If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   Casey Anthony's acquittal may be due to her use of Firefox over Internet Explorer   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 151
    More: Florida, Casey Anthony, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Jose Baez, Google, acquittal, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, detectives  
•       •       •

31823 clicks; posted to Main » on 25 Nov 2012 at 4:02 PM (1 year ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



151 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-11-25 04:54:17 PM

tzzhc4: Your Average Witty Fark User: Subby doesn't understand how the jury reached their decision.

Casey Anthony got off because Nancy Grace made it a national media mess by blabbing about it daily on her herp derp show.

[images.mstarz.com image 300x226]

If Nancy Grace hadn't taken up her cause than Casey wouldn't have gotten a good lawyer and would have probably been convicted.


It is my opinion that Nancy Grace is the the most reprehensible person currently known within our society. Where as many seem to content to draw their distinctions along political, religious or even geographic divides, I tend to view the world as being comprised of two camps, those that would like to see her drawn and quartered and those that do not.
 
2012-11-25 04:54:45 PM

wambu: Nohing illegal in any of that, but besides being slow and a PITA, it also looks suspicious and investigators will likely work overtime finding other evidence of your crime since they would now be convinced of your guilt. They may not be the smartest, but they're not stupid and can be bulldog persistent, which usually pays off for them, especially when you make that inevitable mistake.


Even if you don't make a mistake, they would likely consider it guilt of something, on the basis of "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear".

It's not unlike the Ohio law where drivers could be convicted for drug smuggling for simply having an empty compartment in their car.
 
2012-11-25 04:54:52 PM

iron de havilland:
[i.imgur.com image 552x411]


Gnee, throw some Norse rune tattoos around her neck and she looks like a psycho ex of mine.

/failed to heed the warnings about the proximity of genitals and crazy
//also failed to spot the crazy until it was too late
 
2012-11-25 04:56:56 PM

tzzhc4: Your Average Witty Fark User: Subby doesn't understand how the jury reached their decision.

Casey Anthony got off because Nancy Grace made it a national media mess by blabbing about it daily on her herp derp show.

[images.mstarz.com image 300x226]

If Nancy Grace hadn't taken up her cause than Casey wouldn't have gotten a good lawyer and would have probably been convicted probably strikes a plea bargain to plead guilty to involuntary manslaughter and gets 10 years or so.


FTFY

Even at that, though, the DA should have had the stones to tell that harpy Grace that he was going to deal with the case it needed to be dealt with, not the way she wanted it.
 
2012-11-25 04:58:59 PM
www.seodisco.com
 
2012-11-25 05:00:21 PM

wildcardjack: I use two laptops, a tablet, and gave a neighbor wifi access. On a netbook that used to be mine.

If you accessed my internet history you'd have to piece together the histories from at least seven different web browsers. It's not unusual for me to use Chrome and Firefox at the same time.

Then all you'd have would be Fark, Fark links, hundreds of some seller side Amazon pages, randomized links to wikipedia and an unhealthy amount of hentai. By the time an investigator got anywhere all they'd know is I'm a bit warped, but they'd be hard pressed to prove anything.


I also remember reading about a program you can install which basically screws up any trends data-miners try to get by just randomly hitting various websites every so often. I don't remember the name or all the details, but the basic idea is to create so much noise that any data that is collected is essentially worthless.

Then again, I don't see how search history is anything but circumstantial. I've searched for a variety of topics which I had only a mild curiosity about.

I also don't have a Facebook account which according to some people is a red flag that I'm anti-social.
 
2012-11-25 05:00:49 PM

FatherChaos: And for those of you saying "Wow, Casey's pretty hot," remember:

[weknowmemes.com image 480x360]


Now how else are you going to find out if a woman is kill the first born crazy if you don't knock her up in the first place?
 
2012-11-25 05:01:30 PM

Butthurted: tzzhc4: Your Average Witty Fark User: Subby doesn't understand how the jury reached their decision.

Casey Anthony got off because Nancy Grace made it a national media mess by blabbing about it daily on her herp derp show.

[images.mstarz.com image 300x226]

If Nancy Grace hadn't taken up her cause than Casey wouldn't have gotten a good lawyer and would have probably been convicted.

It is my opinion that Nancy Grace is the the most reprehensible person currently known within our society. Where as many seem to content to draw their distinctions along political, religious or even geographic divides, I tend to view the world as being comprised of two camps, those that would like to see her drawn and quartered and those that do not.



