26 02:09:56 PM  
3 votes:
FTA: Facebook is moderated by workers in Morocco and other developing countries paid $1 an hour via an online outsourcing company called oDesk, one of whose aggrieved workers leaked details of policies, pictured above, earlier this year.

I think I see the problem here.
2012-11-26 08:06:11 PM  
2 votes:
While I get that we should try to stay kinda-sorta within NSFW here, being a public site and all, if you're at work and are honestly worried about a picture from a web forum getting you in trouble or fired, maybe you should not surf the web at work, or at least, do it on your cell phone.
2012-11-26 02:31:15 PM  
2 votes:

zvoidx: Isn't that image technically NSFW in that the point is if someone walking by may perceive it as pron?



I would say so. If I ran across it here(except maybe in an obvious boobies thread), I would have deleted it immediately so no one got in trouble at work from a passing boss. After looking at it further, I'm not sure what I would do about it for future threads, but I'm of the opinion it is staged well enough to get someone in trouble at work-- so is therefore NSFW.
 
/mod's 2¢
//YMMV
Boe
2012-11-26 08:05:11 PM  
1 votes:
I kind of wonder what Facebook would have been like if it originated and was based in Europe.
2012-11-26 06:08:46 PM  
1 votes:
These "photos that look like something they're not" are pretty amusing. Is there a site out there that specializes in this thing? I mean specifically this thing? Because I'd like to browse it when I'm in the mood for a chuckle.
2012-11-26 05:43:51 PM  
1 votes:

Hence the Name...: SearchN: gwenners: SearchN: Are you saying you are looking out for my best interest?

Wait, what are you talking about, WE decided? MY best interests? How do you know what MY best interest is? How can you say what MY best interest is? What are you trying to say? I'M crazy? When I went to YOUR schools, I went to YOUR churches, I went to YOUR institutional learning facilities? So how can you say I'M crazy?

Long answer: Yes.

Short answer: While the opportunity arises occasionally for me to jab a certain mod for personal entertainment I do understand the point of view he has. With my proclivity to entice certain members of our community in specific threads, which may or may not be NSFW (Not Safe for Work), I agree with his statement. There is a certain line and once crossed it can lead to issues for employee's (note: not employers) when viewing said discussions. At times not only will the moderators take action to remove said images and or text, there are times when items will slip through the safety net at which point well minded users may point out the violations of the ToS (Terms of Service) that we all agree to when using this site.

So, longer answer: Yes, you are crazy.

/Threadjack over.

Some people just don't have suicidal tendencies, I guess.


Perhaps they'd be better if they were institutionalized?

/all I wanted was a Pepsi, and SearchN wouldn't give it to me
2012-11-26 05:39:28 PM  
1 votes:

gibbon1: bulok: [1.bp.blogspot.com image 320x259]

[img300.imageshack.us image 678x507]

inb4: The lie is a lie.


Interesting then that the lamp shade is throwing source light onto the thighs, yet the other parts of the background don't seem to be on the woman. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it's a shop of a shop, and it really is a lamp.

/having seen many pixels in my time
2012-11-26 05:33:00 PM  
1 votes:

SearchN: gwenners: SearchN: Are you saying you are looking out for my best interest?

Wait, what are you talking about, WE decided? MY best interests? How do you know what MY best interest is? How can you say what MY best interest is? What are you trying to say? I'M crazy? When I went to YOUR schools, I went to YOUR churches, I went to YOUR institutional learning facilities? So how can you say I'M crazy?

Long answer: Yes.

Short answer: While the opportunity arises occasionally for me to jab a certain mod for personal entertainment I do understand the point of view he has. With my proclivity to entice certain members of our community in specific threads, which may or may not be NSFW (Not Safe for Work), I agree with his statement. There is a certain line and once crossed it can lead to issues for employee's (note: not employers) when viewing said discussions. At times not only will the moderators take action to remove said images and or text, there are times when items will slip through the safety net at which point well minded users may point out the violations of the ToS (Terms of Service) that we all agree to when using this site.

So, longer answer: Yes, you are crazy.

/Threadjack over.


Some people just don't have suicidal tendencies, I guess.
2012-11-26 05:13:05 PM  
1 votes:

SearchN: Are you saying you are looking out for my best interest?


Wait, what are you talking about, WE decided? MY best interests? How do you know what MY best interest is? How can you say what MY best interest is? What are you trying to say? I'M crazy? When I went to YOUR schools, I went to YOUR churches, I went to YOUR institutional learning facilities? So how can you say I'M crazy?
2012-11-26 03:03:40 PM  
1 votes:
Yep, it would be NSFW in my opinion too.  Not because of what is actually there, but because of the perception.  We don't want someone losing their job or internet access simply because a supervisor saw or thought they saw them viewing pron.
 
Sometimes the fake but accurate or accurate but fake NSFW has to go too.  Sadly.
2012-11-26 02:21:20 PM  
1 votes:
/I'm talking about the image FTA/woman in the bathtub
 
Displayed 11 of 11 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report