Cyno01: [i.imgur.com image 550x415]
ladyfortuna: gibbon1: bulok: [1.bp.blogspot.com image 320x259][img300.imageshack.us image 678x507]inb4: The lie is a lie.Interesting then that the lamp shade is throwing source light onto the thighs, yet the other parts of the background don't seem to be on the woman. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it's a shop of a shop, and it really is a lamp./having seen many pixels in my time
Vaneshi: And the other question is: Is the image REALLY deleted as in 'gone from the server' or just hidden from public view?
Parthenogenetic: She should have protested that the picture was art. ART, dammit![i.imgur.com image 634x631]
gwenners: Hence the Name...: SearchN: gwenners: SearchN: Are you saying you are looking out for my best interest?Wait, what are you talking about, WE decided? MY best interests? How do you know what MY best interest is? How can you say what MY best interest is? What are you trying to say? I'M crazy? When I went to YOUR schools, I went to YOUR churches, I went to YOUR institutional learning facilities? So how can you say I'M crazy?Long answer: Yes.Short answer: While the opportunity arises occasionally for me to jab a certain mod for personal entertainment I do understand the point of view he has. With my proclivity to entice certain members of our community in specific threads, which may or may not be NSFW (Not Safe for Work), I agree with his statement. There is a certain line and once crossed it can lead to issues for employee's (note: not employers) when viewing said discussions. At times not only will the moderators take action to remove said images and or text, there are times when items will slip through the safety net at which point well minded users may point out the violations of the ToS (Terms of Service) that we all agree to when using this site.So, longer answer: Yes, you are crazy./Threadjack over.Some people just don't have suicidal tendencies, I guess.Perhaps they'd be better if they were institutionalized?/all I wanted was a Pepsi, and SearchN wouldn't give it to me
gwenners: /all I wanted was a Pepsi
stainedglassdoll: gibbon1: bulok: [1.bp.blogspot.com image 320x259][img300.imageshack.us image 678x507]inb4: The lie is a lie.[us.fun.marinov.net image 500x375]
Beanlet: gwenners:/all I wanted was a PepsiThat was my first thought when I started reading the comment you commented on.. you filled in the rest very well. Now off to get myself a Pepsi.
serial_crusher: Yeah, it's absolutely crazy that facebook's algorithm has such a high instance of false positives. Sheerly unfathomable that it might think that elbow was a boob.Even with human moderators, my company has had to make our moderation tool configurable such that the moderator sees a small thumbnail of an image instead of the whole thing. Because let's see how you feel after a 12 hour shift of looking at full sized hoarse pictures. So yeah, it's understandable that a thumbnail of that would be quickly dismissed as a boob and not further inspected if the moderator was gay or an ass man.
Want to see behind the curtain? Try
It's how we feed the squirrel
Sign up for the Fark NotNewsletter!
Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.
When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.
Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.
You need to create an account to submit links or post comments.
Click here to submit a link.
Also on Fark
Submit a Link »
Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Fark, Inc | Last updated: Dec 12 2017 21:40:27
Runtime: 0.239 sec (238 ms)