As upsetting as the Anthony case was, it paled in comparison to the melancholic nausea I experienced the day that Nancy Grace announced that she was pregnant.
 
2012-11-25 05:02:16 PM
I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.

and the detectives in the Anthony case didn't even thoroughly check browser cache / history... wow.. I underpay my computer guy. Maybe I should have given him a bj...
 
2012-11-25 05:08:22 PM

diaphoresis: I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.


Did the police do anything with it?
 
2012-11-25 05:09:52 PM

wambu: There are numerous ways to leave no trail on the computer itself or with your ISP, or at least ways in which it makes it too expensive, time-consuming or beyond the technical expertise of most local police.


img819.imageshack.us
 
2012-11-25 05:10:18 PM

diaphoresis: I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.

and the detectives in the Anthony case didn't even thoroughly check browser cache / history... wow.. I underpay my computer guy. Maybe I should have given him a bj...


As a guy I'm gonna go ahead and say it's not too late.
 
2012-11-25 05:11:59 PM

FitzShivering: diaphoresis: I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.

Did the police do anything with it?


Yes.. They arrested the woman in Florida. It was her 3rd strike. Her lawyer called to ask about reparations.. I told him she could die in prison and I'd call it square.. He hung up on me.
 
2012-11-25 05:13:02 PM

dstanley: diaphoresis: I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.

and the detectives in the Anthony case didn't even thoroughly check browser cache / history... wow.. I underpay my computer guy. Maybe I should have given him a bj...

As a guy I'm gonna go ahead and say it's not too late.


ROFL! I never thought about it that way...
 
2012-11-25 05:13:09 PM

Amos Quito: Butthurted: tzzhc4: Your Average Witty Fark User: Subby doesn't understand how the jury reached their decision.

Casey Anthony got off because Nancy Grace made it a national media mess by blabbing about it daily on her herp derp show.

[images.mstarz.com image 300x226]

If Nancy Grace hadn't taken up her cause than Casey wouldn't have gotten a good lawyer and would have probably been convicted.

It is my opinion that Nancy Grace is the the most reprehensible person currently known within our society. Where as many seem to content to draw their distinctions along political, religious or even geographic divides, I tend to view the world as being comprised of two camps, those that would like to see her drawn and quartered and those that do not.


As upsetting as the Anthony case was, it paled in comparison to the melancholic nausea I experienced the day that Nancy Grace announced that she was pregnant.


Damn, My mind, in an effort of self preservation, had almost blotted that from all recollection. The fact she was able to procreate is further proof of the absence of a fair and just Skywizard
 
2012-11-25 05:13:40 PM

diaphoresis: FitzShivering: diaphoresis: I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.

Did the police do anything with it?

Yes.. They arrested the woman in Florida. It was her 3rd strike. Her lawyer called to ask about reparations.. I told him she could die in prison and I'd call it square.. He hung up on me.


internethighfive.jpg

and second to dstanley's comment. it's not too late.
 
2012-11-25 05:16:44 PM

Coco LaFemme: iron de havilland: Coco LaFemme: I truly believe she killed that kid, because she's a party girl whore who saw being a mother as getting in the way of being a party girl whore. Of course, my gut feelings don't equate to a guilty verdict, so the jury's opinion stands......but I don't have to like it.

[i.imgur.com image 552x411]

Thankfully, the law is not based on gut feelings and prejudices about "party girl whores".

She may have killed her child, but the case, as it was presented in a court of law, failed to convince a jury of her peers that she was guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

You know how I know you didn't read the full text of the post you quoted?


but I don't have to like it.

Says enough for me.
 
2012-11-25 05:19:03 PM
Windows won't actually delete files you "delete". (At least not until you run out of free space)

What you want is this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/eraser/

& This: http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=cascades

& This: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314834

& This: https://www.google.com/search?q=live+cd&rlz=1C1LDJZ_enUS508US508&oq=li ve+cd&aqs=chrome.0.57j60j61j60j62l2.2671&sugexp=chrome,mod=10&sourceid =chrome&ie=UTF-8
 
2012-11-25 05:24:03 PM

Happy Hours: I also don't have a Facebook account which according to some people is a red flag that I'm anti-social.


Or at least anti-social networking.
 
2012-11-25 05:24:38 PM

PhiloeBedoe: I'm no lawyer but aren't you suppose to introduce evidence during the trial?


The only one responsible for introducing evidence to the trial is the prosecutor- not the defense attorney. The Prosecutor is the one bringing the case and has a duty duty to submit all evidence to the defense team under a process called discovery.
 
2012-11-25 05:25:30 PM

citizenj: Encrypt using truecrypt, password and fingerprint access required, non-logging vpn for all internet activity.

How you like me now, son?


Truecrypt is a direct read for you know who.
 
2012-11-25 05:29:10 PM

the ha ha guy: wambu: Nohing illegal in any of that, but besides being slow and a PITA, it also looks suspicious and investigators will likely work overtime finding other evidence of your crime since they would now be convinced of your guilt. They may not be the smartest, but they're not stupid and can be bulldog persistent, which usually pays off for them, especially when you make that inevitable mistake.

Even if you don't make a mistake, they would likely consider it guilt of something, on the basis of "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear".


So much for civil liberties America.

It's not unlike the Ohio law where drivers could be convicted for drug smuggling for simply having an empty compartment in their car.

I purchased a former drug-smuggling boat at a government auction (great boat, great deal, great story about it). There were several voids/hidden compartments in the boat that had been used to hide drugs. Each one had a sticker atached that warned that it was a crime to cover them up. The stickers somehow came loose before I sold that fun, fun boat (11-meter Scarab).

/"Yes your Honor, he covered up a hole in his boat. We ask for the death penalty."
 
2012-11-25 05:29:15 PM

Butthurted: tzzhc4: Your Average Witty Fark User: Subby doesn't understand how the jury reached their decision.

Casey Anthony got off because Nancy Grace made it a national media mess by blabbing about it daily on her herp derp show.

[images.mstarz.com image 300x226]

If Nancy Grace hadn't taken up her cause than Casey wouldn't have gotten a good lawyer and would have probably been convicted.

It is my opinion that Nancy Grace is the the most reprehensible person currently known within our society. Where as many seem to content to draw their distinctions along political, religious or even geographic divides, I tend to view the world as being comprised of two camps, those that would like to see her drawn and quartered and those that do not.


But if there was a hardcore porno of her putting stress cracks in Ann Coulter's boyish pelvis thanks to the vigorous and prolonged thrusting of Nancy Grace's epic-sized strap-on, would it twitch?

Just a little?

I for one would be conflicted, and I like neither of those hags.
 
2012-11-25 05:35:27 PM

poe_zlaw: PhiloeBedoe: I'm no lawyer but aren't you suppose to introduce evidence during the trial?

The only one responsible for introducing evidence to the trial is the prosecutor- not the defense attorney. The Prosecutor is the one bringing the case and has a duty duty to submit all evidence to the defense team under a process called discovery.


The point I was trying to make is why is the Sheriff's Dept. releasing this information now? What good does it do other than to deliberately imply guilt? She was tried and found not guilty, they had their shot.
 
2012-11-25 05:35:36 PM

Valiente: Butthurted: tzzhc4: Your Average Witty Fark User: Subby doesn't understand how the jury reached their decision.

Casey Anthony got off because Nancy Grace made it a national media mess by blabbing about it daily on her herp derp show.

[images.mstarz.com image 300x226]

If Nancy Grace hadn't taken up her cause than Casey wouldn't have gotten a good lawyer and would have probably been convicted.

It is my opinion that Nancy Grace is the the most reprehensible person currently known within our society. Where as many seem to content to draw their distinctions along political, religious or even geographic divides, I tend to view the world as being comprised of two camps, those that would like to see her drawn and quartered and those that do not.

But if there was a hardcore porno of her putting stress cracks in Ann Coulter's boyish pelvis thanks to the vigorous and prolonged thrusting of Nancy Grace's epic-sized strap-on, would it twitch?

Just a little?

I for one would be conflicted, and I like neither of those hags.


Holy shiat sometimes you people give me nightmares. UGH.
 
2012-11-25 05:43:55 PM

Valiente: Butthurted: tzzhc4: Your Average Witty Fark User: Subby doesn't understand how the jury reached their decision.

Casey Anthony got off because Nancy Grace made it a national media mess by blabbing about it daily on her herp derp show.

[images.mstarz.com image 300x226]

If Nancy Grace hadn't taken up her cause than Casey wouldn't have gotten a good lawyer and would have probably been convicted.

It is my opinion that Nancy Grace is the the most reprehensible person currently known within our society. Where as many seem to content to draw their distinctions along political, religious or even geographic divides, I tend to view the world as being comprised of two camps, those that would like to see her drawn and quartered and those that do not.

But if there was a hardcore porno of her putting stress cracks in Ann Coulter's boyish pelvis thanks to the vigorous and prolonged thrusting of Nancy Grace's epic-sized strap-on, would it twitch?

Just a little?

I for one would be conflicted, and I like neither of those hags.


Although "it" twitches from the mere sight of a ill-concealed bra strap while stalking the regulars at the Queen sized aisle of the local Wallyworld, the idea of an Ann Coulter/Nancy Grace scissor-lock being committed to film for all of posterity to witness sends a shiver most evil down my spine and causes my (rather sizable, of course) man parts to pull as far within my body cavity, as possible, in an effort to escape the horror. Ohhhhh the horror.
 
2012-11-25 05:47:20 PM
Aw come on, who here wouldn't get Casey Anthony, Ann Coulter and Nancy Grace in a pile? Granted Nancy would have to be on the bottom of the pile so she doesn't pop the other two like a zit.
 
2012-11-25 05:50:22 PM

PhiloeBedoe: poe_zlaw: PhiloeBedoe: I'm no lawyer but aren't you suppose to introduce evidence during the trial?

The only one responsible for introducing evidence to the trial is the prosecutor- not the defense attorney. The Prosecutor is the one bringing the case and has a duty duty to submit all evidence to the defense team under a process called discovery.

The point I was trying to make is why is the Sheriff's Dept. releasing this information now? What good does it do other than to deliberately imply guilt? She was tried and found not guilty, they had their shot.


Maybe they're hoping for a random shooting and the gunman/gunwoman makes a mysterious getaway
 
2012-11-25 05:51:06 PM
Do your searches at www.duckduckgo.com, They don't track you. So if you delete things locally correctly and securely, nothing from them can be subpoenaed.

Supposedly.
 
2012-11-25 05:51:16 PM

diaphoresis: FitzShivering: diaphoresis: I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.

Did the police do anything with it?

Yes.. They arrested the woman in Florida. It was her 3rd strike. Her lawyer called to ask about reparations.. I told him she could die in prison and I'd call it square.. He hung up on me.


Excellent. That is very good to hear. Know of a few cases personally where the police just shrugged, so sounds like maybe at least a few departments are starting to understand the importance of what they're being given!

I hope you all got the identity stuff worked out, I know it's a bear to fix even after they catch the person. :(
 
2012-11-25 05:52:14 PM

wambu: DoomPaul: Flint Ironstag: And its hardly CSI level investigation. They can trace an IP address with a GUI written in visual basic. These guys didnt even think to check Firefox or get records from their ISP. They just checked the easily deleted ie history....

As a mostly technically ignorant individual, would using a VPN help cover one's tracks or is everything saved on your computer?

Not that I'm doing or planning to do anything illegal.

There are numerous ways to leave no trail on the computer itself or with your ISP, or at least ways in which it makes it too expensive, time-consuming or beyond the technical expertise of most local police. But it's a bother and you only need to mess up once to leave enough evidence.

The easy way is to use a run-from-CD Linux distro or a Bart's PE CD that has TOR software installed; that setup saves nothing to a disk drive (you don't even need one in the computer) and makes it difficlt to track your Google searches and Internet activity. You can find .iso images of these on-line and burn your own copy as well as find some great cryptograhy software.

Nohing illegal in any of that, but besides being slow and a PITA, it also looks suspicious and investigators will likely work overtime finding other evidence of your crime since they would now be convinced of your guilt. They may not be the smartest, but they're not stupid and can be bulldog persistent, which usually pays off for them, especially when you make that inevitable mistake.


I use the linux live distros to repair windows boxes, and the browser functions aren't really that pita-y
 
2012-11-25 05:52:46 PM

PhiloeBedoe: poe_zlaw: PhiloeBedoe: I'm no lawyer but aren't you suppose to introduce evidence during the trial?

The only one responsible for introducing evidence to the trial is the prosecutor- not the defense attorney. The Prosecutor is the one bringing the case and has a duty duty to submit all evidence to the defense team under a process called discovery.

The point I was trying to make is why is the Sheriff's Dept. releasing this information now? What good does it do other than to deliberately imply guilt? She was tried and found not guilty, they had their shot.


They're trying (probably) to imply it's not THEIR fault she didn't get convicted...it's some lazy forensic computer investigator who didn't follow up on a lead. Likely because the prosecutor is on record as saying "It's too bad we didn't know about the search because we could have put the accidental death theory into question." Translation: It's not MY fault I didn't think of that sooner, it's the sheriff's office for not telling me something I should have thought of myself. It's all 13th hour ass-covering. The simple fact is that the DA went into the case without knowing if they even HAD a murder, much less who might have done it; so they never really had a case to start with.
 
2012-11-25 05:52:55 PM
No need to blame the jury, blame the incompetent forensic examiners.
 
2012-11-25 05:54:49 PM

FitzShivering: diaphoresis: FitzShivering: diaphoresis: I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.

Did the police do anything with it?

Yes.. They arrested the woman in Florida. It was her 3rd strike. Her lawyer called to ask about reparations.. I told him she could die in prison and I'd call it square.. He hung up on me.

Excellent. That is very good to hear. Know of a few cases personally where the police just shrugged, so sounds like maybe at least a few departments are starting to understand the importance of what they're being given!

I hope you all got the identity stuff worked out, I know it's a bear to fix even after they catch the person. :(


It took about 1yr. Even with court transcripts and an attorney, the credit monitors have their own set of rules about what and when anything can/will come off a credit report. It helped that all my other creditors had me on excellent terms and that we caught the fraud so early.
 
2012-11-25 05:55:05 PM

PhiloeBedoe: The point I was trying to make is why is the Sheriff's Dept. releasing this information now? What good does it do other than to deliberately imply guilt? She was tried and found not guilty, they had their shot.


Or somebody has a beef with somebody on the prosecution/police side
 
2012-11-25 05:55:47 PM

iron de havilland: Coco LaFemme: iron de havilland: Coco LaFemme: I truly believe she killed that kid, because she's a party girl whore who saw being a mother as getting in the way of being a party girl whore. Of course, my gut feelings don't equate to a guilty verdict, so the jury's opinion stands......but I don't have to like it.

[i.imgur.com image 552x411]

Thankfully, the law is not based on gut feelings and prejudices about "party girl whores".

She may have killed her child, but the case, as it was presented in a court of law, failed to convince a jury of her peers that she was guilty beyond reasonable doubt.

You know how I know you didn't read the full text of the post you quoted?

but I don't have to like it.

Says enough for me.


I guess you missed the part where I said my gut feelings don't change the jury's verdict, and their verdict should stand. I always love when people out their own ignorance and save me the trouble. There's no law written anywhere that says you have to like or agree with a jury's verdict.
 
2012-11-25 05:59:28 PM

martid4: Truecrypt is a direct read for you know who.


Voldemort?
 
2012-11-25 05:59:57 PM

diaphoresis: I have been the victim of identity theft. Fortunately 2 things occurred:

1. I know a brilliant computer guy who knew how to get the records ISPs say they don't keep on customers
2. The identity thief did everything by Internet

He literally helped me find out who did it, what her REAL name/SSN/birthdate/address was, and handed the cops over a ream of paper detailing everything.

and the detectives in the Anthony case didn't even thoroughly check browser cache / history... wow.. I underpay my computer guy. Maybe I should have given him a bj...


Couldn't hurt.
 
2012-11-25 06:01:43 PM

diaphoresis: It took about 1yr. Even with court transcripts and an attorney, the credit monitors have their own set of rules about what and when anything can/will come off a credit report. It helped that all my other creditors had me on excellent terms and that we caught the fraud so early.


So even when given detailed and conclusive proof that if wasn't you, the credit monitors still keep these entries on your credit record?

Given that they then presumably share portions of this with people you might later apply for credit for, at some point they're going to do this to the wrong person, and the resulting class action lawsuit for libel is going to farking kill them.
 
2012-11-25 06:02:12 PM
it's not every Fark thread that goes to the Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom meets Josef Mengele honeymooning with the experiments level of erotica but today is special. Looks like daddy is going to have to put on the leather chaps and go looking for some fresh road kill tonight.
 
2012-11-25 06:02:54 PM
i235.photobucket.com
 
2012-11-25 06:03:59 PM
Florida.
'Nuf said.
 
2012-11-25 06:04:22 PM
I have no problems with this.

Sloppy investigative work should *always* result in a not guilty verdict. Every farking time. No, I don't care about gut feelings or how the victim feels or anything like that. If the prosecutor, who has the resources of the entire government behind him, can't do it the right way, it shouldn't be done at all.

It's the only thing that keeps us from sliding down the path to where people eventually get disappeared in the dead of night and pushed out of helicopters 10 miles from shore.
 
2012-11-25 06:05:21 PM
Just like Michael Jackson, I think she's guilty, but the prosecution didn't prove it. If the prosecution didn't prove the crimes, the juries did the right thing by acquitting. I see no reason to blame the juries of either case.

Those cases were far more circumstantial and hard to prove than the O.J. Simpson murders. For O.J., the prosecution proved it every which way, so we can blame that jury for being dumb. At least with him, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas for 15 years, so he's where he belongs.
 
2012-11-25 06:06:00 PM

bubo_sibiricus: I have no problems with this.

Sloppy investigative work should *always* result in a not guilty verdict. Every farking time. No, I don't care about gut feelings or how the victim feels or anything like that. If the prosecutor, who has the resources of the entire government behind him, can't do it the right way, it shouldn't be done at all.

It's the only thing that keeps us from sliding down the path to where people eventually get disappeared in the dead of night and pushed out of helicopters 10 miles from shore.


Wow... that's some nice slippery slope arguing, Lou.
 
2012-11-25 06:07:12 PM

reillan: bubo_sibiricus: I have no problems with this.

Sloppy investigative work should *always* result in a not guilty verdict. Every farking time. No, I don't care about gut feelings or how the victim feels or anything like that. If the prosecutor, who has the resources of the entire government behind him, can't do it the right way, it shouldn't be done at all.

It's the only thing that keeps us from sliding down the path to where people eventually get disappeared in the dead of night and pushed out of helicopters 10 miles from shore.

Wow... that's some nice slippery slope arguing, Lou.



and it's silly, since they'll keep the courts running just as they are long after they start disappearing us in the night.
 
2012-11-25 06:08:45 PM

reillan: Wow... that's some nice slippery slope arguing, Lou.


As if it doesn't happen every goddamned day in less-than-upright governments.

Remove the motivation to do the job right and you get piss poor results. This happens not only in government, but in industry and professions.
 
2012-11-25 06:08:52 PM

DammitIForgotMyLogin: diaphoresis: It took about 1yr. Even with court transcripts and an attorney, the credit monitors have their own set of rules about what and when anything can/will come off a credit report. It helped that all my other creditors had me on excellent terms and that we caught the fraud so early.

So even when given detailed and conclusive proof that if wasn't you, the credit monitors still keep these entries on your credit record?


Yes. The agencies have their own rules and practices. My attorney said I was lucky enough to get this fixed in a year. Sometimes they won't do anything at all.
 
2012-11-25 06:18:46 PM

Coco LaFemme: I truly believe she killed that kid, because she's a party girl whore who saw being a mother as getting in the way of being a party girl whore. Of course, my gut feelings don't equate to a guilty verdict, so the jury's opinion stands......but I don't have to like it.


I don't. I think she was a shiatty mother, and the kid got killed because she wasn't paying attention and freaked when they found the kid in the pool. Stupid people tend to freak the frak out when forced to take responsibility for their actions (or lack of them).

Then the public made it into a witch hunt. They want revenge.

There were crimes committed after the fact, but I doubt it was anything other than negligence and shiatty parenting that would have never even got to the level it did if they just called 911 like normal fraking people. I mean, who kills their kid when they can just drop them off or put them up for adoption.
 
2012-11-25 06:23:20 PM

Coco LaFemme: I truly believe she killed that kid, because she's a party girl whore who saw being a mother as getting in the way of being a party girl whore. Of course, my gut feelings don't equate to a guilty verdict, so the jury's opinion stands......but I don't have to like it.


I believe she killed the kid too--but more likely negligently than purposely. The kid prolly drowned in the pool while Casey was passed out or something. Then, knowing she was on the hook for criminally negligent homicide, made an extremely clumsy effort to cover it up by making it look like a kidnapping and murder. Her effort almost backfired, landing her in prison for murder.

Just the total incompetence of the cover up makes me thing it wasn't pre-planned. It was done by a person in complete denial about how bad it looked to everyone that no one had seen her kid for a month.
 
Displayed 50 of 151 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report